Free Douthat
One thing I failed to point out in my initial post is that part of the problem with running a weekly column is that every one that comes out it is a real statement. It’s your vision of the world for that week. NYT columns generate a lot of buzz and a ton of play on blogs, more than even the most controversial and high profile blog posts. This makes every one fraught with importance for how you are judged by the blogging world, where someone’s opinion can ebb and flow literally over the course of a day depending on their output. As I said before, I think Ross is in an almost untenable position: as he is going to be seen as the New York Times pet conservative, he has to be sufficiently conservative that he is not tuned out entirely, without sacrificing the open-mindedness and heterodoxy that made him such an appealing figure in the first place. It’s a narrow path he has to walk, and at worst it could result in the kind of “one for this side/one for the other side” dance that ideologically promiscuous pundits sometimes have to do. But this is exacerbated by the weekly publishing schedule. When you write one statement of your beliefs a week, each one needs to send just the right collection of signals. A blog, meanwhile, can ruminate on so many different issues over the course of a week that you don’t need to worry about treading any particular ideological paths. Your perception can merely be the aggregate impression of everything you’ve had to say.
(There is a separate conversation to be had, by the way, about the self-censoring aspects of constant bias accusations. When you become convinced that all of the media is a conspiracy to silence your point of view, you winnow the number of acceptable fora within the media that you are willing to listen to. Which in turns limits the prospects of like-minded pundits in terms of where they can work and be taken seriously by your movement, perversely limiting the ability of your message to spread. But I digress.)
The point is this: give Douthat a goddamn blog, New York Times. He can keep writing his column. You can ask that he talk about stuff in his column that doesn’t appear in the blog. You can insist that he operate in a different voice in the column than he does on the blog. You could even have the proviso that it be a blog about policy, or culture, or whatever. But give the man a blog on your website. Let him post about things that are a little less consequential. Let him stretch his feet out a bit. You hired this guy because you think he’s talented. Why not given him broader ranger to show it?
And you, dear bloggers– spread the word. And if you like this image, spread that too.
Now there’s a campaign we can all get behind!Report
I’ll sign that petition!Report
I’m sure he could have a blog if he wants one. It’s his personal responsibility to get one!
I’m not really familiar with his work pre-NYTimes (the self-aggrandizing piece he wrote complaining that Harvard was too easy – despite obviously having an 8th-grade science background that he had no interest in improving – turned me off.) But he doesn’t demonstrate much in the way of original thinking or writing skill in his present job.
This reminds me of evaluating prospects in baseball – a player will look great in the minors. He has all the skills that have made other similar players successful in the past. And then he makes the jump…and fails miserably. And it takes a lot of evidence of failure before I accept that his minor-league performance did not adequately predict his numbers in the majors. I’m right to demand a lot of evidence that his true talent is not what I saw before, but ultimately I have to admit that my eyes deceived me.Report
well said freddie.Report
C’mon, Freddie, Douthat is a “moran”.
The only way to improve the quality of american political discourse is to have his jaw wired shut and put him in anti-typing handcuffs.
I particularily despised his last polemic on the “ignorant little brown muslim people”.
I’m reading a book by Ibn Arabi on string theory and spacetime that was written a half century before Galileo finally convinced the pig-ignorant papists of heliocentrism.Report
I mean 500 YEARS before Galileo finally convinced the pig-ignorant papists of heliocentrism.Report
Um, Galileo was a ‘papist,’ and a fairly devout one at that.Report
Oh, brother!! Do I need to reset my snark detector? Because the only good thing that could come of Ross getting his own NYT blog is more “chunky” Reese Witherspoon comments and the hilarity that would ensue. It would be the unintentional comedic gift that keeps on giving.Report