How does the number 183 become 5? Easy – redefine the verb “to waterboard” as meaning only “sessions of waterboarding.” Similarly, how does the number 83 become “8 to 10”? Easy – redefine the verb “to waterboard” as meaning only “long pours of water.” The good news is that at least we’re moving away from trying to restrict the meaning of the word “torture” to trying to restrict the meaning of the word “waterboard.”
Mark of New Jersey
Mark is a Founding Editor of The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the predecessor of Ordinary Times.
Thanks to your generosity, we were able to upgrade our service plan. Hopefully this will help us address some of our performance issues.
on Youngsters Make Merry at Evanston Country Club Christmas PartyHester Walrath (1898-1971) went on to attend Northwestern University, marry a businessman, and have…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024So the "CR" of 1500 pages, given to members 24 hours before the vote, and which did all kinds of thi…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024Do you not understand the irony of speaking positively about banning political parties in the same b…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024I suppose we could blame the townspeople for not showing up the umpteenth time the shepherd boy crie… on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024A small backlash? If the election were held today they would be the 2nd biggest party in the Bundest…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024I have no idea why pointing out that Na.zis were elected legitimately is relevant to this discussion… on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024No, I'm pointing out that you find 'Trump is Hitler' more absurd than 'These people are Na.zis', so…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024The local paper referenced this work, partially paid for by the feds, this morning. Some of the phas… on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024And I will, again, point you that you are the first to mention Hitler, You sure about that? Maybe re… on A Note from EmHe's one of the AIs. https://claude.ai/new I make him read my essays and then I argue with him about…
Youngsters Make Merry at Evanston Country Club Christmas Party
December 21, 2024
December 20, 2024
December 19, 2024
December 18, 2024
on A Note from Em on A Note from Em on A Note from Em on A Note from Em on A Note from Em on A Note from Em on A Note from Em
on From The Wall Street Journal: How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in Charge on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
on A Note from Em on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 12/16/2024
2 + 2 = 5Report
Nobody is “redefining” anything. Get off your high horse once an for all.
How would you define it then? It seems reasonable to define “waterboarding” as “sessions of waterboarding” and not as the individual pours of water, no matter what your opinion is on the legality/efficacy of the practice. Why is this so Orwellian, as ED Kain suggests? By the way, this “Orwellian gambit” is yet another example “outrage” because it implies that anyone who thinks that the practice should be defined as “sessions” and not “pours” belongs in a totalitarian police state and only ED Kain and his friends belong in a free society, etc etc. Defining waterboarding as “sessions” is not an attempt to hide or cover up the practice but only one to make it more precise. Not doing so has the obvious purpose of exaggerating the practice to the unimaginable—i.e., it’s politically motivated.
What if we used your criteria for other things in daily life? How many Cokes did you drink today? Well… let’s define “drinking a Coke” as individual sips. Then you’d become some kind of Coke pervert if you only drank one Coke.
How about masturbation? Let’s define it as meaning individual strokes on the genitals. Then I masturbated about ten thousand times last week, or whatever. Why is this so stupid? Because we just don’t talk that way. Why, then, should we talk that way about waterboarding?Report
“Why, then, should we talk that way about waterboarding?”
Because we talk about some things in sets (wholes) and other things in terms of the individual (parts). Yes, drinking a Coke is commonly understood as meaning “drinking an entire can or glass of Coke”. But it does not follow that all acts are understood in this manner.
And given that the boasts about the efficacy of waterboarding include that it only needed thirty or forty seconds to break an extraordinarily resistant man and that it was used in a program designed to break the will of that man through sheer repetition aimed at producing ‘learned helplessness’, it seems to me that waterboarding is much better classified with the later (parts) than the former (wholes).
There’s also the intent in treating it as a whole rather than a part, which is of course to obscure the viciousness of the act so as to reduce our discomfort.Report