Amazon’s ‘Catastrophe’ Is A Very Good Television Show
It seems odd to talk about Amazon’s Catastrophe as a television show, doesn’t it? It originally aired in Britain, which is a country in England, and its rights were purchased by Amazon as a means of giving the company’s Prime subscribers more content. But, I suppose I watched it on a television, so maybe that matters?
Or maybe it doesn’t.
In any case, let’s cut to the chase: Catastrophe is truly wonderful television, it is only six episodes long, and unless you’ve got something better to do, you should absolutely watch it. For more details, keep reading.
Catastrophe stars was created and written by Sharon Horgan and Rob Delaney, two performers who exist on the relative periphery of American consciousness. Horgan has starred in primarily British comedies (she is Irish) without having ventured across into American media and Delaney has starred primarily on Twitter (he is a standup by trade, but used a ferocious Twitter account to really establish his career). Horgan plays Sharon, a single 41-year-old teacher and Delaney plays Rob, a single American in London. They hook up after being crammed together in a packed pub*. They sex relentlessly for a week and then Delaney returns home. Four weeks later, Sharon calls, announcing her pregnancy, and Rob returns. We go from there.
Their courtship is nonexistent. Rob and Sharon are simply two people making things work. We’re not treated to a montage of them falling in love but rather, we see two people in extraordinary circumstances – the glow of a honeymoon period perhaps – adjusting to it mightily. We see two adults acting like adults: thinking things through, communicating with one another, occasionally acting like complete idiots, repairing the damage of those idiotic moments. We’re not forced to endure the sort of sitcomish hijinks that an American telling of this tale might force upon us.
Part of this might be the result of British television – Horgan and Delaney had six episodes, or roughly 180 minutes, to tell the story that they wanted to tell. With time at a premium, the impossibly stupid nonsense of so much American television gets put on the shelf and what we see instead is what genuinely seems to be a real couple, foibles and all. If anything, it is almost possible to come away from the show’s first series** feeling simultaneously rushed and wanting. We move breathlessly through what other shows might dawdle over or, knowing American television, never address at all. Sharon faces real pregnancy fear, with time briefly spent on abortion, a discovered pre-cancer, and her child’s potential for Down Syndrome. It is almost impossible to imagine an American sitcom mining the same ideas for laughs.
Nor is it possible to imagine an American show giving us plenty of pregnancy sex – only occasionally played for laughs, but not in the, “Eww, can you believe people have sex when they’re pregnant?” variety – as well as smoking and drinking (which would probably get an American show booted off the air if it even so much as considered the possibility).
The reality of all of this falls entirely upon the very real chemistry that exists between Horgan and Delaney, the actors, and what they bring to Sharon and Rob, the characters. It isn’t difficult believing that these characters feel deeply for one another, whether its Sharon defiantly telling a friend that she’s happier having Rob in her life than not or Rob refusing to go to a strip club at lunchtime because his interest is only with Sharon. It doesn’t feel hacky in other words; it feels natural.
One warning for those interested – the show ends very abruptly on a huge cliffhanger. If that’s not your bag, avoid at all costs, as the credits started rolling with both my wife and I muttering concerned, “Goddammits” at the screen while rolling over to go to bed.
Here’s a link to the show.
—
*British for bar
**British for season
Is a television show a television show if you don’t watch it on a television set?Report
R. watches Netflix and Prime almost exclusively on her iPad, so I call them her iPad shows. Instead of asking if she has any television tonight, I’ll say, “You got any iPad tonight?” She doesn’t think it’s as funny as I think it is, though.
(Other people don’t think it’s as funny as I think it is can explain a great deal about all of my adult relationships.)Report
Hey, this is totally off-topic, but there was a commenter with the handle “R” around here a few days ago.
That wasn’t YOUR “R”, was it?Report
Wow, turns out if you search for a comment with just “R,” there are a lot of comments with r’s in them.
I didn’t see the comment(s), but she didn’t say anything to me, so I doubt it. Then again, you can’t trust Apple people.Report
I figured it probably wasn’t.
It was here:
https://ordinary-times.com/blog/2015/06/23/in-which-i-become-a-raging-social-conservative/#comment-1038096Report
I just refer to them all as “my stories”.
“SHHHHH! My stories are on!”Report
@glyph
Isn’t that what grandmas say?Report
that’s the jokeReport
This is surprisingly profound.Report
It does confuse me that they are included in the Emmys.Report
*sniff* I don’t have a television set, and I refuse to call something a Computer Serial simply because it is serialized on my personal computer.Report
I will watch this show, but since it sounds like it’s basically my life at 21…Report
My best friend from college had a horrendously bad divorce about 4 years ago and stayed away from women afterwords. Until about around December that is, when a friend decided that he needed a girlfriend and blind dated him. Cut to now, with a baby due in October. He is 45 and she is 44. Much hilarity.Report
I was roughly that age when I had my two kids, though my wife was younger. I had the good sense to rob a cradle, so she was still in her thirties. In any case, while there are any number of reasons why I would have been completely unprepared to have kids when I was younger, it would have been a heck of a lot easier chasing toddlers around.Report
Oh man.Report
Well, they both seem happy which is nice. My son was born when I was 24 and 20 years later is doing quite well in college. With the plus that I get another 20 years to pack it in for my retirement without worrying about tuition and such. So I got that going for me, which is nice…Report
My son’s mom and I had a brief fling when I was 21 and she was 20. She got pregnant, we tried to make it work, failed miserably after a couple years, and now I can’t stand to be in the same room with her. My son is wonderful, and sitting next to me as always, but man that was rough for a while, trying to make it work between two people who had no business trying to be a couple.Report
I did the same at 23 (she was 21)Report
Girlfriend and I had our first kid who I was 20 and she was 19, then split up for sixish years, got back together when I was 27, immediately had another kid, bought a house, the figured maybe it was time to get married. As one does.Report
Wow, @sam you really put the horse in front of the cart!Report
I’m glad that the second time around you figured it out. My friends are under orders to shoot me should I ever attempt such a thing with baby mama.Report
Britain, which is a country in England
I don’t know if this is an inside joke of some sort, but this is reversed.Report
It’s an inside out joke.Report
We all have our faults. One of mine is being very easily entertained.Report
Sometimes, life mimics art.Report
There are way too many streaming services to subscribe to.
That is all.Report
Amazon’s deserves special attention, what with it being so much more than a simple streaming service. $100 annually for the media/shipping/books/music? It’s unbeatable.Report
I tell everyone this, but if you are in no rush for whatever physical item you are ordering via Prime to arrive, choose “no-rush” shipping at checkout. Shipping’ll take an extra couple days, but you get a buck or two credit you can use towards paid digital downloads. If you order as frequently as I do, that’s a free album every couple weeks.
Suck it, Columbia House!Report
Al…bum…?Report
You know – a collection; a compilation; a compendium; an anthology. A group of related musical works, which are gathered together in an intentionally-ordered series. A CD, an LP, a cassette, or a downloaded electronic file folder containing such items – even if virtual – may be thought of as an “album”.
Speaking of, I need to rename my P.I.L. MP3’s as “Digital File”.Report
What you’re saying is true, and yet… I want my two day delivery whether I need it or not and I got Prime for the two day delivery and I can’t be rational about this because two day delivery.Report
A simple yes or no would suffice but does Catastrophe give a good reason why Sharon doesn’t get an abortion or does it fall into the long list of entertainment where an abortion inexplicably doesn’t happen.Report
Based on the first two episodes, which I watched last evening upon this recommendation, she considers and discusses it, and decides against it. The reasoning is not perfectly clear, but that seems realistic enough. She seems to realize she wants to have a baby, and is at an age where this can be problematic, so decides to keep this one even if the surrounding circumstances are not ideal.Report
1. I think we’ve fought about this before, haven’t we?
2. The first answer is practical – because the show revolves around a pregnancy. If there’s no pregnancy, there’s no show, or at least, there’s a different one that isn’t called Catastrophe. And the show’s scenes featuring the agonizing reality of pregnancy – like the precancer, like the fear of Down Syndrome, etc – also don’t happen. There is, in fact, no reason for Rob to come back to Britain/England. He and Sharon agreed their time together was great and that they’ll always have fond memories for one another…before the pregnancy.
3. The second answer might be a broader discussion of how our media encourages us to believe that we always must be shown an explanation for everything. I suppose we could assume that, for Sharon’s character, abortion wasn’t an option, but heaven forbid we do that without it being explicitly told to us (although it was obviously explicitly shown to us)?
4. If I’m correct in remembering that you and I have fought about this before, the real answer here is a deeper and uglier assumption that choosing abortion is some sort of mathematical equation and not something far more complicated. We don’t have to do this again of course, but if the facts on display aren’t enough for you – Sharon chooses not to have an abortion, despite considering it on two separate occasions – then the issue is you, not her.Report
@leeesq
Are you similarly curious about how good a reason Sharon (or Rob) have for choosing to engage in extramarital sex? Or do you accept THAT as something that doesn’t need justifying but cannot accept the character not having an abortion without a “good” reason offered?Report