As you may have noticed, the last few days the regular gents have been lazy dogs like Puck here. Or if you want to be generous to us, we’ve just had collective writers’ block.
In any event, consider this an open thread. Of course, if any of you have any suggestions for topics that you’d like to see one of us (or all of us) write about, this would be a good place to do so as well.
Mark of New Jersey
Mark is a Founding Editor of The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the predecessor of Ordinary Times.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on All the President’s Nominees: The Legion of GroomHegseth Defended monuments in Washington such as the Vietnam Memorial, while your buddies were fine…
on The Mandate That Wasn’tA mandate is simply the authority given to democratically elected officials. It has nothing to do wi…
on The Mandate That Wasn’tHeh. A fortunate turn of the head doesn't count.
on The Mandate That Wasn’tSome have suggested that the ability to dodge bullets is an indicator of the Mandate of Heaven. on The Mandate That Wasn’tJohn is correct in the dictionary sense. In the political sense, at least as I understand it, a mand…
on The Mandate That Wasn’tNo man has possessed the Mandate of Heaven since the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty in 1912. on The Mandate That Wasn’tNot really. But we all know that. on The Mandate That Wasn’t"Who should the Democrats have run instead of Kamala?" If you can't answer this, you've illustrated… on The Mandate That Wasn’tIt's real in some really troublesome ways!
on The Mandate That Wasn’tThey also need better and longer term messaging discipline and to take the media to task publicly.
November 20, 2024
Movie of a Young Man Calling on a Lady Friend
November 19, 2024
November 18, 2024
November 17, 2024
on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t on Open Mic for the week of 11/18/2024
on How Republicans Can Save Trump’s Presidency on How Republicans Can Save Trump’s Presidency
on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t
on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t
on The Mandate That Wasn’t
on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t on The Mandate That Wasn’t
OK: How about a blog on the question, Does Sarah Palin represent a threat to the American order because she refused to participate in the sacrament of abortion, given the fact that the child was a Down Syndrome baby?Report
Oh, come on Bob. We liberals love Down Syndrome babies. The sacrament of abortion is reserved for poor, unwed mothers. It goes along with our six other sacraments; divorce, assisted suicide, public high school graduation, privacy, becoming a social worker and eating the body and blood of Michael Moore.Report
Chad, thanks, you’ve revealed everything but the secret hand shake!Report
Rights theory, theology, morality, Providence… The hippie stuff, mostly.
Batman, of course.Report
I was hoping for a truly lurid sex scandal. I was kind of embarrassed for Will this morning.Report
I was reminded of the Harold Bloom/Naomi Wolf revelation.
Maribou and I actually do that one for friends. “Wanna see my Harold Bloom impersonation?”
Then I put my hand on her leg.
Sadly, many of our friends have no idea who Harold Bloom is.
Sigh.Report
Well, you got me. I initially thought of Allan Bloom. Different, very different.Report
Eek. Harold Bloom is (allegedly) sketch-tastic. So props for the reference.Report
I’m not sure about an “American order”, not being a “real American” and all. I’m sure the Palins plan on taking care of the tyke themselves and won’t be taking any of those socialist handouts that burden society. Then again Alaska is the greatest welfare recipient we have.Report
Is 2009 the year of the advent of the conservative hippie? What with the tea partiers and the increasingly ludicrous policy stances I’m getting a real Woodstock vibe. Will the longterm reaction of the establishment press to the conservative hippie be similar to the reaction to the echoes of the liberal hippies through the 70s and beyond? (In short, a drastic swing in the opposite ideological direction in order to avoid any semblance of association with the DFHs).Report
Catching up on Sunday’s meet the press, I really wonder why Republican grand strategists thought minority homeownership was more likely to make them Republican than education reform.
Say what you will about the Reverend Al Sharpton, but he’s not far off the mark when he talks about the civil rights implications of the nation’s achievement gap and habitual under-sourcing of the educational needs of needy/minority communities. Which, let’s face it is really, really difficult to pin on evil Republicans.
If there was ever an issue where you could walk into the Bronx, Newark, or East LA, identify as a Republican, say the government has failed and isn’t accountable/responsive to the people and have any resonance, it’s on education.Report
In the latest controversy over climate change (or is it nontroversy?) there’s been a bunch of emails between members of a climate science group that were leaked to the Internet: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/20/climate-sceptics-hackers-leaked-emails
What I was interested in regarding this issue is not necessarily the particular content of the emails, but the relationship between scientists and the public. In most cases scientists are fairly open with each other about their methods and results. The public, however, mostly sees science as some inaccessible monolithic institution of men in white lab coats and safety glasses. How might there be some barriers between the scientific community and the public that cause distrust of scientific findings that have political or cultural implications? (i.e. climate change or evolution) Some examples could be inaccessible technical jargon, failures in public science education, and perceived or actual elitism of scientists. How does the media narrative of scientific results contribute to public confusion over current scientific theories?Report
The media often does a craptacular job of reporting on science. For one thing they go with the false equivalence model of reporting: Earth flat or round: opinions differ.
There are really good websites, often with practicing scientists, that aim to popularize science as well as great tv shows. The evil socialistic PBS/NPR is known for that. The site Real Climate noted in the article is a good example of that. but people really have to actually want to learn and understand. The alleged controversy of evolution in this country is an example of people not wanting to learn or understand.Report
A lack of curiosity is a difficult obstacle to overcome, especially since actually taking time to learn about something is hard. With evolution, I think the issue too often gets painted as science vs. religion, when the theory of evolution has very little to say about religion. Well, except if you happen to believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis.Report
I have a Yorkie named Puck. My wife bought him as a pup to keep me company when I was recovering from a quintuple bypass. He sat with me everyday as I watched soap operas and popped pain pills. Needless to say, we bonded and he follows me everywhere I go around the hosue.Report
Palinism and Jacksonianism: Compare and contrast. Both resigned from office before their term was up, for one thing (Jackson quit the Senate due to financial issues and then quit as governor of Florida because… I’m not sure why). Both harboured deep resentments due to political attacks on their families. Both were deeply polarizing. Both were seen as, for lack of a better word, hicks by many of their opponents. Both highly populist.
My US history class is covering Jackson, so the parallels occurred to me. Anyone with a greater knowledge of American history care to expand on this?Report
Two things I’d love to see explored:
1) What does it say about society/MSNBC’s audience that, when they’re not indoctrinating America’s youth with liberal propaganda, their programming concerns overwhelmingly one topic: life inside America’s prisons. Don’t get me wrong, i think it’s important we have a realistic sense of what happens in the places where we send those whose right to live freely in society we have taken away, if only to help combat the rampant speculation and innuendo about it. But what does it mean that a particular cable network find the topic to be the equivalent of a self-administered morphine drip of profit?
2. What will be the impact if, as seems to be suggested by knowledgeable prople in this On Point broadcast [http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/11/google-vs-murdoch, major mainstream newspapers-of-record soon] begin to charge for their main news (not just opinion) content? What would the effect be on places like this, which thrives on discussion centered on news generated by major mainstream outlets (even if initially mediated by other commentators)? My own sense is that the practice of (more or less accurate) summarization of reporting would become a newly valuable skill, and discussions like those here will essentially go on based on word-of-mouth/second-hand description of the reporting that is now simply linked to. But I’d be interested in others’ speculations as well.Report
its says prison shows are cheap to make and popular enough, therefore profit ensues. its a capitalism thing.Report
Remember the murdered census worker in Kentucky? The one who had “fed” written on his chest?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-11-24-census-worker-suicide_N.htm
The police have ruled it a suicide.Report