Voltaire: Candide (nor Optimism)
As a stand up comedian, Steve Martin had a bit in which he would muse about what a great prank it would be to raise a child and teach them to “talk wrong”, with the hilarious result being that the child would arrive for the first day of school speaking gibberish. The joke is funny because it strikes a nerve: education really is closely tied to a child’s personal development; teaching them wrong can do them quite a bit of damage.
The same touched nerve accounts in part for why Voltaire’s story Candide is still so funny, even though most of us remember next to nothing about Liebniz (monands, right?) who we all know was the target of the story- it’s the damage done by a young man’s commitment to what his philosophical tutor has taught him about evil: it got into the world because God has a need for it. The evils we suffer only seem that way because our understanding is limited. As everyone who has read the story remembers, Candide believes this is thus the best of all possible worlds- because Doctor Pangloss told him so.
Everything bad that could possibly happen to Candide does, of course, and his friends Pangloss and the lovely Cunegonde are exposed to more harm than SouthPark’s hapless Kenny. Voltaire is unsparing in portraying pre-modern Europe, the Americas, and the Levant as something akin to Goya’s war prints done for Mad Magazine. One appeal of the story for us might be that it provides the comforting sense that the past as recently as the eighteenth century really was terrible- maybe ours isn’t the best of all possible worlds either, but it’s the best it’s ever been. Now please pass the ice cream.
Of course, the other nerve-touching thing about the story is that all of Candide’s thought and theorizing brings him nothing but trouble. While he’s busy proving his philosophical theorems, he nearly gets killed in the wars of religion, hanged in an auto–da–fé, enslaved by pirates, and goes through countless other catastrophes. The one time in the story that he “turns off his brain” and simply floats aimlessly down a river, he winds up in El Dorado, a utopia.
Is Voltaire, the philosophe, saying that philosophy causes nothing but trouble in this life? The famous conclusion, in which Candide decides that we must all cultivate our own gardens, fits at once the safe version of the Enlightenment as “thinking for yourself”; on the other hand, Voltaire seems to be saying we should keep our heads down and not think too hard about the nature of life; or even that our reason just serves to mask the real nature of existence. This is why the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 was a problem for the Enlightened as well as the religious: it shook the belief that there was any common purpose linking man and the natural world that reason could suss out- a reasonable inference from Newton. Reason creates a picture of order than nature frustrates. In a world of such calamities, it’s a wonder Candide can hear himself think at all.
W.C. Fields once said that, if you want to tell people the truth, you have to make them laugh while doing so, or else they’ll try to kill you. With satire, we laugh at the exaggeration that things are much worse than we know they are, but it is nervous laughter of the sort that makes characters in old comedies fretfully loosen their ties – we can only hope the kernel of truth is a small one so it’ll go down easier.
I had half of an essay on the Lisbon Earthquake that I wanted to post on All Saint’s Day…
Anyway, Candide was the funniest book I had ever read until I got about halfway through at which point, with *ZERO* change in tone, it became the most depressing existentialist essay I’d ever read.
I’d like to bring Voltaire to here/now and go for a walk with him. I wonder if he’d want to go back or not…Report
Would anybody leave now to live in city without flush toilets?Report
Is this a trick question?Report
No. It was just my way of saying that while we have problems, nobody wears wide brim hats so they won’t be hit in the head by people throwing the contentsof last night’s honeypots out the second story window.Report
We obviously don’t live in the same neighborhood.Report
Why would you thinkthat?Report
Rufus, such high-brow stuff and on a Friday? I was already going to start drinking early, now you’ve given me something else to read.Report
Stick with the original plan, make the “reading” part just a rider or an addendum.Report
I can do that. I was feeling pretty guilty about forgetting how to insert those links to Amazon dot com that we were talking about adding. Anyone know how to do that?Report
Here’s the Amazon version, but ED has to do some partner magic on it to make it a revenue generator. I just grabbed the first thing that came up on my search and Kindle has it for free (being ancient and all).Report
Right, we were supposed to be able to do that in our posts, but I forget how. Interestingly, my offer to Penguin Classics has gone unanswered, but I like those editions more than enough to recommend them to people in real life and wouldn’t feel at all guilty about linking to them here.Report
You need an affiliate account on Amazon. Mine got borked I think because I used the same email address that I use for my normal Amazon account which was linked to something else already.Report
Got it. That’s the version I read. Let me know if you’d prefer another.Report
I haven’t compared the translations, but the Penguin ones are usually first rate. Part of my pitch to them was to see if I could get comped some. No such luck.Report
When philosophy and music come together like this one has to mention it, Leonard Bernstein’s Candide shouldn’t be missed. Bernstein himself conducting the Overture. And a neat production with Kristin Chenoweth and Paul Groves.
Report
I wanted to include “What a day for an auto-da-fé!” in the post, but forgot to. It’s a great musical that often reaches Monty Python heights.Report
most of us remember next to nothing about Leibniz
Other than inventing calculus?Report
Yeah, I was trying to be funny in this post because I’d just read a funny book. I’m no Voltaire though clearly.Report
I may not think your jokes are fumy, but I will defend to the death your right to make them.Report
It’s necessary to call a poster on these matters, pour encourager les autres.Report
How much evidence is there that Voltaire was versed in Eastern philosophy? Your point about Candide floating down the river and ending up in El Dorado sounds suspiciously Buddhistic.
The Lisbon Earthquake, I’ve thought, was a problem for Enlightenment thinkers like Liebniz, who needed to reconcile rationalism to teleology. To me, Voltaire is not a post-Enlightenment author, I see him as a late Enlightenment author, and Candide is in a real way the climax of the Enlightenment for this reason — he rejects teleology as irreconcilable with empirical reality.Report
I’m going to guess: not much. There wasn’t that much cultural exchange of that type until philologists really got busy in the 19th century. The Panchatantra, for example, may have arrived in Europe as early as the 11th century, but from Arabic or Persian sources. Work on Sanskrit (and the attending interest in religious texts) didn’t really begin until the end of the 18th century, I would guess – and it is only a guess – that work on Chinese religious texts on Buddhism would similarly be left until the colonial ethnographic spirit took hold.Report
I don’t know, honestly. But I suspect he was familiar with the basic ideas because in a few places he brings up Buddhism as a response to those who would say that a society can’t function without a belief in God.Report
I agree too that Candide is maybe best thought of as a late Enlightenment text.Report
Geez, RufusF, liberal arts education worth going into debt for! I wouldn’t be so crabby about Big Ed if a tenth of my teachers had been in your league. Mega-props, sir; you continue to astound and inspire me.
[On a personal note, I have been thinking on theodicy and Leibniz a lot lately. Had the creator–God, if there is one–made this mortal coil significantly more horrible or even less horrible, there would be less place for free will, faith, and yes, reason, all postulated by Leibniz as why things are as they are, why the human equation is exactly what it is.]
[In short, why. Leibniz’ is a completion-backwards thesis, after all, an attempt to explain why we’re here atall, a posteriori. Quid sit deus—if there is a God, what would He/It be? The rest follows, to the best of Dr. Pangloss’ ability to theorize and explain.]Report