Lawsplainer: Our Three Most Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Here’s a rundown of recent edicts from the high bench in Pulsifer v United States, O’Connor-Ratcliff et al v Garnier, and Lindke v Freed
Here’s a rundown of recent edicts from the high bench in Pulsifer v United States, O’Connor-Ratcliff et al v Garnier, and Lindke v Freed
Trump v Anderson and what the Supreme Court had to say about efforts to keep Trump off the ballot in Colorado, truncated for consumption
Yes, Sidney Powell had a lot to lose, as do most people facing the full power of the prosecution. But she got a sweetheart deal
I can’t help but feel like everyone involved believes they are in a made-for-TV politico-drama without any real ramifications, especially Trump himself.
DNA doesn’t lie, but people do, and society cannot afford rogue chemists out to make a name for themselves at the expense of true justice.
It certainly is bad to make false representations to a court. But will it matter here? Short answer: no. Long answer…
A competent lawyer is often the only thing standing between a person and their personal or financial ruin. But Trump had Tom Fitton
CorningWare is Em’s current obsession/old lady pastime. Do you have this stuff in your cabinets? And how much do you want for it?
I am not a big fan of most of the current big bench, but anytime they team up to smackdown prosecutorial overreach, I’m here for it.
I drank my room temp water and seethed. And then I had a thought: Is there such thing as a countertop ice maker? Oh, there sure is
Before I get into the specifics of Carroll vs. Trump, Twitter reveals that there are still people out there who need a little legal education on that matter.
After all the blustering about taking on Disney, it appears DeSantis quit paying attention, as his new board blindsided by the agreement.
My dad quit drinking. I have never known a sober version of my father or even one I felt had the potential to quit. So, who is this man?
You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed. Like most things law-related, it’s not that simple.
“It’s just a game,” said some dude on Twitter when I mentioned I was still not quite over 13-9. He just didn’t understand the Backyard Brawl
Like most things legal, it all comes down to the wording of the various state statutes, because the word “abortion” has different meanings, depending on who you ask.
Some nice First Amendment red meat. This week’s case of the week is hot off the SCOTUS press: Shurtleff v. Boston
I don’t like the word “rape” used to describe anything but rape. And nothing is cancer except cancer. Words have meanings
Ketanji Brown Jackson has only two cases from her time on Circuit Court of Appeals. Nevertheless, I will provide a brief synopsis of each.
Said Furuqui: “If they do not have the resources to do it, they ought not do that.” Especially if they can’t do it constitutionally.