7 thoughts on “Consider Phlebas

  1. Yeah, Banks is an excellent writer, and is one sick individual. I think Use of Weapons and Player of Games are his best work, for they are more seductive before the beautifully written horrible parts.Report

    1. @William the Coroner, I agree with your estimation of the Culture novels, although I found Matter pretty underrated. The Algebraist is also an excellent, non-Culture science fiction novel by Banks.

      In the last year or so, I’ve tried to go back and read some of the science fiction that I loved as a teenager: Asimov, Clifford D. Simak, Heinlein, and I have to say, you really can’t go home again. There are definitely some that stand up: Dick (although the quality control can be pretty daunting), Gibson, and to a limited extent Clarke, but a lot of those old masters are so invested in a literature of ideas and plot that they completely ignore character and prose. Banks, Kim Stanley Robinson and a handful of other modern writers are able to stand head and shoulders with modern literary fiction. It’s nice to have someone explore these ideas in a well rounded way, with time and effort invested in all of the areas, not just in plot.Report

    2. @William the Coroner, Somehow, The Wasp Factory comes off as considerably sicker to me than anything I’ve read in his science fiction. I guess fantastic settings somehow dull my responses to grotesque writing. I love Banks, but the Algrebraist is far superior to any of the Culture novels I’ve read (haven’t gotten to The State of the Art)

      So. . . have you finished yet, E.D? I had actually just finished this book a couple of weeks ago but somehow missed this post. I only saw it when you mentioned it at Balloon Juice.
      I think there’s a lot in Consider Phlebas and entire set of Culture books that would make worthy discussion for the folks here.Report

Comments are closed.