Observed: The counter people at the local post office dressed as a nun and a priest the day before Halloween.
Part of me feels like that’s wrong but part of me also feels like any sort of fuss would ultimately be much ado bout nothing.
Thoughts?
Kazzy
One man. Two boys. Twelve kids.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Our current situation is the gov is creating massive market distortions. My suggestion is for the go…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Right?.. that's the beauty of it. Protect actual losers (there will be some) allay fears of many who… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024But why? As BB says above, there's a good chance that most of the change will be a net increase. So… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024We managed to get a constitutional amendment to prevent alcohol in the face of the bulk of the natio…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024I was going to make a joke about how white men struggle hardest with disappointment due to getting t… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Sure, I agree, but they vote in state level elections too. It isn't realistic to think you're ever g… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024There is no reason why home/zoning regs needs to be set at a local level rather than a state level.… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024That's pretty tough when the tool they use is called democracy. And they're among the most motivated… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024This is rewarding something that needs to be punished. Do this and there will be huge games played o…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Ann Selzer has an op-ed in which she announces her retirement from polling. It's kinda defensive in…
November 17, 2024
November 16, 2024
November 15, 2024
November 14, 2024
on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on Got a Match?
on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty on Subject to Change: The Trump Cabinet So Far on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on Saturday Morning Gaming: Castlevania (Remembered)
on Saturday Morning Gaming: Castlevania (Remembered) on Saturday Morning Gaming: Castlevania (Remembered) on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty
on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom)
“Separation of Church and State,” or more formally the Establishment Clause and the conceptual limitation of governmental power which that clause communicates, does not require that the government feign ignorance of the existence of religion or religious institutions, nor does it compel the government to prohibit its employees from engaging in religious expression or activities because those employees retain their rights of free speech and free exercise notwithstanding Federal employment.
In my opinion, the Establishment Clause requires that the Federal government not endorse one religious view over others. A postal employee dressed in religious garb on a day when the dress code is relaxed to allow Halloween costumes would not be interpreted by a reasonable non-Catholic person interacting with that governmental employee as an endorsement of Catholicism by the government.
TL/DR: Come on. It’s Halloween.Report
I’m going to issue a concurrence
Now if they were using Halloween as a pre-text to evangelize that might be a different story.Report
those employees retain their rights of free speech
Do they retain that right *while* they are working though? A school principal can’t read a sermon to the school merely claiming that he is expressing his personal religious beliefs as a private citizen. There are limits on his behavior in the course of performing his job.
That said, I also concur with your ruling. A costume worn in jest is certainly not endorsement of a religion. If anything, I think Catholics have more of a right to object.Report
Hey… I was Catholic… once.Report
On your deathbed, you will be again.Report
The rules of government employees and discrimination or termination based on speech are tricky and convoluted. Your example is easy though because he is using his position to impose his religion on others.Report
In case it wasn’t clear, I’m 99% of the mindset that this is totally fine. It was just curious to me (which was the initial title of this post… but I wanted to go with something slightly more specific to the subject). It being the day before Halloween also stood out.Report
I suppose someone could argue that dressing as a nun for Halloween, not just a sister of perpetual indulgence, as a government worker would be similar to dressing in black face. I’m not going to make that argument but I could see how someone could get their panties twisted.Report
Cardinal Zin Wine was indeed banned in Ohio.Report
I would say that from a managerial prospective it might be a bad choice because it could cause offense.Report
For dressing as a priest on a pagan holiday?Report
My guess is that anyone dressed as a priest or a nun is not engaged in anything close to an act of prosetylization. If anything, it leans to sacrilege.Report
Let’s say instead “Poking good-natured fun.”Report
Given the demos of the local area, I’d venture to guess the two folks were Catholic.Report
I’m with Burt on this one. Both his opinion as to why it’s not wrong/unconstitutional and his claim that they’re poking good-natured fun. Even if they are catholic, a little humor at the expense of the clerisy isn’t unheard of. In fact, if one feels like reading way more into this than is warranted, we could say that holidays like Hallowe’en, or Mardi Gras, exist specifically to poke fun at power structures, a way to let off steam and to “give the subjugated their due.”Report
So long as they’re not dressed as a priest and an altar boy.Report
@mike-schilling
I sort of know I wasn’t supposed to laugh, but I did. I’m a terrible personReport
“Leans towards sacrilege” is just to differentiate from leans toward proselytizing.Report
Is Halloween like Christmas and Cinco de Mayo now in that it lasts for a danged week?Report
Halloween is Christmas. (Oct 31 = Dec 25. Or 185 in base -10.)Report
Awesome. And I had never before even considered the notion of negative bases, but I see how that works.
So when are you going to write up that post about raising numbers to complex powers? Still can’t wrap my head around that but I’m sure it will be a Homer doh moment once you explain it.Report
My current excuse for infrequent posting is that I just started a new job and it leaves me no free time. That should be good until Thanksgiving or so, and I’ll need either to invent a new one or attack the backlog of posting ideas, whichever is easier.Report
By “new job,” he means baseball season’s over, so he has to start researching his team for next year’s rotisserie league.Report
next year’s rotisserie league.
Roasted Big Papi; yummmmmy.Report
Stop making me hungry.Report
I think you can probably argue that choosing such unoriginal costumes is unconstitutional.
And even if it’s not technically against the framework document, I think you can make a case that the Founding Fathers would have surely come up with something more clever and topical.Report