Forgiveness
As of right now, I’m willing to forgive Ron Paul a heck of a lot. Barney Frank too. Their bill to legalize marijuana would do a whole lot of good both for our country and for the rest of the world.
As the late William F. Buckley noted,
Conservatives pride themselves on resisting change, which is as it should be. But intelligent deference to tradition and stability can evolve into intellectual sloth and moral fanaticism, as when conservatives simply decline to look up from dogma because the effort to raise their heads and reconsider is too great. The laws aren’t exactly indefensible, because practically nothing is, and the thunderers who tell us to stay the course can always find one man or woman who, having taken marijuana, moved on to severe mental disorder. But that argument, to quote myself, is on the order of saying that every rapist began by masturbating. General rules based on individual victims are unwise. And although there is a perfectly respectable case against using marijuana, the penalties imposed on those who reject that case, or who give way to weakness of resolution, are very difficult to defend. If all our laws were paradigmatic, imagine what we would do to anyone caught lighting a cigarette, or drinking a beer. Or — exulting in life in the paradigm — committing adultery. Send them all to Guantanamo? […]
Today we have illegal marijuana for whoever wants it. An estimated 100 million Americans have smoked marijuana at least once, the great majority, abandoning its use after a few highs. But to stop using it does not close off its availability. A Boston commentator observed years ago that it is easier for an 18-year old to get marijuana in Cambridge than to get beer. Vendors who sell beer to minors can forfeit their valuable licenses. It requires less effort for the college student to find marijuana than for a sailor to find a brothel. Still, there is the danger of arrest (as 700,000 people a year will tell you), of possible imprisonment, of blemish on one’s record. The obverse of this is increased cynicism about the law.
We’re not going to find someone running for president who advocates reform of those laws. What is required is a genuine republican groundswell. It is happening, but ever so gradually. Two of every five Americans, according to a 2003 Zogby poll cited by Dr. Nadelmann, believe “the government should treat marijuana more or less the same way it treats alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and make it illegal only for children.”
A short eight years later, there are two presidential candidates, Republicans no less, who support marijuana legalization. No, they probably won’t win, but wouldn’t it have gladdened Bill Buckley’s heart? Next time around I wonder if the Democrats will do as well.
The introduction of this bill is huge. It of course has no possibility of obtaining passage, but that’s not the point. In the absence of a popularly perceived emergency, non-fiscal legislation takes years of coalition building to pass. Where the proposed legislation is perceived as a huge electoral risk, it also requires years of sponsors not getting killed at the polls to pass. But for the ball to even begin rolling, someone needs to introduce the legislation the first time.
The ball is finally rolling.Report
Kucinich has been pro-legalization for a while, hasn’t he?Report
I believe so, yes. If anything he was a far less credible candidate than either Johnson or Paul, but credit where it’s due.Report
I think Kucinich and Paul are pretty similar. They both have a great deal of support from a certain element within their party, but not much outside of that element. Perhaps one difference is that there are some on the left who would vote for Paul, while there probably aren’t many on the right who would vote for Kucinich.
I don’t know a whole lot about Johnson.Report
Kucinich and Paul are the proverbial oxymoron: the honest politician.Report
Thrilled to hear about this and I agree with Mark that this is the first tiny step in a long, multi-year effort. But damn it’s a good start.Report
Good point, Jason – and so ironic. I would be willing to bet that the D’s base would be much more open to legalization then the R’s. Odd that it is the Rs who have candidates test-ballooning it.Report
I went to a Democratic Caucus in 2008.
Here’s the part of the story from when they opened up the floor to various resolutions:
Now the resolutions are open to the floor. Someone asks that we pass a resolution noting our footprint on this earth and how we need to reduce our carbon footprint. Passed overwhelmingly.
I decide, as a Democrat, to speak up.
“Be it resolved that we end the War on Drugs and War against our Citizens.”
A middle-aged matron on the other side of the room said “I am a teacher and we have got to continue to fight the War on Drugs for the children.”
An old lady on my side of the room said “We should still fight the drug dealers in Columbia!”
A middle-aged African-American on the other side of the room said something to the effect of “It’s a shame that the hammer of the law comes down hardest on minorities but we shouldn’t just give up…”
A guy who has obviously been to more caucuses than I makes a motion to table my resolution.
33 votes to table. 2 opposed.Report
Agreed. Just suspect that had you done the same at a Republican caucus the vibe that you were a delinquent would have been stronger.Report
I dunno. Ron Paul was making his first big splash around the time that this happened (February) in 2008.Report
Point taken. Comment withdrawn.Report
there are four D co-sponsors of this bill.Report
That’s something.
I hope it gets put to an on the record vote rather than one of those yea/nay votes “these people were louder” votes.Report
Legalizing marijuana now polls roughly as well as many issues on which the candidates are expected to take a party-line stance. Being pro-life — virtually required as a Republican — polls around 45%, give or take. Pro-pot gets about the same percentage.
Neither party wants to take up the cause. Partly this is because pot has only recently started doing so well, while the abortion numbers have been around that level for years. Partly though too there is a stigma among some of the population that marks a candidate as downright crazy for taking a pro-pot stance. The party suffers by association, of course, which is why they won’t touch it.
Likewise, those inside the beltway are never, ever going to give up even a smidgen of their power unless they are convinced that it’s the only way to keep the rest of their power. This is a lot more than a smidgen, so I’m figuring popular support will have to be way over 50% for this one to go anywhere.Report
Yes, what the Beltway sees as “sensible and moderate” is much different than what you get when you poll actual Americans. See their warm embrace of Paul Ryan as a Very Serious Person.Report
When “lowest law enforcement priority” bills have passed in many municipalities, police have responded by saying “we’re going to arrest who we are going to arrest.”
Fun Thought Experiment:
Assuming this passes (which, of course, it won’t), how will Justice respond? Similarly?Report
To some extent it’s probably going to end up like enforcement of traffic laws.
If you break a traffic law in an egregious manner right in front of a police officer, then you’ll probably get a ticket.
If you break a traffic law in a relatively minor way where nobody can see you and nobody gets hurt, they aren’t going to go out of their way to catch you.Report
Unless you’re in Chicago and you run a red light and almost run over a pedestrian. Then, if a cop sees you, you only have a 50% chance of getting a ticket.Report
Sorry….I know that comment was out of place. I’m just frustrated with car drivers here.Report
Are people really sure this has no chance? It has a kind of DADT feeling to me. Yes there will be a ton of opposition, but it also might be one of those issues that is sort of reaching its “let’s just finally do the right thing and be done with it” moment.Report
7 years at a minimum I’m guessing. We have to get far enough past the 2016 cycle that the election weight isn’t holding it back.Report