Yes, Virginia, You (Probably) Got a “Tax Cut”
It’s Tax Day! Congratulations to everyone who made it through another year and gets to spend at least a few hours figuring out just how much of a bite Uncle Sam, your state, your locality, and anyone else who happened to be walking by took out of your income.
Of course, this year is a bit different. This is the first tax season after Trump’s tax cut, which purported to reform the code. One of the results of the tax overhaul last year was that payroll deductions were decreased, since the tax burden became a bit more predictable thanks to an expanded standard deduction and the elimination or reduction of some itemized deductions. However, this had has the reciprocal effect of reducing the refund that people are used to receiving at this time of the year.
This is a policy change that many conservatives and libertarians have argued toward for years. The complaints about the past system were that refunds 1) gave people the impression that they weren’t paying taxes but getting a benefit; 2) amounted to a massive interest-free loan to the feds.
The argument for the overtax-and-refund system were plenty. The biggest reason was resources: it’s easier to overtax people and refund the difference than it is to undertax them and try to collect on the bill. There are also two potential benefits to the overtax system: 1) it prevents people from having to write a big check they may not have the funds for if they’ve underestimated their taxes; 2) it amounts to a kind of forced savings so that people get an infusion of cash they can use for something expensive. Indeed, this one of the key arguments in favor of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): that it gives poor people a sudden influx of cash so they can replace a clunker car with one that costs less in the long run or afford the security deposit on an apartment instead of renting day-to-day.
The subtleties of this, however, are lost on a lot of people. They barely noticed the $10 more a week in their paycheck. But they are noticing the $500 refund they’re not getting. Complaints have been building for weeks but have now reached a crescendo with various Democratic politicians and celebrities tweeting out things that are either ignorant of why refunds are smaller or pretending to be.
2/ Already this April, we’ve learned that tax refunds are down this year by $6 BILLION.
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) April 14, 2019
The average tax refund is down about $170 compared to last year. Let’s call the President’s tax cut what it is: a middle-class tax hike to line the pockets of already wealthy corporations and the 1%.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) February 11, 2019
Even some of the President’s own supporters are complaining. We are now in the odd situation where most Americans got a tax cut but don’t think they did:
Ever since President Trump signed the Republican-sponsored tax bill in December 2017, independent analyses have consistently found that a large majority of Americans would owe less because of the law. Preliminary data based on tax filings has shown the same.
Yet as the first tax filing season under the new law wraps up on Monday, taxpayers are skeptical. A survey conducted in early April for The New York Times by the online research platform SurveyMonkey found that just 40 percent of Americans believed they had received a tax cut under the law. Just 20 percent were certain they had done so. That’s consistent with previous polls finding that most Americans felt they hadn’t gotten a tax cut, and that a large minority thought their taxes had risen — though not even one in 10 households actually got a tax increase.
…
The tax savings were relatively small for many families, however. The middle fifth of earners got about a $780 tax cut last year on average, according to the Tax Policy Center.
Most Americans would probably welcome a $780 windfall. But in contrast to 2001, when President George W. Bush’s Treasury Department mailed rebate checks to taxpayers, last year’s tax cuts showed up mostly in the form of lower withholding from workers’ paychecks. A few extra dollars in a biweekly paycheck proved easy to miss. Moreover, as taxpayers filed their returns, many found they were due smaller refunds than in the past, which may have further skewed perceptions of the law.
I find it amusing that people are upset about Trump, for once, doing a thing large numbers of Americans claim they support: simplifying the tax system.
Yes, I said, “claim they support”. Because this reaction was entirely predictable. I don’t mean the Democrats and their affiliated celebritwits pouncing on it. I mean the reaction of the general public.
The American tax code is absurdly long and insanely complex. It has spawned a multi-billion dollar filing industry and is so complicated that even the IRS sometimes gets it wrong. Just last week, a bi-partisan bill was written to make sure the IRS can’t do your taxes for you and, while it smacks of crony capitalism, it’s also an open question of whether the IRS even could file your taxes for you without making mistakes.
People have been demanding a simpler tax system for a long time. We’ve had various presidential candidates promise that the IRS could do your taxes or the code could be simplified down to a postcard or whatever. But what people say they want and what they actually want are sometimes two different things. People want a simpler tax code … except for the mortgage interest deduction. And the charity deduction. And state/local taxes, definitely. And daycare, obviously. And healthcare expenses. And retirement contributions. And is it really fair to tax capital gains like income?
Therein lies the rub: the tax code didn’t get complex because of a ancient Egyptian curse. It got that way because we wanted it that way. We want our special deductions and social-engineering credits and alternative systems and all the other jazz. We will never simplify the tax code until a majority of Americans decide that it’s worth giving up their favorite deduction for. Or worth giving up a refund for. And this outcry is a reminder that we’re not there yet, if we ever will be. I suspect, after a year or two, most people will get used to the new system and this hubbub will die down. But this portends a tax system that will mostly go on as the shambling drunken mess that it is.
Of course, in the long run, nobody’s taxes have been cut. As Harry Browne argued in the 2000 election, a tax cut without a spending cut is not really a tax cut; it’s a shell game. Eventually, things have to be paid for. The deficit is surging right now and we are on a completely unsustainable fiscal path. Trump’s tax cut has not reduced the tax burden, Laffer Curve misrepresentations not withstanding; it’s re-arranged it so that the burden falls on the future rather than the present.
So if you’re upset that your refund is smaller or non-existent this year, better hold on to something. Because it’s only going to get worse.
I guess we’ve finally lived long enough to reach official “moocher” status: we didn’t pay income tax this year. But we did pay several thousand dollars in property and sales taxes.Report
Payroll withholding has always been a crapshoot. If the proposed W-4 goes through, then you’ll hear some howling.
What’s lost in the shuffle is small C corps. Their tax rate went from 15% to 21%. You want to see how a flat tax works? There it is.Report
I don’t know about the majority, but I can do math and due to the cap on deductions for mortgage, property taxes and charitable donations we paid several grand in taxes more than last year. Same for most of our neighbors.Report
That’s unusual. Only about 10% of people ended up paying more. Most paid at least a little less.Report
Anyone who lives in a state with higher local taxes and higher land values and whose income is below the 95th percentile paid more. The SALT cap reduced their deductions and they don’t make enough money to get any benefit from the reduced rates in the upper income levels.Report
Yup. I’m in the lucky 10% that got hosed (and pretty badly).
I think (unlike many of the other changes) the SALT cap and related changes are justifiable on policy grounds, but they are not a helluva lot of fun.Report
You should take that up with your state government. See if you can get them to spend a bit more responsibly.Report
I find it amusing that people are upset about Trump, for once, doing a thing large numbers of Americans claim they support: simplifying the tax system.
[citation needed]
What the Republicans (This really has little to do with Trump) passed lowered taxes. It’s hard to say it _simplified_ them in any manner. I’m not aware of _any_ part of calculating taxes that has gotten easier, unless you mean ‘more people take the standard deduction’.
Just last week, a bi-partisan bill was written to make sure the IRS can’t do your taxes for you and, while it smacks of crony capitalism, it’s also an open question of whether the IRS even could file your taxes for you without making mistakes.
That’s not an open question at all. The IRS, almost by definition, knows the correct way to file taxes, so much so when there’s any dispute they are almost always accepted as the authority and even when it does make it to court, they almost always win.
The only way the IRS would make mistakes in calculating people’s taxes is if it didn’t have all data. But, of course, the same is true to literally anyone who calculates taxes.
Having the IRS calculate taxes with _just_ the information currently provided on W-2s and 1099s by third parties would be accurate for most taxpayers. People who take itemized deductions (Which starting this year is estimated to be only 6% of them) would need to additionally provide those, of course, but handing the records to the IRS and saying ‘figure this out’ is still simpler than calculating that by themselves and then having to defend it if the IRS argues. Or just…get rid of those deduction.(1)
There are, of course, a few edge weird cases that are weird enough that the IRS would get things completely wrong, and those people probably should do their own taxes…and there’s not any reason they couldn’t. No one is saying that people shouldn’t be _allowed_ to file their own taxes, just that the IRS should do it all automatically and send out a bill. You could obviously file different ones in advance, or even dispute the calculated bill when you get it.
Asserting IRS wouldn’t be good at figuring out taxes for the vast majority of American is nonsense, especially considering they literally do that…that’s how they _check_ people’s taxes returns, of course. Pretending otherwise is merely one of the ways that the for-profit tax prep industry stays in business leaching off government forms.
1) Tax deductions are _really stupid_ anyway. I don’t mean as something that complicated taxes, I mean as an entire concept.
If the government is going to subsidies behavior, then there should be a place you send evidence of that behavior, and you get cash in return. End of story. Having it as part of taxes is both nonsensical and an utterly moronic way to exclude _poor_ people from getting any benefit from it by having it be a _reverse_ progressive tax.
Why should someone who makes $1,000,000 a year and donates $100 to charity get $37 from the government, when someone who makes $10,000 a year and donates $100 gets literally nothing? The entire concept of tax deductions is moronic. If we want to pay people $37 dollars for donating $100 to charity, let’s just DO THAT. And let’s certainly not do it in a way that only helps the wealthy!
And removing deductions from taxes simplifies things hugely. If taxes are, entirely, based on income, they are really easy to calculate.Report
Virginians specifically got fewer benefits from the tax code changes (for a purple state) due to the income/income tax/property value tax profileReport
Despite major changes in my mortgage interest, SALT, and business expense deductions, my total tax bite came out about the same. My refund was about a tenth of what it used to be, and I always liked that $5-6,000 shot coming right after I have paid off holiday and year-end related expenses, but given the smaller bite out of my paycheck over the year, I had less need of it.Report
Did you get any more take home? That’s allegedly been a selling point for all this, but the reported facts seem to be that most Americans got so little back they didn’t notice.Report
Small for each paycheck, but it added up.Report
Report
If so, it seems short-sighted if progressives want to reverse the tax cuts and end up proposing tax increases that increase taxes for 8 out of 10 Americans (number from Harwood’s link).
Not sure what any of this means when just under half of American households didn’t pay income taxes. If Michael Cain received a tax cut, but lacked enough income to appreciate it, does it make a sound?Report
People are not stupid; if their taxes were cut by an appreciable amount, they’d know it. This was a weird year for us so it’s impossible to do an apples-to-apples comparison, but we still itemized and lost a lot of SALT deduction, so I expect it worked out to a tax hike.Report
As I have read the reporting, the issue with “seeing” the tax cut is the adjustments the IRS made to withholding didn’t give the majority of taxpayers a boost that was big enough to be seen. The commonly reported average is around $600 for the year. If that reporting is true, then we need to see how adjusted withholding plays out for the 2019 tax year before we make decisions about effectiveness.
Of course we are all skirting the issue of the expiration date on these a few years hence . . .Report
That’s 10 bucks a week (assuming that the other 80 went to the tax return).
Mad Magazine had a bit back in the 70’s or 80’s where they asked something to the effect of “how come small tax hikes always raise billions and large tax cuts only amount to a few cents in your pay check?”
Iggles points to how important messaging is. If my paycheck only went up 10 bucks a week (or 20 bucks a paycheck), I’m not sure I’d notice really. An additional 80 bucks in the return over what I got last year? I’m not sure I remember what my return was last year so comparing it to this year won’t really register.
I’m sure, as far as the gummint is concerned, it *IS* a huge tax cut. They see the $600, on average, from freakin’ everybody.Report
We got a lower refund, but paid less taxes. I think we’re at a weird place because we do the “married but withhold at the single rate” and we could just barely itemize. Refund was about 500 less, but we still paid less in taxes.Report
As a HENRY, I’m not sure if I should be happy or embarrassed that I didn’t pass the threshold to itemize my deductions.
I reassure myself that I’m not a traitor to my class by remembering the new code doubled the standard deduction… but still, I can’t shake the feeling, am I now just middle class?Report
But are you HENRY the eighth?Report
I haven’t seen data, but I think it’s likely that the median California taxpayer had their total tax bill raised. The SALT and mortgage changes fall hard here.
Furthermore, I suspect that’s one reason that Republicans did so badly here last November. If the R’s can’t keep your taxes lower, what good are they?
Mind you, as a progressive/liberal I think it’s probably ok to limit the mortgage deduction. The SALT deduction I’m not so sure about, though I’ve read claims that it addresses an equity problem. What I’m unhappy about is what they did with the money – give it to corporations to do stock buybacks.Report
“A massive interest-free loan to the feds” is fairly meaningless when the interest you’d get by putting that money in a checking or passbook savings account is pretty much zero.Report
I think we’ve had the cuts for long enough now to be able to say they failed in all their publicly stated goals. They exploded the deficit, they certainly didn’t pay for themselves and they were massively tilted to high income earners (which is, of course, why the GOP structured them that way). Also they didn’t boost the economy even remotely as much as the tax cut boosters claimed they would.
Can we finally bury the idea that the GOP is the more fiscally responsible party?Report
Sadly, no.Report
The deficit is surging right now and we are on a completely unsustainable fiscal path.
Surging at full employment. What will happen once the economy slows down is hard to imagine. (See now why Trump wants to pack the Fed with lackeys?) Yet people who claim to be fiscal conservatives aren’t calling for the GOP’s collective heads; this would amaze me if I had any belief in that claim.Report
Like @North’s comment above yours . . . the GOP hasn’t operationally been fiscal conservatives since Reagan. We had almost 40 years of data going into the tax cut debate and approval that it wouldn’t work, but it was done anyway because it had a policy and political outcome focus, which was achieved. and frankly no one should be surprised that the corporations used buybacks to boost stock prices – most of the Fortune 100 CEO’s outright said they would do so beforehand.
As to the slow down – were we to be using the expanding debt and deficit to fund infrastructure this would not likely be an issue. But since we aren’t, the Fed has a small amount of monetary policy cushion, but not really enough for a massive bubble bursting recession.Report
My federal taxes went down a few hundred dollars. My state taxes went up considerably more as a direct consequence. I assume this is by design.Report
Also, on the topic of simplification, the 1040 is now just one page, where it previously was two. Success?!? The IRS accomplished this by moving onto new schedules some stuff that had previously been on the main 1040, and also squishing together onto one line stuff that had formerly been on two. Does this make it simpler? Not at all. Rather, it introduced extra shuffling around with schedules, and those multiple items crammed onto one line are less user friendly than having different items distinct from one another. But someone undoubtedly was high-fived for getting the 1040 down to one page.Report