Spinning my wheels.
Does anybody else ever have weeks or months where the world seems to push back really hard against your conception of it? Where it seems to shake off all your attempts to impose order on its flux?
Blogging has gotten harder for me now that Obama is President. You see, I knew where I stood with George W. Bush. I’m a young guy, and I started trying to form political opinions in the tail end of the Clinton years. My family subscribed to the National Review and the Wall Street Journal, so I began with a baseline of conservative critiques of Clinton. Oddly enough, it was from Clinton’s detractors that I picked up the idea that executive war power should be limited. Somehow, I missed the signal that executive power is awesome when a Republican has it, and my assessment of Bush was ambivalent or negative for the full eight years, though I can’t say I ever viscerally disliked him: I just thought he wasn’t a very good President. But I had an idea of what I thought conservatism was supposed to be about, and, even though it ended up being pretty different from what the Republican Party was trying to do, I think I had pretty good grounds for making sense of policy by the time I started blogging, which was well into Bush’s second term.
But I have to start from scratch with the Obama administration. I’ve never paid attention to a liberal President before — I was doing other things during the Clinton administration, like reading way too many Star Wars novels — so I’m trying to figure out how I should evaluate Obama’s aims and his methods, issue by issue. Which means that I first need good labels for his aims and methods, and there’s a number of possibilities on offer, from the “Afro-centrist Marxism” set to the “competent and pragmatic” set, and that’s what I’m working on now.
I think it’s just my disposition to be this abstract. It might be better to just pick a starting point and make ad hoc modifications as needed, in the hopes that the dialectic of blog-argument will get me to a good place. On the other hand, as Augie March said, “…I don’t like low opinions, and when you speak them out it commits you and you become a slave of them. Talk will lead people on until they convince their minds of things they can’t feel true.”
One reason my post count has been low recently is that I’ve been trying to wait until I’ve worked out some moderately responsible opinions before writing… but maybe it’ll be worthwhile to write through the process of trying to form opinions in an unfamiliar situation. I think we all know which body part opinions are supposed to be like, but responsible opinions seem much harder to come by, at least right now, when the world keeps bucking my expectations.
Haha. I have very similar concerns and an entirely different strategy. That’s why your posts always come off as well thought out and intelligible and mine are like the ramblings of a bi-polar drunkard. :0)Report
>from the “Afro-centrist Marxism” set to the “competent and pragmatic” set
Maybe instead of looking at ideologies to start with, look at his resume to figure out where he’s coming from: community organizer; teacher. In both, you’re trying, possibly through indirect means, to lead a group or individuals to figure out how to lead themselves.
Personally, I think one of his over-arching goals is to teach us to be citizens again.Report
On a similar note, it would probably be helpful on some level for me to read Obama’s first book.Report
I’m still trying to recover from reading Clinton’s My Life back in 2005.Report
I think E.D. accurately elludes to two different posting styles. One is to wait until you have made up your mind and write with conviction. That’s sort of like college, when papers should never use phrases like, “I think…” or, “It is my belief…” Writing as you think (thinking out loud) is sort of like journaling. That’s the way I blog. I’m like E.D. in that I just sort of say what is on my mind and I guess I have dreams that someday my kids or grandkids could read the breadth of my blog and it would document a slow but deliberate evoluton of my own beliefs.
One great thing about the League, for it’s members, is that you all have the luxury of not having to write every day. There are times when I would KILL for that. But as a slave to traffic, the monkey is on my back. So I guess the League is accomplishing one of many goals that I know you all had with its founding which is that it accomodates a variety of styles of blogging and merges them all well.
As for trying to understand this President..he remains, for me, a very hard person to predict and see any real pattern with. In some respects a like that. I like that his responses aren’t predictable. But of course the boring conservative in me likes a certain degree of certainty.Report
You have no idea how much I sympathize. Of course, my escape for now is just to write about abstractions.
A friend of mine in his 40’s who’s been a journalist for a while is totally unsurprised by this. As he puts it: “Young people can do investigative journalism and they can write about ideas. No way in hell they can do political or cultural analysis. They just haven’t lived long enough or seen enough elections.”
I’m beginning to think that he might be right.Report
I have to sort of agree with your friend. I have a blogging friend who is in his early 20’s. His take on things is brilliant but often lacking historical context. At 34, maybe I’m finally getting old enough that the ‘big picture’ is coming into view.Report
I don’t know. Age helps to be sure, but I know a lot of older people who just ain’t all that bright or analytical or good at big picture stuff. Then again, I’m 28 and so when I look back on all this silly writing I’m doing now a few years down the road, I’m sure I’ll be embarrassed as hell by all of it….Report
Ha! I’m embarrassed by stuff I wrote 6 weeks ago!Report