Creative Team Behind “Batwoman” Quits After DC Interferes
J.H. Williams III and W. Haden Blackman have quit DC after the publisher decided last minute to put the kibosh on a number of storylines in the current Batwoman comic book series.
In a blog post Williams wrote,
“In order to live up to our mantra and ensure that each arc took Batwoman in new directions, we carefully planned plotlines and story beats for at least the first five arcs well before we ever wrote a single issue. We’ve been executing on that plan ever since, making changes whenever we’ve come up with a better idea, but in general remaining consistent to our core vision.”
“Unfortunately, in recent months, DC has asked us to alter or completely discard many long-standing storylines in ways that we feel compromise the character and the series. We were told to ditch plans for Killer Croc’s origins; forced to drastically alter the original ending of our current arc, which would have defined Batwoman’s heroic future in bold new ways; and, most crushingly, prohibited from ever showing Kate and Maggie actually getting married. All of these editorial decisions came at the last minute, and always after a year or more of planning and plotting on our end.”
Williams cites the “eleventh-hour nature” of the editorial edicts as particularly frustrating, especially given how much planning had gone into the series from the very beginning. As a result, Batwoman #26 will be he and Blackman’s last.
On Twitter, Williams asked fans to , “please stick with us through issue 26, we hope to give something strong in our last issue,” while Blackman said, “Huge thanks to @JHWilliamsIII for being such an inspiring collaborator. I’m proud of every panel, buddy.” Williams responded similarly, “It’s been a truly great thing to work with you on this. Very overwhelmed right now. So proud of our work. There will be more!”
On the one hand, this is extremely unfortunate. Batwoman not only stars an empowered and complex female heroine, but one who’s also a lesbian, making the book even more of a rarity. The fact is that Batwoman is one of DC’s best comic books right now, not despite the progressivity of its characters but indeed precisely because of it.
Williams and Blackman succeeded at making Kate Kane (Batwoman) an incredibly compelling character by embracing her sexual identity and tying that directly to her experience as a caped vigilante. The storylines were mature and sophisticated, something few superhero comics can even begin to claim. In addition, Williams art in the series has been truly amazing, and as co-writer has shown just how powerful a comic can be when the script and illustrations are tied so seamlessly together.
Still though, while DC’s decisions regarding Batwoman and the creative team’s resulting departure are both infuriating and saddening, I think Williams and Blackman’s unwavering conviction in this matter is something more writers and artists in the industry should emulate.
Both men will have no trouble finding more work, even if that means taking refuge in the ever expanding domain of “alternative” comics like those published by Image, IDW, and Darkhorse. And if more of their peers start following their example, the big two publishers, DC and Marvel, will be forced to either change course or simply become increasingly irrelevant, at least as far as the actual medium of comic books is concerned. Batman, Superman, and the Avengers may continue to flourish, but the art surrounding those icons will be dead.
I tried to warn them that Batwoman as dominatrix was just a ripoff of Catwoman, but would they listen to me? Nooooo.Report
While DC’s decisions regarding Batwoman and the creative team’s resulting departure are both infuriating and saddening
I think you meant, “predictable and… uh… predictable.”Report
I actually find DC’s decision with regard to Batwoman odd. It’s not like they’ve been particularly conservative – either in the political sense or temperamental one – on these issues. They’ve been very vocal about their attempts to include gay characters in their stable. That they’d have press releases about Alan Scott* and Batwoman being gay and lesbian, including a picture of Alan kissing his boyfriend, and draw the line at marriage does honestly strike me as odd.Report
It’s important to note this isn’t the first time this has happened since the nu52 reboot. Various writers and artists have been replaced (sometimes, even before their first issue has come out) and it seems the whole company is being run by editorial fiat, which isn’t surprising, since DC is now being ran by Bob Harras, he of the editorial-dominated time of early 90’s Marvel.Report
The same thing happened with the Tolstoy-Dostoyevsky reboot of Spiderman, which is why they switched to writing novels.Report
They shoulda stuck to graphic novels.Report
Jim Shooter is laughing from his grave. (Oh, he isn’t dead? Well, he *should* be.)Report
I haven’t read any of these books but I do still get Batman and Detective Comics.
I’d just wonder what these guys were promised when they started. If they were told “hey, we run a tight ship and our continuity editor is the most important person in the building”, that’s one thing. If they were told “hey, you guys have free reign and all you have to do is just avoid using the “F” word!”, then that is, indeed, quite another.
If nothing else, it sounds like it was *NOT* a good fit… I hope Top Cow snatches them up and lets them come up with something amazing.Report
The thing is, Williams has been the artist since the beginning of the book, pre-Nu52. So, for a few years, it has seemed like a great fit, especially since William’s art and writing had led to numerous award and acclaim for DC.Report
Are self-published webcomics doing well, economically? Would that be a viable place these writers and artists might go? Or are they pretty much obliged to work with a publisher?Report
In a sense, yes. There is complete self publishing, but there’s a lot of upfront costs and basically, if you’re comic isn’t a success, then you’re completely done.
But, what has happened is independent publishers such as Image, IDW, and Boom! have a middle ground. You own the IP and the publisher puts up the costs for the book (publishing, printing, etc.) and you don’t earn any royalties until the publisher make their money back.
In most cases, this is about 5,000 copies or so, which is what a book has to sell to make it in the Top 300. However, the issue is that to make a living, it had to sell a lot more and few comics outside of Marvel and DC sell that many. The general “career” cycle for a comic book creator these days is have comics as a side job where you sell one or two indy comic that gets your name known out there, get a few freelance gigs for Marvel or DC, then finally become a main writer for them, at which point, your name is big enough that if you launch a creator owned series with Image, you can sell that 15 or 20 thousand copies that will make you enough and get enough attention from Hollywood/TV/other forms of media.Report