72 thoughts on “Monday Trivia, No. 159 [Mo wins]

  1. Hmm… it starts with 3 of the 4 largest states, and ends with a lot of relatively small states. This must be important.Report

  2. With the exception of Massachusetts and maybe Utah, those top states are all big producers of talent at the high school football level. At least, based on my understanding. Maybe Mass and Utah are better than I understand.Report

      1. Duh. Great point. I was less focused on what was missing than what was there. Okay, so it is definitely not high school football talent.Report

    1. I don’t think it’s the percentage or number of seniors notwithstanding Florida’s top ranking. Pennsylvania would be much higher in either case, as it has one of the oldest populations of any state.Report

  3. If they’re counts, the numbers are very small. There wouldn’t be so many ties otherwise. Maybe the first three states are high, but things tighten up quickly.Report

    1. Just for kicks, you might expect something like this:

      30 Florida
      20 California
      16 New York
      13 [Illinois, Massachusetts]
      12 [Ohio, Utah, Washington]
      11 [New Jersey, Oregon]
      10 [Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin]
      9 [Connecticut, Kansas, Texas]
      8 [Colorado, Arizona, Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico, Vermont, Virginia]
      7 [Alaska, Delaware, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee]
      6 [Hawai’i, Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, South Carolina, West Virginia]
      5 [Alabama, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Rhode Island]
      4 [Arkansas, South Dakota, Wyoming]
      3 Nevada
      2 North Dakota
      0 D.C.Report

      1. More people translate into more groups that want a specialty plate “in honor of” them. When I worked for the Colorado legislature, I was surprised by the number of bills introduced each year to create an additional specialty plate. Also, since most states have their plates stamped and painted by inmates, more people => more prisoners => greater ability to handle the variety.

        It was just something that popped into my head.Report

      1. So it must relate to third parties somehow. I know it isn’t number of official registered third parties, with California ranked so high (we have only 5 qualified third parties here).

        So.. Number of third-party candidates for office? Say, House and Senate? It can’t include state-level offices because I’d expect New Hampshire with its massively huge state legislature to have more.Report

      2. Mo wins, with an assist from Burt. At the top end are Florida with 21 political parties, California with 21, and New York with 20. At the bottom end are Nevada with 6, North Dakota with 5, and DC with 4. The data comes from Project Vote Smart.Report

      3. Project Vote Smart. Not all of these parties are qualified for the ballot, but they exist, or did the last time PVS updated their list, or are struggling to establish a real existence.

        There are some who are not recognized, some who are recognized but not regularly ballot qualified due to restrictiveness of state laws, and some who are ballot qualified.Report

      4. 50 states and a lot of people obsessed over their own particular issues means there will be some degree of turnover among third parties. I’m sure Project Vote Smart has limited resources and so can only update occasionally. Possibly they last updated before 2009. Possibly the Louisiana Prohibition Party (rightfully) ceased to exist since then.

        This is a good general case of what federalism brings us–a near impossibility of staying up to date on the current status of just about any issue that is under the control of the states.Report

    1. Since its a count of whole numbers, that would be the number of times I’ve been arrested in each state for singing or dancing. But come on, that would, umm, err, be ridiculous. [nervously tugs collar]Report

Comments are closed.