Sarah Sarah Quite Contraire
This explanation of Gov. Palin’s resignation seems to me to make the most sense (h/t Sam Stein): [See Updates Below for counter explanation]
The head of the Republican Governor’s Association said on Friday that in emails sent to him moments before she announced her resignation as governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin discussed expanding the role she played in the Republican Party.
“Part of her decision is she wants to spend more time campaigning for candidates,” Nick Ayers, the executive director of the RGA, told Fox News.
In other words, [edit: if this story checks out], she is trying to claim the mantle of Republican leadership and thereby be considered the de facto leader going into the 2012 GOP nomination contest. GOP Leadership is not going to come from the Senate or House–what do you think Eric Cantor is going to run for President? Sanford’s out. The moderate Republicans are going to have a helluva time winning the primary (e.g. Charlie Crist). Newt’s too old and too f’in crazy.
I’ve always thought Huckabee was the front-runner for 2012. Pawlenty with an outside chance, but he’s not exactly telegenic. The outside chance X factor candidate would be Gen. Petraeus but Obama has seemingly neutralized him (for now) by putting the Gen. as head of CENTCOM and getting him on board with Obama’s Af-Pak policy.
Palin therefore has to steal the ground on the social conservative base from Huck. He’s gone for the talk show thing, but she appears headed now for hard campaigning.
On the one hand I actually appreciate her retiring. Given that she doesn’t want to do the job she was hired for I mean. Once a girl like that has seen life in the big city how is she gonna go back to the sticks of Alaska? She’s clearly not interested in being Governor, so I think it’s actually the right move in terms of putting somebody in the position who will be focused on governing. Presumably Gov. to be Sean Parnell will be interested in his own political career as Gov.
While the commentary consensus (so far) seems to be this means her political career is over, I wouldn’t be so fast to write her off. She’s trying to replay her rather unlikely win in the Alaska Gov. race. Go hard to the base and get a deeply personal, extremely loyal following. Then expand from there to reach out to the middle. And force the issue by deploying cultural war battles.
We will see. This is a major gamble on her part, but if she gets spots to campaign for others she could build a network on the national level that could in theory catapult her to the Republican Nomination. If she doesn’t get the return calls from local GOPers running for House, State Senate seats, PACs and the like, then she’s toast.
But I would not underestimate how she could could win some major brownie points in the GOP base by campaigning for other candidates. That said, she better get it together because that press conference today appeared very discombobulated and thrown together last minute. She better have some hard yes-es on this campaigning idea or this could be over fast.
But if it does bomb, I think it would be from lack of execution not the decision itself. By the transitive properties of the Feiler Faster thesis combined with the fact that campaigns never so much begin and end as are continuous processes now in American politics (they just go through hotter and colder phases of activity/inactivity), this could pan out for her. The old consensus on having to finish terms is really up in the air. Obama won his Senate seat in 2004 and started running for President in 2006 (if not 2005). Why couldn’t it work for a Governor?
I should say at this point–given there hasn’t yet been a total economic meltdown–I think she would be crushed by Obama. She would need a real crisis moment socially and politically to try to ride in Huey Long populist demagogue style in order to win. A scary proposition in my mind–both the collapse scenario and just as frightening in my mind Palin as President.
—
Update I: (Afterthought)
One problem she is going to have when she runs for the GOP nomination–which is undoubtedly what she wants to do and if she has opening I have to assume she’ll go for it–she’ll have to figure out how to deal with the primary calendar which is not going to serve her well.
Iowa: Huckabee is going to be near impossible to beat there.
New Hampshire: They are not fans of hers up there. I know she’s all pro-gun but there is not a big social conservative base in NH.
I would think she could do well in South Carolina. Nevada potentially as a Western candidate. Though Romney was strong there in 2008.
Update II: (In response to some early comments)
I thought the tone in this one was pretty clear, but apparently not. She wasn’t qualified to be VP and she won’t be ready to be President in 2012. The thought of her anywhere near actual federal power keeps me awake at night. But not for the same reasons it does for Rich Lowry. She has a certain brassy streets smarts politically but she doesn’t actually have political smart smarts imo. Especially on foreign policy…to put it very very charitably. iow, I would love it if the other commentators were right and she’s ready to be stuck with the fork, but I’m a little worried that isn’t the case.
Update III: The official story is that she is done with politics. Maybe. If so, I wish her well in life.
The other other theory is that it might be damage control for an upcoming scandal. If that ends up being true and the scandal sticks, then for sure she’s a goner. She’s weathered a number of potential scandals up til now, so we’ll just have to wait and see. She was very shaky in that press conference.
Update IV (Sunday): Right on cue:
But in a statement posted on Palin’s Facebook account, she suggested that she had bigger plans and a national agenda she planned to push after she resigns at the end of the month.
“I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint,” she said.
Palin also cast herself as a victim and blasted the media, calling the response to her announcement “predictable” and out of touch.
How could she be credible as a Presidential candidate, though, with only 2 1/2 years as governor of a state? She’s no more qualified now than she was in November, and then she was only running for VP. How can anyone outside the hard-core base take her seriously?Report
Because of one word — Obama — and his far less experience in anything when he made it to pres.Report
But Obama had several years at the state level and then a term as Senator. And unlike Palin, he actually demonstrated that he was well versed in the issues
before he ran.
Palin was mayor of a small town, and then governor of the smallest (population-wise) state for 2 1/2 years; that might be enough, at a stretch, if she showed that she really understood the issues and had good ideas, but she has shown the absolute opposite in every media appearance she has had.Report
But what kind of crisis could this nation face, that sarah would be the answer to? If we had a military/terrorism crisis would sarah be in any way a solution to that? Other repubs maybe, but will anybody but her rabid followers see her wink and you betcha act as what is needed for cope with another 911.
FWIW i knew a lot of conservatives here is Ak who didn’t like her for all the same reasons many americans don’t like her. They dropped all that, in a fearless display of lack of character, when she was nominated for VP. This will not play well with many of her supporters here. There will be some more stories about her coming out now that people will be angry, betrayed and don’t have to worry about her vengeance. However Alaska has never particularly mattered so she may not be dragged down by that. At best this is a high risk gamble.Report
More information on “grassroots” supporters gathering across the nation to support Sarah Palin for President in 2012 can be found online at http://www.palin4pres2012.com
Note, the website is in danger of crashing due to the flood of readers and supporters signing up to show their interest in a Palin Candidacy. The GOP establishment had better watch out, Sarah Palin and Ron Paul combined with the power of the internet will remove the stranglehold of GOP special interests and the elites who have brought the party to its knees in defeat in the 2008 elections.Report
Yes, that’s why Kagan thought she was so wonderful and her “non-elite” ignorance of foreign policy didn’t matter.
Ignorance doesn’t make someone free from special interests; it makes them extremely manipulable. Find a person who knows little or nothing of an issue, feed them your talking points, and further the meme that they’re “populists” – that’s any special interest group’s dream.Report
Sarah Palin and Ron Paul combined?
You can’t find two people who are farther apart politically and are still both Republicans. That would be quite possibly the worst ticket since… well, since McCain/Palin.Report
Lieberman/Kucinich 2012! 😀Report
Matthew Dallman:
Except that Obama never resigned from office before he was elected Preaident. Hell, he even showed up for some votes. Palin could have filled out the rest of her term then ran(it’d still give her 2 years). Don’t you think Pawlenty, Mittens and Col. James Braddock’s BFF will run those “Cut and Run” ads against Sarah? That’s what is going to kill her. How many people will the Presidency when they don’t already hold some political office? Nixon? Ray-gun? Eisenhower? What about before Ike? It can be done, just not that often.Report
To me, the scandal breaking is the only thing that makes sense here. If you weren’t trying to essentially go quietly into the night, why would you quit on Friday afternoon of 4th of July weekend?Report
Palin is no Huey Long.Report
Sadly, she quit for a reason not revealed. Nothing else makes sense, though I’m sure she’s tired of the frivolous law suits and the related expense. If there’s no ‘scandal’ hidden there somewhere, I think she’s just saying ‘the hell with it.’Report
“The thought of her anywhere near actual federal power keeps me awake at night.”
That would be a lie, Dierkes, and you know it. Along with the nonsense that “I’ve always thought Huckabee was the front runner”. Really . . . always? Truth, or typical cute convenient rhetorical trick. You choose.Report
She didnt jump, she was pushed.
Guess we’ll find out the push-force.
She continues to be absolutely clueless…..that “prayed on it” is the kiss of death in American politics.Report
Also…Obama started running with his speech at the DNC convention.
In 2004.Report
And Stein is wrong.
That spate of hastely contrived Heartland Pageant Speak is just cover for her real reasons, w/e they might be.
Its like Miss Congenality or the second runner-up doing a facesaving climbdown from her ambitions.
“I didn’t really want the crown anyways.”Report
Here’s my blog opinion — http://bonzai.squarespace.com/blog/2009/7/4/the-sarah-palin-decision.htmlReport
Mike, brilliant! She does seem to have to learn a great deal plus she’s not a natural “smack ’em in the mouth’ kind of debater, yet she appeals to many people with her very simple message. By the time the Big O has his four years in my old dog, Buck, might be able to beat him.
I’m putting you in at CBS to replace the churlish, tight-assed, Katie!
And, finally, my condolences to all the kids here at LOOG on the passing of MJ!Report
Thanks, Bob, I will try do a good job as Katie’s replacement. I want to interview Barney Frank first.Report
Why isn’t Mitt Romney in the conversation? Personally, I think he may be the best Republican candidate for 2012.Report
Romney I think has the backing of the establishment conservatives (he did last time around and I assume will again in ’12). But for me he’s just so awkward and robotic. He’s so uncomfortable and in the age of television that matters. Whether it should or not is a different question, but it does. He’s technocratic and in the end he says what’s popular, so he doesn’t scare me like Palin does (although I wouldn’t vote for him) but we’ll see. He had everything set up for him in 2008 but couldn’t seal the deal. Hard to imagine that chance coming around twice, but who knows. The Republican Party is really lost and someone eventually is going to have to become the leader, if only for a short period of time.
My own sense is the GOP would do much better to drop its Reaganomics tax cutting mania and focus on the development of the middle class a la Douthat and Salam’s Grand New Party. Romney is not that guy. He’s clearly a plutocrat and into “flood-up” economics. Pawlenty could be that person as could Huckabee. Palin in theory could be as well I suppose, except she really wants to win over the paleo-libertarian crew with her emphasis on getting gov’t out and is playing the classic GOP card of getting middle class votes through culture war stuff while screwing them economically.Report
Chris, why don’t you and the league and Mike and ect talk about a rising third party; as in who and how and why. I should find that of interest…or have I missed the debate?Report
As far as I’m concerned, anyone who describes L.Ron Hubbard’s “opus” Battlefied Earth as their favorite movie is automatically disqualified from the Presidency. I’ve got no issue with Mormons; Scientologists are another matter.Report
I can’t get a handle on Romney — he does seem robotic.
Contrary to popular belief, I think a viable third party is possible. If the Republicans can’t overcome the Democrat advantage, they may leave a vacuum which makes a third party a reality — especially, if the Democrats look like they have only about 40% support, and the independent numbers continue to grow. It would require a herculean organizational effort. I have to believe power brokers are talking about this behind the scenes.Report
Mitt Romney is turning over in his (well-coifed) political grave at not being mentioned in a thread on the 2012 GOP nomination. With the fall of other credible conservative options (Jindal’s state of the union address, Mark Sanford’s fathers’ day, etc), the nomination is Romney’s for the taking.Report
c,
I dig the phrase well-coiffed grave. I think it was supposed to be set up for him in ’08 but Huckabee ruined it. There are even less moderates and economic Republicans then there were last time. The social conservative component of the GOP is only growing. I don’t see how he wins them. They vote on personal identification (Reagan, Bush II, Huck/Palin) never mind Romney’s Mormonism which only makes it that much harder for him. As I said before, I really think to win the GOP is going to have to come with a different economic platform and Romney could never realistically sell a middle class outreach.Report
The social conservative component of the GOP is only growing. I don’t see how he wins them. They vote on personal identification (Reagan, Bush II, Huck/Palin) never mind Romney’s Mormonism which only makes it that much harder for him.
I don’t think this is right at all. There’s little evidence from the primaries that evangelicals have a problem with Romney. He won most of the caucuses and the red states outside the south, which indicates that his popularity was strongest with the Republican base. The south voted for Huckabee, but I expect that’s mainly due to regional affinity rather than an antipathy towards Mormons. And Romney doesn’t need the south – he’s not a moderate (his statements in the 2008 primary were doctrinaire talking-point Republicanism) but he may be able to present himself as one due to his stint as Mass. governor and I don’t see anyone who has a better chance of winning primaries in the large blue states.
Barring some new, as-yet-unforeseen candidate, the nomination in 2012 will be Romney’s.Report
Katherine,
You may be right. Romney won some states out West (where he is strong) and some uncontested ones but he just wears poorly. By all rights it should be his–he’s got the money, he’s got business background, well organized. But he just doesn’t have that thing.
No Republican won in the 20th (and 21st) century without Ohio. Could Romney win Ohio? Being a native Buckeye, I gotta say no. Romney could in theory put pressure on Obama out West (Nevada, Colorado shading purple/blue, New Mexico). But he’s weak in the Midwest.
In terms of whether Romney is a moderate or social con, he’s really a politician who’ll say anything. He ran in Mass where being socially liberal was popular so that’s what he was. He ran for GOP nomination and so he became a social con (in rhetoric). He just comes off so gimmicky–national security was in so he promised to Double Gitmo. He’s just very goofy. But the GOP nomination is much shorter than the Dems. If he wins NH, NV, then he needs to win Florida then it’s his.Report