Ai Weiwei, Alcatraz, Dissent, and The Limits of Free Speech
The Chinese Dissident artist, Ai Weiwei, has an installation at Alcatraz. I went on Sunday afternoon and the entire experience is a good example in what Thomas Frank famously called The Commodification of Dissent and the Conquest of Cool.
Ai Weiwei is a Chinese artist who helped work on the Beijing Olympic Games. He is also vocally critical of the Chinese Government and their stance on democracy and human rights and independently investigates government corruption. The Chinese government detained him for just under three months in 2011.
Alcatraz is a ten minute Ferry ride from San Francisco. After some standard safety information, you hear a bit about the history of the Island from its start as a military fortress to keep the English, French, and Russians out of the San Francisco Bay, to its use as a military prison for secessionists during the Civil War to its use as a Federal Prison from 1934-1963 and then the Occupation by Native Americans during the late 1960s and early 1970s. We were told to be on the lookout for the graffiti.
The Aiwei exhibit involved five installations spread through out the island. Three were in the prison factory, called the Industry building. Two were in the main prison.
The first installation was of a large and very colorful Chinese dragon. The dragon was made of several panels and some panels contained quotes on privacy and freedom. There was a quote by Ai Weiwei and a quote by Edward Snowden on how important privacy is for freedom. There was also a quote by an African dissident but I can’t remember who or what the nature of the quote was. I don’t think it was Nelson Mandela but it could have been. My companion for the day is Han Chinese and she told me that Dragons are the ultimate symbol of power and were the symbol of the Emperor in Chinese culture. I guess having a dragon that partially consists of quotes about freedom and privacy is about how freedom and privacy are the ultimate powers and maybe using a dragon is a way of taking away its use as a symbol of state authority. There were also several paper kites of owls in the room. My companion agreed that the kites looked like owls but said she did not know of owls having any significance in Chinese Culture.
The second room was a hall of dissidents. Basically it was portraits of various democracy advocates and whistle blowers done in Legos and on the floor. You walked around the room and looked down on the portraits. It was often hard to read the names as they were done in Legos. Most of the dissidents came from Eastern Europe/Russia, Middle Easter Countries, and Asia (especially Vietnam and China and Tibet). There was also a portrait of Edward Snowden. More on this later.
The third exhibit was unremarkable. It was a large winged creature and you viewed it from the gunner’s gallery where prison guards would watch prisoners as they worked during the day. My companion felt like the symbolism was a bit too strong here.
The remaining exhibits were in the main Prison. Alcatraz is very small. You can do a guided audio tour before seeing the final two exhibits. The audio tour tells you that only 1500 people served time in Alcatraz during its 29 year history as a federal prison. The audio tour was probably more informative about the nature of being a prisoner than Ai Weiwei’s art installations. The guides/narrators were four prison guards and four former prisoners. The tour was interestingly not censored and the former prisoners admit to their crimes. One guy went to Alcatraz on Weapons charges and tells you how he was filled with hate. The tour is also done in a way to make you almost feel like a prisoner. You are told by a narrator (maybe one of the former guards) about how to move through the prison in rather brusque tones. There were sections of the prison called Times Square, North Michigan Avenue, and other places on the outside world. One prisoner recalled how you could hear parties from the San Francisco Yacht Club especially on New Year’s Even and how lonely it was to hear girls laughing. They talked about riots over being served the same food over and over again and about random murders with improvised weapons and what it was like to hear a shiv go into some guys back. It makes a popping sound apparently.
The final two installations took place in A-block and the Hospital Wing. The A-block was used to hold conscientious objectors during WWI but was used during the Federal Prison days as places where prisoners could write letters and legal briefs on typewriters. The cells had music and poetry composed in prison being pumped through them. All of it composed by political prisoners. Mainly African and Asian though there was one string piece by a Jewish composer who was held in Hitler’s concentration camps.
The final exhibit was in the Hospital Wing and it was a bathtub, toilet and sink overflowing with little white and probably plastic flowers. I guess this symbolizes beauty and life springing up from ruins.
The hospital wing also contains the cell of Robert “The Birdman of Alcatraz” Stroud. Despite the portrait given in the Burt Lancaster movie, Robert Stroud was not a gentle man. He was cruel and mean until the end. He was a pimp and murderer in Alaska. He spent most of his time at Leavenworth but was transferred to Alcatraz after killing a guard at Leavenworth. He was already a pretty old guy when he murdered the guard. The inmates who remembered him on the audio tour described him as sociopathic, brilliant, suicidal, murderous, and a hell-raiser who liked to rattle everyone’s cages whether they were a guard or a fellow inmate. He spent 11 of his 17 years in the Alcatraz Hospital Wing due to illness before being transferred to the Prison Hospital in Missouri for three years before dying. Interestingly, being in the hospital gave him a large cell especially compared to the others.
After all this you exit to the gift shop. Before the gift shop was a poster talking about how the U.S. holds a quarter of the world’s prisoners and a bit about prison and criminal justice reform. In the giftshop, you could buy your own Ai Weiwei bag of Legos’ along with t-shirts, sweatshirts, windbreakers, various documentaries, books, and movies about life at Alcatraz.
The most striking thing to me was the inclusion of Edward Snowden in the Lego dissident hall. There is a sort of limitation and paradox of free speech here. The news freely and often reports on Edward Snowden and the various doings of the NSA that he managed to reveal. Citizen Four won the documentary for best picture, the National Parks Service is allowing a Chinese dissident artist to stage an exhibition on freedom at a former prison. Yet the NSA still is recording tons of data against everyone and seems to show no signs of stopping or reforming. People still go through security theatre to board plans. Nothing seems to deescalate. The War on Some People Who Use Some Drugs is still going strong and civil forfeiture is still a thing despite numerous high profile stories. There seems to be some way in which free speech can render reform toothless. You can criticize and expose all you want but reform takes a long time or never happens at all. Though obviously free speech is much better than a society without free speech.
The selling of little bags of Ai Weiwei Legos was also a bit odd. I am not sure why Ai Weiwei choose to use Legos as a medium for his dissident portraits except that it is potentially easy to assemble move, fix, repair, and break up. But selling a little bag of them in the giftshop just seems to be a way in which political anger is taken, mollified, and turned into another bit of profit. Museums do need money to run and I don’ mind the gift shop at most art exhibits but there was something about selling Legos and t-shirts that depressed me here especially because Ai Weiwei is an explicitly political artist.
Perhaps reform is just something that takes decades. Maybe we need to wait until the old guard retires and new people can run for office. Maybe there just is not enough interest in NSA or Prison reform except in a few quarters.
“Yet the NSA still is recording tons of data against everyone and seems to show no signs of stopping or reforming. People still go through security theatre to board plans. Nothing seems to deescalate. ”
Maybe because, despite the cries of Dudes On Tumblr, most Americans think that what’s going on is a necessary and proper government function and is part of what security actually looks like.
If someone buys a locking mailbox after their mail gets stolen we don’t call it an intrusion on communication and start spouting made-up quotes about trading freedom for security.Report
Is that really the right analogy?Report
I was thinking a better analogy was the use of militarized police force in the neighborhoods that get that kind of policing.Report
“Is that really the right analogy?”
Is it really *not*?
You’re taking it as a given that all this stuff is a useless waste of time that clearly doesn’t work.
What if it isn’t?
It’s certainly true that if the NSA had been permitted to cue the FBI to take a look at a certain group of guys attending flight school in Florida then the WTC attacks wouldn’t have happened–and that “the NSA isn’t permitted to cue the FBI” was a specific decision rather than something that just happened by accident.Report
Jim,
they don’t have the talent to make it anything other than a brute force project.
And I’m not sure they have the talent to do that properly and securely.
If google can make a hackable car (yup, got hacked. Then got FIXED), and google’s rather smarter than the Us Gov’t… I don’t think this is likely to be a terribly effective program.
Blackhatting North Korea was a nice trick, I’ll admit, but that’s hardly needed to come from the surveilance state.Report
Lego’s represent your own ability to protest, and how easy it can be.
That said, I am reminded how much I dislike art installations. I am not a fan of being forced how to think (the part I dislike the most are the quotes.)Report
“I am not a fan of being forced how to think”
Wondering whether I should make a joke about being married here or not?Report
Well played sir!Report
Speech is just that: speech. And free speech is just one form of freedom. Just because our ability to use our relatively free speech to denounce restrictions on other freedoms or rights is unsuccessful doesn’t mean more free speech is worse than less.Report
I am not sure that I understand this point. I get that the ability to speak freely and criticize and perform activism doesn’t necessarily lead to reform, but are you arguing that it actually works against reform?Report
Free speech can make it seem like reform isn’t really that needed. If people could protest about police wrong-doing without getting in trouble, it show that things aren’t really that bad, right?Report
No. It doesn’t.Report
A lack of free speech facilitating denial shouldn’t be misinterpreted.Report
I disagree, @leeesq . Free speech catalyzes reform much more than it domesticates abuse.
When speakers are punished, they tend to also be censored, and even if not, the punishment effects a chill on others’ speech. Consequently, few people hear what the reform martyrs ever had to say, but they do hear what the government has to say about them.Report
Shame on Lego. If they’re going to say “no Politics with our toys” they blasted well ought to mean it.
Sorry, I can’t say that with a straight face.Report
From the website of the foundation that sponsored Ai Weiei’s project that you linked:
The page on “with wind” (the large dragon) indicates that the quoted individual is indeed Mandela. Regarding the owls
The other US portraits in the Trace (Lego) exhibit are Shaker Aamer, Shakir Hamoodi, MLK, John Kirakou, and ex-PFC Manning. I guess Mumia and Peltier don’t have the juice anymore. It also appears that none of the Pussy Riot women made the cut for Russia. Finally, It must take a special talent to be the only representative of Iraq and to have been jailed by all the governments on either side of the 2003 overthrow.Report
@kolohe
They played a Pussy Riot song in the A-block Installation.Report
(Forgive me if I’ve used this anecdote before, but seems appropriate here):
I had a Mormon friend who did his mission in Argentina in the late 70’s. I asked him a few years afterward if he didn’t feel terrified being in so dangerous a place during the Dirty War.
He looked puzzled, and said he had no inkling of it- everywhere he went, things were peaceful and safe.
I realized that even in the most dangerous and oppressive regimes, there is a strata of people who are totally unaffected by it. It isn’t necessary of even desirable for a regime to oppress ALL the citizens; as long as the majority are not troubled or inconvenienced, you can pretty much do whatever you want with the minority.
How many people here have been inconvenienced or harmed by the NSA wiretapping? How many here have been disappeared into a black site or had friends who were?
I’m thinking now of the revelations about Chicago’s black site jail. Its inconceivable that the victims of it didn’t talk about it to their friends and family. Yet who was listening? No one who mattered.
There is an observation that revolutions never start with the oppressed poor; they start only when the bourgeoisie become disaffected, and rise up. Only they actually possess the tools and wherewithal to stage effective action.
Its another reason why adding voices of people of color and the working class to the national dialogue is important; we need to hear from people who actually have had NSA wiretapping used at their criminal trials, not just the rest of us who experience it vicariously.Report
I have, for what it’s worth. Probably best not to get into details.
Know someone who got yelled at by the State Department, too
[for something more appropriately described as “being too nebby” rather than “helping a foreign state”].Report
I think the Russians and Cubans might disagree with your observation about revolutions but I generally agree with the over all point.Report
Actually there have been admissions that as long as we don’t devote 30% of GDP to internal spying (such as the East German Stasi did ) we don’t have the resources to watch everyone. I recall hearing that it takes about 8-10 full time equivalent folks to track one person. So that suggests that does suggest absent a very paranoid government universal spying won’t happen as it is to expensive.Report
I suspect that ratio no longer holds, or if it does now, will not hold indefinitely. Technological advance makes everything less labor intensive and cheaper. I imagine that goes for surveillance as well.Report
Not only is the hardware to watch everyone getting cheaper and more prevalent, the software to analyze the result is getting smarter (and the hardware *that* runs on is getting cheaper.) Which is vital: there’s no point in having 24×7 video of everyone if you need people to watch it all looking for misbehavior.Report
@mike-schilling
And even if they can’t monitor everything, they can store what they record so if they want to investigate you more later (or just make an example of you), they’ll be able to go back over what they have on you.Report
I want to make a comedy about some poor schmoe who has the job of reviewing the most mundane and boring footage and phone conversations and e-mailed captured by the NSA.Report
@glyph @mike-schilling
You can also do a comedy where the most mundane conversations are brought to heightened levels of threat:
NSA Head Honcho: “She said brings your laundry on Sunday. What does laundry mean?”
NSA entry-level spy: “She is his mother and he is visiting on Sunday. Laundry means his dirty clothing….”Report
“I want to make a comedy about some poor schmoe who has the job of reviewing the most mundane and boring footage and phone conversations and e-mailed captured by the NSA.”
Make sure you cut Terry Gilliam a royalty check.Report
I very much enjoyed this art review, @saul-degraw . I’ve done the Alcatraz tour before and it ought to be a high point of every new tourist’s visit to San Francisco. I recall some of the moments narrated that you related to — the sound of women laughing coming across the bay, the instructions about how to move about the prison. Broadway. The importance of serving good-tasting food and library privileges.
I might not make it to Alcatraz in time to see the Ai Weiwei installation, though, so this put me in a position where I had to partially imagine the experience. Alcatraz strikes me as an appropriate place for an installation of Ai’s work.
While the winged creature may have seemed a bit over-the-top and obvious to your companion and you, and the Legos offered for sale may seem a bit commercial and common, bear in mind that Alcatraz is visited by people of all levels of artistic sophistication and you are probably among the elite in terms of training and ability to autonomously interpret contemporary art. And, you had the benefit of a companion who could assist with interpreting symbols rooted in Ai’s cultural vernacular.
Kids like playing with Legos. Hell, grownups like playing with Legos. If selling Legos a) support the expenses of maintaining the national park, b) support the exhibition of contemporary art, c) remind people that sometimes, and in some places, people who have done nothing wrong wind up imprisoned, and d) remind people of the need to demonstrate humanity even to those rightfully put behind bars, then I’d say that the Legos have more than done their job.Report
The importance of serving good-tasting food and library privileges.
And the even greater privilege of being on the swim team.Report
I don’t understand your argument about speech and political activity for two reasons:
First, the logic that speech is a substitute for political action doesn’t make sense to me for 3 reasons:
1) Political action requires coordination and coordination requires speech. Impairing the coordination of dissidents reduces their ability to dissent.
2) Humans are social and sensitive to the beliefs of others. If a viewpoint is forbidden dissidents will be led to underestimate the fraction of people who believe as they do due to availability bias. This may discourage them from trying to change things.
3) Laws banning certain viewpoints will tend to lead to the proponents of those viewpoints being imprisoned. It’s a lot harder to change policy from inside a cell.
Secondly, it feels like an explanation in search of a question. Why have calls for prison reform gone unanswered? The simplest explanation is that the median voter is comfortable with the status quo, either because they don’t know how bad things are, or because they don’t care (or are even pleased by it). If there aren’t a substantial number of people willing to change their vote over prison reform, the Democrats have no incentive to do anything about it.Report
As long as free speech is directed where it can be expressed harmlessly, it’s not a problem. Where dissent is ignored it will be. Where it causes trouble to the ruling order it will be put down. Those with more to loose are naturally reluctant to risk what they have.Report