First Praxis, information-based developmental health project, launched by Cambridge researcher
I met Kenneth Lipp not long ago through a mutual friend in England and have already had occassion to be vastly impressed by the frenetic pace at which he works. As a junior research fellow at Cambridge specializing in cognitive ethology and prosimian genetics who just recently received a grant on primate research and is presumably expected to go do whatever that would entail, the fellow has a lot on his plate already but has nonetheless just launched a project with the purpose of applying various newly-viable communicational methods to a range of problems of efficiency of both aid and information within the context of Third World development programs and the agencies that implement those programs. Yesterday, I agreed to a partnership between Project PM and his newly-announced effort, First Praxis; more information is available at Lipp’s announcement, a bit of which I’ll excerpt below:
First Praxis is the project beta for an applied research and education network, designed to build an interconnected system of highly skilled nodes for assessing and responding to crises in human health and general well-being. Although still beta, or pre beta, in development, Praxis is as of this moment an active project, operations in motion commensurate with need according to our present limitations.
First Praxis is a network of scientists, academics, and activists based strategically worldwide where a thumb on the pulse is most in need.
Local experts will monitor health issues and social conditions in their region, providing routine updates on the general needs and strengths and positioned to sound the alarm in such cases where they anticipate impending crisis.
We have thus far added as affiliates (loosely) two institutions from theTHRiVE network.
We also have limited arrangements with the International Health Links Center and researchers at the Sanger Institute, UK.
I have spoken with writer Barrett Brown regarding ways in which FP can synergistically network with his think-tank ProjectPM as an information/investigatory resource, as well as with the Science Journalism Improvement Project to help disseminate information to the public. I asked Barrett to share a few words on the imperative of advancing information’s universality.
Thereafter I’m quoted threatening to overthrow various elected governments or something. At any rate, this partnership is fortuitous as one of Project PM’s two active sub-programs is the Africa Development Program, the members of which we’ll be putting at Lipp’s disposal in addition to the more communications-oriented work in which we specialize overall.
I’ve recruited several people from The League for the Science Journalism Improvement Program and would love to hear from anyone else who might be interested in joining up, having been very impressed by a lot of the commenters I’ve seen here. Although many of our participants are credentialed or otherwise have professional backgrounds in what they’re working on specifically, some of our most active and effective members have seemingly irrelevant backgrounds while also possessing a knack for understanding the nuances of information flow and the contexts in which it does so. If you have an interest in learning more about Project PM, we’d love to show you some materials and answer any questions you might have. Meanwhile, Lipp is also accepting participants from a presumably more academic background for First Praxis and his e-mail address may be found at his post to which I link above.
Update
As noted in the comments, you may also e-mail Emma about either project; she’s a Newcastle-based activist with a background in immigration law and human rights and helps me with a lot of my correspondence in addition to also being involved with First Praxis. She may be reached at emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com, and is better about getting back to people quickly than I am.
Update 2
If you only take in one parody this year of me and my propensity for Ross Perot-esque video demonstrations of my awesome ideas, let it be this one.
Anyone interested can also email me at emilieduchatelet8@gmail.com. (Kenneth can you put my email address on your blog post :))Report
I can.
First of your posts close enough to my field for me to understand, Barrett. Light a brighter candle, and chase back the darkness.Report
KL if you log in to this site before posting then people can link directly to your blog by clicking on your name. (provided you have added the website to your profile) I have flu. Just sayin.Report
If I do what? Where? I vaguely sense that I would pleased with your suggestion, but don’t really know what it means doing. I get that it involves the computer. I’ll try to figure out what you’re saying, but I’m hitting escape and unplugging if some site starts asking me hard questions.Report
Yeah, okay smart arse. Shut up. I was being helpful. You need a haircut.Report
Has this blog just turned into a recruiting website for Barret Brown’s various projects? That’s a decline. It’s as though all the old (and worthwhile to read) writers have given up completely.Report
Mia, everyone writes about whatever is interesting to them at the time. And some writers take breaks for a while when they have nothing to say.Report
@Mia
Hi, Mia. I’m sorry all you got from it was passive-aggressive, it might turn out to be a powerful thing. Maybe not, but your snarky question is not much help telling me why.
Are you asking if my blog was conceived and is maintained so that it can maintain exposure for “Mr. Brown’s various projects (I don’t think more than 2 projects), mentioned in several posts. Over the course of a week or two? You have a right to your opinion of course. I would just hope that you might consider the multiple postings that have occurred might be–
1.Admittedly promotional, in that they are intended to promote what they purport.
2. Just a few current of many other posts which all together make up my blog
My latest post is about obstetric fistula, which Barrett officially denies, at last word, having invented.
http://cultureisaweapon.blogspot.com/2010/12/fistula.htmlReport
She meant that this blog seems to be a medium that’s dedicated to promoting my projects, presumably because I’ve made a couple of posts about them in order to recruit those who are interested in participating in things like this. I’m afraid you’re going to have to get used to this sort of thing as we proceed.Report
It isn’t any trouble. I have to admit that there are links on both sites to the other.Report
Barrett and Mia, after some reflection, I would like to revisit the original question.
In fact, Mia, what I think you may be so turned-off by is economics, and while that’s certainly noble, I can’t argue against the word noble. I did side-step your question, because it did not force an answer, and from your tone I caught no sign you were here to get one; but since it’s free, why not try it out anyway-
In order for information which I deem meritorious to be valued as such—as well as to increase my personal leverage—I have taken advantage of the internet, a vastly interconnected system of distribution and promotion. Allying myself with like-minded bastards like B. Brown, as well as participating in broadcast dialogue with many other bloggers, and dropping a few names occasionally which are more than I can carry, I mean to receive a benefit. This benefit is without argument my impetus in any engagement, and as this goes for everyone, I think at some level, I find it much healthier not to pretend it isn’t there till after Xmas, or is a burden forced upon us as a necessary goblin of capital.
This pattern occurs at all strata of information motility.
I’m guilty of wishing, under my keystroke, for perhaps some tighter regulations to accessing the world wide web. It is quite true that most anyone in the West, certainly in the US, who has sufficient motor function can and probably will get a blog and then have unfettered freedom to make a scene and “speak” his “mind.” We don’t limit that access, however, in a society that protects the right to dissent above all else (which we don’t but should). We compete against poor information with good, but even were we to so desire, we are not in a position to pull the strings of life
Researchers, journalists, social activists, and others compete with intimidating complexity and asymmetric transmission as a rule. There are in fact narrower distinctions drawn each day across disciplines and professions, an elucidating but drawn-out synthesis to resolve our heuristics, and it’s getting blurrier before more focused .These reasons and more are why those of us with ideas to share are vigilant for opportunities to associate with others, to increase the frequency with which our ideas are entered into contention and contribute to same’s fitness to be selected for in ensuing generations.
We add to the batter the merit I mentioned earlier (or erudition as in Barrett’s network. There, I slipped one in), and call it fecundity, which is the principle involved in peacock plumage and moulting, and I think “strut,” but it goes from there to get pretty sexy and technical.
I promote ideas I judge to have quality and as part of various bias systems which bolster reciprocity, I am committed to integrity in my advisement and transmission of data, and I should not have evaded an immediate discussion of this deceivingly intuitive pattern.
I am not ashamed to have traded a something for a something else, and though we may use one another, and can’t stop yet, we can look each other in the eye and acknowledge it.Report
Not completely.
I have lost almost all interest in politics these days, though.
-wrb (old but of dubious worth)Report