Men Who Help
One of the questions fiction writers often ask each other when discussing the craft is this: do you have any recurring themes that keep popping up in your work?
I’ve noticed of late that I do have a prominent theme in my fiction writing. I don’t know if there’s a specific term for it but I think of it as “men who help.”
If you’re curious about what I mean, let me direct you to a couple of my pieces – the best example that I’ve published is Mom Vs. Couch and to a lesser extent the “men who help” theme appears in No More Tender Vittles.
Over and over, I find myself creating a fictional world where a woman simply can’t DO something on her own and needs somebody to give her a hand. While I don’t hold myself to writing exclusively about men and women, that is the type of relationship I write about the most, and so my female characters are most often accepting help from manly folk.
This is a pretty politically incorrect take, I’m told. Women need men like fish need a bicycle, and all that. Modern stories are more about grrl power than helpful fellas offering an umbrella to a girl caught out in the rain. We celebrate stories where the men are portrayed as helpless, feckless, useless – even brainless. We want our dudely damsels to be in distress so the infallible, brilliant, and tough women come swooping in to save the day. Men aren’t the helpers, they’re the help-ees. And somehow, that’s meant to be empowering for women.
But the thing is, I LIKE that “men who help” plotline. It makes me happy to read it and to write it. The idea of someone, anyone, showing up to lighten my burden is compelling to me. I don’t need to be saved, but a helping hand now and then? Well, I certainly wouldn’t slap it away.
It’s fricking exhausting being a woman. There are so many expectations laid upon us and that we have to work a second shift or even a third sometimes to get it all done. It’s not mens’ fault that that is the case, but it IS the case. It’s one thing for a supernatural superhero like Diana Prince – aka Wonder Woman – to be always tough and strong and never need anyone’s help. But Diana Prince is a fictional character. The character Diana Prince doesn’t have children or a job, and I doubt she really has to scrub a lot of toilets. She’s a supernatural being without the physical weaknesses we mere mortals have. She has the time and the energy to tackle every crisis singlehandedly without the assistance of anyone else. But despite all this, or more likely because of it, I just don’t find her story particularly compelling.
I was talking with a friend of mine and we were commiserating about how HARD everyday life is. There is always something that needs doing, and nearly always a LOT of somethings. Whether you’re married like I am or single like she is, the work never ends. We’re meant to keep it all going flawlessly and somehow work on ourselves too. How do people manage it all? Surely they have to have help from someone – friends, family, spouse, hired help. But what if you don’t have those people in your life? Or what if you do, and they make additional demands of you rather than lending a hand? Is it really so wrong for a strong independent woman who feels like she has no one to rely on, to want to lose herself in a story about a strong independent woman who does?
Far more compelling to me than the story of Diana Prince, Wonder Woman is the story of Kim Wexler, Attorney-at-Law, on Better Call Saul. If you’ve watched the show, you’ll know that Kim is an insanely hardworking woman who pulled herself up by the bootstraps* and gets in over her head trying to juggle the needs of her clients and her boyfriend. She ends up spread so thin that she forgets about the needs of her body, falling asleep at the wheel of a car and nearly killing herself.
Kim Wexler IS a hero, as much of a hero as Wonder Woman is (way more so to me anyway) and she just needed some goddamn help. She could have managed it all with some help; she could have knocked it right on out of the ballpark. She was capable and willing. Even just a little help from somebody along the way would have made the difference. There was NOTHING weak or inferior about Kim Wexler, she was simply an actual human being with physical needs for sleep and a limited number of hours in the day to do all the stuff she needed to do.
Needing help is not a sign of weakness or patriarchal brainwashing. It doesn’t make you less the heroine of your own story if you sometimes long for another person to step in and pick up some of the slack. It isn’t anti-feminist to need help from other people and it isn’t anti-feminist to take help even when you don’t desperately need it, even when you just kinda-sorta do. Nor is it anti-feminist to acknowledge the reality that some tasks in this world are easier for men to do than women. Opening a pickle jar, for instance, is something that regularly flummoxes me not because I’ve been patriarchally oppressed by a sexist cucumber but because my hand is half the size of a male hand.
Some jobs in this world are simply more difficult for one person to handle alone, particularly when that person happens to be small in stature. And there are definitely times when husbands and boyfriends, as great as they are, represent another set of demands to be met on top of all the jobs you already may have to handle. It’s just a nice fantasy to imagine a scenario involving a guy who didn’t want anything from you, who just wanted to give you a pickle, and not in the proverbial sense. It’s a fiction, sure, but it’s a fiction that appeals to me a lot more than the affairs of a goddess.
Women don’t need to be saved. It’s true. We aren’t helpless damsels-in-distress waiting for Prince Charming to come along. We are everyday superheroes who get up in the morning and work a series of miracles and then collapse into bed at the end of the day, exhausted. But even superheroes have a sidekick or a butler or whatever.
A facilitator. An assistant. An extra set of hands. Someone who, for even just a little while, isn’t adding to your burden, but instead is helping you to carry it. And the idea of someone doing it voluntarily instead of waiting until you ask, instead of making you beg and plead for it, instead of demanding that you earn assistance by performing a series of favors in return, instead of waiting till you literally fall asleep at the wheel of your car or of your life before pitching in – it’s a pretty darn nice idea.
Kim Wexler may emphatically insist that she saves herself, but in the end she nearly kills herself trying to save everyone else at the expense of herself. And I’m sorry, I don’t think it’s healthy for the world to hold up the hijinks of supernatural creatures as aspirational for women. Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel don’t have physical weaknesses nor do they have biological needs. They barely seem to have emotional needs. They don’t have jobs and kids and 10,000 miscellaneous totally necessary household chores to do. They don’t even have to do their own hair or paint their own nails since they are, after all, fictional characters.
Wonder Woman has never called in sick to work because her baby was teething and kept her up all night. Captain Marvel has never sat in a car and cried because she had a flat tire on the freeway and she forgot to charge her cell phone. Neither of them have ever had to run into the grocery store when they were late for a meeting because they got a run in their stocking and bought Midol at the same time because their cramps were so bad.
Women who never need help are NOT REAL. And fiction may not be real, but we still learn lessons about the world from it. The lessons we learn from seeing unbreakable, infallible women is that we can never break and we can never fail. The lessons we learn from women who save the world singlehandedly are that we have to do the same. It’s that same toxic message women have gotten since the dawn of time wrapped in a veneer of empowerment. Do better. Try harder. You’re not good enough. You never will be. Anything short of perfect isn’t good enough.
It’s just now we also have to be good at kicking people’s butts on top of all the other stuff we’re supposed to be good at.
So I’ve decided to reject that message and embrace my “men who help” plotline. It may not get me brownie points on Jezebel or The Mary Sue, but it’s meaningful to me. And I believe it’s meaningful to other women as well.
The people who don’t like it can go suck a pickle. If they can get the jar open.
*In the interest of being fully accurate, let’s mention that Kim Wexler was only able to pull herself up by the bootstraps only because her bosses at Hamlin, Hamlin, McGill loaned her money to go to law school. I think that’s entirely awesome, even if fictional, and don’t want to let that go without a shout out.
Photo by quinn.anya
I like it too, as a plotline. (I see far too many young men – many of my students – who have either been trained to be incompetent, or who have figured out if they act sufficiently so, someone else – usually a woman – will do the stuff for them).
Also, for me, it’s a bit of wish fulfillment. I’m not married and don’t (currently, though by currently I probably now mean “ever again”) have a boyfriend, so there’s no one else in my life close to me to do that heavy lifting, and I feel really bad putting some of it onto my friends, because, you know, they’re just MY FRIENDS and they don’t have as tight a link to me (or so I feel, maybe incorrectly) than the guy I’ve (theoretically) thrown my lot in with.
Also, men who help are men who NOTICE people need help and are sufficiently unselfish enough to do so. (I’ve also known men in my life who never helped, not because they were helpless in the traditional sense, but because they were so wrapped up in their own egos that no one else really *existed* for them)
Confession: I have a long, ongoing, sort-of-self-insert story (the lead woman character in it is a slightly-better version of me, and by a different name) and in this story there are two male co-workers (setting is a bookstore/small press) who are Men Who Help. One is better at the emotional kind than the other, but they both do help occasionally – but then again, they also NEED help from time to time….
It sounds stupid to write about it but that little story that’s run in my head off and on for a couple years has provided comfort when distressed and diversion when I need it. And I think it does present a better version of the world….Report
Exactly! I’m so glad you read this, I had our conversation in mind when I wrote it.
Your story sounds lovely and I promise it’s no stupider than writing about a couch that eats people. I’d love to read it!Report
Heh. I’ve never written it down, at this point it’s so long and epic in my mind that the thought of writing it down is daunting.Report
Kim Wexler is probably the most realistic depictions of young corporate lawyers I’ve ever seen.
Everybody thinks young lawyers in private practice are either doing coke with strippers, laying down ultimatums, or coming up with genius legal theories in eureka moments while surrounded by leather-bound volumes. Most likely, they’re making sure addresses match in obscure filings or grinding through documents in some windowless conference room.Report
That is true of so many things that are glamorized in media!
I really enjoy the character and the realism of her. Thanks for reading.Report
David Baldacci likes to write all of his novels with a male protagonist and a female helper. I always saw it as a buddy-action thing with a little bit of potential romantic tension thrown in (he almost never actually delivers on that). I never think of it as pandering, but more of an attempt at adding a different perspective. And in the case of at least one of those series, the female is the better fight/shooter of the two so she ends up doing a lot of the saving.
On a personal note, I always like to hear married couples talk about the division of labor in the household, when they aren’t bitter about it. Marriage is a partnership and finding that balance is special.Report
Everyone needs help. Rescue is a staple of both adventure and romance. It doesn’t, however, have to be gendered. Examining why, for instance, you as a woman are focused on men who help could be a rich vein to tap, in terms of fiction.
Because I have known a few women who couldn’t be bothered to lift a finger to help someone. Not a lot, but a few. I think that’s a sterile and isolating way to live, but some people think it’s what they deserve and are entitled to. If that’s not your world, that’s good.Report
It doesn’t have to be gendered, but gender matters. Honestly, it doesn’t surprise me that many str8 women enjoy reading about such things. It seems perfectly wonderful, precisely because of the sexual subtext — and by “sexual” I mean to include the whole spectrum of romantic relationships, including the mere potential for romance. (Flirting is sex!)
#####
I’m going to present a counterpoint, but it should not be interpreted as contradicting Kristin’s point. Instead it is meant to add context.
I grew up a boy — most of you know this. At a certain point, I changed. In turn, the way people treated me changed.
This wasn’t so much in meatspace, as I’ve never really passed very well, and the men who are into trans women are — well, it’s complicated. But online — I remember when I first began presenting as female online.
Men treated me differently. It wasn’t nice. It felt intrusive.
How can I explain this?
Okay, so I was writing at the time, and posting my stuff on certain online forums. There were many men. When I wrote with a male pen name, everything was basically okay. Others would critique me. I’d critique them. It was fine.
With a female pen name — oh gosh. Men lined up to help. I started getting random emails from random dudes who were darn certain they could help me. They were very eager, insistent even.
Often they weren’t very good writers, and their suggestions were not helpful, and dammit I didn’t really want that kind of help.
It’s hard to explain.
They wanted attention. Their “help” was a pretext for a certain kind of relationship, which wouldn’t help my writing but sure would take up my time.
“But Veronica, don’t you want critique?”
Of course. And yet.
They were too eager, too insistent. Moreover, they did not want a conversation between equals. For example, they wanted to tutor me, and for me to be receptive and compliant.
There was this one guy, who seemed cool at first. I tried to do a “mutual critique” thing, where he critiqued my thing and I critiqued his. This seems like a natural thing to do.
It didn’t work out.
It’s a truism that amateur writers don’t want critique, they want praise — of which I am as guilty as anyone. But this was different.
The word “condescending” comes to mind.
#####
There is a thing about “men helping.” Often it’s not just help in a natural way. It’s more than that. It’s a kind of relationship, with all varieties of sexual tension and subtext. If as a women you’re receptive to that, then fine. But when you are not, it’s tiresome.
I’m busy! Help when needed is welcome, but unwanted help is intrusive. Moreover, unwanted help with a sexualized agenda is just annoying as heck.
to be clear, “sexualized agenda” doesn’t have to mean “trying to fuck me” (although sometimes it does). It’s more than that. Some men enjoy simply flirting for it’s own sake. But flirting should be mutual. The power dynamics should be welcome by both parties. If I’m not in the mood, then their “help” is not helpful.
Try telling such a man that you don’t want his help. There is no good way.Report
That is all entirely true and since it was beyond the scope of the piece I really appreciate you chiming in to share your experience.
Sometimes help is not really help.Report
This is a really good comment, Veronica. It reminds me of how I (as a straight man) sometimes interact with women.
And you’re on to something about “sexualized agenda” not being merely or only having sex. I hadn’t thought of it that way before, but I think it’s probably right.Report
Thirsty. I mean, literally thirsty. I had written a couple dozen stories and the number of times being thirsty came up was astonishing to me, in retrospect. I had no idea I was writing this as a common theme, and I had written two stories where it was THE central plot point.
I live in the desert, is my only explanation.
As for Wonder Woman, I haven’t read a lot of her stories—an interaction with Kristin usually means another book order from Amazon, I find—but she did have her Steve Trevor. And I will be shocked to find if a great many of her stories (say, around 40%, especially after her introduction) do NOT involve being helped. Because—at least until recently—ALL superheroes get help from others.
People joke about Robin, The Boy Hostage, but he’s saved Batman’s bacon on more than one occasion. Lois & Jimmy Olson have saved Superman. Steve Trevor has helped out Wonder Woman, I’m absolutely positive. And not just the sidekicks but random people. The help was usually not on a superheroic level although it often was, as through some transmogrification, Lois Lane became a robot, Jimmy Olson turned into The (legally distinct not-quite) Hulk, etc.
Why? Because everybody but The Villains were helpful in the Golden Age of comic books. There were very few villains relative to the general population, and there weren’t even a lot of cowards. A very common trope is the comic book equivalent of the guy in Tiananmen Square, where somebody stands up to a villain who can crush him.
And if we ask Why? again, the answers are simple: A good story needs a not invincible hero, and comic books in particular used to be about Good Values. Everyone needs help, everyone can help, everyone SHOULD help.
The weird perversion of the past 50 years is to convince women (and men) that they are the “only one”. It’s a miserable existence and a lie.Report
Ha glad you clarified re thirsty! They keep inventing new words faster than I can keep up.
One of my fave writers, Jess Walter, often has people getting eye injuries in his writing. I always wonder what happened to him.
LOL re book orders – I’ll take that as a compliment! 🙂 Thanks for reading!Report
Related:
https://www.thisamericanlife.org/679/save-the-girlReport
I don’t disagree with the post Kristen, but I do think there is a bit more nuance to be mined here. For what it’s worth, I’ve never seen anyone say that female character should never ask for or receive help. (Not saying no one has ever said that – this is the internet, after ll -just that at least to my line of sight it’s n to a big enough universe to make itself known.)
What I *have* seen objections to are the historical tendency for female characters (especially in TV and movies) to act as merely a one-dimensional plot device for a male character to help, which is similar (and probably related) to complaints about women characters (again, primarily in TV and movies) existing as a one dimensional plot device as a thing for the male character to win.
TV certainly doesn’t seem to be like this anymore (I don’t go out to the movies enough these days to comment on those), but that I can say that when I was growing up and a young adult, outside of arthouse films or PBS costumed dramas, women’s roles really did tend to be written as if whoever wrote the scripts hadn’t given much thought at all to them except as a plot device for the male characters.Report
Also: Kim is hands down the best character on Better Call Saul.Report
Kim may get a spinoff and I certainly hope she does.Report
All that is true, but please understand that my larger point here is that women – real live ones, not fictional characters – are expected to do by far and away more than ever before and we are expected to do it all perfectly. We are supposed to have jobs, a family, keep house, exercise, look fabulous, have hobbies, be demons in the sack, create perfect bento boxes for our children’s lunch and post pics of it on social media etc etc etc and it’s a lot of pressure and it’s a lot of work. Even if you aren’t seeing it in fiction, I assure you that in real life, that message is blaring very loudly in every woman’s ear since birth for at least the past 50 years from a whole lot of non-fiction sources.
I get that it was dumb to have a girl in the background jumping up and down in movies and TV. I get that there were toxic messages attached to that (but of course, at least women saw actual women in real life doing all sorts of things to counteract what they saw on screen). To replace one untrue trope with an equally untrue trope where supernatural creatures who just so happen to be female who are constantly perfect and always flawless do all the stuff singlehandedly while the men stand around going “Duh, Ralphie” with their finger up their nose or down their pants – it does nothing for me. In fact in many ways it seems very much akin to the 9 million toxic messages I’m already getting from everywhere anyway – that women have to do it all, all alone, all the time.Report
I do agree with this.Report
I hate the “dumb Dad” trope (especially, but more generally the “dumb helpless man who needs the woman to step in and handle stuff”) with a passion.
REAL humans need help sometimes, and can give help some times. That’s what having relationships is – you give when you are strong, you accept when you are weak. And if you see people around you with more on their plate than you have, you at least don’t try to add to their burden.Report
YES!!Report
Ha! It’s gone but apparently you got an Illuminati comment! I wrote a (not very) funny thing 10 years ago about joining the Illuminati and I just let the I-spam acculumate as a (not very funny) gag. 402 comments! (And I’m sure only because I haven’t checked on that blog in years.)
I always wonder if those things actually hook people.Report
We also get one with a phone number that tells us who to contact in order to become a member of the undead (one of the sexy ones… think “Twilight”).
Occasionally, people interact with the spam.
Which DRIVES ME NUTS.Report
Yeah, the fleeting amusement of engaging with spammers is not worth the necessary showering afterwards.Report
Oh boy! I’ll dust off my secret handshake and report backReport