Wednesday Writs: DNA and Privacy Rights Edition
It’s important to safeguard DNA & privacy rights-you want them there for you, if you ever find yourself in the crosshairs of the system
It’s important to safeguard DNA & privacy rights-you want them there for you, if you ever find yourself in the crosshairs of the system
No, promoting vaccinations are not in “violation of the Nuremberg codes”. And I thought the willy-nilly invocation of HIPAA was bad.
It looked like a cartel hit, some people said. Eight people executed in the dead of night, most in their beds, and nobody heard a thing.
Our case of the week, M&A Associates v. VCX, meant the American classic Debbie Does Dallas was being thrusted forever into the public domain.
SCOTUS, the 4th Amendment, and a case of “he said, she said” sets precedent for consent to search in our Case of the Week, Georgia v. Randolph
Grandma’s house was my happy place as a child, as is the case for many people; grandparent magic is a known phenomenon.
Em’s a little busy, but meanwhile in Colorado it is about to be legal to turn your earthly remains into compost
The Supreme Court definitively decided that there will be no general taxpayer standing to sue over federal statutes in Frothingham v. Mellon
The 21st Amendment is well known for ending the long national nightmare that was prohibition when it was ratified in 1933. But…
Let me tell you about being owned on Facebook by my mom, and I hope when I’m done I have adequately expressed my appreciation for her
Krispy Kreme donuts are HIPAA covered entity & their “free donut with proof of vaccination” promotion is a HIPPA violation…
Chief Justice Roberts finds the majority’s decision to be an unwise expansion on the power and purview of federal courts
The judge called Richard “Bigo” Barnett “brazen, entitled, and dangerous.” What would I tell Mr. Richard Barnett if he were my client?
You never know when a new scam might pop up, one she has not heard of, and she might not catch on as quickly as she might think.
Wednesday Writs, Ordinary Times weekly legal feature by Em Carpenter, is back with links to legal stories to read, share, and discuss.
A lawsuit by the NAACP alleges Trump conspired with Rudy Giuliani, the Proud Boys, and the Oath Keepers to violate the Ku Klux Klan Act
In an Order issued yesterday in Dunn v Smith, the Court held condemned man, Willie Smith, Jr., would be permitted the presence of his pastor
Does SCOTUS’ South Bay United Pentecostal Church v Gavin Newsom order contradicts important case law in Employment Division v Smith?
Trump’s Impeachment Response to the House Articles of Impeachment begins in the traditional vein of Trump legal filings, with a typo
Reviewing Imbler v Pachtman to answer “If Trump is vindicated, can he start a class action suit for malicious prosecution against Pelosi, et. al.?”