What’s Your “Go-To” Lesson in Politics?
Here’s a question I was asked at a dinner party recently that made me wonder how people here might answer. The question:
What is the single lesson you have learned in your life that most informs the way you view political races today?
Maybe that lesson can be part of a book you read, be it Animal Farm or Atlas Shrugged, Walden or The Road to Serfdom. Maybe it was an event, either public or private. Maybe it was something your mom used to say to you when you were growing up.
For me, I think I would answer differently depending upon what day of the week you asked, but on any given day this would always make the top three, if not hit the number one spot: The Kraft Cheese and Macaroni ad campaign.
I learned about this is an Advertising 101-type class my sophmore year of college, and even though I gave it little thought then I have long found the lesson profound if somewhat unsettling in retrospect. The story as I remember goes like this: Kraft had essentially invented instant mac & cheese back in the 1930s, and for decades had what might as well have been a monopoly of the market segment they themselves created. In the 1970s, however, they began losing huge chunks of market share to competitors. This erosion was not due to price – in fact, a lot of the upstarts were charging more. Instead, research showed that other mac & cheeses were gaining in popularity because people thought they tasted like they had cheese in them. (If you grew up with Kraft as I did, you know that while it is a fine comfort food it tastes nothing like cheese.) This put Kraft executives in a bit of a quandary. On the one hand, they were still top dog and had a best-selling product that a generation had grown up with, so they weren’t thrilled with the idea of increasing their costs just to make their product taste like real food. On the other hand, sales, profits and market share were declining on an annual basis. So what to do?
What they did was launch an ad campaign that older Leaguers like myself will still remember: They ran ads for years that had actor housewives and kids say Kraft should rename the household staple Kraft Cheese and Macaroni, because it tasted so cheesy! And the strategy worked. By the early 1980s Kraft had once again become the near monopoly of non-homemade mac & cheese. But here’s the thing: They never changed the recipe. They just told everyone that it was cheesier, and all the people who had abandoned it for not being cheesy enough came back. And what’s more, they stayed – for decades.
In the next year and a quarter, I will think about this lesson every time I see a campaign ad, or hear a talking point given in response to an difficult question during a debate, or read a human interest piece on the man or woman who just might be my next President, Senator or Whatever. Because what I have come to realize is that all party politics that are played with the public are just variations on the Cheese and Macaroni campaign. In the months ahead, publicists for Rick Perry, Michelle Bachman, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama and everyone else running will spend billions of dollars trying to get me to believe that the candidate’s families – their marriages and their relationships with their children – are exactly like mine. This is ridiculous, of course. I would never choose a career path that would subject my family to the Hell those fame worshipers are about to put their loved ones through. Hell, these people are actively choosing to essentially widow and orphan their loved ones for somewhere between the next two and ten years, depending on how successful they are.
And those messages on maters of substance won’t fare any better when compared to reality. Seriously, is there anyone that doesn’t bleep DNC Blue that looks at what BO has done in his first term and still buys the Change message? Similarly, is there anyone that isn’t a knee-jerk ditto head that actually believes that the GOP is about reduced government influence and spending in any capacity other than as a campaigning shtick? If you just read either of those last two sentences and felt you dander go up, followed by “Hey, that’s not what my side does!” you have fallen for the Cheese & Macaroni hook, line, and sinker.
Anyway, that’s my go-to lesson. What’s yours? I plan to be surprised and inspired by this lot’s answers.
UPDATE: Additional brilliant part of the ad campaign I just got watching the linked commercial: The use of the phrase “we use Real Kraft cheddar.” Which you actually have to think about before realizing they don’t actually claim to use cheese.
My side doesn’t do it. Well, that example you point out doesn’t compare to the many ways the other side does it worse. Hmmm, that second example isn’t comparable to what the other side is doing because the circumstances are different in a specific and not-arbitrary-I-swear way. Oh, well that third example is pretty bad, I guess. But really, my side only does it because the other side does it.Report
But Trumwill, what’s the thing that colors your political views more than anything else?Report
Oh, drat. You want me to be serious.
It’s complicated, because it involves a novel a I never got around to writing involving a guy tripping on acid, locked in a room with Fox News running on TV. Sometimes you have ideas. Sometimes, by the end, the ideas have you.
To be absurdly simplistic, I think a whole lot of it comes down to who the voters perceive themselves to be, who they want to be, and who they want to be apart from.Report
Is the acid-head saying “Christ, what an imagination I’ve got!”
(The question makes more sense if you’re read Stand on Zanzibar.)Report
Well done.Report
Crap! I have read Stand on Zanzibar, and I know I should be able to pin that reference down, but I can’t.Report
There’s one minor character who spends his whole life in front of the TV zonked on various drugs in order to avoid military service. He says that all the time.
That’s also what Shalmaneser the super-computer thinks about the real world.Report
It’s been a long time since I read it. If I didn’t have such a huge pile of things I wanted to read, I’d re-read it.Report
I reread it often enough when I was young that large parts of it are in permanent storage.Report
The number one Go To Lesson in Politics movie of all time is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV_49xlZ07Q"Bullworth Slim pickings on youtube but here’s another snippetReport
Anyway, that’s my go-to lesson. What’s yours?
Get yourself some Kraft Dinner and some pre-shredded “Mexican Blend” from the case. Drop yourself half of that bag (or more, I won’t tell you how to live… maybe add some salsa!) into the mix after you add the orange stuff but before you add the milk and stir it for 10 seconds or so and *THEN* add the milk.
Stir until everything is even.Report
This is an immigration metaphor, isn’t it?Report
Had it been an immigration metaphor, I would have mentioned “French Fry Gravy” rather than salsa.
Because, seriously, I live in Colorado. You can’t go to the bathroom without passing a salsa stand (much worse than passing a kidney stone).
It’s the French Fry Gravy you can’t find anywhere.Report
This is classic: “You can’t go to the bathroom without passing a salsa stand (much worse than passing a kidney stone).”
But please, in the name of all that in good and holy, please tell me the Kraft / Mexican Blend thing is not something you actually eat.Report
Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it, man. (He also adds extra butter.)Report
Oh dear. I know I’m going to regret asking this, but here I go.
So this Kraft Mexican blend dinner. You’re drink of choice with it would be…?Report
Some variant of Cranberry Juice (*NOT* Cranberry Juice Cocktail).
Topics of conversation ought be limited to: the affairs of the day, anxieties about the week (but not the month or year), and/or Batman (and/or his accoutrements).Report
Well, that’s OK then.
Um… “Batman’s accoutrements.” That’s not metaphor either, right?Report
Not for a second.Report
Was that Jaybird’s pick up line?Report
I was aking Maribou.Report
Jaybird’s pickup line was something like, “Here, let me show you how to beat this level,” followed by putting his hand over mine on the mouse.
(I was playing Heroes 2.)
(We were friends for a long time before we fell in love.)Report
Oh my, a smooth operator, indeed. How could you resist? It reminds of the movie where the couple were molding clay together, Patrick Swayze? I met my wife at a river sand bar where young people got high and sun-burned, and mumbled drunk-like that we should find a bush or something.Report
You can’t go to the bathroom without passing a salsa stand (much worse than passing a kidney stone).
I kind of suspected that you were a closet Marxist.Report
My Mom used Campbell’s cheddar cheese soup.Report
I’ve not made mac and cheese from the box for years now. It’s immensely better to use a bechamel base (midwesterners call it ‘gravy’ and it’s just milk and flour) with real cheese and a bit of salt stirred in as the sauce for a pound of macaroni, kept warm in a slow cooker. I add in some chipotle chiles in adobo sauce, or sometimes some garlic, or sometimes some truffle oil. Deli meats can be added after the whole thing is cooked — try it with mozzarella cheese and julienned sandwich pepperoni for pizza mac and cheese.Report
…or just buy pasta and make your own cheese sauce:
– 3 Tbsp margarine (melted)
– 3 Tbsp flour
– 2 cups milk
– 2 cups cheese
Mix first two, add milk gradually, microwave in 2-3 min. segments, whisking after each, and add cheese when it starts getting thick. Throw in some spices.Report
I think I might be a League outlier. If I’m going to do M&C at all:
Penne Pasta
Bit of Olive Oil
Fresh Parmesan or Asiago
Torn Basil
Oh yeah.Report
As for the real question, I point to two things.
First, people vote their pocketbooks unless you give them a damn good reason not to. The default question is are you better off than you were four years ago?
Second, if you need to get people to change the way they would vote if left to their own devices — indeed, if you need to control their behavior in any way at all — you have to scare them. LBJ’s “Daisy” advertisement is still the zenith of political fearmongering.
I don’t mean to suggest that voters in 1964 voted against their economic interests in picking Johnson over Goldwater, or that the 1980 election was free from fearmongering. What I do mean to suggest is that democratic decision-making is ultimately the product of tension between greed and fear.Report
Burt, I’d be curious to know where you got these lessons. Experience, observation, study?Report
Experience. I used to work for a political fearmonger. I’ve appealed to both fear and greed when I’ve gotten good results out of juries; when I try to focus on other things, I’ve found that my results are less satisfactory. And I notice that both political parties have abandoned any pretense of making appeals to voters’ better angels and instead now aim directly at one of those two targets in every advertisement, every rumor float, and every talking point. “Hope and change” were about fear (of the status quo, which in 2008 sucked) and greed (things sucked in 2008 so change was bound to make people less poor). My only question is, when was the last time that some emotional appeal other than these was made to voters in a way that resonated?Report
Have you looked at the most recent Canadian election? The Conservatives appealed to fear of everything, the Liberals (as they have been doing for the last decade) to fear of the Conservatives, but the NDP (social democrats) ran a positive campaign.
The Conservatives won a majority, which supports your thesis, but the NDP managed to vault themselves out of third-party status and become the official opposition for the first time in their history.Report
I’d like to learn more about the way the Irish have it set up, where you vote for two candidates. My understanding is this works well with breaking out of the “I like him/her, but they’re not electable” quandary. And I think it’s how the conservative catholic country finally elected it’s first woman president about 10 years ago.Report
I’m a fan of IRV (I don’t know if that’s precisely what the Irish are doing, but it’s a way of stating your preferences up and down rather than potentially throwing your vote away). Our system does trap us in a two-party system, and I think that the two party system has a bad rap in some ways, but there are things we can do to open things up somewhat, at least on the legislative level, without amending the Constitution.Report
BC tried to bring in something like that a couple years ago, but the referendum on it narrowly failed because people though it seemed too complicated (it was set up so that every few ridings were consolidated into one bigger one, each of which elected 3-6 people, and people ranked their choices of candidates).Report
Yeah, the fact that it is complicated does make it more problematic. I still think it worth it, in the end, however.Report
The problem with this idea is that the NDP surge took place in only a single province; Quebec, which decided to jettison the Bloc party in favour of new blood, since they had already tried every other federal party before. Outside of Quebec, the story was massive Conservative gains at the expense of the Liberals. The NDP, if memory serves, only picked up two seats in the rest of Canada.
My point is that there are other factors that can be used to explain the NDP surge, NOT a widespread acceptance of a positive message.Report
I’d say my life experience so far has lacked anything anchoring my political thought. Perhaps the closest thing for me was reading Les Miserables. Nothing I’d ever read before compared to the effect that book had on me, and nothing has since.Report
CC- say more? I’d be interesting in knowing what that effect was, and what part or theme of the book you took to heart. (I am assuming you were not inspired by Javert to live a life obsessed with revenge.)Report
Can I promise a full post on the topic instead?Report
Yay!Report
“Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.”Report
Yes, that is a valuable lesson.Report
“The Irony of Democracy” by Dye and Ziegler. Ever since then the cynicism just oozes from my every orifice.Report
To my eternal shame, reading mencius moldbug forever ruined elecoral politics for me.Report
He is one of my favorite guilty pleasures.Report
The thing is, the kinds of criticisms he raises against democracy seem much more plausible given that I’m from Singapore and the ideas he’s throwing about are not too alien around here. (Yet gradually geting more so)Report
I think my go-to lesson is usually what Burt said, but my no. 2 or 1B lesson is to emphasize how very, very little most people know/care about politics.Report
This second bit. We’re the weird ones.Report
I have to remind myself of this frequently.Report
“We’re the weird ones.”
What are you talking about? We’re on the internet!Report
The biblical story about the crowd choosing the criminal Barabbas over the guy who’s challenged the prevailing religious/political power norms and structures.Report
Good one.Report
In some translations Barabbas is a revolutionary, so it’s a choice between resistance to oppression being done peacefully through sacrifice or being done violently.
Being of revolutionary sympathies myself, I struggled a fair bit with that one.Report
Revolution against what? Stephen Harper?Report
LOL, no. Not within my country as it is; revolution against a democratic government by enfranchised people who possess civil liberties is unjustifiable in almost every circumstance.
I’m a fan of Louis Riel, though he did go somewhat mad near the end. I have some admiration for John Brown. I consider the Cuban Revolution and the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua to have been justified, and substantial improvements over the governments that preceded them. I think that the ANC had every right to bomb buildings in South Africa. In the present day, I have deep sympathies for the Palestinians. I do not believe that the use of violence against an unjust government renders a movement illegitimate.
In short: it is generally believed that when one nation attacks another, the nation attacked has a right to defend itself using violence. The inclination of my heart is to feel that, similarly, any group within a state that is attacked or oppressed by its government, and lacks legal or electoral means of redress, has the right to violently resist that government.Report
Revolution against a government is not justified unless the government agresses against its own people in a conflict which it has escalated to the level of a war of all against all. Even then, the revolution is only justified if it will improve the lifetime prospects of the worst off.Report
The mere fact of oppression is insufficient. Gays are oppressed in many states in america because they are not given equal rights. This still does not justify rebellion. The reason why the bar for justifying armed rebellion is that the chaos engendered is bad for everyone, especially the worst off. This is not just in terms of income, but in terms of civil liberties etc. In a state of war of all against all, the poor are the ones most likely to be subject to predation (even by the revolutionaries themselves)Report
Reading Gödel’s incompleteness theorems in 1992.
It shattered all belief that there is one framework to explain everything.Report
This comment is falseReport
There is no false.Report
This comment says that there exists a proof that it is false.Report
which comment?Report
For the record, I will admit to campaigning hard for Obama, partly on what is now obviously a naive hope that he was sincere about the whole Change schtick. I will almost certainly vote for him again, but solely because the GOP has presented a completely unpalatable alternative. If there were a Republican candidate I agreed with on even a handful of issues, I would probably vote for him or her. I lament that there is not.
As far as what informs my take on politics, there is probably no single event or thing. If I had to define it, even vaguely, it would probably be the experience of being raised in a fundamentalist, evangelical church and leaving it as a young adult. There was no single moment, but the process of abandoning the worldview of my youth probably makes me the somewhat conflicted voter I am today.
And the Better Half’s macaroni is too kick-ass to even begin to compare with the boxed stuff.Report
The Abolition of Man, CS Lewis. I saw the modern project laid bare, a project I was inculcated into without any awareness that there was any other.
Here, free:
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/lewis/abolition1.htm
Don’t be a Man Without a Chest. I also liked the appendix, Illustrations of the Tao. There are things that are good; then, now and always.Report
This might have been the one out of everyone that I might have actually guessed correctly.
Good choice.Report
Tod: And Mr. Carr took so long to penetrate where I’m “coming from,” which was so obvious to you. I don’t blame him, of course, as he’s self-evidently a good Joe. But I do blame “the system,” and the academy.
One thinly-paged book stands unrefuted against what they shove down our collegians’ throats, @ high payment and debt at that. Y’d think they’d fit it in there somewheres, for pennies on the scholastic dollar.Report
Back in the Marines I once tried to interpret an order that a General had put in writing. I figured that I knew what he was thinking when he wrote it. The Sergeant Major basically told me I was being an idiot. The General had written exactly what he was thinking and anything I came up with was reading into something that wasn’t there. That caused me to realise that folks do the same thing with everything. Law, the Constitution, advertising, politicking, etc.Report
Not quite a “go-to lesson”, but Warren’s “All the King’s Men” is one of my favorites when it comes to politics. It really speaks out against idealism, which doesn’t please me, but it’s so damn true when it comes to the conflicts, biases, and distortions that arise when any person holds power. The story of Willie Stark/Huey Long (and Jack Burden) could have been told in an ancient Greek city-state or an episode of the Wire; it’s just about the combination of having to make consequential decisions and satisfy many parties, including one’s self. Morally ambiguous for sure, but power and politics are rarely beautiful creatures. These thoughts stay with me when I consider the complexities of the individuals within governing institutions. I try not to be “a hater” and put myself in the politician’s shoes…Shoes, admittedly, I would be terrified to be in.
Some favorite quotes: “Yes, I am a student of history, don’t you remember? And what we students of history always learn is that the human being is a very complicated contraption and that they are not good or bad but are good and bad and the good comes out of the bad and the bad out of the good, and the devil takes the hindmost. But Adam, he is a scientist, and everything is tidy for him…and a thing is always what it is…The molecule of good always behaves the same way. The molecule of bad always behaves the same way.” -Jack Burden
“He resigned because he wanted to keep his hands clean. *He wanted the bricks but he just didn’t know somebody has to paddle in the mud to make ’em.* He was like somebody that just loves beefsteak and just can’t bear to go to a slaughter pen because there are some bad, rough men down there who aren’t animal lovers and ought to be reported to the S.P.C.A. Well, he resigned.” -Willie StarkReport
There’s a Dorothy Parker poem you might like.
The Veteran
When I was young and bold and strong,
Oh, right was right, and wrong was wrong!
My plume on high, my flag unfurled,
I rode away to right the world.
“Come out, you dogs, and fight!” said I,
And wept there was but once to die.
But I am old; and good and bad
Are woven in a crazy plaid.
I sit and say, “The world is so;
And he is wise who lets it go.
A battle lost, a battle won-
The difference is small, my son.”
Inertia rides and riddles me;
The which is called Philosophy.Report
‘Cause I was so much older then
I’m younger than that nowReport
I found All the King’s Men an engaging piece of literature. Please note, though, that its author was a professor of literature never employed in any political post. I am not sure he ever carried a petition as a volunteer.Report
My main lesson was when I became familiar with the welfare system and it’s deleterious effects on the poor in America.Report
itsReport
For me it was reading Bryan Caplan’s Myth of the Rational Voter. It really helped me integrate the new economic models of irrational agents into a framework of human behaviour. Plus it has some great examples of just how deeply perverse most people’s views of economic topics actually are.Report
What does Brian Caplan know about HVAC systems?Report
Where’s your data on the Kraft story? I’d be curious to read more about it.
As to political lessons, The Once and Future King — politics is supposed to be noble and beautiful. Mostly it’s crass and very sad. We would be better off in a lot of ways if we could just do without it. But we can’t. And life is still beautiful.Report
This doesn’t qualify as a foundation political inspiration, but whenever I hear people bemoan the lack of civility in today’s politics (implying a golden age of civility sometime past), I remember reading a biography of Sam Houston who beat a fellow member of Congress with a cane. The Star Spangled Banner also brings this scene to mind because Houston’s lawyer was Frances Scott Key.Report
It’s not true that politics is more uncivilized today, not according to history, anyway. Just going back to Reagan — I remember Reagan getting savaged worse than any president since, and it was unrelenting.Report
Some handicapping is necessary. Though he had countervailing themes and practical objects inconsistent with such, Reagan’s rhetorical aspiration was the reconstruction of the political economy of 1928 (with a large standing army appended). Not so Mr. Bush, whose general tendencies might be most instructively described as “Rockefeller Republican ca. 1962” (before such types started pushing contraception and abortion). Mr. Reagan was far more confrontational to the political class of his day (in objectives and in words) than was Mr. Bush, for better or for worse.Report
The most important political lesson I have learned is that, of themselves, people seek not their own good, but their own destruction. Anyone who forgets this, forgets why we need politics in the first place.Report
If everyone seeks their own destruction, then those in the political realm seek their own destruction, so, why do we need politics when we are all just self-destructing?Report
My apologies. I forget to include the word ‘tend’.Report
Ashby’s law of requisite variety. I am wary of any control system (government or otherwise) that does not adequately take into account the variety of the system it is supposed to control.Report