Fried Green Tomatoes and The Husband Problem
Since Valentine’s Day is looming on the horizon yet again, I decided to reread several of my fave romance novels just like I did last year. But this time, I’m reading literary books rather than trashy ones to prove the point that romance can be written about in a literary way. That means you lucky people get to hear even more of my innermost thoughts on the subjects of love and romance, only classier.
Last year I re-read Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander and one of the things I found interesting about the book was the clever way Gabaldon solved The Husband Problem.
The Husband Problem, you may recall, is a state of affairs where women have a tough time getting into fantasy scenarios when real life intrudes. When it comes to getting lost in the pages of a romance, your husband is all-too-often the avatar of the real world, appearing at the precisely wrong moment to tell you all about the snowplow he’s building or that the rabbits need to be fed or that the fire needs a log or remind you that your World War II newsletter needs to be done, like yesterday. (I have slightly atypical problems.) Whatever projects you personally have left simmering on the back burner so you can have a love affair with your Harlequin, there Hubs is to remind you all about them just when Colby Abrock is whisking Ethanie McHartcornishston off to his castle where they’re going to be forced to marry each other on some incredibly flimsy pretext.
But not all authors are clever or writing fantasy. Most authors must solve The Husband Problem in different ways because they’re either unimaginative (no offense meant, some writers have different skillsets) or telling real world stories that don’t involve circles of Druidic stones ferrying women off to faraway times where the bad guy looks exactly like their husband the way Diana Gabaldon did.
For this installment of “Kristin Reads Vaguely Literary Romance Novels” I read a book I’d never read before called Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe. Believe it or not, as famous as it is, I’d never read the book, never seen the movie, had barely a clue what it was about, and bought it on a whim in a 2 for 1 deal because I wanted to read The Goldfinch. For some reason, I still haven’t read The Goldfinch but I devoured FGTAWSC in a matter of hours. The book is written by Fannie Flagg, who, if you’re my age, you will recall as that redhaired southern gal on Match Game starring Gene Rayburn that you watched when you stayed home sick from school.
If you aren’t my age or don’t remember, watch this; it’s cute and romantic even though they get the answer to the last question wrong.
Aside — some people find FGTAWSC problematic. If this is you and you’re about to go off on me in the comments section for daring to discuss such a dreadful work of literature thereby violating your delicate sensibilities, I humbly suggest you write a piece about it where you lay out your arguments and I’ll be happy to read it. This is an article about other elements of the book, and not only is delving into racial politics entirely beyond the scope of the piece, it’s a romance novel that happens to be important to a lot of members of a marginalized group, lesbians. Lesbians deserve to have some things that are for them without having to carry the banner for every other marginalized group at the same time. And this is true even if certain things in the book may be a teensy bit dated and Fannie Flagg totally forgot to write a scene in which Wonder Woman comes through a portal to smite the KKK.
The primary story of Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe, however, does not involve lesbians falling in love. It centers around a woman named Evelyn Couch, a timid woman who has always played by life’s rules. Evelyn is rapidly approaching menopause and as such is experiencing some at first vague, and then not-so-vague, dissatisfaction with her life, to such an extent that in her mind she assumes a fake superhero-ish identity and starts fantasizing about getting revenge on all the terrible men of the world (it’s funny that this book came out when I was 17 years old and yet I never read it till it was personally applicable — serendipity I guess). She befriends an equally timid elderly woman in a nursing home, Ninny Threadgoode, who tells her the story of the small southern town she grew up in — Whistle Stop, Alabama — and that is where we meet Ruth and Idgie, the star-crossed lovers of our story.
With me so far??
Ruth and Idgie meet when Ruth comes to town to teach Vacation Bible School. Since this is Ordinary Times, online home to various snoots, I feel I must include some anthropological notes here, so please read the following sentence in David Attenborough’s voice:
Vacation Bible School is this thing that American plebes do where kids go to church for a week straight in the summertime to do crafts and learn songs and give their moms a break, and then on Sunday morning that week everyone goes to church and they put on a little pageant for the parents and usually someone brings cupcakes and the church matrons serve this terrible red punch in very small Styrofoam cups. I suggest you have coffee with your cupcake instead. It’s a nice tradition and interestingly is one of the few old-fashioned things that still happens pretty much without fail in small towns and some bigger ones, too.
Thank you, David. By the way, you talk a lot different than how I remember.
Anyhoo, Idgie is a wild and untameable tomboy when we meet her and her parents fully accept and love her just as she is, a touch that I really liked. I find I am just about exhaustionized with the “good guy, bad guy” one-dimensional characterization that’s been endemic the last couple decades whereby any authority figure is invariably a repressor of some sort. The accepting parents in FGTAWSC felt very refreshing and far more representative of the people I know out here in Middle America. Aside from her parents, the person Idgie loves best in all the world is her brother Buddy, who is sadly killed very early on in the story, causing Idgie to become inconsolable, till Ruth helps her get over it. Over the course of time, Idgie and Ruth develop romantic feelings for each other, but Ruth is forced by economic need to marry an abusive brute by the name of Frank Bennett.
Aside again – in addition to containing a very sweet same-sex love story at its heart, Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe touches on several other women’s issues that aren’t often discussed. The need of women throughout history to marry or stay married for financial reasons is a massive cloud over women’s heads even into the present day (it’s one of the core elements of Greta Gerwig’s recent critically-acclaimed take on Little Women) and yet it’s fairly unusual to see the concept explored in media. Additionally, the friendship between Evelyn and Ninny – both of them older and relatively meek women the likes of whom aren’t typically treated as protagonists in fiction – is unique and well done, and menopause as a plot point is rare indeed. It would be sad if this book was thrown onto the dung heap as being not PC enough when there’s so much to like here.
When Ruth’s sick mother (the main reason Ruth married Frank Bennett to begin with was so her mother could be adequately cared for) passes away, she gets a message to Idgie to come and rescue her from her abuser. Idgie shows up with some badass friends, gets Ruth out of Frank Bennett’s clutches, and things seem to be going ok till Frank goes missing. I don’t want to give away too much but let’s just say you might have wanted to avoid the barbeque served at the Whistle Stop Cafe for a couple days there.
Sometimes one of the answers to The Husband Problem is The Murder Solution.
In fiction, I mean. Obviously. In fiction. By the way, if my husband turns up missing at any time in the near future I would like someone to quickly delete this post and everyone forget I ever wrote it.
Third and hopefully final aside – If anyone decides to now argue “if a male singer made a song like Goodbye Earl about killing his wife all the feminists would be OUTRAGED” kindly STFU. In 2017 which is like only three years ago or something, 137 women a day were killed by their domestic partners. In 2017. As many as 70% of all women experience partner abuse over the course of their life at least once. 94% of the murder victims in murder-suicides are women. I myself personally knew a woman who was killed by her boyfriend and another woman who was kidnapped by her ex-husband and held hostage for several months. I could have gone on listing statistics and troubling experiences I’ve personally heard of for several days if I’d wanted to. I suspect we don’t even want to know how many women historically died at the hands of men back when the legal system recognized a man’s God-given right to beat his wife. According to Wikipedia, in most nations domestic violence laws weren’t even put into place till the 1990s.
And also I’ve heard this song before too, so. Yeah.
This is one of those times you don’t need ta chime in with “but men tho”.
Despite my admiration for Diana Gabaldon and Fannie Flagg, most romance writers apparently don’t share it, choosing to solve The Husband Problem in a much more obvious and IMVVVVHO much less enjoyable way. They decline to solve The Husband Problem at all. They dodge the problem by writing about super young women who have never been kissed let alone anything more, and letting them be romanced then living happily ever after with basically the first guy they ever met. Like I said in my original piece on this topic, “Most romances evade The Husband Problem entirely by giving us a nubile and unformed 17 year old heroine with no family ties, but I’ve found as I have gotten older that the adventures of nubile unformed 17 year olds are not terribly interesting to me.”
One of the things that irritates me about approximately 95% of my fellow writers (across all genres) is they can’t seem to figure out that a woman’s world doesn’t stop spinning when she turns 21 years old. Women continue doing things other than cooking and cleaning and wiping snotty noses even after their tits start to sag. Women even continue wanting things like love and romance. We don’t turn into desireless Betty-Crocker-or-Career-Girl-Barbie-esque automatons the minute some a-hole slaps a gold ring on our finger. And as a result, we maybe, possibly, I know it’s crazy but hear me out, might sometimes like to read about women that look like us and think and feel like us and have lives that vaguely resemble ours.
Why is it so goddamned hard for people to write books and make movies about women who have possibly experienced a slice of life beyond high school?? Why is it this impossible Gordian knot that most writers just can’t seem to unravel so they don’t even bother to try? Fun fact(s) – women get divorced, they become widowed, they marry later on in life, they don’t marry at all, they decide they are lesbians, they murder their husband and serve him as barbeque, there are thousands of reasons why a woman over the age of 21, 31, 41, 51 or more might be looking for a romantic relationship. Yet again and again in the vast majority of books I’ve ever read, it stars some ridiculous precocious bimbette that I’m supposed to give half-a-sh– about because I don’t even know why?
Well, I don’t. I’d take characters like Idgie and Ruth and Evelyn and Ninny every day of the week over the adventures of Doeeye Ingenuestein. And the funny thing is, I read books and watch movies and have a couple spare pennies I’d happily spend on entertainment but I’m just not seeing a whole lot out there for gals like me. Straight, gay, every ethnicity, religion, and backstory out there, all us gals who have reached the age of majority and just want to be able to crack a book or sit in a darkened theater for a couple hours and see some semblance of reality in which people like us get to do anything other than the dishes..
Every marginalized group out there will tell you that it sucks and hurts not to see people like you represented fictionally, and it’s true for older women too. We matter. Our lives are interesting and our stories deserve to be told.
Heads up, those who are writing chick lit and romances in particular, you’re not writing for thirsty men, so hows about you quit writing about 18 year olds (a whole lot of whom prefer Instagram to reading and are probably not the target audience for buying your product, just sayin.) There are millions of us grown women out here, billions, probably even, an army of mature ladies who would like a protagonist that we can relate to, meaning she’s old enough to buy booze. I know why you don’t do it, of course, it’s because it’s slightly harder and requires a tad bit more thought and creativity to juggle a complicated adult female character than a formless, shapeless Everywaif like Bella Swan, generic star of the Twilight series. I further know that many of you don’t want to do anything actually creative because you only became a writer to mimic what other writers did before, which was write about 18 year olds, only you want them to be in love with a fallen angel instead of a sparkly vampire this time because that is what turns your personal crank.
But I do think there are a few of you out there who are serious about writing and might heed our call. Maybe you had exclusively young female protagonists before because you never thought that much about it. Because it seemed easier or just what most people did. Well, start thinking. Solve The Husband Problem, would you?? Solve it by murder or a circle of Druidic stones, I don’t care, just don’t solve it by giving us yet another boring young virgin that we’re meant to identify with even though that ship sailed a LONG time ago.
Solve the Husband Problem for all of us who love fiction and hate hearing the same story again and again, a story that hasn’t interested us since we were maybe 22 if that even. Do it for representation if you must…no wait, DON’T do it for representation, don’t do it because “every woman who isn’t an unspoiled yet entirely nubile sex kitten is a marginalized group” because older women are NOT a marginalized group, we are a maximalized group, one that every unspoiled yet entirely nubile sex kitten will eventually belong to, and that’s why it’s incredibly stupid there’s barely any fiction targeted at us. Do it because it’s more interesting to write about lots of different people rather than the same chick over and over again.
Do it because you’re a writer and the job of a writer is to observe and capture the world in all its beautiful variety even if it makes it slightly more of a challenge than writing about a girl whose biggest problem involves her prom dress.
Whoa
This is one of the very best posts I’ve seen in this site in a very long time.
There’s nothing I can add, and any comment of mine would surely be superfluous. Except the following:
Thanks, thanks, thanks!!Report
Wow, thank you so very much!!! I really appreciate it!Report
Fannie Flagg was on game shows a lot when I was young, and she was always funny. I had no idea what she did outside of being a celebrity on game shows (Hollywood Squares I think, in addition to Match Game?).
The core idea of Match Game was turned into Family Feud with Richard Dawson (seen briefly on your clip). I think I was able to watch MG in residence hall lounges while I was in college. But anyway, Fanny Flagg was always funny. With that name, how could it be otherwise?
I had no idea she wrote novels. Thanks for fixing that.Report
Girl, preach!Report
LOL, no stopping me! Thanks for reading!Report
The Bridges of Madison County kinda dealt with the Husband Problem by taking a “The Only Way Out Is Through” approach.
Francesca Johnson has a great marriage to a great guy and she has great kids and a great family. Sure, she’s a little lonely, but hey. That’s Life, right? Anyway, the great guy and the great kids go off to the State Fair and she has a whirlwind affair with a guy who wears tight jeans. A short visualization of the four days in the sack:
After the four days, he says “wanna come along?” and she says “Yes! Maybe… Nah… I have a great husband and great kids and a great family!”
Big sigh. She enjoyed her time with him just like we could. Thanks, Oprah.
The movie knew that this might be a bit of a tough sell to sell as a straight story so they went meta and made it that Francesca died and wanted her ashes scattered from a particular bridge. Why this bridge? So the kids read her journals and found out that, 40 years prior, this happened:
And then she got asked if she wanted to run off and she decided that, no, she wanted to say with her husband and her kids and her family. Which, may I point out, were great.
Dump the ashes off the bridge. Be glad that she could have experienced something like that. Be glad that, hey, *WE* aren’t like that! Big sigh.
Problem solved.Report
So here it is: The Formula You’ve Been Looking For:
Young Woman. 22. Bookish. Invisible. Researcher type. She’s working in a library or museum or something like that. Works with a handful of people. Reaches out a handful of times to the ones she thinks are single and gets rebuffed. This one is engaged. That one is gay and in a serious relationship with a delightful guy. That other one is weird. Like, really weird. Body-pillow waifu weird. Ah, well. The only guy she hasn’t asked out is the really burly quiet one who we see with his shirt off because he’s painting the drywall he just put up and, holy crap, he might have a six-pack, we dunno, because he’s so damn hairy.
Anyway. she’s doing research. And she researches this document from a different era. And this era has a female protagonist! And, by God, this female protagonist had suitors. Multiple suitors. Each one an archetype. A soldier, a butcher, a hunter, an artist. Stories about getting to 2nd Base ensue. She gets to 2nd with each one of them. And writes about it. Holy cow. It’s a good thing that mono didn’t exist back then because everybody that she meets would get mono. She narrows it down to two and gets to 3rd with each.
Our protagonist finishes her research and says “but what happened next?”
And either hits on or gets hit on by the painter guy who is not engaged and not gay and not weird.
They get to 2nd.
The sequel’s name? THE LOST TEXTS.Report
Okay, I realize that it doesn’t involve the middle-aged thing.
Middle-aged woman in a good, if routine, marriage with a good, if routine, husband and good, if routine, children finds herself… crap. You can’t kill the guy. You can’t kill the kids. If you don’t want an affair to happen, you’re stuck with a story about how they rekindle.
Do you want a Swiss Family Robinson? Drop the kids off at gramma and grampa’s and get on a chartered boat to have a vacation! Uh-oh, are those storm clouds? Shipwrecked! The captain’s dead! So is the first mate! The Professor and Mary Ann and the Movie Star too! Well, it’s time to make it work until you can get rescued. Huh. The husband is actually competent at stuff. “How did you do that?”, she asks at one point. “I do this at my job”, he says sheepishly. She’s good at stuff too. “Wow!”, he says after she solves a problem. “You’re really good at this. I never noticed.”
He loses his gut. Not that she needs to lose her gut, but she loses her gut. They get tanned and muscular and they’re like teenagers again. He spears fish and starts fires. She collects berries and weaves palm fronds into usable containers. Right when she realizes that they’re pregnant again, hurray! Discovered by the Coast Guard! The kids are on the boat! “We were so worried but gramma and grampa took care of us and we were never in any peril whatsoever and your absence inspired us to study harder and do better in school.”
That’s the best I got without a plague or The Joker killing people.Report
There is a lot of that in the reboot of Lost in Space which I liked and wrote about here https://ordinary-times.com/2019/02/10/feminism-lost-in-space/Report
Wait, I can save this. The lady in the different era is from the desired demographic. Easy peasy.
So we can have her engage in all kinds of acrobatics (she’s a baroness! The baron is unsympathetic! Or sympathetic but absent! Anyway, it’s a permission slip!) and when stuff gets a little too intense, we shift focus back to the researcher.
When the researcher is too uptight and stuffy or unlucky (how did yet another date go wrong!) we can jump back to the baroness and see how her date went right. Better than right! Two dudes! At the same time! How scandalous! How torrid! I don’t approve of that at all! Better switch back to the modern day again!
And so on.
Hrm, is this one of those things where it should, instead, be swapped around?
Have the researcher be happily married with kids and reading a story about a scandalous baroness and we can see how her research is having her hit on her husband in new and interesting ways and that rekindles between them?Report
Actually, this last one version could be very good.
(Apologies if by any chance this is exactly Outlander’s plot. I haven’t watched the series.)
(I hope it isn’t Outlander’s plot since I watched the first episode and found it trite and annoying, so as much as I like historical fiction, this one was a very hard pass)
(The reason I find it annoying is because I immediately identified with the Husband, who, AFAICT, was a decent bloke that really loved her. I’m a sucker for decent blokes. In rom coms I mostly root for the other guy, you know, the one that gets dumped through not fault of his own)
(Hey, perhaps Kristin would be kind enough to write a post from the POV of the dumped guy or gal who is decent and loves the protagonist but can’t sweep her/him off her/his feet. That’s a novel I would read.)Report
a post from the POV of the dumped guy or gal who is decent and loves the protagonist but can’t sweep her/him off her/his feet
I’m imagining the comments to this post and they’re glorious.Report
Investigating that dynamic is on my list of things to write about hopefully in the near future. Thank you!Report
I once wrote a story where the protag was a romance fan, so I moved back and forth between her life and the life she was reading about. At the climax of the tale, in a stunning turn, the novel inspired her to step up, take a chance, and go for the girl she belongs with.
It was fun.Report
That sounds awesome and like it would sell.
(But it’d be yet another story about two young beautiful people starting out.)Report
I’d read it! Did you post it somewhere or publish it? The plot kind of reminds me of Romancing the Stone. My mom, who devours romance novels and Fannie Flagg, introduced me to that movie as a youngin’ and I feel like it was successful for its time. It’s very Fannie Flagg-esque to have stories within stories too.Report
Jay, I would happily read any of them. I am honestly not that hard to please, it’s just that there’s really a stunning lack of anything that isn’t Twilight out there.Report
I had very seriously considering doing a two-fer on this and had BOMC in my stack of books to read, but the thing was, I just didn’t LIKE the book. I didn’t like it when I read it in the first place and I didn’t want to read it again. And as it was, this came out plenty long anyway LOL. But great minds did think alike on that!Report
About Vacation Bible School:
My memory is hazy, but my mother enrolled me in something like that at a local Baptist church when I was a child. The thing is, she was Catholic and as I later learned, didn’t particularly want me to become protestant. She probably just, as David Attenborough said, wanted a break from me. Entirely understandable. And as I recall, it wasn’t that bad, either, for my post-toddler, pre-Kindergartener (or pre-1st grader?) self.
(I’m pretty sure it was VBS because a few years later I got involved, through a friend, with that same church, and they did have VBS. I served as one of the “middle schoolers who help out with things but don’t get paid” part of the program and helped put on the pageant, which was a puppet show.)
Great post, by the way. I don’t have any real comment on the argument because I’m so unfamiliar with the literature. But it makes sense to me.Report
I went to vacation bible school pretty much every year growing up. My most vivid memory was an assistant pastor, who was very obviously a closeted lesbian, teaching me to fight back when I got bullied.
“Some you just have to hit them,” she said. “You’ll get in trouble, but it’s still the right thing to do.”
I’m not sure if Jesus would entirely approve of her message, but on the other hand, he trashed the money lenders, so maybe “turn the other cheek” is right sometimes, but not others.
In any case, vacation bible school is a thing.Report
My kids also met a lot of very helpful older people at VBS that imparted life lessons not unlike this one. Thanks for reading!Report
Yep, and I think the VBSers go out of their way to make the lessons very generic and nondenominational for that very reason. Thanks for reading!Report
I guess the reason that I find the husband problem really infuriating is that the paranoid parts of my mind make me believe that women put in the horrible men category for some reason. My relationship to women in the real world tends to be widely variable. Many of them seem I get along with just fine on a platonic level and have decently close friendships or even brother-sister types relationship. I have one friend where I jokingly refer to as my lesbian wife, she finds this hilarious.
There are other women that I just seem to set off in.a bad way despite not really having any interactions with them. They just find me uneasy to be around and there is a since that they would kick me out of the hobby scene we are in together if they could. And sometimes they react in a way that is inappropriate. Like at a fundraising dance I was at least night, where one of those woman thought I took a bit too big of slice of cake and exploded at me. “Excuse me, are you going to eat all of that.” I just ignored her but I’m at the end of status enforcement policing somewhat frequently, so I really don’t like it.
So with the husband problem, even though I’m not a husband and boyfriend, I just end up getting rather annoyed because I have the experience of irrational hatred directed at me and the feeling that there would be people that would like to an Athenian style ostracizing exile if they could.Report
I’m not sure you are following what I’m saying when I talk about The Husband Problem. I’m sorry that you encountered a-holes, but what I was driving at had nothing to do with horrible men (because hey, I love my husband and would actually be very sad if he was murdered and turned into barbeque) and more of a desire for writers to simply come up with other approaches to romance novels other than having a 17 year old pretty pretty princess getting swept off her feet. It’s boring and does not take me out of my real life, not at all.Report
Are the classics, i.e. Bovary, Karenina, or Effie Briest, relevant to the Husband Problem?Report
All of those were written by men and passionate romance weren’t the point. Many were on how passionate romance can be quite superficial or even deadly and that real deep love is something else like Tolstoy’s Christian love for all humankind. The husbands in each of those novels were bad in ways similar to the husband problem but the lovers weren’t that great either because romance wasn’t the point.Report
Thanks. Good points.Report
Hummm, well if the Husband Problem can be described as “he’s a great guy, but I’m kind of bored with him after 20 years together” then everyone – male, female, other, gay, straight, whatever – has a Husband Problem, and we can all kind of relate to that.
But maybe it’s something else, it’s kind of hard to tell.Report
That’s actually NOT The Husband Problem and you can read the original piece here which explains it: https://ordinary-times.com/2019/01/27/familiar-in-a-strange-land/
It’s also linked in the body of the piece.
I know it’s a little harum scarum having these essays as followups, since people might read only one and not the other, but I did my best to make each of them both extensions of the originals and unique. 🙂 Thanks for reading.Report
If anyone decides to now argue “if a male singer made a song like Goodbye Earl about killing his wife all the feminists would be OUTRAGED” kindly STFU. In 2017 which is like only three years ago or something, 137 women a day were killed by their domestic partners.
To be clear, that’s globally. The US only had 47 murders total per day in 2017, and about 37 of the victims were men. For murders of intimate partners the numbers skew the other way, but now we’re looking at about three women per day in the US being murdered by intimate partners, and one man. That’s a big difference, but not so big that it makes sense to act like it’s an ever-present threat for women and a non-issue for men. This also doesn’t account for the fact that women sometimes get the guy they’re cheating with to kill their husbands, though I couldn’t find solid statistics on that.
I don’t see anything to support the 70% claim on the page you linked, but it does say, “1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have been victims of severe physical violence (e.g. beating, burning, strangling) by an intimate partner in their lifetime.” Again, a significant difference, but not enough to justify the kind of double standard you’re using it to justify here.
Mind you, I have no objection to a song celebrating a woman killing her abusive husband and wouldn’t have said anything if you’d just thrown the song in there without comment. I’m pretty pro-dead-criminals in general. I just don’t think a double standard is warranted.Report
Sigh. It’s literally the most Ordinary Times thing ever for me to throw in stats because I didn’t want to be accused of making a straw man argument regarding something that is absolutely 1100000000% obvious (men hurt women more than women hurt men) only to have someone come along and pick at the stats.
Of course there IS a double standard when it comes to domestic violence and it is an ever present threat for women. There are at least two of us gals on this site, not exactly a massive sample size, who have encountered abusive situations personally, not to mention having seen it in other couples as well. Can you come up with instances of “but men tho”, sure, but I think most people would agree that the trend very much goes the other way and all throughout history, has gone the other way.
This is one of those posts where I’m just going to have to walk away now because I literally cannot even with this. Thanks for reading.Report
Okay. This is a cross-promotional thing. You’re no longer thinking about selling one book. You’re now thinking about selling three.
In the novel: We have a happily, if routinely, married couple. Good husband, good wife, good kids. They might be in a rut. But it’s a good rut. But they’re, seriously, overly familiar. She’s working in his office. He brings her a bowl of popcorn to snack on, because he loves her, and as he gives it to her, his thumb brushes a piece of popcorn and it falls on the floor. He bends over to pick it up which puts pressure on the area below the waist which makes some gas escape him. It’s not on purpose! It just happened!
And it’s not a good one. It’s a bad one. She no longer wants the popcorn. She no longer wants to be in the room. Maybe they should sell the house? But who will want to buy a house that smells like poop?
The wife reads a romance novel. This romance novel is the most cliche’d crap you’ve ever heard of. Fabio Lanzoni on the cover. Open the cover and it’s a picture of Jason Baca! Or vice-versa! And the story has horses and costumes and bodices and all sorts of torrid crap.
Note: Companion Book: The book that she is reading in the story. Available as a downloadable novel from Amazon.com for $1.99.
Anyway, this romance novel inspires her to hit on her husband. “Hey, instead of doing whatever tonight, can we watch a movie together?” They sit on the couch. She scoots next to him. He puts his arm around her. It’s a good movie.
She continues reading the novel. There are descriptions of nipples.
“Hey, wanna watch another movie together?” It’s a less good movie. Kinda bland. Kinda bad. She turns to him and asks “Hey, wanna make out?” And they start smooching on the couch! And *POW*! THERE’S TONGUE!
One of the kids walk in. “EW! GROSS!”
The romance novel continues. There’s now stuff that isn’t appropriate to even allude to.
The wife gets a book like “Do One Thing Every Day Together”. They start doing one thing every day together.
Note: Companion book: Do One Thing Every Day Together. Available from Amazon for ten bucks.
The romance novel concludes, the husband and wife get a room at a B&B, they watch a movie that is downright *AWFUL* and he turns to her and says “Wanna make out?” and they make out and then stuff progresses and it’s even better than in the book that you can download for $1.99.
I think that this overcomes the Husband Problem and, on top of that, moves additional product.Report
I loved reading this. It made me laugh, but more notably, I’m persuaded, which doesn’t happen often. I followed the writer here from Twitter, because she has quality tweets, I wanted to checkout her writing, and I loved FGTAWSC. Now, I feel like I need to write stories for middle aged, lesbian women. Thanks Kristin.Report
I’m sorry I missed this at the time but PLEASE do tag me if you ever write those stories!Report