Romney’s Going Big in Iowa
One wonders how much the rise of Newtmentum influenced this decision:
The answer to one of the great lingering questions about the Republican presidential race has suddenly turned up here along Ingersoll Avenue, where Mitt Romney’s Iowa campaign headquarters is opening for business.
Mr. Romney, who has been cautiously calibrating expectations about his chances in a state full of social conservatives, is now playing to win the Iowa caucuses. Television commercials are on the way, volunteers are arriving and a stealth operation is ready to burst into view in the weeks leading up to the caucuses, the first Republican nominating contest, on Jan. 3.
The escalation of his effort in Iowa, along with a more aggressive schedule in New Hampshire and an expanding presence in South Carolina, is the strongest indication yet that Mr. Romney is shifting from a defensive, make-no-mistakes crouch to an assertive offensive strategy. If he can take command in the three early-voting states, he could make the nominating battle a swift one.
“There is a lot of wisdom in trying to deliver a knockout punch,” said Matt Schultz, the Iowa secretary of state, who supported Mr. Romney four years ago but is unaligned now. “If he came and won Iowa and New Hampshire, it would be all over.”
Utter conjecture on my part, but I wonder if seeing the Not Mitt Romney championship recently handed down from Cain to Gingrich spooked Team Romney enough to inspire this high risk/reward move. What might and should have the Romneyites antsy is not the arrival of nominal frontrunner Newt Gingrich as a real threat to Romney’s winning the nomination. Rather, they might take Newt’s sudden, somewhat arbitrary, boomlet of popular support as proof that a significant chunk of GOP voters won’t make their peace with a nominee Romney until there’s truly nowhere left for them to go.
The operational assumption of most pundits and pols is that, eventually, this’ll happen; Romney’s skeptics will come into the flock. And, wary of conventional wisdom as I may usually be, I’m on-board with the consensus this time. But that doesn’t mean I think Romney’s position is an especially good one. The longer it takes for him to truly have the nomination as his, the better the odds that Mitt will have to mouth the kind of far-right platitudes that make middle-of-the-road voters uncomfortable — the feverish apocalypticisms of moral bankruptcy and societal decay that more fringe-friendly candidates and natural-born Cassandras like Michele Bachmann or Newt Gingrich can deliver in their sleep.
So it makes sense for the Romney folks to decide it’s time to put a stop to all the BS and to get this motley crew of voters united behind the Next In Line. If he can win Iowa, he’ll win himself months of being able to shift to the political center, focusing his campaign around attacking Obama’s record rather than defending his own. Yet because he’s now so clearly decided to try to win, losing in Iowa will be significantly more harmful to the campaign than it would have been otherwise. If he loses, voters and, more importantly, journalists will decide that Romney needs to prove himself capable of winning over the kind of Republicans more easily found in Iowa than New Hampshire.
And then Romney will find himself in that frustrating media dynamic in which his victories, no matter how decisive, are considered somehow less than relevant unless and until they come in a state where the Tea Party faction of the Republican Party — generally less than thrilled by the prospect of a candidate Romney — is the dominant power bloc. At that point, the locus of media attention will be on Romney’s failures, not his victories; every day, he’ll be playing defense in the press. But if he can win in Iowa, that all goes away before it’s even the chance to start. Better still, his best-case media narrative — Mitt Romney, the Inevitable Nominee — takes hold.
It’s a funny thing, really: Romney’s going for it in Iowa, but his decision is not about Iowa and it never was. As has been the case ever since Rick Perry turned out to be a tiger composed of the flimsiest, most delicate paper, Romney’s real audience is the media. He’s running in the Iowa caucus, yes; but the voters he really cares about can be found in the nation’s bylines — not its cornfields or county fairs.
Dude you post is awesome! In fact, your whole series of posts on this election thingie have been great!Report
Did someone — someone who has been drinking, perhaps — hack into Murali’s account?Report
No, I have just been under stress recently and a large portion of that stress got lifted. So I’m feeling very mellow.Report
Mazel tov!Report
There was an amusing CNN article about how, now that Gingrich is a co-front-runner, he’s preparing to be attacked, where ‘attack” mean “quote accurately”.Report
Ron Paul has a good chance of winning Iowa. I started a post on my blog today claiming that Romney is making a strategical error not campaigning hard in Iowa, but I didn’t finish it. Huntsman has made a bigger mistake putting all his eggs in the NH basket.Report
Huntsman doesn’t have any money to do it any other way; the problems Romney has with the Iowa caucus goers, Huntsman has as well, with bells on.
Ron Paul is shaping up to be an interesting wild card in both Iowa and NH, but I won’t believe that the passion and money his organization has will translate into actual votes until they do. 2008 taught me that.Report
You’re being a might bit uncharitable in some parts to a guy who took your advice! 🙂
It’s possible that they’re not ‘spooked’ so much, as see an opportunity. They could have always seen this ‘not-Romney’ bloc as a stumbling block, but now with Newt being the not-Romney du jour, they now sense a unique chance to put this away. (which is the heart of your analysis in both this and the previous post). Head to head, Romney can go qualm for qualm with the thrice-married, corporate-influence-peddling, Queen-Nancy-sofa-sitting Gingrich.
The other oolie in the media aspect in this race is you can’t discount the right wing media machine as the principle lens through which the Republican primary voter will get his or her information. (I think, but would have to look up that all the early primaries are of the sort that would generally preclude opportunistic voting by non-Republicans- as there is no other game in town for the other league)
Report
Oh I didn’t mean to sound as if I were belittling Romney’s decision. “Spooked” isn’t bad — running a campaign in a state of low-level terror has its benefits, really.
Good point about right-wing media. This story is interesting, in that regard.Report
Bravo to the incisiveness and esp the even-handedness of this analysis. WD, sir.
I would add that New Hampshire, the 2nd poll and first real primary, has been in the bag for Romney since elsewhen. However, Gingrich has pulled into a statistical tie, trailing only 29-27. So Romney spent the weekend in New Hampshire.
Should Romney lose the first 2, #3 South Carolina might turn and Romney’s on the outside looking in. The CW has ridden on Romney’s putative electability and Newt’s lack of same. But GOP primary voters might go all-in, and decide to win or lose with a guy they agree with instead of one whose greatest political virtue is his, um, flexibility.Report
If the Republican primary voters can’t also see the almost equal ideological malleability of Gingrich, well, it wouldn’t surprise me.Report
Gingrich needs to be careful to pace himself during the campaign, since as he’s noted: “There’s no question at times in my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate.”Report
That’s why his wife suggested they vacation in Hawaii a week after the campaign started.Report
Smart lady. He is exactly on schedule to start fooling around with wife #4.Report
Pedantry alert: you refer to Gingrich and Bachmann as “natural-born Cassandra’s”. The analogy is not quite correct since Cassandra was indeed a prophetess of gloom and doom but her curse was to be always correct in her prophecy, but never to be believed.
Those two are rarely believed and less frequently correctReport
Double pedantry alert: I apologize for the greengrocers’ apostrophe.Report
“If he can win Iowa, he’ll win himself months of being able to shift to the political center…”
Then please, let him lose in Iowa and take as long as possible to wrap up the nomination. So that come November, it’s easy to remind people about just what the Republican Party positions are.Report
Amen. The last thing we need is another Big Government, centrist Republican in the White House. We need a real, freaking, substantive opposition party.Report
Not going to happen. The median voter likes big government centrist whatever.Report