More opinions are to be announced Wednesday and Thursday. Expect the Noel Canning and Hobby Lobby cases then. That is all.
Burt Likko is the pseudonym of an attorney in Southern California. His interests include Constitutional law with a special interest in law relating to the concept of separation of church and state, cooking, good wine, and bad science fiction movies. Follow his sporadic Tweets at @burtlikko, and his Flipboard at Burt Likko.
Burt Likko
Pseudonymous Portlander. Pursuer of happiness. Bon vivant. Homebrewer. Atheist. Recovering Republican. Recovering Catholic. Recovering divorcé. Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Ordinary Times. Relapsed Lawyer, admitted to practice law (under his real name) in California and Oregon. There's a Twitter account at @burtlikko, but not used for posting on the general feed anymore. House Likko's Words: Scite Verum. Colite Iusticia. Vivere Con Gaudium.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?That's in conflict with what the polls show. Now it's still early and it's possible in a few weeks t… on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?Just because you voted for a person or a party doesn't mean you can't see their flaws, or that you c…
on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemHere is John Kelly, swearing _under oath_, that Trump discussed having the IRS go after John F. Kell… on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You would be. Hey, question: Did you vote for Harris? If so, why do you think you are the person the… on The Shepherds have a Credibility ProblemIt is evidently the case that lying about trump being a Hitleresque mass murderer got donations and… on The Shepherds have a Credibility Problem“If half the country has decided that Trump is qualified to be president, that means they’re not rea…
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?Why would they have to ask the government?
on TrumpedIf only Jeff Bezos had allowed the Washington Post's editorial board to run that endorsement. on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What?You’re sitting here claiming it’s impossible to pick off voters when Trump/the GOP just picked off a…
on TrumpedAbrams... ran twice for governor, lost twice, and was an election denier on one of those. Other than…
November 7, 2024
The End of the Political Parade
November 6, 2024
No Matter which Candidates You Bet on, You’ll Get a Shock or Two
November 5, 2024
November 4, 2024
on Puppy Love in the IG Era: Ten Favorite Dog Breeds on The *OTHER* stuff on the ballot on Weekend Plans Post: Batchin’ It (Again) and It’s Snowing
on History Was Made in 2024 Election, Now What? on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped on Open Mic for the week of 11/4/2024 on Trumped on Trumped on Trumped
on Trumped on Trumped
on Trumped
I have very mixed feelings about the Court waiting until the end of term to release the major decisions.
On the one hand, I am sure that these cases get debated through a luck of memo writing behind the scenes.
On the other hand, I can’t help but think that they do it so they can flee for vacation and avoid the heat of the kitchen from the results.Report
This term has not been nearly so end-punctuated as others. Several big cases like McCutcheon v. FEC (election contributions), Town of Greece v. Galloway (Establishment clause), Schuette v. BAMN (affirmative action), and Executive Benefits v. Arkison (role of bankruptcy courts) have all been handed down already.Report
@burt-likko
You are forgetting Real Housewives of the Supreme Court!
That was the case I was waiting for.Report
Egad. I pray that’s not really a thing.Report
While probably of interest to only a small subset of us, today’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA is significant. IANAL, but on first reading, “tortured” is the adjective that comes to mind. Well, Alito’s dissent (Thomas concurring) is clear enough: “The rest of you all got it wrong in Massachusetts v. EPA, you’re still wrong, and greenhouse gases simply can’t be regulated under the CAA.” Otherwise, it seems to set things up for a decade’s worth of challenges to every attempt that will be made to actually regulate greenhouse gases from fixed sources.Report
Maybe “cobbled together” is the adjective I’m looking for. I admit, this is one where I would love to be able to have a transcript of all the memos and conversations that went into putting it together.Report
Any predictions/thoughts on Harris v. Quinn?Report
They saved it for the last day, so that suggests it’s been some combination of exacting from a research perspective, and contentious from a disposition perspective. The 7th Circuit has gone 3-for-3 this term, and that bucks a 3:1 reversal ratio that’s been a highlight of the Roberts Court. I’d look for a 5-4 vote for reversal, I’m guessing Alito writing for majority on free association grounds, and Breyer leading the dissent on ripeness grounds.Report
Thanks for the thoughts. I imagine the fair share provision will be invalidated, but the decision won’t wipe out fair share generally, just in this case because of the weird medicaid issues. However, I don’t really know and am just spitballing. (I’ve listened to the oral arguments, but didn’t read the briefs, and ianal, etc.)Report
I’m expecting decisions in Hobby Lobby, Noel Canning, and McCullen tomorrow. And my term recap is mostly written now. Thing is, I have about a dozen trials starting about an hour and a half after the decisions are to be announced. So, bear with me tomorrow while I keep my own bills paid and we’ll have a recap ready to go.Report