the ballad of RSM
Worried that conservatives will really make a roaring comeback? Read Robert Stacy McCain, and be assuaged.
Joe, neither Dreher nor Frum is a professional talk-radio host, and I’m guessing neither one of them would last six months in the medium if they tried it.
Something tells me Rod wouldn’t actually be too enamored of giving the Drive-Time Weather Forecast brought to you by Pep Boys everyday. Could be wrong.
People who’ve never done talk radio, or who’ve never been in a studio and seen how it’s done, have no idea how extraordinarily difficult it is to fill so much as a single hour, much less three hours a day five days a week. Now, consider how difficult it is to do it well, so as to attract a commercially viable nationwide audience. For Dreher (and his source) to disdain Levin is for them to sneer at someone who has succeeded exceptionally in a venue they’ve never even tried.
I’d say that for McCain to disdain Dreher is for him to sneer at someone who has succeeded at something he’s never tried, namely writing with integrity, moral seriousness and clarity of vision.
This is the arrogance of the intellectual elite, to imagine that their particular specialty — the expression of abstract ideals via the written word — is the only ability that matters, qualifying them as experts on anything and everything they choose to write about.
But, of course, this is also the specialty of Robert Stacy McCain, and as Sonny Bunch was once so kind as to scold me, he has made a life and a career of it. And this, once again, is the central contradiction of the movement conservative pundit, men who regularly mock nerdy philosophizers when they are, in fact, nerdy philosophizers. Robert Stacey McCain isn’t, actually, some character from a Bruce Springsteen video. He’s a writer and thinker, a guy who pals around at Washington magazine parties and think tank frou-fras. He is most assuredly not one of the Ordinary Americans he is here glamorizing. This was the glaring idiocy of the Sarah Palin boosters within the conservative intelligentsia from last year, people decrying liberal elitists when in every material way, they themselves resembled those liberal elitists far more than they resembled what they believed Palin represented. It takes a special lack of self-knowledge to write an insidery, navel-gazing post about how much you hate navel-gazing insiders, but then, it takes a special lack of self-knowledge to regularly decry intellectualism underneath a quote from Arthur Koestler.
I don’t give a damn what your SAT score was — and I’ve been knocking the tops off standardized tests of verbal reasoning since I was in elementary school
I’m not kidding, the guy actually wrote this in a blog post. Click the link and be amazed.
A disdain of blunt expression is natural among those who make their living in the wussified environment of contemporary elite journalism. To be a journalist in Washington is to live one’s life surrounded by men who have never driven 110 mph, never spent a night in jail, and never won a fightfight in their lives.
But not Robert Stacy McCain! No! In between writing for The American Spectator and attending tasteful luncheons with people from the Brookings Institute, he leads a life that is totally street. I’m talking straight hood, son.
The upper echelons of American journalism have become the exclusive monopoly of former teacher’s pets, who as children were never sent to the principal’s office, who as teenagers were never suspended for showing up drunk for chemistry class, who as college students never woke up at 6:30 a.m. on the porch of the ATO house, who never played in a rock band or sold a pound of weed or dove from a 50-foot cliff into an abandoned rock quarry.
But not McCain! No! McCain chews diamonds and shoots pure lightening out of his urethra! McCain plays hockey against gorillas and once arm wrestled the Pope. I once saw McCain chug a keg of Milwaukee’s Best and then fill out a 1040 form. (Not even the EZ version!) McCain slings more dope in a morning than B.I.G. did his whole goddamn life, and somehow, for McCain, that’s, like, the most conservative shit ever. McCain’s American flag has a smaller American flag that flies from it, and he has a harem of Klingon women to give him sexual favors. McCain snorts Clorox and when he gets pulled over, he karate slaps the cop and gives him the ticket.
It is therefore not surprising that the effete elite of American journalism sneers at Mark Levin. What Levin possesses — and what the typical 21st-century journalist never has possessed nor ever will — is the double-dog-dare-ya boyish audacity that the Ordinary American naturally admires.
Many of the Ordinary Americans I see also naturally admire ranch dipping sauce for pizza, paying voluntary taxes called the lottery, and Ryan Seacrest. There are many qualities that some Ordinary Americans have that I have little but disdain for. That’s the simple truth about the way I often feel, and there’s no need to pretty it up or pretend. But then, there are many Ordinary Americans that have lots of qualities I admire. I’m just not willing to engage in self-promotion in the guise of giving it up for “the common man,” or to ascribe to most people virtues they simply don’t possess, because I think I’m making some sort of salient political point. Actual respect for great masses of people, after all, entails recognizing that there’s few insults greater than patronizing to them with “jes folks” pablum, or over-the-top praise from people who are not like them and never will be. Among the attitudes I do see on a fairly wide-spread basis, by the way, one bit of Ordinary American-ness, is a rabid antipathy towards people who pretend to be something their not. Ordinary American or faggy liberal elitist, nobody likes a phony.
Mark Levin is such a success, a man who fights and wins. He has achieved his success independently, by his own merit and relentless labor, and I am not fit to tell him what he should or should not say on his own radio show.
That depends. Does Mark Levin succeed by being paid to voice his dumbass opinions? Indeedidly do. Is he succeeding politically? No. By the way, Rod Dreher and Conor Friedersdorf have achieved success independently, by their own merit and relentless labor, but McCain is still entitled to strike feebily in their direction. This is America, after all.
One more thing: Mark Levin is a big man. His nasal tenor voice might lead the uninformed listener to picture him as a diminuitive nebbish. He is not. He’s the size of a Big 10 linebacker and I’d bet dollars to donuts Levin could take out Rod Dreher with a single punch.
Get a room, dude, I’m blushing here.
Oh, amen, Brother Freddie, amen.Report
Breaking news: blogger Freddie de Boer doesn’t like Rob McCain. Other stories: Steve Sailer isn’t big on Malcolm Gladwell, Andrew Sullivan dislikes Hillary Clinton & Pope “Not Satan’s biggest fan”.Report
Freddie,
Wonderful, loved it, it’s why I come here!
This is not the first perfervid piece on Mr. McCain I’ve read recently. Not that I shoot about the internet all that much (just a few favorite sites you know) but over at Taki Mr. Spencer the editor (I believe), a short while ago was bitching similarly about McCain and within a week or so McCain’s contributing to Taki! Whas at?
I mean the dude’s magic and while I agree with you that he does come across a bit much at times-all you liberal fellas are a bunch of commies-he can cobble together a sentence or two, and, hey, I’m sure there’s a few liberal commentators who similarly prance about uttering grandiose statements of self-aggrandizement.
BTW any of you commie-libs goin’ to write a tribute to the VETS today?Report
Right on bro.
What’s with this “he’s really actually very smart” defense? Or the “he’s got a really big audience and you couldn’t run a talk radio show” defense. Yes, I would be a failure at talk radio, it’s true.
But I thought the issue was the unethical nature of his statement. Last time I checked lots of smart people (let’s say I’ll give the benefit of the doubt to Levin on that one) were really unethical.Report
Oh man, that was dead on.
Remember last fall? I don’t like to, either, but I was cleaning out old e-mail, including some forwarded stuff from my friends who clamor for the raw meat. Some of these e-mails were so popular I got them a half-dozen times, and it was exactly the sort of clueless stuff that brings on the RSM/Levin-style chest-pounding rants against the “liberal elite.”
Utterly typical was the one with two attached images: 1. Obama looking dweeby, wearing a bike helmet, pedaling away at a mountain bike on some city street, and 2. Sarah Palin straddling a hog, looking like the cover of a biker mag.
Tagline: “ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW.”
Well, no, sorry, that wasn’t “all I needed to know,” and it wasn’t all that a good bit of the electorate needed to know, either. But that e-mail was ridiculously popular among conservatives of the sneering variety.
And that’s the problem. Yeah, a good number of liberal ideologues are walking, talking cliches, and are insufferable drones. But to make the election “bicycles vs Harleys” was a poor way to frame the debate, even if it played with my friends who ride. And Levin (and McCain) are all about trying to zero in on that kind of pissed-off voter, those men and women who see wimps in the woodwork threatening our toughness. So to hit that “this is all you need to know” target, they bombard listeners (and readers) with these weird anecdotes and stereotypes, some of which completely miss the mark, and others which sound flat-out ridiculous to anyone who doesn’t match up with a patronizing stereotype of “real America.”
(Postscript: a funny thing about the populist conservatives is that many have interests which I consider kind of un-manly. I have several friends who are about as hardcore as it gets about loving that kind of rhetoric, and also play World of Warcraft for 20+ hours a week.)Report
My old roommate in grad school was the first person I met who “naturally admire[d] ranch dipping sauce for pizza…” He landed himself a tenure-track position at Harvard. Ordinary American? Or effete cocktail party attendee?Report
Mark – ranch is Everyman’s pizza dipping sauce. By “Every” I mean elitist, joe sixpack, whoever. Doesn’t matter. Ranch is damn good with pizza.Report
Spot on. Of course, William Buckley used to wrestle bears at Yale.Report
RSM an’ Mark Levin are tryin’ to be ganstah whiggahs but they aint got no thug.
None a’tall.Report
E.D. – 7: Even Buffalo and Syracuse sometimes turn their noses up at ranch: a friend of mine used to say that you could tell a “classy” chicken wings joint by whether they gave you blue cheese dressing (classy) or ranch (not.)Report
It was all a dream, I used to read Commentary Magazine
Ronald Reagan, Ollie North up in the limousine…Report
“Even Buffalo and Syracuse sometimes turn their noses up at ranch: a friend of mine used to say that you could tell a “classy” chicken wings joint by whether they gave you blue cheese dressing (classy) or ranch (not.)”
This is not a “sometimes” thing. As folks from WNY and CNY known quite well, if you have any respect for the chicken wing, you will use Blue Cheese and only Blue Cheese. It’s not an issue of class, though – putting ranch on a “Buffalo-style” (Buffaloes don’t have wings!) chicken wing is equivalent to putting Swiss Cheese on a Philly Cheesesteak. It’s just downright unacceptable.Report
This was hilarious. Bravo and well done.
However, do not diss ranch dipping sauce and pizza!
This is one of those guilty pleasures one must indulge in once in awhile, common man or not.Report
“To be a journalist in Washington is to live one’s life surrounded by men who have never driven 110 mph, never spent a night in jail, and never won a fightfight in their lives.”
And who wants to hang out with non-violent non-criminals?Report
I did a lot of that crazy shit, but I was smart enough to not get busted. I sold weed, but it was a way to make money and have free weed, not a way to prove my manliness. I woke up in any number of places not knowing where I was. Getting drunk is surprisingly easy, it certainly doesn’t make one manly. In my experience guys who feel the need to brag about how tough and manly they are feel inadequate.Report
I’d say that for McCain to disdain Dreher is for him to sneer at someone who has succeeded at something he’s never tried, namely writing with integrity, moral seriousness and clarity of vision
. To use a Colbertism, you just nailed him.
McCain: The upper echelons of American journalism have become the exclusive monopoly of former teacher’s pets, who as children were never sent to the principal’s office, who as teenagers were never suspended for showing up drunk for chemistry class, who as college students never woke up at 6:30 a.m. on the porch of the ATO house, who never played in a rock band or sold a pound of weed or dove from a 50-foot cliff into an abandoned rock quarry.
Setting aside your point that McCain probably fits that description – isn’t that something any moral/cultural conservative should value? Responsibility, good behaviour, hard work, as opposed to rebellion for rebellion’s own sake? He described me there, and I’m more proud of it than not. What’s so laudable or valuable about hangovers? But he’s just looking for an attack – if our current news and commentator corps HAD sold pot, he’d be after them for that.Report
I was a senior investigative reporter on the national desk of The Washington Times for 23 years — the first reporter hired by the newspaper pre-publication in February 1982 — and knew Robert Stacy McCain as an editor on our desk. He was a repulsive racist, sputtered vile racist, anti-semitic, and other bigoted diatribes constantly during my tenure, which ended in September 2005. It was a source of continual embarrassment to me that the senior editors did not fire him for his workplace bigotry and incompetence. I have a chapter about this experience in my forthcoming book, “Journalism Is War,” to be published shortly by Anomalos.
George Archibald
Post Office Box 212
Middleburg, Viurginia 20118-0212Report