*My apologies for the hiatus: I was swept away by Christmas spirit, or something.*
[L1]: In 1951, an epic battle came before the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Or, epically named, at least: Batman v. Commissioner. The caped crusader vs. the pillar of police? The Dark Knight vs the Top Cop? No… actually, our case of the week was the farmer vs. the IRS. Mr. Batman was a Texas rancher who wanted to make his son, only 14 at the time, a partner in the farm. He was counseled that such family partnerships were frowned upon and seen as instruments of tax-dodging. Indeed, when Mr. Batman’s tax returns reflected his arrangement with his son, the IRS took issue and attributed some $20,000 more in income than Batman and his wife had claimed. Thus ensued a two year court battle, in which the IRS emerged victorious. All in all, it was a fairly dry tax
[L2]: A captive of the Bronx Zoo will have his day in Court. After 42 years, a Court will decide his freedom: Happy the Elephant is granted Habeas Corpus.
[L3]: Who among us has embezzled half a million dollars from a Catholic School and spent it gambling in Vegas? The answer is: Nun of us. Two nuns, actually.
[L4]: Many have lauded (rightly so, in my humble opinion) a rare successful bipartisan effort by congress last week: the passage of the First Step Act, a bill, already signed into law by President Trump, to ease some overly harsh penalties for drug offenders at the federal level.
[L5]: Lawyers behaving badly: this time at a deposition, in which the offending counsel called his opponent stupid, and a bitch. His justification: Trump. “Standards have changed,” explained the lawyer. Bonus: when the judge in the case reprimanded him, he accused the judge of “robe rage”.
[L6]: Chief Justice John Roberts continues to disappoint conservatives, this time by siding with the liberal contingent of SCOTUS in rebuffing the Trump administration’s attempt to keep new restrictions on asylum alive via motion for stay of a lower court ruling, pending appeal. This was the same case that led to some verbal sparring between Chief Justice Roberts and the president back in November.
[L7]: There was much speculation around Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s pointy-edged necklace, worn in this year’s official SCOTUS group photo. Was it a pointed (no pun intended) jab at her newest colleague? No, as it turns out. Just a gift from an adoring fan. The gifter was a lawyer, however, which may raise ethical concerns should the attorney ever have a case before the Court during RBG’s tenure. But, considering how few lawyers achieve that honor, it is likely a moot point.
[L8]: In a victory for Ninjas everywhere, a Federal judge has struck down a New York law that banned Nunchucks. H/T Oscar Gordon for the link.
[L9]: A federal judge in Houston issued an order that made the rounds on social media for its blunt rebuke of the lawyers in a case. “What is wrong with you?” asked Judge Vanessa Gilmore of the whiny lawyers before her. The short and not sweet order can be read here.
[L10]: There is no such thing as a good time to shoplift, but there is such a thing as the worst possible time to shoplift: during a Shop with a Cop event. Thanks to our dumb criminal of the week for the public service announcement.
[L11]: Back in November I posted a clip from My Cousin Vinny, calling it one of my top three lawyer movies of all time, and promising to post a second the following week. Apparently, I forgot, so I present, #2 of my favorite lawyer movie scenes, with Al Pacino in the obvious form the devil would take in today’s society: the lawyer (bad language warning):
https://youtu.be/b5RAgn-ZP3E
L8: At least Michelangelo is legal now. Leonardo and Raphael are still running around in defiance of the law.
PS the why of the nunchucks ban is some weapons grade stupid.Report
Assuming Raphael is carrying a pair of traditional sai, they are not sharpened weapons (no edge, no point) so would fall under laws for batons/truncheons. In New York, it appears that batons are only illegal if they are between 24 and 26 inches in length, and less than 1.25 inches in diameter. Now I’m curious about the very narrow range of lengths that are illegal…Report
They thought about making batons longer than that illegal but someone yelled “maybe we could finally arrest the Mets!”
So Casey Jones is still okay.Report
It is curious. Wikipedia informs me that police batons have ranged from about 12 inches for a “daystick” up to three feet for a riot stick. A “nightstick” is about 26″ long and seems like the sort of thing you see on cop shows, so maybe the idea was to outlaw them for civilian use.
I carry a “tire thumper” that looks to be somewhat less than 24″ long so I guess I’m legal.Report
I assume the upper limit is to avoid outlawing short people’s walking canes, even though they are famously formidable weapons.Report
See also: BartitsuReport
[L2]: One person’s frivolous lawsuit can be one judge’s journey of discovery.Report
Looking at the filings in the link, the Court has not necessarily decided that Happy is a person. The plaintiff specifically argues that that bridge does not need to be crossed yet.
It does seem like some sort of bridge has been crossed (in New York at least), leading to a a future in which NGOs empowered by legal process delivered by men in uniform brandishing assault weapons demand that Fluffy’s owner appear before the tribunal to explain himself. If he argues Fluffy is not a human, she’s just a cat; then inhumane treatment is basically conceded.Report
[L5] That sounds like a really bad attempt to excuse rotten behavior. “Why would you say such a thing?” “Uh … Trump?”Report
L3: If this were made into a movie, there would be two plot lines. One would be is that the nuns stole 500K on a zany scheme to save the school/orphanage from vaguely defined evil people who want to threaten the school or orphanage for shits and giggles. I don’t think I need to outline the plot of the more adult/less family friendly version.Report
L1: I wonder if any of the people involved in the case made a Batman joke during the hearings.Report
I think it may have predated the Batman comic? Not sure though, I’m not a nerd.
Just kidding, nerds.Report
[L8]: My son’s holiday gift to me were nunchucks, that he picked up on a Japanese 101 field trip to a market in NJ. Now I appreciate them even more. (Next we have to get the ban in PA on throwing stars over turned. I realize they are not as much a defensive weapon as nunchucks, but if I can own throwing knives, and people can walk around with AR-15s…)Report
I love weapons like nunchucks or throwing stars/knives. If ever there was a class of weapons that are more likely to cause injury or embarrassment to an assailant who has not spent considerable time training with them…
I remember when I first expressed an interest in nunchucks, and a family friend got me two pair, a nice set of oak ones, and a set that was PVC pipe with an internal weight, and a foam rubber covering. He told me that when I could use the foam rubber set without braining myself, he would let me have the oak ones. I didn’t see the oak ones for a while.Report
I expect it will take me awhile too. Fortunately one of the higher ranked black belts in my dojo seems to be quite proficient (won weapons forms at the last tourney with an impressive nunchucks kata) so I’m hoping to get lessons from him.Report