Harsh Your Mellow Monday: Hold ’em and Fold ’em Edition
Plenty happened over the weekend, and we only have today before tomorrow, so let’s get busy with Harsh Your Mellow Monday.
[HM1] The Also-Rans Run Out of Options
The Killer Bs of Bernie, Biden, and Bloomberg will dominate the chatter between now and Wednesday morning when the Super Tuesday results change the narrative yet again. But that’s because everyone else still running for president is now an also-ran that cannot win.
Sorry if this is breaking news to you, Warren/Klobuchar/Gabbar…(sorry, I can’t finish typing that with a straight face, as you were) but your chosen one isn’t becoming the nominee this time around. Bloomberg isn’t either but more on him later.
Since Warren 2020 campaign manager Roger Lau took to Medium to detail out Senator Warren’s plan to go all the way to the convention, let us start with her.
“Our grassroots campaign is built to compete in every state and territory and ultimately prevail at the national convention in Milwaukee.”
Uh, well maybe your definition is different. You are indeed “competing” as in the campaign is on ballots and doing campaigning things, but that doesn’t make you “competitive”, which, let’s be frank, you haven’t been. Senator Warren has finished third, fourth, fourth, and fifth in the four contests so far and going into Super Tuesday holds a commanding one delegate lead over Amy Klobuchar that is keeping her in fourth place in that column.
“We believe that Super Tuesday will greatly winnow this field and it will become clear that only a few candidates will have a viable path to the Democratic nomination — and Elizabeth Warren will be one of them.”
Yes to the first part; let’s talk about that second part. So your theory here is that after roughly a third of delegates are doled out, the candidate likely to still be in third or fourth place is going to be the go-to savior to a deeply divided party. That’s your plan.
But as the dust settles after March 3, the reality of this race will be clear: no candidate will likely have a path to the majority of delegates needed to win an outright claim to the Democratic nomination.
Well, yeah that is a possibility but again, that discussion about who is number one isn’t going to go three or four deep, which is where y’all are going to be in the queue…
After Wisconsin nearly one-third of the pledged delegates will still be waiting to be elected…
Ummmm, because two-thirds of them are already divided up to people mostly not named Elizabeth Warren, without enough left to catch up…
In the road to the nomination, the Wisconsin primary is halftime, and the convention in Milwaukee is the final play.
Ok, you know what, we tried to hear you out here, but now your just wishcasting.
This same train of thought was being presented by the Buttigieg campaign before his somewhat surprising news last night that he was bowing out. But he had at least won Iowa and was respectable in New Hampshire and Nevada before the inevitable shellacking his horrid minority polling numbers told observers his South Carolina results would be. “Hey, there are points on the board out there for you, don’t give up now!!!” is the battle cry of operatives and workers who would very much like a few more months of paychecks. But it’s nonsense strategy and hoping against hope, and should be called as such. But pundits and talking heads need something to write about, so we will get think pieces involving six “ifs” mixed with two “maybes” squared to the fourth “it coulda/maybe/possibly” power.
Pete read the way the wind was blowing and bowed out last night. Warren is behind in polling in her home state, let alone anywhere else. Klobuchar might have a chance in her native Minnesota — where she has never lost a race, let her remind you, for the umpteenth time — but where Bernie Sanders is very strong both historically and in current polling.
The remaining candidates are mathematically done in the race. Now it’s ego, paying off campaigns both in donor dollars, personal pride, and campaign debt, and picking the spot to leverage an endorsement of who will actually be the nominee. Even if the politicos’ wet dream of a contested convention occurs, they will all be outside that discussion.
The reality is they are done. Everything else is just hot air filling the spaces that should be vacated by the also-rans.
[HM2] Bloombergism
If cyberstalking is a crime, perhaps mediastalking should be, because that is what Mike Bloomberg is doing to anyone with a screen or radio in any state that is voting on Tuesday.
New York Times breaks it down with graphs and charts, but here’s the money quote and sobering comparison:
The breadth of Mr. Bloomberg’s broadcast campaign is numbing. The roughly $410 million on television ads alone — $370 million spent, and another $41 million reserved through super Tuesday — is more than Hillary Clinton and President Trump spent on television ads during their entire 2016 presidential campaigns, primary and general elections combined, according to Advertising Analytics, an ad tracking firm. And Mr. Bloomberg, who entered the race in November, did it in four months.
In layman’s terms: He’s frickin’ everywhere.
Every commercial break on radio, TV, and streaming in a Super Tuesday state starts or ends with a Bloomberg ad, and sometimes both. The giant floating head in 1984 didn’t get this much media coverage. There are hurricanes that made landfall in the continental United States thinking of bringing a class action lawsuit for not getting the attention from the networks Bloomberg has bought in the last few weeks. Mikey Money’s nearly half a billion dollars in spending is more than just a high mark in self funding that has never been matched. It’s pushing the limits of how much advertising someone can do before it tips over to actively ticking people off.
He got that way by buying up, almost literally, every available campaign operative on the market as detailed in NY Mag By Vanessa Grigoriadis:
Up in the waiting room, an ad plays on a flat-screen TV about low-income and minority pregnant women and how they die more than white women (but Mike will fix that). Two countdown clocks hang above the TV, one marking the days until Super Tuesday and the other the days until the national election. The folks here don’t seem like run-of-the-mill campaign volunteers; they’re middle-aged political mercenaries in fleece with time-tested strategies and robust Rolodexes. A political consultant tells me, “They’ve hired the whole goddamn world and have a lot of credible people. It’s not like Trump’s first campaign, with people working for him you’d never heard of before — which, by the way, definitely worked.” Bloomberg has recruited from his City Hall and hoovered up people from shuttered presidential campaigns (Kamala Harris, Andrew Yang).
He’s always treated employees to salaries, health care, and bonuses beyond industry standards and is now paying many multiples more than other campaigns, plus free furnished apartments in Manhattan. “This is the kind of campaign we’ll never be on again in our lives!,” exclaims one staffer, incredulous at his new Bloomberg-issued iPhone 11, the free booze, and the three catered meals a day (peeking in the campaign café at dinnertime, I spied pizza and tuna steak). Even the lowest-level campaign workers, like a yoga teacher who says they’re making $6,000 a month just to canvass for him — work that almost every other campaign relies on volunteers for — share some of these benefits.
I’m thrilled for anyone getting their money and making a living. But that isn’t sustainable, and more importantly, it isn’t organic.
But it’s How Mike Gets It Done (TM).
Except that isn’t going to work here. Case in point on slickly planned but not organic-leading-to-cringe and awkward Bloomberg moments, there was the brutal visual of Mike in the pulpit at Brown Chapel AME Church in Selma, Alabama with folks standing and turning their backs to him. For those not familiar with church-going etiquette and protocol, that’s another level up in disrespect from actually throwing something at the speakers, since doing that at least means you were paying attention and responding to their words. Pre-staged? Sure. Microcosm? Yep.
The question now is, how will Mike exit stage left? He isn’t winning. He has pledged publicly to turn over what is now the most lavishly-funded campaign in American history to the vague “whoever is the nominee.” But as the embarrassment, cost, and realization of failure start to sink in after Tuesday, the questions on just what role Bloomberg sees himself playing are going to be bigger than his long-gone chances of winning the nomination. Buttigieg led the way on stepping aside, but it’s notable he did so at the same time as Bloomberg’s 3 minute “Cornonavirus” infomercial on two networks, effectively bigfooting that out of the news cycle. One more thing for Bloomberg to stew on as he is long on infrastructure and spending, and yet to get a single vote cast for himself.
$50+ Billion can buy a lot of spoilers revenge, and Mike Bloomberg is not accustomed to losing. Someone is going to feel the wrath, and it won’t be the soon-to-be former Bloomberg 2020 staffers. But it will be someone, and probably whoever takes what Bloomberg thought he was writing checks to acquire — the Democratic nomination.
[HM3] A Republic, If You Can Afford It
Aren’t they just precious:
Conservative activists sent a warning shot over the bow of the Trump administration this weekend, saying they understand why spending and deficits have risen over the past few years — but it’s time to reel them in.
An overwhelming majority in the CPAC/Washington Times poll, taken at the Conservative Political Action Conference, said it’s time to get back to fiscal discipline. They said the military spending increases and tax cuts that President Trump has promoted are fine but spending cuts are needed elsewhere.
Asked what one amendment they would want added to the Constitution, more activists chose a balanced budget amendment than any other option.
“Conservative activists” are full of it. It’s been 24 years since then-President Clinton addressed the nation and declared the “era of big government is over.”
Sounded good at the time. Utterly laughable now. Since that 1996 State of the Union, blowing out the budget — that is, when congress bothers to even have one — has been a bipartisan tradition that shows no signs of stopping.
“While the estimated magnitude of the fiscal gap is subject to a substantial amount of uncertainty, it is nevertheless nearly certain that current fiscal policies cannot be sustained indefinitely,” the GAO’s report concluded. The sooner the growth of the deficit and debt can be slowed or reversed, the less those policies are likely to affect economic growth.
But is anyone listening? Lawmakers from both major parties have worked together in recent years to pass budgets that exploded annual deficits and added to the debt. Democrats running for president are promising to hike federal spending by trillions of dollars to pay for free college, government-run health care, and the fight against climate change—and even though they are also promising to raise taxes, the math doesn’t add up. That means deficits will continue to grow. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has abandoned any pretense of fiscal conservatism, and most of his party has followed suit.
But the report is right there for them to see. When the past decade’s fiscal recklessness hits the fan, they won’t be able to claim that no one saw this coming.
The truth is the only folks who care about fiscal responsibility is the out-of-power party, and then only as a cudgel to whack the in-power party. After years of “tea parties” and decrying the Obama Administration’s monetary policy, those same folks almost all are totes cool with the deficit binge President Trump is racking up since RAWR America Great, lib tears, something something.
But fear not. The GOP will once again find their voice on monetary restraint just as soon as a Democrat comes into the White House, and around and around we go around the hypocrisy maypole.
When the Republic really does fall, or extremely hard times do come from the failing of the government to do the most basic of functions and not spend far more than is even theoretically possible to raise in revenue, remember to skip the ideological finger pointing that will ensue. It was all of them. It was all of us. Everyone knew. Nobody did anything meaningful. That’s the testimony, sad as it is, of the era of unrestrained government. Not for any grand plan or scheme or cause. Just mostly out of laziness to do anything different than let the ship of state coast downhill till the crash happened.
Even mildly restrained government isn’t in the American political consciousness anymore, much less smaller or lesser government. One of the veneers that President Trump truly stripped away from the Republican Party was the fiscal conservative one, as no bill is too expensive if it’s going to the right cause, the right group of people, or makes for the right optic. Thus farmers get massive offset subsidies and border walls get funding by hook and crook along with dozens of other things regardless of any actual budgeting process. Shocking, ain’t it; who would’ve thunk it, that the man who made and lost several fortunes in business dealings with highly leveraged debt might not be particular in stewarding the public purse.
Didn’t see that one coming…Said nobody who bothered to actually think about it at all.
The era of big government is now probably permanently established in both practicality and in political working theory, until something cataclysmic enough — God forbid — will force austerity and a change of practice. Till that time, presidents will be voted upon not on their management ability to steward the nation’s finances, but which avatar will bring the federal funding spigot to bear on their causes of choice.
Franklin might have quipped we have “A Republic, if you can keep it,” but we will cease to be able to afford it long before we get around to actually losing it. No doubt to many folks’ surprise, and protestations they aren’t responsible. But they are. Not that, at that point, it will matter much.
[HM4] Go Harsh Yourself — Getting it Right & Wrong So Far
Held Up Good — Poor Strategery: Elizabeth Warren Tilts the Misinformation Windmill, January 30th, 2020
“The postmortem on the Elizabeth Warren 2020 campaign later this spring will be full of reasons, excuses, if only-isms, and coulda, woulda, shouldas. Those reviews should also be long on the running thread that has plagued this campaign since its inception, a flaw that is the fault of the candidate running and filters down through the organization promoting her: lots of plans for everything except winning over Democratic Primary Voters that do the actual voting.
In short, bad strategery.”
Practically Cassandra, Over Here — Bern Notice, April 3, 2019
“Static though it might be for the next few months, the 2020 Democratic nomination race will not lack for drama. It’s a shame one of the twenty-odd candidates isn’t named Hobson, since as it stands right now Bernie Sanders losing the nomination hurts the party (see 2016), and Bernie Sanders winning the nomination hurts the party (see panicky Biden propping upping). Hobson’s choice, indeed.”
Bob Uecker “Juuuuust a bit outside” Award — The Pete Principle, April 14, 2019
“Talking heads need something to kick around, and Pete Buttigieg is the perfect combination of different, engaging, and intelligent to fill plenty of airtime, eating up space in Twitter and Facebook posts, and keep the horse race narrative going. There has to be an underdog to the story, whether he wins or not, and Mayor Pete checks a lot of those boxes. What he does with it is wholly up to him. Novelty wears off quickly, and if he doesn’t have a message beyond that to distinguish him from a crowded field that has a sameness of political thought problem brewing, he might find himself the underdog that was interesting while not much else was going in the campaign, but couldn’t challenge for the title in the end.”
So Wrong I Should Stick to Food Blogging Award — About Last Night: Fifty Shades of Fearful Beige in Democratic Debate, January 15, 2020
” It makes kind of a nice bookend to the primary debate season before the first votes are cast in Iowa. All that pressure has bent the arc of this story right back to where we started. Joe Biden in the front, with others thinking, wishing, and hoping it wasn’t so, but no one in the Democratic field actually doing anything about it. He probably won’t win Iowa — after all Bernie tied/won the Hawkeye Cauci in 2016 depending on which numbers you use — maybe New Hampshire nor Nevada either. But everything after that, barring something cataclysmic, will be Joe finishing this off in time for Spring Break.”
So Right You Should Thank Me This Quality Content is Free:
Bloomberg has to get on a debate stage at some point and a lot of this will sort itself out when folks have to listen to him talk
— Andrew Donaldson (@four4thefire) February 16, 2020
[HM5] The Youth of America are the future…
Penn State students are holding a candlelight vigil for their local Taco Bell that is closing down.
Some things are bigger than sports pic.twitter.com/vsF9yZnVZj
— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) March 2, 2020
HM3
To harsh your mellow, the GOP congress and the Clinton administration did do a good job of paring down and eventually eliminating the deficit before that combo was no longer in power.
Sure, there were external factors that helped – dot com boom and optimized working age/retirement age demographics were most prominent – but nonetheless scoreboardReport
One time in 24 years is hardly something to get excited about.Report
There are a buncha theories online about Warren failing to catch on when Vox, for example, had her as the presumptive frontrunner as recently as October.
The “sexism” argument would resonate better, I think, were it not for Clinton in 2016 and the whole “presumptive frontrunner” thing as recently as October.
I think it’s as simple as her positioning herself to be all things to all people and not being the best at any one of those as so always being a perpetual not-as-good-as-(insert name here). You want a centrist? We’ve got Biden. You want a Socialist? We’ve got Bernie. You want someone young and energetic? We’ve got Mayor Pete! So on and so forth.
Never bad, mind… just never a first choice for any lane she was in. The main exception might be the “woke” lane.
And that lane seems to be punching below its weight.Report
I think the main problem is that she’s not Bernieing as hard as Bernie, but is Bernieing too hard for the people who aren’t into that kind of thing. Consequently, her base is people who are willing to accept a bit less free stuff in exchange for a passable simulacrum of responsibility and intellectual respectability. That’s something, but it won’t win you the nomination.Report
Oh, I think it’s blown past those limits.Report
Agree, I was trying to be measured there. I’m at “Throw stuff at the TV” mode for weeks now at my place over it.Report
Warrens issue was that she was in no way genuine. Every time she opened her mouth it was simply to say what was politically expedient at that moment. Indeed, when you start to look at her career it is redily apparent that this has been her MO for an entire life. And when the proping up started to look a little rikity, these things became just too apparent.
She didn’t have a plan for that.
As far as spending an deficits go, I would say you are on the money with power-in and power-out, vis-a-vis the things said to the punters. But one thought on that; Democrats won the spending wars. Whether due to the financial crisis, the aging population, ending the cold war, whatever. It doesn’t matter at this point. This is the new reality. And while some of us want this to end, that reality is going to be driving the clown car for the forseeable future. Bernies politics, Obama and Bush’s politics, Trumps. All spending.Report
The compete divorce of revenue and spending began with Reagan’s supply-side and Laffer Curve nonsense, whence came the orthodoxy that tax cuts always pay for themselves and solve all problems. Also the Starve the Beast theory that there’s no need to make hard decisions about spending now — it’ll happen in the future, magically. Dick Cheney gave Reagan credit for proving that deficits don’t matter — we should too. (Though Cheney and Bush are the ones who get credit for running two wars on credit cards.)Report
Since almost everyone here is anti-Warren to a comical degree, I’ll chip in as a supporter. Warren seems like the candidate who got attacked from the right and the left. I’m pretty convinced that Bloomberg was more freaked out about Warren being the nominee than Sanders because Warren has the knowledge to be effective. She seems to be the only Democratic candidate still around that acknowledges the utter nihilism of Mitch McConnell. Biden’s odes to the old bipartisan Senate are delusional as is Sanders when he thinks he can have a heart to heart with Mitch about the poor in Kentucky. Mitch does not give a fuck. Sanders is also delusional when he talks about “revolution.”
Warren on the other hand gets it and understands it. I think the corporate class was more freaked out by her plans than it was by Sanders and his socialism. Warren sought to reform Capitalism and make it more fair. She could be effective here. But she did not earn the trust of the Berniestans because she calls herself a capitalist and it is believable even if she wants a more robust welfare state and knows how to get there. So she caused the anti M4A and lovers of extreme wealth inequality to shit their pants and never earned the trust of the Jacobin set and the Sandersistas.
This is also a combination of aesthetics and sexism. Bernie is gruff and unpolished and that has appeal to a lot of people. I met Elizabeth Warren in 2012 when she was first running for Senate. She is a great and down to earth person. Very friendly. But she is also a law professor and generally talks to people like they are adults. This is where “school marm” came as an insult for her. It also explains why almost every Warren supporter I know has a graduate degree or at least really liked college a lot. She is the candidate of middle-class liberals.
This is a loyal Democratic group and an important one but not a majority. There was also that poll from a few months ago where 90 percent of Warren supporters said they would support whomever the Democratic nominee was even if not their first choice. This makes her the most expendable unfortunately because her supporters have stakes of removing Donald Trump as being very high.Report
I think that if she ran on the ideas in The Two-Income Trap, she’d have done better.Report
As a fellow Warrenista I also have a hard time grasping why my fellow Dems would prefer Biden to her but I’ve had to accept that I am not necessarily the median Dem across even California, let alone the rest of the country.
Like I’ve said, were it not for the raging racism/ misogyny, a good portion of Democrats would vote Republican.Report
Well don’t forget your old fashioned Dixiecrats . . . . most of who are voting Republican around me if not actually saying so.Report
The articles I have read state that Democrats going into the primaries voting on issues go for Sanders and Warren. Democrats deciding on “electability” go for Bloomberg, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar.
Warren seems to appeal to people with graduate degrees. As someone on LGM just commented, success in grad school is not necessarily about smarts but the ability to delay gratification for a long time and to slog. She is calm and persistent. She also implicitly or explicitly promises hardwork.Report
As fond as I am of her I wouldn’t be heartbroken to see her stay as a highly effective Senator, or return to the CFPB or even the NLRB.
She can be very effective in almost any role.Report
Ah conservative activists are having a freak out about budget and deficits. Hypocritical bastards.Report
At this point, it’s even more obvious that fiscal discipline doesn’t stand a chance without a balanced budget amendment.Report
oh yes so that when we get into a recession we automatically tighten our belts when we should be spending because we’re the only entity that can.Report
I’m personally not so confident that deficit spending helps us get out of a recession. But if you want to write a system that permits it while requiring a surplus during expansions, I’m interested.Report