Beck’s Moment
The interesting thing about Glenn Beck is that aside from being completely crazy, his substantive views on policy (if someone like Beck can be described as having substantive views on anything) are about as far as you can get from doctrinaire Republicanism. In a widely circulated post from last week, Glenn Greenwald explains how Beck gives voice to transpartisan anti-establishment sentiment. Andrew Sullivan has also noticed that Beck’s foreign policy views – a mish-mash or “more rubble, less trouble” and nascent non-interventionism – differ substantially from conservative orthodoxy.
So while Republican congressmen may ape Beck’s anti-establishment rhetoric, they don’t come close to endorsing the substance of his libertarian-ish views. Similarly, Beck’s newfound suspicion of the Patriot Act or his isolationist rhetoric have not exactly caught fire with the RNC.
Movement organs have been willing to promote Beck’s crusade against ACORN and his attack on former green jobs czar Van Jones, however. In the grand scheme of things, these issues are incredibly trivial, but they allow the Republican Party to channel popular enthusiasm into an issue that doesn’t highlight the profound differences between people who sympathize with Beck’s anti-establishment rhetoric and people who basically buy into Republican Party orthodoxy. Liberals have correctly noted that the ACORN sting and the resignation of a minor administration functionary aren’t really that important, which is precisely why movement operatives are so eager to latch on to them. Trumpeting Beck’s hidden camera antics is a way for Republicans to coopt libertarian/conservative populism without making any real concessions to the genuinely radical critique embodied by the Tea Party Movement.
The interesting thing about Glenn Beck is that aside from being completely crazy, his substantive views on policy (if someone like Beck can be described as having substantive views on anything) are about as far as you can get from doctrinaire Republicanism
That is interesting; being as far as you can get from doctrinaire Republicanism is generally a sign of sanity, intelligence, and good moral character.Report
Beck doesn’t have views; he has ratings. He says what he needs to to get them.Report
For my part, I’m pleased that his ravings are getting the ratings they are.Report
Really? You’re pleased that Americans want to listen to a man say that Obama is racist, hates white people, and is using health care reform as reparations?Report
I see what you did there.
Pretty sneaky!
No, that’s not the thing that makes me pleased. I’m touched that you’d think that that would be the thing that warms my surely two sizes too small heart, however.Report
Yeah, it’s kind of funny, but that was sort of what I was noting the other day, regarding Michael Moore: to the degree that Beck’s current rhetoric overlaps with Moore’s (or Taibbi’s), that’s pretty much the only place I can really agree with him or the whole “Tea Party” critique. Hearing Moore on the radio, he at times sounded like Ron Paul(!). If I seem a lot more wishy-washy, it’s probably because I sort of straddle that line in the Greenwald article. I’m a quiet guy, and I know a number of good people in government, but I can’t help being aware of the deep, deep problems in our system. And I lack the confidence that good people with good intentions is good enough.Report