John Boehner & The Rock of Sisyphus
Note: This piece is part one of two. The next part will address the promise and perils of a Paul Ryan speakership. It is recommended that Ryan’s circumstances be saved until then.
The Rise & Fall of John Boehner
If all goes according to plan, tomorrow Paul Ryan will be elected Speaker of the House. He didn’t especially want the job. He was nowhere in the general historical order of succession towards the Speakership. But these are special times. How did we get here?
I’m not going to get into the Tea Party and PPACA and all that, because everybody knows – or think they know – the important aspects of it. Rather, the often overlooked event was the budget battle of 2011. With the threat of a shutdown and the debt ceiling, Speaker Boehner and President Obama worked out a compromise that included some immediate budget cuts and the promise of more down the line (with the threat of a sequester). Historically, compromises like this are celebrated and grumbled at by both sides and life goes on. This time, however, things went off-script. Almost immediately, Republicans were declaring resolute victory. Outsized expectations that Obama would go down in 2012 were born. But then people started looking more closely and the cuts that Boehner had extracted at the front-end were largely illusory. Then it was the Democrats who were declaring victory and Republicans who were scrambling.
There were three lasting political effects from the budget of 2011. The first – as described in Double Down – is that President Obama was extremely ticked off that what was meant to be a good-natured compromise was (initially) portrayed as a Republican victory that embarrassed him, and he made the determination that that would not happen again. The second is that Boehner lost the trust of the already ornery Tea Party and hyper-conservatives in his party. The third is that it planted the seed for the Sequester.
In 2012, true to his word, President Obama did not compromise (much) in the budget process. This led to Boehner folding in order to avert crisis. That lead to more raucous cheering among Democrats. This victory was followed up on January 1st by the delaying of the Sequester, which again peeved conservatives, the Tea Party, and pretty much everyone important to Boehner’s Speakership. Shortly after the newly elected congress convened in 2013, the Sequester went into effect, giving at least the illusion of a major Tea Party victory amidst a sea of losses – most specifically the presidential race, as well as senate races, both of which were laid at the door of The Dreaded Establishment. Message: Tea Party winners, Boehner loser.
It took the 2013 shutdown to change this dynamic. The Tea Party had wanted their chance to do their thing, they did, and it was largely perceived within the party as disastrous. As it turned out, the Tea Party had a lot of blank pages in the battle plan where “How we’re going to win this thing” was supposed to be. When even the mighty Ted Cruz himself was forced to relent, it was the beginning of the end for the Tea Party. Establishment forces were ready to go on the offensive to avoid losing winnable races in 2014. The subsequent shutdowns that were supposed to occur did not occur. There was no embarrassing movement towards impeachment. And in 2014, Tea Party primary challenges either neither materialized nor was successful. Then in 2014/15, the Tea Party shot at the king and missed. Boehner was challenged for the leadership, won in what wasn’t even a contest, and he rained holy hell down on his detractors.
Contrary to conventional belief, he was not forced out. He never lost control of his House again. He just lost the will to keep fighting his own people, and perhaps on some level he no longer found it productive. So he announced his intention to retire.
The Empty Seat
Complicating Boehner’s exit was the lack of an heir. Though most primary challenges in 2014 were beaten back, one large exception was Eric Cantor, who was his chief deputy. Cantor is said to be the last victim of the Tea Party, but they ultimately had little to do with it and were not greatly involved in his last race. Cantor lost, by and large, because he was too busy preparing himself to be Speaker and not busy tending to his district. The Tea Party can perhaps take credit for anti-incumbent fervor, but if any group specifically was involved in that race it was the anti-immigration lot.
Next down the line was Kevin McCarthy, who was the assumed successor after Boehner made his announcement. This in and of itself was remarkable because McCarthy himself was only elected into the House in 2006, making his ascension the most rapid since Charles Frederick Crisp, who became Speaker in 1891. He also would have been the youngest since Crisp. It was also remarkable because for all of the anger over Boehner being insufficiently conservative, McCarthy was even less so. Which meant that he was neither a young ideological firebrand nor a someone who had waited his turn. That he was next in line to begin with was not an auspicious sign.
Of course, McCarthy never became Speaker. The battle lines were drawn for a protracted fight, but McCarthy had diarrhea of the mouth, rumors of infidelity, and he removed himself from consideration. It is entirely possible that, if he had plowed forward, he would have gotten the job. Except that, when he looked at the job, he seemed to have decided that it wasn’t worth fighting for. Which, it turned out, was a widely-held view.
The Powerful Job Nobody Wants
If McCarthy’s status as the front-runner was not itself alarming, the lack of people behind him was especially so. Former Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan got immediate attention, but deferred. In fact, a job that is ostensibly one of the most powerful in the country and theoretically the third in line to the presidency itself, had somehow become a job that nobody of significance wanted. It wasn’t just the establishment that had difficulty. Hensarling didn’t declare. Golmert didn’t declare. The rabble-rousers that had caused this mess themselves had two candidates: A former Chief of Staff of Jon Huntsman, and a possibly lame-duck congressman who supports Jeb Bush for president.
All of which leads to this conclusion: It absolutely had to be Paul Ryan as the next Speaker of the House. Despite the fact that he didn’t want the job, he had to accept it. Despite the fact he is a problematic candidate who would be dismissed from consideration in any other circumstance, he has to be picked.
Feature Image: “Flickr – DVIDSHUB – John Boehner (Image 2 of 10)” by DVIDSHUB – John Boehner [Image 2 of 10]. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons
Good overall summary Will.
I always feel bemused at the 2011 deal; it was based on the assumption that the old neocon corps of the GOP still had credibility and power since the way the Sequester deal was set up was that the cuts would land on domestic spending and defense spending (things liberals and neocons were respectively very interested in). Then, of course, the neocons were revealed as mostly toothless in their own party and the sequester came down.
I remain of the Chait frame of mind that Obama agreeing to partner the debt limit increase with anything at all was a very poor idea. It took a shutdown, a near credit rate downgrade and several protracted battles to break out of that unproductive precedent.
I’d feel for Boehner… except that I don’t. He and McConnell cynically decided at the outset of Obama’s presidency that they’d jujitsu Obama’s Hope’n’Change mantra by denying him any form of bipartisan cooperation regardless of the merits of any given deal. That certainly did Obama considerable harm and probably gave them some significant boosts in the elections that followed. It also metastasized the current dingbat GOP attitude that’s been bedeviling the Democrats, the country and now ultimately, them. They bred up this tiger and it gave me no small amount of satisfaction to see it maul the crap out of them every time they tried to keep it from running them off a cliff.Report
I would say that Paul Ryan doesn’t want the job because it ruins Presidential ambitions. There seem to be certain positions that are powerful but political dead-enders. Mayor of NYC is another one of these positions. I’m partially convinced that Mario Cuomo only became Governor because he lost the Democratic Primary to Ed Koch during the late 1970s.
Good summary. My Democratic partisan opinion of the whole saga is that the GOP is being split by too many factions. A big problem with leadership in the House is that they really don’t have that many sticks to use against dissenters. A lot of Congress people are concerned about donors in their districts more than anything else.Report
There is little to indicate that Paul Ryan has presidential ambitions, other than that he is an office holder and that’s the sort of ambition we expect office holders to have. And there is quite a bit of reason to believe he doesn’t.
But this will be explored in tomorrow’s piece.Report
Well, there was the whole VP nominee thing…Report
He was recruited for that, though. Other than his chairmanships, and the congressional seat he holds to begin with, he’s had to be talked in to stuff, and the one thing no one has yet succeeded in talking him in to is the presidency (despite a couple of attempts).
He may pursue it later (or might have if he’d not been recruited into this), but he’s previously said he will probably serve in Congress a while then leave politics.
Before all this, I expected him to be out of Washington by 2020.Report
While not particularly relevant to the circumstances he will face as Speaker, it does seem worth mentioning that his chairmanships of two very powerful committees — Budget and then Ways & Means — have resulted in a lot of posturing but very little tangible. If that’s part of Part 2, feel free to delete this.Report
Are there a lot of other candidates who spent as much time as Ryan did crafting his media persona and didn’t eventually run for president?
If I was Ryan, I’d be thinking that if a Republican wins in 2016 then all of the issues of the crazy caucus dissipate and I’m the 2nd most powerful person in politics. If a Republican doesn’t win in 2016 then there’s no way in hell I’m getting my poverty agenda through anyway and can always step-down from Speaker in a big play for party victimhood (“look, even the well-intentioned, plainspoken Paul Ryan cannot work with Hillary”).Report
If you had asked me in December of 2012, or even as late as last year, “If you had to bet on someone to be the next Republican nominee for president, who would it be?”… Paul Ryan is who I would have said. Pretty easily.
With everything coming together for a Ryan candidacy, he… expressed no interest in it whatsoever. In fact, he pretty definitively shut down “Draft Paul Ryan” efforts rather quickly with an unequival “No.” Which is the same answer he gave in 2012 when approached. And really, nothing he has done since has indicated an interest in the job.
He might change his mind, but at this point I believe it would require changing his mind.Report
Is it possible he correctly assessed Clinton’s strengths? He’s young and can wait, hell he could even leave politics for a while and then run as an outsider. Plus it sounds like the GOP has really swallowed the theory that Dems have a very shallow bench.Report
I’m inclined to say “no” here. In early 2014, I would have put his odds of winning the nomination if he ran at about 50/50. I would have put his chances of beating Hillary Clinton at roughly 30% (to lowball it a bit). while a 15% chance of becoming president doesn’t sound great, it’s very unlikely that he will ever have that kind of chance again. From a tactical standpoint, if his goal was to be president, that was his opportunity. (Whereas, strategically, his decision not to run in 2012 was wise.)Report
Remember when Chris Christie wisely held off running against a powerful-looking Obama? “Wait and see” is not a tactic I’d expect many politicians to consider given the most recent exemplar, especially not in a year without an incumbent.Report
And yes, I realize I’ve selfishly moved the goalposts to “will Paul Ryan ever consider running for president in his lifetime?”Report
It sounds like the truism applied to the GOP for the upcoming presidential election of a “deep bench” which turned out to be just lots of warm bodies was also valid for the Speaker position.Report