Thursday Throughput for 4/11/19
[ThTh1] Black holes were first theorized in the 18th century by John Michell as objects with gravitational fields so strong that light can not escape from the surface. In the latter half of the 20th century, we began to detect black holes. Not directly but through their influence: either the effect of their gravity on the orbits of nearby of objects or the emissions of the hot bright disk of material spiraling into them (the accretion disk). Cygnus X-1 was the first black hole detected this way. Observations showed that a blue supergiant was orbiting a massive object that was invisible in the optical but giving off copious X-rays. But even as our technology has advanced, we’ve never been able to see a black hole because they are extremely compact.
The image below is the closest we will ever get to actually “seeing” a black hole. What you’re seeing is an image created by eight radio telescopes spread out across the world from the South Pole to Greenland comprising the Event Horizon Telescope. They use a process called interferometry to combine the signals of the telescopes so that they resolve details as if they were a telescope as vast as the separation between them. In this case, they can resolve details down to a precision of 20 micro-arcseconds (enough to read a newspaper in New York from a sidewalk café in Paris, as the press release notes). For comparison, your eye can resolve details down to about one arc-minute, if you have your glasses on. The orange material in the image is the accretion disk. The dark hole at the center is the black hole, which is a few times as big as our solar system but weighs 6.5 billion times as much as the Sun.
The accretion disk is not actually orange. That’s false color for an image that comes from the radio. If you were to see this with your eye, it would probably be white (you can read more about how these image are created here). What’s more, the image is still blurry. Finer resolution could make it look more like the simulated image which shows a thin band of material swirling into oblivion. Here’s a video showing the context of what you’re seeing.
Event Horizon has also imaged the black hole at the center of our Galaxy — Sgr A*. That image may come out soon. The rumor is that the resolution is so good that we can actually see the accretion disk changing, making image processing tricky. Stay tuned!
[ThTh2] Earth has eclipses maybe every six months when the moon’s orbit aligns with the position of the Sun. Mars experiences them every day.
[ThTh3] Edwin Hubble. Scientist. Astronomer. Discoverer of the expansion of the Universe. Namesake of a great telescopes. Also, basketball player.
Tonight is the #NationalChampionship game! Did you know Edwin Hubble was a gifted basketball player? He and his @UChicago team even won a conference title. His basketball flew in space with fellow alum John Grunsfeld (@SciAstro) on the telescope’s final servicing mission. pic.twitter.com/VYImUSmToa
— Hubble (@NASAHubble) April 8, 2019
PS – Wahoowa! I went to UVa for grad school and was delighted at this year’s outcome, even though I didn’t pick them to win the OT Final Four competition.
[ThTh4] So apparently one of the most lethal spider venoms in the world may help stroke victims. That’s assuming this isn’t a PR campaign being run by the venomous spider itself.
[ThTh5] LIGO, the gravitational wave detector, has started its third run. And on Tuesday, it made its first detection of the new run: two black holes smashing together four billion years ago.
[ThTh6] One of the pictures you take when you first start astrophotography is to set up a camera for a long exposure and watch the stars trails through the sky as the Earth rotates. This video reverses that, fixing on the stars and watching the Earth rotate.
Stabilizing to the Milky Way shows the rotation of the Earth pic.twitter.com/C5YPZMEG7v
— Domenico Calia (@CaliaDomenico) April 9, 2019
[ThTh7] Bombs away!
[ThTh8] Usually when people talk about land whales, I assume they’re telling me I need to lose weight.
[ThT9] The entire field of planetary science is being upended on a seemingly weekly basis.
[ThTh10] This article is a couple of years old, but was RT’d into my feed this week. It disputes the notion that our brains are similar to computers, pointing out critical differences between the way we think and the way computers “think”. It’s right on the money, in my opinion. And I’m always happy to see someone taking on Kurtzweil’s ideas.
I found this amusing in relation to the black hole.
I’ve been told that Black Holes & Time Warps by Kip Thorne is a good text for non-physicists to read if they want to know more about such things and don’t have an advanced STEM degree.Report
What I was reminded of most when I read the Slate article was the article from a million years ago that was complaining about the NASA guy’s shirt.Report
ThTh1: I love that in this day of fiber optics and the internet, data transfer is by sneakernet (fly a stack of hard disks from each telescope to a central location). As we used to say, back in the day, “Consider a pickup truck full of data CDs driven nonstop from Seattle to Miami by a team of graduate students. The bandwidth is impressive; the latency sucks.”
Tangentially, earlier this week I pulled out one of my backup CDRs from 1995. Still mounts on my Mac, and the data appears to be intact.Report
ThTh10: I just finished watching the first season of a new animated show called Gen:Lock (I should do a TenShot about it…) that touches on this, a bit.Report
The Black Hole is a flaming cheerio in black coffee.Report
I find it a sublime example of Chiaroscuro; Dutch renaissance using light to highlight the focal point off center while allowing the rest to soften, unfocus and fade into darkness. There’s also an implied motion, like a spring sprung yet captured at one singular moment. Very nearly perfect, really.
But sure, your flaming cheerio description is good too.
{ I tease 🙂 }Report
[ThTh10] Yes yes yes!
The “AI futurist” crowd bugs me to no end. Brains are embodied, and computer programs are not. The difference seems stark.
I do, however, think this comment skips a few steps:
The correct answer is I don’t know (and neither do you). This is the Hard Problem of Consciousness. Can matter in motion lead to qualia? Do qualia even exist? (I think they do, at least it feels as if they do, and isn’t “feels as if X” not the definition of qualia, unless it isn’t, and dammit I don’t know.)
I guess my point is, what bugs me most about the “AI futurist” crowd is their naivete.Report
Beresheet just suffered a main engine failure during descent and impacted the lunar surface.
Youtube feed of the landing attempt.Report
Falcon Heavy launch this afternoon, all three booster cores landed successfully at their target return points. The live feed of the pair landing at Cape Canaveral within a few seconds of each other still looks like CGI.Report
That’s some really good CGI.Report