Presidential Debates & Lie Detectors
So, League, let me ask you… If you could ask any of the candidates anything in tonight’s debate and know that you’d get an honest answer, what questions would you ask, and to which candidates?
Some quick background on how I came to ponder this question for myself:
I fully intend to watch tonight’s GOP primary debate; this is the first time all year I have had a strong desire to do so. There are two reasons why I am so on board for the debate. The first is that I listened to the last debate while I was multi-tasking in my office after hours, and was surprised to find it so thoroughly entertaining.
The second is because I’m curious to see how the other candidates are going to handle the scandal that had enveloped (but not beaten!) the frontrunner. Common sense would seem to say that this is the perfect time for the pack to subtly bring up both Cain’s ability to compare female stature history of sexual harassment, and cut into his standings in the polls. But this is the 2011 GOP, so who’s to say where common sense lies? The base they are pandering to wants to believe that sexual harassment is simply uppity women with no sense of humor, and it tends to reward politicians that blame the media for everything. So do Perry, Bachman, et al go after Cain for being a slimeball – or the media for falsely reporting that Cain isn’t the greatest human being ever? Also, which strategy will the audience choose to back? (Mitt won’t go there, of course. He wants Cain to be the last man standing against Camp Romney.)
Last night, a reporter asked Cain if he would be willing to take a lie detector test to back up his categorical harassment denials. In classic Cain fashion, he said of course he would – providing anyone could give him a good reason to take one. (Umm… ’cause you’re here answering all these questions?) But this presser question, asked on the eve of a debate night, has led me to wonder:
What would I ask the candidates if I knew that they had to answer honestly, openly and in detail?
As I’ve said before, I can’t see myself voting for any of these people – with the possible of exception of Romney and maybe Hunstman. (I say Huntsman not because I like him, but because I literally know nothing about him except that no one knows who he is.) So I would have all of my questions be questions that I was really, truly curious about.
Here’s what I would ask each candidate:
Romney: You seem to play to whichever audience you’re trying to win. But if you were a voter, and had to choose between the Mitt Romney running in this election, or the Mitt Romney that ran for Governor of Massachusetts in 2003, who would you vote for and why?
Gingrich: Why are you running, really?
Bachmann: Why do all of your chiefs of staff and managers seem to quit, with little to nothing positive to say about you afterwards? Please give both your belief about their motivation, and what they identified as their motivation in private when resigning.
Santorum: What do you really think of Jews, Mormons and Muslims? As a people, how trustworthy and moral are they?
Cain: Why are you running, really?
Paul: Which of the other candidates on stage do you respect most, and least? Why?
Perry: What was the primary motivation for your switching parties?
Huntsman: This is probably the only time I’ll get to see or hear you, so in five minutes tell me what kind of President you would be, and be very specific with where you stand on issues such as taxation and any cultural issues you feel so strongly about as to change public policy.
So those are mine. What are yours?
UPDATE: In the interest of fairness, I should probably add this, even though he clearly won’t be present tonight:
Obama: So honestly, how much of the whole “Change” thing did you really mean at the time?
I’m psyched to see tonight’s debate if only to stare incredulously at the TV screen as CNBC reporters ask completely obtuse questions about the economy.Report
Ah yes. Life’s little pleasures. They do make the rest of it worthwhile.Report
Those are really great questions, in a situation where you expect the opposite number to level with you. In the context of these debates, not as much. (Except the Huntsman one. That one is actually legit.)Report
Romney: (what Tod said)
Cain: you make a big deal about your business experience, yet you are running for a position that both a) is, in principle at least, not about profit & b) includes a grant of the use of force. What are your thoughts about this clear contrast between running a business & the presidency, and in what way (if any) would you admit applying business principles to politics would be counterproductive?
Gingrich: It’s been recently pointed out that the individual mandate part of “obamacare” was originally part of conservative proposals for health care reform. Why, in terms of philosophy, did the perception of that feature shift to where it is now?
Paul: Federalism seems to be a way you’ve been able to play to both social conservatives and libertarians at once. Well, say hypothetically you won the presidency & got to fill 2 slots on the Supreme Court in quick succession — after which they get cases where their rulings result in the overturning both of Roe vs Wade and of all federal laws criminalizing drug possession. What would your response be to the respective parts of your base who would obviously be angered by one ruling while being thrilled by the other?
Perry: you took some serious heat within the party for your remark about the children of undocumented immigrants getting in-state tuition. Could you explain what you think the source of their anger is?
Bachmann: imagine it were conclusively proven in the future that sexual preference was a genetic trait and not a choice. Say a committed, deeply Christian couple had a test early in the pregnancy of the woman revealing her child had “the gay gene”. If the woman confided to you that she considered, even if briefly, abortion because of that, what would you say?
Santorum: same question as Bachmann
Huntsman: you stated, in contrast with much of the base, that you agreed climate change is a man made phenomenon. What do you think the opposition to that stance comes from?
Johnson: say you won the nomination and were to choose a running mate, but your only options were between one that disagreed with you on abortion and one that disagreed with you on marijuana. Which one would you choose, and why?
Karger: …why are you a Republican? Seriously, I don’t get it. Explain.Report
Well done.Report
BHO believed in change a lot, I think. He was not a Reagan who could lead the people [even enough of his own party] to it. If he’s come out as a “centrist,” it’s for what he was unable to accomplish, not what he wanted to.
The Christmas Tree tax? Good grief, is this for real?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/obama-administration-to-delay-new-15-cent-christmas-tree-fee/
Taxing Christmas? Even the Gingrich Who Stole Christmas wouldn’t try that.
Gingrich still has a snowball’s chance, I think. The others, no. I’m interested to see if Gingrich, the only one who’s followed Reagan’s 11th Commandment, can lead the others into resisting being baited into giving all their free campaign airtime over to the Cain mess. Gingrich himself won’t bite, I’m certain.
As for Tod’s core question here, I think the one question none can or should answer honestly is how much they’d actually be willing to compromise with the Democrats in Congress. Now is not the time.
Report
Uh, Tom, did you read the article about the Christmas tree fee? This ain’t really an Obama proposal.
This is cartel behavior, plain and simple, and it’s being rung through the Department of Agriculture. Does Obama ultimately bear responsibility for the regulations passed by the executive branch agencies in his administration? Of course. Is there any real sense in attacking Obama on this? No, it’s just cheap political rhetoric designed to lull people who don’t pay much attention into thinking that Obama himself proposed and pushed the idea.Report
It’s also worth noting that the administration is delaying the implementation of this (bad) idea.Report
James, I did ask if it was real, giving BHO some benefit of the doubt as it’s breathtakingly stupid. I didn’t and don’t read every little stupidity down to the nub; however, it does appear that BHO’s administration did greenlight this. As I wrote recently, if Romney’s smart he’ll run against the administration and its incompetence, for which he’s answerable for, rather than the personally popular BHO himself.
I’m semi-listening to the GOP debate just now, and it seems they’re taking that advice and doing what I wrote about Gingrich, the 11th Commandment, etc., as above, what I really wanted to add to this discussion. The attempt at the Grinch tax was just another drop in the bucket—of course it would never actually be implemented. That outrage alone would guarantee BHO as a one-term president.Report
“This is cartel behavior, plain and simple, and it’s being rung through the Department of Agriculture.”
Not that this excuses this behavior by any means, but it’s the same sort of the thing the Dairy (Got Milk?) and Pork (The Other White Meat) sectors (among others) have been doing for years.Report
Kolohe, Exactly. Which is why in the comments on my guest post I proposed overturning the law that allows agricultural cartels. But in the today’s policy world, yeah, it’s not really something unusual, other than the awkward symbolism of it.Report
You know, quickly skimming this comment, I at first thought you were talking about derivatives.Report
James:
Barry isn’t responsible for this economy so why should he be responsible for anything the executive branch does?Report
I love the smell of ideology in the morning! It smells like….oh, wait, that’s from mess my dog made in the middle of the night.Report
James:
The truth hurts doesn’t it?Report
I’m not an Obama supporter.Report
Can that be our next site-wide poll?Report
I’m not sure that being both Not An Obama Supporter and Not An Anti-Obama Ditto-Head translates for everybodyReport
Crap, I didn’t know it was supposed to only be people who’d be at the debate…Report
No, the rules are loose in Tod’s Fantasy World. Feel free to throw out any others that strike your fancy.Report
Since you throw in Obama…
I have way too many things I’d ask him. Pick one:
– You recently gave up smoking tobacco after a bit of a struggle. Yet, in the past, you had smoked marijuana and that didn’t seem to stick anywhere near as stubbornly. Do the implications of government using as a source of tax revenue sales of an addictive product while a non-addictive one is barred from the open market ever cross your mind? If so, how? If not, why not?
-Say hypothetically an alleged supporter of terrorism against another country was hiding out in the U.S. The intelligence agency of that country found out where that person was, and launched a drone strike which killed both that person and some nearby civilians. Would this be a war crime?
-Surveys of OWS protesters have suggested many of them are disaffected Democrats, angry about Wall Street influence in politics. Many democratic politicians, including yourself, receive a lot of campaign donations from the finance sector. What do you think the perception of quid pro quo from this does with regards to the credibility of representative government & voting for said representatives?
I’ve got more.Report
Nice. Especially #2, which I’d really like to see asked while Obama was under the influence of a truth serum.Report
To make #2 a valid, or even an interesting question, you would have to also posit that the US was somehow either complicit in sheltering the terrorist or otherwise incapabale of either detaining him or extraditing him to the other country in question. Both of which premises are absurd – and the question’s therefore a slow lob over the plate.Report
They’re not absurd. The US has been doing just that with Luis Posada Carriles, a terrorist accused of bombing a Cuban plane in 1976, killing 77 people. He’s known to be living in Miami; US law enforcement even picked him up several years ago for immigration violations, of all things, before releasing him on bail. The US refuses to extradite him either to Cuba or to a Cuban-allied country that would be willing to try him if the US considers Cuba not an option due to human rights issues.
For bonus points, he was trained by the CIA. As an anti-Cuban terrorist. Anyone does anything like that to the US, it’s an easy cause for war. The US does it to another country, it’s business as usual. Damn imperial hypocrites.Report
To Romney: Under what circumstances would you wage a pre-emptive war; are you sincere in saying you would expand Guantanamo; and what are your views on torture? [I want to know precisely how dangerous this guy is, and how much of it is populist posturing.]
To Paul: Do you really think you could get a return to the gold standard, substantial military cuts, or drug legalization through Congress? What would you do if Congress refused to pass any of your major initiatives? [Optional alternative question: Do you believe that historical factors play a significant role in how prosperity is distributed in America; and if not, explain why and how not.]
To Obama: What have you learned since assuming office that has affected your views on such issues as sweeping government concealment of information, the importance of having proof of guilt before we lock people up and/or kill them with drone strikes, and the extent of constitutional liberties; how much of what you said and wrote on the subject prior to your election as president did you believe; and, to your knowledge, is the US still using torture in any form?
That’s just the start of what I’d like to ask him, but it covers some of the most important points. I’m fairly sure Romney will get the nomination, so he’s the only candidate who it’s really important to have questions for. Paul’s the only other interesting one, so he gets a question for that reason.Report
Ooo, very good.Report
O/T, but when I tried to find the debate tonight, I saw the Country Music Awards were on. For a second, I thought that was actually the debate…Report
To all of them. Would it be on your first trip to the Oval Office bathroom or the second that you first wipe your ass with the Constitution?Report
I’m sure you have a reason for wanting to ask that, but that’s the sort of thing that creates the impression in pols’ minds that the people are begging to be lied to.Report
That’s why I’d only ask it if they were on a lie detector, or even better, had to take a truth serum.Report
To all: why shouldn’t the American people trust you with power?Report
Tod, posts like this make me feel extra special good that I’ve made a commitment to always agree with you. It was the right move at the right time. This. is. awesome.Report
Romney: What responsibility do you bear for the perception that you’re completely insincere?
Gingrich: Do you understand why gay men in comitted relationships don’t want to be lectrued to by a serial adulterer?
Santorum: What you said that there used to be no sex in the military, what in God’s name were you talking about?
Cain: Do you respect people who blame their own mistakes on racism?
Paul: How much did you know about the objectionable material in the Ron Paul Report?
Obama: How do you intend to become a more effective president?Report
Very good.Report
“Could you give me a list of things that are not Interstate Commerce?”Report
Growing marijuana in your backyard for personal use.
Oh wait.Report
:”And do you know why I asked that question? Ron, please give the others a chance to answer.”Report
The other one I’d be tempted to ask is “Let’s say a bill from a Republican Congress and a Republican Senate reaches your desk. You agree with the aims of the bill but you are pretty sure that it is not Constitutional. Do you sign it anyway?”Report
For Obama:
You knew from the primaries that the Republicans were going to be complete a-holes obstructionists and from your first summit were shown how “serious” they were about fixing the economy. So when you thought to reason with them,
WTF WHERE YOU THINKING???????Report
WHERE == WERE
No more edit feature?Report