Falling Out of Love with Hate, a Placeholder
There are a handful of pundits whom I avoid reading.
I avoid reading them because I find them so reliably infuriating that I end up saying regrettable things; or at the very least, with my blood pressure elevated beyond all possible benefit to the exposure to ideas I find objectionable.
There is no particular thread connecting these pundits. They are liberal, conservative, male, female, religious, atheist. The only common theme is that when I read them I want to punch them in the face; or at least call the out publicly as fools and frauds.
Two things bring this gallery of rogues to mind.
The first is this paragraph posted by Alan Jacobs on the new book Unapologetic, and the reception it’s received from (some of) his fellow Christians:
“I’ve read the whole of Unapologetic and I think it’s a uniquely beautiful book. Of course, there is much in it that I don’t agree with, but you know what? Maybe in those areas Spufford is right and I am wrong. I need to consider that possibility. Moreover, there are surely many people who know nothing about Christianity, or who know little and want to know even less, who will be touched by Spufford’s approach in ways that they could never be touched by anything I write.”
The second is this paragraph from an Essay by Noah Millman, The Return of Fromm’s Fear Of Freedom:
“Deep social structures that provide a sense of meaning to life are not imposed; they grow – that’s why we call them “organic.” If the problem is that these forms are unable to grow in the world we are building, or simply that they haven’t grown much yet because they haven’t had much time to do so, then the challenge isn’t to come up with a Big Idea that can provide us poor mortals with Grounding, but simply to make it, at the margins, easier for social structures that work for people to grow, and trust that they will grow, even if what grows doesn’t look precisely like what grew in earlier generations.”
—
I have a persistent daydream, and that daydream find me and the afore mentioned fools and frauds on my boat. We are in the middle of a passage, an easy one, like California to Hawaii. We have time on our hands. There’s no hurry.
There’s also no one there watching us. We are face to face, stuck with each other, with only ourselves and each other to impress. No reblogging, no commentary, no page views; at least not until we arrive at our destination and each of us (undoubtably) recounts our passage.
—
This post is a placeholder. A public reminder to myself of things I want to explore in greater detail when time allows. Think Thermomixed Up, but with less hate.
not sure what is so objectionable about the alan jacobs paragraph. pray tell.Report
I did not mean to imply that Jacobs or Millman are a part of my personal petty “Rogues’ Gallery”. I left them unnamed on purpose. Sorry for the confusion.Report
I had an unfortunate falling out with a friend last night. We’ve disagreed vehemently about things in the past, but have always been able to keep such disagreements from getting personal. Sadly, no such luck last night… and the worst part is that it should not have been a big deal. So let’s just say that I think you wrote this post for me for this moment.
Also, I love your Thermomixed Up-type posts. I’ll be glad to see something like that coming back.Report
Sorry to hear about you and your friend.Report
Thanks David, I appreciate it.
It shall pass, no doubt, but until then it will lead to some awkward and uncomfortable situations.Report
I’m guessing you weren’t arguing over food.
I have found that these arguments go better when there is food.Report
You’re right. I’m sure it would have been much better over food.Report
“I have a persistent daydream, and that daydream find me and the afore mentioned fools and frauds on my boat. ”
The hard part about reading, versus conversing, is not imagining the words you read being spoken inside your head. Because when they’re spoken, they are spoken with your voice. Which means you hear it as though you were talking. And if you said the things those people wrote, then you’d obviously be either lying or stupid or wrong; and you get mad, because who’s this jerk that came along and made you be lying or stupid or wrong?Report
Oh, DD! That’s what I hate about euphemisms like “the n-word.” We all know what the “n-word” really is and so when someone says “n-word” your internal voice just translates it to “nigger.” So now some asshole that can’t bring themselves to say the word out loud has just caused you to say it in your own head in your own voice. Just like I did there by typing it out. Of course what I’m talking about is more of an issue with spoken words since written words do that anyway no matter what.Report
The quoted graphs seem entirely bland and ordinary to me; they’ll never get any points for originality or courage. But what is infuriating about them? Is the objection that these these paragraphs took more effort to read than they took thought to write?Report
I could be way off, but I took the two sample paragraphs as pieces that are spurring David to act more charitably towards the fools and frauds, that Jacobs and Millman are showing him that he needs less hate.
But that’s just me.Report
Yeah, it’ s just you. fool!Report
It’s fun to be the fool.Report
just ask Axelrod.
… oh, wait, that’s troll.
my bad.Report
For some reason, my mind went right to Axel Rose. That probably works.Report
ah, that makes sense. I would have understood that better if I had kept the title of the post in mind, eh?Report
For the new year. — I still live, I still think: I still have to live, for I still have to think. Sum, ergo cogito: cogito, ergo sum. Today everybody permits himself the expression of his wish and his dearest thought: hence I, too, shall say what it is that I wish from myself today, and what was the first thought to run across my heart this year — what thought shall be for me the reason, warranty, and sweetness of my life henceforth. I want to learn to see more and more as beautiful what is necessary in things; then I shall be one of those who makes things beautiful. Amor fati: let that be my love henceforth! I do not want to wage war against what is ugly. I do not want to accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all and all and on the whole: someday I wish to be only a Yes-sayer.
-By some German dude, translated by some other German dude.
OK, it’s #276 in Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, Kaufmann’s translation. I suspect Nietzsche realized that this was one of his most difficult aphorisms to follow, given how difficult it was for him to follow it himself. But I suspect it’s worth trying.Report
Perhaps you haven’t been sailing enough lately. When I reach such a pass it’s time to saddle the horses and head into the mountains. Like the oceans, the mountains can swallow a man in a moment of laxity or a misreading of the weather. It does center the mind nicely.Report
Remarkable that your initials are AJ; and yes, not enough water time this year. I’ve invested most of this year in the hopes of abundant water time in the near future!Report
It’s a coincidence, first and middle, not first and last. By the way, she’s a beauty, and it seems to me she’ll be worth every minute invested in bringing her to life.Report
Do you also “love” particular pundits because they cause others’ blood to boil? I’m thinking of a lady who comes from a family of academics that are actually intimidating and very much dislikes whisking a bechamel.Report