Don Draper Studies I: Shoring Fragments Against Ruins
(This post talks about all of Season 4 of Mad Men. Read at your own risk, but, I mean, it’s on DVD already, so go ahead and help out Netflix and the Postal Service.)
Over at Postmodern Conservative, Jason Joseph offers brief comments on Don Draper’s development in Season 4 of Mad Men. Unfortunately—and I say this respectfully—he gets him dead wrong. When studying a man making himself up, it’s more revealing to examine him through the narrative he insists on creating than through an external framework (however incisive the latter may be):
[A]s the season progresses, cracks began to show in his wall. His private life spills into his professional life as he has affairs with at least three different women from his workplace, one of which he proposes to in the season finale. His daughter, distraught over her parents’ divorce, shows up at his office and makes a scene in an earlier episode. […]
Over time, it seems Draper is unable to keep his vices privatized. To see where his character is headed, just take a look at Sterling now.
The initial observation—that the careful public/private distinctions in Don’s life are cracking, if not crumbling—is accurate. One could go so far as to make a similar comment about all the carefully constructed distinctions and segments of Don’s life. This is the development which led me, part-way through this past season, to refer to Mad Men as “The Long Slow Trainwreck of Don Draper’s Life.” Each episode seemed to show him spiraling more and more into self-destruction and a blend of self-pity and self-loathing.
All of this seems to fit with the narrative Joseph offers—the office affairs, the detrius of the divorce, the Sterling-esque drinking, etc. But let’s consider the events mentioned in the paragraph quoted above in chronological order, and see how the narrative is affected. The first affair, with a secretary who clearly wants to nurse him, is a direct result of the drinking that follows Don’s divorce: she helps a shit-faced Don home, and in the aftermath its unclear to what extent he remembers forcing the issue in a state of drunken lust. In the end, it is precisely Don’s attempt to sustain, after the affair, the public/private distinction that leads to her tearful departure. She wanted to nurse and nurture him; he, with the exception of one evening, wanted a secretary.
The second affair is, in reality, a relationship—this time with Dr. Faye Miller, a female consultant the firm brings in. She is, on a level only matched by Rachel Menken, an intellectual and emotional match with Don. Were he living in an age of partnership marriages, she (or Menken) could/would have been “the one.”
But this, rather than the end of this string, is when Sally runs away to Don’s office and makes the aforementioned scene. Miller is apologetically terrible with children and her attempts to soothe Sally only make matters worse. Don’s secretary, Megan, is able to calm her, however. While this is not the end to Don’s relationship with Miller, the writing is on the wall: she may be an ideal partner, but she is not an ideal mother—and, therefore, she is not Don’s ideal wife.
Megan is the third and final office affair: importantly, she seduces Don at least as much as he seduces her. Her mothering credentials are solidified when Don hires her to act as babysitter on the trip he takes with both children to California, and he proposes shortly thereafter. While both he and Roger will, soon, both be married to their “very young secretar[ies],” Roger leaves his wife for the object of his momentary lust. Don, having been left by his wife, passes over the object of his lust and a possible true partner in favor of finding someone who can act, better than any of the other alternatives, Betty included, as a mother to his children. Roger’s engagement to a very young secretary destroys his family; Don’s engagement is an attempt to rebuild his family.
At the midpoint of Season 4, I made the following prediction:
[C]ould the Don Draper who once called a drunken Roger Sterling in blackface a disgrace see the vindictive drunk he will become in several years time, one imagines that he, too, would be condemned. Tony Soprano never sees that he has slipped completely away from the standards he claims to revere; Don’s chances for some degree of redemption rest, it would appear, on whether he has the same failing.
While it is, of course, early to say anything definitive, it appears that Don does not share that failing with his televised predecessor. Don, having become a vindictive drunk, manages to see himself for who he has become—and acts to repair the damage. He cuts back on his drinking. He tries to be a better friend, partner, father. He turns away from the women of his past—women who were objects of his lust, or women who would nurse and mother him—in favor of either a Miller/Menken type, or a mother for his children.
In short: Roger marries his secretary because he is bored. Don marries his secretary because he is trying to fight back against the forces, both in and out of his control, that have been laying waste to all his well-laid plans. In Megan, he sees a key to restoring his life, at least partially, to the vision of America that has always been his goal.
I think you’re right about Draper’s relationship with Megan as well as about Draper’s difference from Sterling. But as much as I would want to see it, I can’t imagine the writers telling the story of his genuine redemption. They always seem to err on the side of “complexity” and that usually means “laying waste.” Hopefully somewhere along the line he’ll be able to answer the question, “why should you deny yourself something you want?”Report
This was probably intentionally an overly generous interpretation of Draper’s behavior over the season, but I agree that these points are a needed corrective to the prevailing judgement interpretation of the character’s path that dominated as analyses proliferated immediately after the finale.
I just remember shaking my head at those who argued in earnest that Draper “should” have made a commitment to Faye; that he had some type of real obligation to make that choice rather than the one he did.Report
“judgement,” that was to have been (struck through that is, if it still doesn’t come through).Report
I agree with this interpretation. With both Faye and Megan, Don seemed to be unconsciously trying them out as potential wives. While Faye failed the parenting test, she was pretty successful in other ways. I think Don likes women who are accomplished and intelligent–he loves Peggy (as a protégé rather than a potential romantic partner) for that reason. And he is seduced by Megan when Megan suggests to Don that she aspires to be like Peggy. We don’t know if that’s really true yet–we don’t know Megan that well. But Don thinks it’s true. So Megan passes that test, and then passes the parenting test. Next stop, matrimony.
At the same time, we see Don imaginatively chart the course for his new firm through a major existential business crisis.
It may be true that the writers will throw some more misery Don’s way, but it’s also not hard to imagine Don’s life getting boring as he gradually corrects and reverses his various interesting self-created flaws. That wouldn’t be a tragedy for the show–there are so many other characters it can focus on–Betty, Pete, Lane, Peggy, etc.Report
I think this responds to Tony S. above as well as to you, Robert:
I doubt that Don’s life will be allowed to get that boring. He is, in a sense, trying to build a house on a foundation of sand. There’s a sense in which the Don Draper we first met in Season 1 was a very naive man: Betty couldn’t cheat, have an affair, get angry with his philandering, or leave — because Divorces Don’t Happen. His past wouldn’t catch up because it’s something you can abandon. Look at how crushed he was when Hilton ditched Sterling Cooper in Season 2: how could this happen? He was on an Upward Trajectory.
Don has a particular vision of an ideal American life — ultimately, it’s very “1950s” (or, more importantly, the opposite of his own, miserable childhood). The house may fall down, but I suspect he’ll be caught inside trying to prop it up.
Plus, there’s Betty. Even if the writers do, SHE won’t let his life get boring. Getting to watch Pete and Peggy develop is also always great, but while Lane entertains me, he doesn’t quite complement this exploration of America (the American Dream?) in the same way that Don, Peggy, and Pete do.Report
I’m sure you’re absolutely right. Something still nags me about it though. I think it’s possible to underestimate Don’s actual talent and to overestimate what you call his naivete. If his response to Betty is that “Divorces Don’t Happen,” this is not because philandering goes unpunished in his ideal picture of the 1950s, but because he simply cannot convince himself to sacrifice his talent. His genius for advertising and persuasion is partially born of his willingness to submit to the whim of the moment (and the woman) while remaining aloof and observant. The show needs to resolve somewhere what Douthat called the “yearning for domesticity” that is constantly confronted by both the “gleaming workplace” (which requires that he remain aloof to his wife) and the actually miserable “domestic sphere.” He has to find a way to, as The Killers (a band that is, like Mad Men, all about American nostalgia) put it, make sure that “merry still goes ’round.” If anyone can do it, Don can. He already came up with the carousel pitch.
I agree, though, that there is really no show without at least Don, Betty, Peggy, and Pete.Report