Science And Technology Links 4/6/17
Aerospace
From Will: Translating the lingo here, what they are talking about is having modular avionics (AVIation electrONICS) systems that all follow a common software language and hardware architecture. Modern avionics are essentially networked purpose-built computers that tie into external sensors and internal control systems. Back in the bad old days, the avionics computer was locked just above the pilot’s shoulder and somewhere between his ears. Cockpit indicators, like artificial horizons, airspeed, altitude, etc. were designed to be slotted into common holes in the dashboard and hooked up to common external sensors (like pitot tubes, etc.). That was about as standardized as it got. Nowadays, only the simplest of aircraft are without computerized avionics. I’ve seen restored WWII fighters with modern avionics systems tucked into the cockpit, complete with multifunction touch displays and HUDs.
Commercial and military aircraft all have complex avionics packages. Once upon a time, those avionics systems were unique to each manufacturer, and sometimes unique to an airframe (companies might re-use pieces from one airframe to another, but you also had airframes with completely unique systems). As you can imagine, this made for not only design headaches, but support nightmares. Having common hardware requirements and common software APIs streamlines things quite a bit.
A new twist on an old trick.
But will they help us do the Electric Slide, or the Electric Bugaloo?
The Falcon 9 rocket has been successfully re-used. This is a pretty big deal when it comes to reducing the cost to orbit. Another way to keep down costs is to use a Single Stage To Orbit (SSTO). The reasons we use multiple stages is both weight (once the fuel is used, to point in carry the empty tank around) and efficiency (the traditional bell shaped rocket nozzle has a lot of shape variation, and that variation affects how efficient it is in certain air pressure and density regimes). Now the rocket at the link looks less like a rocket and more like Paul Bunyan’s beard trimmer, but that is what is known as a Linear Aerospike, which is a rocket nozzle that is efficient across a wide range of atmospheric conditions, which means you only need one rocket motor for the whole flight.
Bio
Despite the alphabet soup, the topic of interest is the discovery of another key part of why our bodies degenerate with age.
Lungs can make blood, who knew (no one knew, that’s why it’s interesting). Also, we can make blood in a lab using immortal stem cells. I just can’t but wonder what will happen to all the college students who are unable to get free pizza once every 8 weeks.
Speaking of stem cells, fixing a torn rotator cuff. Wave of the future, folks.
Computing
Why is AI still kinda dumb?
Once more around this maypole. It bothers me how seemingly blasé law enforcement is about backdoors and the clear danger they represent.
Microchip! Assemble thyself!
Finally, I can put the TV remote in my couch cushion, instead of losing it between them.
Energy
Globally, coal power plants are in decline (old ones being retired, new ones not coming on-line). Not surprising. Especially given the interest in other sources of power (full disclosure, the CEO of Windlift is an old friend of mine from Grad School). Related, given the intermittent nature of wind and solar, storing power in compressed air.
The polymer membrane in hydrogen fuel cells is a fragile thing, and a tear in one greatly reduces it’s ability to produce power. New ones will hopefully be able to heal themselves, thus significantly increasing their service lives.
Storing solar power in solar cells, thanks to ferns.
Environment
Turning citrus peels into heavy metal water filters. And here I was just using them to freshen up the sink disposal.
Turning leaves into fertilizer! Wait, we already do that with compost? Let me re-read… OH! Using bionic leaves to make fertilizer! The advantage is, no need to using petroleum to make fertilizer, and the ‘leaf’ can be plugged into the ground next to the plants. I’d be curious to see how this would work in a farmer’s field, but I can certainly see something like this working in a garden, or a greenhouse.
I do love a nice poly-cotton blend, but the material hasn’t been very re-usable except as fill. Note the word, ‘hasn’t’.
Materials
A liquid that can move by itself. Do you want The Blob? Because this is how you get The Blob!
Graphene Quantum Dots. Not the candy. Handy little things, from TVs to laundry detergent.
Because graphene, here is a desalination filter, and a water filter (OK, it’s carbon nanotubes, but close enough).
And for when we don’t want water hanging around, a self healing, highly durable hydrophobic coating.
Printing with liquid metal (and an introduction to shear thinning).
Military
When I first saw Team Wendy, I was pretty sure I was going to read about how fresh (not frozen) beef was helping soldiers. Turns out, that is not quite right.
Physics
Subatomic quantum behavior continues to surprise.
Paging Orson Krennic. Mr. Krennic, your new toy is ready.
Man, if you can’t count on the existence of Dark Energy, what can you count on? Seriously though, there is an important bit in there about models and how they can bite you in the ass.
How much more do we have to learn about mosquitoes before we can just up and wipe the little bastards out?
Robotics
Upside, this is a cool new way for robots to manipulate things! Downside, these guys have heard of tentacle porn, right? Rule 34 exists for a reason, people.
These are closer to cybernetics than robotics.
Transportation
Thinking about autonomous air vehicles. If self driving cars give you the willies…
Using little plasma generators to give trucks some aerodynamic efficiency.
That is a bad-ass looking wheelchair. And it climbs stairs.
More money for the dream of supersonic commercial flight. Still need to figure out how to quiet the boom.
Sweet Lord Poseidon, I want one!
Image by Joe Dyer
Quiet morning on the links, huh? I’ll chime in and say I appreciate the effort.
Also, tangentially related to the first item
(em added)Report
Basing things on IE? Your problem is obvious!Report
This strikes me as being vaguely related to the age of the people in charge of advising the people in charge of approving the purchase order.
The Colonels advising the Generals at this point know Linux as this crazy OS that only eggheads can use and we can’t expect Airmen Basic fresh out of boot to sit down at a computer and know how to use Linux but… yeah, they’re down with Windows.
When we get Colonels who grew up in the post-Redhat era to start having enough stroke to be able to tell the General “New distros of Linux are different. They’re really user-friendly now”, we might be able to do a real and serious (and perhaps even cheap?) upgrade to military tech.
(Sometimes I wonder how much money Microsoft lost due to Windows 8 when it comes to military contracts…)Report
It’s not like the military has any idea how to use Linux.Report
I’ve got a bud who recently went on IRR. Before that, he worked on the floor of a Space Operations Squadron.
I’ll ask him if he ever encountered that. (Normally, he gives rants on how much he hated working with windows and how glad he is to not have to anymore.)Report
Be interesting to hear if the USAF is still maintaining it.Report
They sure as hell didn’t use it in the F-35 program.Report
F-35 is a case study in how not to do military equipment.Report
The F-16 was so badly unstable that, during its first high-speed taxi run, it oscillated so badly that it actually left the ground.
It’s now being used as the Superior Legacy System We Never Should Have Stopped Buying in articles like the one by this turd, who’s gleefully reposting some forced-out general’s backstabbing of his former colleagues.
ps the description: “”First, the roll control was too sensitive, too much roll rate as a function of stick force. Second, the exhaust nozzle control for the prototype was wired incorrectly. You had to be on the ground for the nozzle to be wide open, so as soon as you took the weight off the wheels, the nozzle closed and essentially doubled the thrust at idle.”
So, um, the prototype for this Superior Legacy System was built so badly wrong that it was basically uncontrollable.Report
Related: the success of the F-16 is largely due to avionics that (eventually) took care of all the fiddling details so quickly that the pilots had no idea it was happening.
I imagine the first few prototypes were exciting birds, before that got that figured out.Report
PS thanks for the appreciation.Report
I figure that what happened was the people who wrote ALIS were mandated by the customer to use off-the-shelf software as a cost-savings measure.
And, at the time, the off-the-shelf software was IE 8.
The only backwards compatibility between IE 8 and IE 11 is the ability to parse basic HTML, so any hacks that made ALIS work on IE 8 are not available to IE 11…unless, as described, you turn all the security features off.
And they’re not allowed to rewrite ALIS to work with IE 11 because “you already BOUGHT that software, we’re not gonna give you MORE MONEY to go BUY IT AGAIN”. And they’re not allowed to use an entirely different system because “off the shelf saves money, MAKE IT WORK.”Report
This company I used to work at used a bug tracking system with an HTML front end that only worked on IE. Well, only on some versions of IE. Well, only on very specific patch levels of some versions of IE. Really, not “gotta have these patches”, but “gotta have these patches but not those, because those fix bugs it depends on”.
Eventually, someone I worked with spent two days writing a dead simple HTML frontend that had no polish at all but worked on any browser without crashing or freezing.Report
At least the consensus remains, IE sucks.Report
If you’re looking for tea leaves to read for 2018, here are some.
I’m not totally sure how useful these are, given that only 31% of the folks in Colorado Springs voted and, especially, given that Tuesday was a huge snowstorm (a bunch of businesses closed, and my boss even sent out an email saying, paraphrased, “days like this are one of the reasons why we give you guys vacation days… stay safe, etc”).
The takeaway is that people are now joking that Boulder has moved to Colorado Springs.
A window into 2018? An outlier? What are your priors?Report
I suspect too niche to have many implications for 2018. What’s your take?Report
Colorado Springs Republicans are demoralized and/or prefer to vote in person (which a snowstorm can thwart) while, at the same time, the Colorado Springs government decision to limit RMJ from being sold within the city is angering both people who wish to enjoy RMJ and the 3 or 4 fiscal conservatives who wish that the city was getting its hands on those sweet tourist dollars/sweet tax revenues.
But I’m probably projecting.Report
Is this related to a link, or are you threadjacking?Report
Oh, um, sorry. “The technology involved with mail-in voting is still too complex for as many as 69% of registered voters.”Report
via GIPHYReport
Here’s an interesting idea.
Right now, current wind turbines in offshore installations each have their own electrical generator mounted directly to the turbine (through a gearbox, obviously). The generated power then flows along cables to a central station where it is combined and conditioned for the grid.
This idea removes the generator set from each turbine and replaces it with a seawater pump. The pumps move seawater under pressure to a central generating station and that is where it is turned into power. Hydraulic networks can balance out load variations easier than electrical systems can (or, perhaps, more cheaply, not sure).Report
With the setup they have now there is just the losses of the gearing, generator and electrical conduit.
A pressurized water setup will have the losses of a pump mechanism, a fluid salt water network and a generator plus gearing at pump or generator.
I would want to see some efficiencies at intended scale before betting on that one.
(thanks for writing these links, good stuff)Report
You also have conditioning losses.Report
I was parsing that to the generator equipment, but we could break it out if it would be better represented.Report
Getting well out of my comfort zone here — a systems guy has to know when it’s time to go talk to a real expert — but the specialized generators that have been going into new turbines for the last 5-6 years produce clean-enough properly-synchronized power to plug straight into the grid with little loss in efficiency (only a small portion of the total power has to go through conventional conditioning).Report
A proposal like this has to identify some kind of hazard or weakness of the current design that this hopes to overcome. The paper is 167 pages long, I’m sure there is an explanation of such in there, I just haven’t had time to dig into it.Report
That’s what happens when your waves get all frizzy?Report
Nicely layered.Report
Not related to Sci or Tech, but Don Rickles has died at 90. Hockey pucks around the world say RIP.Report
And Bob Newhart is, wow, 87. They were best friends, as are Mel Brooks (90) and Carl Reiner (95).Report
Think of how many people would pay just to watch them chat and joke and tell stories. Lord knows i would.Report
Did you see this? It’s Jerry Seinfeld doing exactly that.Report
Yeah i saw that. Seinfeld clearly just can’t believe he is present with those two.Report
50 Tomahawk missiles fired into Syria. Holy fishing moly.Report
That’ll ruin your day.
I wonder how good Syrian missile defense is?Report
Apparently the strike was limited to a military base. So at least it didn’t ruin too many Syrian citizens’ day.Report
Are we in a bubble again? I’m not sure that I know anybody personally who was in favor of this particular policy. Like, even online.Report
Here’s a guess: Trump’s approvals go up as a result of this strike.
Oh, and one very prominent person is in favor of exactly this policy (taking out airbases). In fact, she advocated for it just today. HRC.Report
Only safe prediction to make at the moment.Report
Eh, I’m iffy on whether he’ll get anything distinguishable from noise. Public taste for Middle Eastern adventurism is already really low (“bombing terrorists” is great, but people don’t want actual boots on the ground or any sign it’s going to become something serious that could turn into another slog like Iraq), low overall approval for Trump means skepticism as to the wisdom and effectiveness of any proposed plan is ‘baked into the cake’, and the fact that people seem pretty sick of Syria anyways.
He might get a blip for doing something at all, maybe a larger one of Russia saber rattles back enough to push back on “So friendly with Russia” but….I suspect it’ll be down the memory hole by next weekend, and out of the polls.
Just too much downward momentum for what is, in the end, just another bombing run in Syria. After several days of hemming and hawing. (And as Jaybird notes — nobody really wants to be involved in Syria anyways)Report
On the supposition his approvals go up would it be reasonable to conclude that at least those people are in favor of military engagement with Syria?Report
Not sure who “those people” are in this sentence; thus far this is wildly popular with Trump-skeptical Twitter conservatives, which I would expect to be echoed among real people, and I assume the ever-present pro-action part of popular opinion will assert itself. He isn’t going to hit W post-9/11 numbers, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it at least got him over 50% approval.Report
The term “those people” refers to the people who bump his approvals up in light of this air strike. Nothin nefarious. Just highlighting the subject of the discussion: people who want military engagement in Syria.Report
Thanks for the reminder Hillz of the policies of yours so many libs and lefties really didn’t like about you. We hadn’t forgotten.Report
One difference is that I don’t Hillary woulda done what Trump just did: act unilaterally without either legal basis or political cover from allies. The end result, of course, isn’t any different but the politics is. The problem Trump now has is that he’s not only reversing course on his earlier isolationist policies, but he’s alienated so many allies who might have otherwise been willing to follow thru on this … well … pretty reflexive reaction to an event which previously wasn’t within the Trump-policy worldview.
Keep your head on a swivel with this guy. He comes at you from unexpected directions!Report
This is why if Putin did make some sort of deal with Trump, Putin’s the sucker, because anyone who makes a deal with Trump winds up screwed.Report
I suspect that, despite the lack of competence in either the WH or the State department, that the Russian’s are not overly concerned. Playing with chemical weapons draws undue attention, so letting Uncle Sam smack someone’s hands for doing it is perfectly fine by them.
It reinforces who Assad’s friends are, doesn’t it? It also reminds Assad not to play with the big boy toys because that makes the world give a crap, if briefly, over Syria. Which is not so good for Russian interests.
So I don’t suspect much beyond this. Trump lacks the popularity to get involved in Syria — the public appears in no mood for another Middle Eastern adventure. Russian interests weren’t significantly harmed (possibly even advanced) so I suspect this will be a return to the pre-chemical weapons status quo.Report
CNN reports a Tillerson statement that Russia, being the guarantor of 2013 policy to eliminate Syrian chemical weapons, is either complicit in Assad’s chemical weapons attack or incompetent. I think that escalates things beyond a quick return to the status quo.Report
He could have just blamed Obama.Report
I guess that’s what you get a war for its birthday – another war.Report
To be fair, this isn’t a new war, just shifting a participant in a long running one a bit more towards the “enemy” side of things.Report
And that wasn’t the start of the war, just the day Congress voted for the US to enter it. It had been going on for 2 1/2 years.Report
What the hell?
Here’s a link to a tweet that has a video of news coverage of this that will have your jaw on the floor.
What the hell?Report
Did you mean to link something surprising?Report
I feel like I’ve switched timelines again.
I mean, this is the timeline where we’ve screwed up everything we’ve touched in the Middle East, right?
It’s like a series of trolley problems where we’re sold on pulling the lever to kill one person instead of letting five die but every time we pull the lever the trolley blows up and kills dozens in a marketplace.
And we’re quoting Leonard Cohen to describe how pretty the freakin’ missles are?
What the hell?Report
You remember the Bush administration, right? Cable news loves their missile launches.Report
You ask if I remember the Bush administration.
I do.
I find myself aghast at the huge number of people in positions of influence (many of which are older than I am) who seem to have no freaking recollection of anything pertaining to the Bush administration.Report
At this point, I’m more surprised when I see someone who really has learned something.Report
Brian Williams WTF x 1000. Really there aren’t enough Picard and Riker facepalm memes to cover that.
People who thought Trump would keep us out of mucking around in the ME were and are suckers. Someone has to fall for Nigerian prince e-mail scams I guess it’s them.
Was this the MSM being all liberal?Report
If only the DNC hadn’t rigged things against Bernie…Report
Whatever you say Kimmi.Report
Hey, he’s the only one who had a shot at winning the presidency who might *NOT* have started launching missiles on the 100th anniversary of WWI.Report
Jill Stein too.
Well, not at people other than vaccine makers.Report
Rand Paul is screaming something about how we shouldn’t have done anything because the US was not attacked.
Clinton is explaining how this is totally what she would have suggested.
The pro-Trump people in my feed are screaming about how Trump has betrayed them.
The pro-Hillary people in my feed are talking about how they don’t agree with Trump about this or that or the other but when it comes to Humanitarian Intervention, we need to support the Commander-in-Chief.
This is nuts.Report
The pro-Trump peeps on my feed have been very quiet about politics for the last couple months.
I don’t have any strong pro Hillary peeps so that is just my bubble.Report
Rand Paul is screaming something about how we shouldn’t have done anything because the US was not attacked.
The right answer for the wrong reason. We shouldn’t do anything military because all we can do is make things worse. (Or no better, anyway.) . The only thing we ca do that’s a net positive is give refugees a sane and safe place to live.Report
That’s… weird.
It’s mostly pro-Clinton peeps in my social network, and pretty much everyone is like, “WTF? This is a bad idea.”
I mean, precipitous policy reversals and bizarre, clumsy communications aside, this is the sort of thing you get when you vote for a candidate that’s part of the “mainstream” on national security, but we’ve always understood that it goes into the list of “cons”, not the list of “pros”.Report
Where have all the good Arch Duke’s gone? Really isn’t a proper homage to WW1 without one.Report
Gaddafi was a Colonel. What title does Assad claim?Report
He is an actual medical doctor.Report
What happened to “do no harm?”
It looks like red lines actually mean something to trump.Report
And he’s going to be fine. It’s not like he misremembered whether he came under fire or was just terrified about the threat of it,Report
If he had been under fire for real, then he would have quoted lyrics about it.Report
You know that it would be untrue
You know that I would be a liar
It I was to say to you
That we weren’t under fireReport
Applies to HRC as well.Report