Notes from Outside the Boat
Brother Christopher Carr’s series of posts about his time spent slogging through the stagnant American job market recently drew to a happy conclusion, having exemplified why I believe a literary agent would do well to trawl this site for projects: I would love to read that series expanded to a memoir.
In order to wrap things up, Christopher talked about some of the things he learned while “working several low-paying jobs for which I was staggeringly overqualified just to get by.” I cannot hope to compare to his post or series for quality of insights, but as I have worked a few low-paying jobs for which I am overqualified in the last year, I figured I will share the few things I have learned.
1. Being inside the boat is entirely different from being outside the boat.
Not only in terms of perspective on work, but our experience of the world is greatly shaped by either having, or often not having, a base measure of economic security and satisfaction in what we do. This is perhaps obvious, but it becomes glaringly so when you interact with people from different backgrounds and situations on a regular basis; even things like body language and sense of humor are reflective.
2. Poverty and irresponsibility often look the same.
I’m long overdue for an eye exam. When booking, my optometrist’s assistant asked me how I could have allowed so much time to pass in the same tone of voice my parents used to take when asking why I waited until the night before a test to study. In response, I asked how much an eye exam costs. When I see internet sites mocking strangers for driving cars that survive only by the grace of Bondo or wearing unflattering thrift store clothes to Wal-Mart, I wonder if the posters have ever had to choose between paying rent or eating enough calories.
3. You must squeeze the lemon until the pip squeaks.
I now do a very good impression of my working class parents and Depression era grandparents, asking friends: “Why would you buy new clothes when you can find good ones at thrift stores?” “Why would you get Netflix when you can rent movies from the library?” “Why would you ever eat food in a restaurant? Do you know what the markup is?” I’m unable to make even the smallest purchase without first checking my conscience, and usually with a pang of regret. The positive side of my skinflintery is I have no debts and enough savings to last several months.
4. You simply must be a grinder.
A “grinder” in car salesman slang is a customer who wants to get a car for the absolute lowest price they can and will negotiate until they do so; a very tough sell. You must be gimlet-eyed with not only car salesmen and mechanics, but salesmen, hiring agencies, banks, landlords, employers especially, and anyone else who might have a motive to siphon money from you. They will. It’s a game that you must learn to play well especially if your income level is low. O friend, there are no friends!
5. A nervous breakdown is a luxury.
If you must have a nervous breakdown, you need to schedule the time off with HR and find someone to work your shifts. Otherwise, let’s save it for serious bodily injuries, thanks. It’s not so much that mental illnesses are class-based as their manifestations are shaped by what opportunities one has to do anything. In general, I’ve found that the rich have neuroses and the poor have addictions.
6. Anti-consumerism is a luxury too.
When most of your days are “Buy Nothing Days”, it is hard to be impressed by those who have decided to “no longer let advertising rule their lives”. Besides, if you’re outside the boat, there are times in which the right trivial and shallow consumer purchase can save your life or sanity.
7. Credentialism is out of control.
At least it is in Canada, where one cannot pick their nose without the proper nose-picker certification. It reminds me a bit of France, where every possible occupation requires belonging to a cartel professional guild of one sort or another. Ever notice how many novels are written by people who attended the same MFA programs? How many journalists went to the same schools? I’ve heard tell of retail chains where one needs a four year degree to be a manager, receptionist jobs that require Microsoft certification to authorize the applicant to use Office like the rest of us, waitress jobs requiring Smart Serve certification, etc. etc. In many cases, new certifications override experience and longtime workers have to take courses and get certified to do what they’ve been doing for years. Sure, you can do the job in practice, but can you do it in theory? One can only imagine how this has warped the labor pool.
8. Most people really are lazy.
Sloth is a timeless vice among members of our species and common enough in mammals that our vice might just be in seeing it as a sin. Yet grunt jobs seem to both intensify the problem by their very tediousness while attracting the sort of people who intend to do very little for several hours a day. This is why teamwork is such a slice of hell: if you’re the poor soul who works hard, you have to contend with people who see you as a thing to be overcome. (Lazy should be read here as a measure of both physical and mental effort.)
9. Most dreams die through no fault of their owners.
Many, many people work tirelessly and relentlessly in pursuit of their dreams never to see them come to fruition. Life happens regardless.
10. There is no intrinsic value to hard work.
I remember a story, perhaps apocryphal, about a Victorian era church food line in which the Priest would make each patron move a pile of bricks, pointlessly, from one corner of the yard to another, in order to learn the value of hard work. We are devoted to the idea that grueling, unrewarding labor has some intrinsic reward, but this is wishful thinking. As often as it “builds character,” it breaks the spirit and breeds cynicism, damages the body, and deprives society of people who could contribute more to society in sequestering them in the pool of those who will do what the rest of us won’t. Many of those poor sould would respond, “Well, you have to pay the rent somehow.” Certainly true, but those who romanticize backbreaking work are usually those who have never had to do it in order to pay the rent.
11. Instances of luck are our thin reeds.
And yet, for all of this, sometimes employers call back, an idea comes to fruition, or we meet someone who makes our heart go clickety-clack. Not often, but luck’s rareness raises its caliber.
Note: The featured image is from the great Paul Schrader film Blue Collar (1978).
“Credentialism is out of control.”
They can’t refuse to hire you for being black, pregnant, crazy, or drunk.
But they *can* refuse to hire you for not having the proper credentials.Report
Great post Rufus!
That Victorian story might be untrue but that attitude behind it is very real. In The Rise of Victorian Value: Decency and Dissent in Britain, there is a showing that early 19th century debates about poverty are basically like our own with the same stereotypes, fears, and armchair psychology. The early bourgeois Victorians also feared and worried that the poor were begging during the day and then living like debauched royals at night and we have our scare stories about people on food stamps buying lobster tail and steak.
I must also admit to the amount of credentialism that seems to happen in the UK and Commonwealth countries including how certain jobs normally held by teenagers like babysitting require credentialing. Of course this can happen without government intervention as well. There are now websites and apps that promise college educated babysitters and dogwalkers. My pet owning friends have defended the concept of a college-educated dogwalker as being someone more likely to pay attention.
I also agree with your point on the luxury of anticonsumerism.
I have an internet friend who grew up working class and just finished college at 30. She once made a comment about how serving/waiting tables is something that she can always fall back on. This is true but I wonder if the idea of always having something to fall back on can also prevent many people from going forward?
It is interesting that US talk of rampant credentialism is largely about whether a job should require a university degree or not.Report
@saul-degraw
You mentioned this once before and my response was a snarky, “but at least it can pay the bills.”
But now that I’m not being snarky, my question is, what do you mean? How can that idea prevent someone from going forward?
Here’s one (non-snarky) way I imagine that to be true. Someone might more readily return to what they know (waiting tables, customer service, whatever) instead of holding out for a few months for the “better” job, where “better” is defined as one or several of the following: “pays more”; “gets more respect”; “has opportunities for advancement,” where “advancement” means one or both of the following: “getting paid more” or “getting more respect.”Report
By making up excuses about not looking for other work because service jobs are stable if low-paying, always present, etc.Report
This is a real thing. It’s called “getting stuck in a rut,” and I did it for about five years. Then I met a dude — a fellow role-player — who was fairly successful at life and had some contacts. And I told him I could write software, but he didn’t really totally believe me. Then I wrote this little thing for his roleplaying game and he went, “Oh, wait! You can write software.” So he made a couple phone calls and within two weeks I had a better job.
A guy I met at that job liked my work, saw that I was solid. When he got sick of it he left and joined a little startup, which then offered a position to me. Big risk, but I’d lived in a rut and wasn’t gonna do it again. Said yes. Got the job. We flipped the company and I ended up in Boston at a really cool tech concern.
Things were cool there for a few years, until I landed on a shitty project with a crappy boss, one of those projects that drag on and on and never quite goes full death march. And now I was in another rut.
(Of course by then I was a woman and my risk tolerance had changed much.)
Went and found a better job — a much better job.
But on the other hand, that first dude, the roleplaying guy, where would my life be without him? Maybe I’d’ve found some other way. I’m a smart girl and sooner or later I figure shit out.
But then maybe not. Life is tricky, and we all practice fundamental attribution error.
I owe that dude a fuckton.
Anyway, ruts are real. Folks in them can sure use some help.Report
For the record, that’s what the NRA* might have turned the US into if it had survived court challenge and congressional hostility.
*No, not that NRA.Report
I’m confused. The NRA might have turned into a commenting policy?Report
I am too. Did a comment get axed?Report
@mike-schilling @rufus-f
Now I’m confused! What I meant to do was offer a very tangential riff on this part of what Rufus said:
It was a swipe at the early New Deal (again, very tangential).
The comment policy quote was something I was contemplating putting in response to another commenter on this thread who seemed to be violating that particular portion of the policy. (And for the record, I wasn’t referring to either of you or to Saul.) I decided not to cite it because perhaps it wasn’t a clear-cut case, and I’m not sure it’s my prerogative as commenter to call people on what I see as violating the policy.Report
Huh. I thought the comment in question was stating an odious truth. I, too, see “credentialism” as a way to keep the old “I only hire me and mine” racism without racists, sexism without sexists thing going.Report
What JB said. I don’t agree 100% with Jim’s comment (they can certainly refuse to hire you for being crazy or drunk), but he’s making a point about the effects of credentialism, not insulting anyone.
And the War on Drugs applies as well: they can refuse to hire you for having a felony conviction too.Report
I guess I read it differently, but as I said, it wasn’t a clear-cut case, and you both pointed out why.Report
I don’t understand how requiring a wait person – the one who is taking the orders for alcohol and delivering the drinks – to have a Smart Serve certificate is out-of-control credentialism. I live in Ontario, where the Smart Serve is from (unless perhaps you’re referring to a different program with the same name), and not only are the wait person and the establishment legally responsible for the actions of intoxicated patrons but it is illegal to serve to the point of intoxication. The Smart Serve certificate is not about “can you take and deliver peoples’ food and beverage orders” but “do you understand your legal rights and responsibilities as a server of an incapacitating substance” and also “here is how you manage things so everyone has a good time and a safe time.”
For comparison, it may be useful to look up the drunk driving and other alcohol-related damage statistics and compare them to where you live, if your area doesn’t have similar rules.
The Smart Serve program is not “credentialism run amok.” It is one of the reasons we have credential systems in the first place – to ensure that people in positions of responsibility have the necessary knowledge and skills to serve the needs of those around them.Report