I’ve been taking a lot of flak for complaining about San Francisco’s banning soda vending machines on city property. As if I needed any more proof that the government of that city contains some of the worst nanny-staters in the entire country, consider this. And weep. San Francisco is busy taking away liberties you didn’t even realize you had.
Jason Kuznicki
Jason Kuznicki is a research fellow at the Cato Institute and contributor of Cato Unbound. He's on twitter as JasonKuznicki. His interests include political theory and history.
Thanks to your generosity, we were able to upgrade our service plan. Hopefully this will help us address some of our performance issues.
on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death PenaltyDavidTC: For example, if they’re doing ethnic cleanings. Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced r…
on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death PenaltyOr have developed nuclear weapons without signing on to the non-profliferation treaty. That's a cons… on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death PenaltySo what the anti-death penalty want is not something that Biden is capable of doing. Biden, or Biden… on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024Sure, but if someone thinks that some poor post-doc wiped his nose after touching a sample and says…
on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024The problem is that some people say "lab leak" and mean loss of containment of a weaponized virus fr…
on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death PenaltyWe have literally dozens of reasons to not supply arms to a country besides 'genocide'. For example,… on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death PenaltyFor what it’s worth, I do think that Biden’s act is representative of a large swath of the anti-deat… on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024Wall Street Journal has an article about the whole intelligence gathering related to the lab leak th… on Saturday Morning Gaming: Clive Barker’s UndyingSnagglepuss, I believe. Either Snagglepuss or Ed Wynn.
on Saturday Morning Gaming: Clive Barker’s UndyingIn that SungWon Cho video you linked in the Control review, what's that silly voice he's doing? I've…
Alone at Last or The Curse of a Sleepy Eye
December 26, 2024
December 25, 2024
A Christmas Eve Two-Pack of The Days of Real Sport
December 24, 2024
Even on Christmas Somebody is Always Taking the Joy Out of Life
December 23, 2024
on Saturday Morning Gaming: Clive Barker’s Undying on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Weekend Plans Post: The Ghost Town on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024 on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty
on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 12/23/2024
on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty on Joe Biden Agrees that Some People *DO* Deserve the Death Penalty
Where in the Constitution is your right to buy a cat from a pet store, get bored with it, then throw it outside to be run over by a car?Report
@Jaybird, that would be your right to own property and the state’s inability to take it from you without just compensation, explicated in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
At common law back in Ye Merrie Olde Englande, pets, livestock, and other animals were considered mere chattel, and you can do with your chattel as you please. So if you wanted to take an absolutist view of property rights, then you should be able to toss Miss Kitty under a passing Peterbilt if you should so please — provided you don’t damage the Peterbilt in the process — and the state ought not say “boo” about it.
This does not mean I condone throwing cats under cars by any means whatsoever. Nor do I really think that a statute criminalizing animal cruelty constitutes a legislative taking of property; I’m not that pure of a libertarian. But, you asked, so there’s your answer.Report
@Transplanted Lawyer, oh, the Amendments don’t mean *THAT*.
I mean, a literal reading of the 1st Amendment would make McCain-Feingold unconstitutional.
A literal reading of the 2nd would make it unconstitutional to ban an Uzi.
A literal reading of the 8th would make waterboarding unconstitutional.
Try again, hippie.Report
@Jaybird, I think McCain-Feingold was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed with me on that one (for once).
I think it is unconstitutional to ban Uzis.
I think it is unconstitutional to waterboard prisoners.
Peace. Love. Flowers.Report
That is indeed a really stupid one. But notice that it’s currently two removes from becoming reality:
First, it’s still under consideration by the Commission of Animal Control and Welfare.
Second, the commission have no power to do more than make recommendations. Even if they approve, it has to be voted on by the elected Board of Supervisors before becoming a law.
And both of these stages require public meetings to be held, so the chances of pet stores disappearing from SF are IMHO not high. If it’s OK with you, I’m going to worry more about citizens being kidnapped and sent to other countries to be tortured than about not being able to buy a hamster and feed it diet coke.Report
My favorite involves cutting bagels into quarters, instead of merely halves.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/08/BA5C18L6RG.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea
And effective immediately, no more runs to the doughnut shop before meetings and conferences held by city workers. Instead, city employees must use guidelines created by the Health Department when ordering food for meetings.
Examples include cutting bagels into halves or quarters so people can take smaller portions and serving vegetables instead of potato chips.
(Where in the Constitution is your right to a whole bagel?)Report
@Jaybird, hey, if you’re eating the city’s bagel, you play by the city’s bagel rules. You want a whole bagel? No one in San Francisco is stopping you from buying your own.
Yet.Report
@Transplanted Lawyer, from my cold, dead hands…Report
@Jaybird,
(Where in the Constitution is your right to a whole bagel?)
After you cut it into quarters, it’s a hole-less bagel.Report
This is only the tip of the iceberg… the SF government loves banning random things for ‘your own good’ This is just the first in a long line of stupid bans. I’m glad I live in the East Bay.Report
There was a restuarant owner in Phillie on the radio this morning talking about his fine for wearing too much jewelry in his kitchen. The city was harrassing him because he put up sign asking customers to speak English when ordering — but they actually have a too-much- jewelry law on the books. He had a medallion around his neck and a bracelet given to him by his mother.Report