16 thoughts on “T1 – 004: Three Cadaver

  1. I beautiful, insightful and daunting piece, well done. For my own input I could not imagine listening to, instead of reading, your work. I’m a deeply visual creature so listening to the article really didn’t do it for me, I kept drifting off and being distracted by other things (visually).Report

    1. That’s the plan, actually. I think this and the other anatomy posts will comprise one long chapter. There will be one more anatomy post after this, and then the others will start coming out. The prewriting is done for most of them, and I plan to get around to a lot of it this summer. Once all the posts are out, I’ll revise and expand each section and start putting together the book. If you have any ideas for it, let me know.Report

            1. You know, Proust’s father was a physician, and he spent quite a bit of time in his youth in a sort-of pre-apprenticeship in his father’s clinic. I’ve read a few essays that try to describe the influence this experience had on his work.Report

              1. Interesting. In an appropriately Proustian fashion, I’m sure it did.

                When I first started doing research on memory in graduate school, I gave a departmental (actually, area) brown bag talk on some of my first studies, and afterwards a faculty member came up to me and asked if I’d read Proust. I said “Sure, why?” And he said, “Because you’re going to need to cite him. Every paper on memory does.”Report

              2. Interesting.

                I’ve never actually read any Proust, just a handful of essays about Proust. I’ve never read the Lehrer book, although I am aware of that writer’s unfortunate fall from grace.Report

    1. Definitely. Although it was more focused on strategy at the level of the individual. Both can be applied to fields outside of combat, like sports, business, or medicine.Report

Comments are closed.