19 thoughts on “…and again and again and again…

  1. E.D. Jane???

    I’d be offended. I.N. Sane would have been TONS better, if obvious.

    Hell, he could have gone for oblique and called you a milquetoast who wouldn’t hurt a fly and gone for E.D. Jain.

    N.O. Brain would have been better!

    E.D. Jane? Man. You got ripped off.Report

      1. It is with slowly dawning horror that I understand the joke that he was making.

        The link above yours was to a Jackie Hunter. I was wondering what she must have written and what her name really must be. Jackie Hunt? Nah, he might have gone in a different direction. Anyway, I get to the page and it’s a Jack Hunter.

        His insult was calling a guy by a girl’s name.

        Dude. He just called that guy a girl.

        Dude. It is a withering insult, in his brain, to call a guy a girl.

        Dude.

        And I felt a wash of pity that quickly became a backwash of contempt. Insults like that make me feel sorry for the guy.

        Lord, I hate feeling pity for people.Report

        1. Jane is also a girl’s name, so I guess I, too, am being called a girl. Then again, thanks to the anonymity of the internet and all, and the rather vague first name “E” I actually could be a girl. And beyond that, surname’s are generally sexless anyways.

          Pity, from where I sit, has not yet materialized.Report

  2. ED Jane and the Multiple Hemorrhoids. Maybe we should start a really bad glam rock cover band with that name?Report

    1. Or we could go in a Gwar direction and actually dress up like hemorrhoids. Then at the end of the show, we could bring actors playing our political “enemies” up on stage, call them “girl names” (even the girls, to really rub it in their faces that they’re girls), behead them, and spray their blood on the assembled crowd.Report

  3. This is rich. The prophesy of your earlier post is astounding. Actually, it wound up not being outlandish enough – the post that got you so honored was one in which not a single word was your own (including the title) except for the entirely factual statement that “Jack Hunter reviews…”

    Beyond amusing.Report

  4. Just browsing that list… is the person who wrote this in the 3rd grade? Because it certainly reads that way.Report

Comments are closed.