Freddie
Freddie deBoer used to blog at lhote.blogspot.com, and may again someday. Now he blogs here.
Features
Hot Posts
Devcat Reports
Due to problems related to a WordPress update, the site's layout had to be moderately altered. Some of the changes are temporary.
Recent Comments
on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForIf they want that then they need to have police prevent the Protesters from shutting the U down and/…
on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForI know: Columbia should appeal to the importance of the academy being a place where difficult ideas…
on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForThe word that does the real work is "academically." I don't share what you describe, and I haven't b…
on Martin Niemöller, and Who First They Came ForAmong the things the administration doesn't understand is that every department is different. Differ…
Comics
-
The Greatest Strike in History
March 30, 2025
-
March 28, 2025
-
They’re Acting Queer in Cleveland
March 27, 2025
-
A Loaf of Bread, a Container of Milk, and a Stick of Butter
March 26, 2025
More Comments
on Sunday Morning! A Working Man reviewed
on Open Mic for the week of 3/24/25
on Weekend Plans Post: Pantherine Vandals
on Open Mic for the week of 3/24/25
on Weekend Plans Post: Pantherine Vandals
Same old same old, basically. Summary: Matt backs parental choice, I back personal.Report
Actually, shit, I’m wrong:
Let me reassure this guy: no one is planning to do anything to his dick. Assuming, that is, that he is more than 8 days old. But with respect to the practice of circumcision, the important point is this: he’s my son. Not yours. Parents have the right to decide on medical treatment for their children, presuming such medical treatment is not actively harmful. And parents have the right to include their children in cultural rites and practices, again presuming no harm is done.
(empad)
Matt is under the misapprehension that circumcision is not harmful, most likely because he deems the foreskin as inherently of no worth, whereas in reality it removes erogenous tissue, thus impairing the function of pleasure provision. So this is an ”understanding of the world we live in”, not just a value judgement thing.Report