Court Watching Note

Avatar

Burt Likko

Pseudonymous Portlander. Homebrewer. Atheist. Recovering Republican. Recovering Catholic. Recovering divorcé. Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Ordinary Times. Relapsed Lawyer, admitted to practice law (under his real name) in California and Oregon. On Twitter, to his frequent regret, at @burtlikko. House Likko's Words: Scite Verum. Colite Iusticia. Vivere Con Gaudium.

Related Post Roulette

10 Responses

  1. Avatar Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    I have very mixed feelings about the Court waiting until the end of term to release the major decisions.

    On the one hand, I am sure that these cases get debated through a luck of memo writing behind the scenes.

    On the other hand, I can’t help but think that they do it so they can flee for vacation and avoid the heat of the kitchen from the results.Report

  2. Avatar Michael Cain
    Ignored
    says:

    While probably of interest to only a small subset of us, today’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA is significant. IANAL, but on first reading, “tortured” is the adjective that comes to mind. Well, Alito’s dissent (Thomas concurring) is clear enough: “The rest of you all got it wrong in Massachusetts v. EPA, you’re still wrong, and greenhouse gases simply can’t be regulated under the CAA.” Otherwise, it seems to set things up for a decade’s worth of challenges to every attempt that will be made to actually regulate greenhouse gases from fixed sources.Report

  3. Avatar Gabriel Conroy
    Ignored
    says:

    Any predictions/thoughts on Harris v. Quinn?Report

    • Avatar Burt Likko in reply to Gabriel Conroy
      Ignored
      says:

      They saved it for the last day, so that suggests it’s been some combination of exacting from a research perspective, and contentious from a disposition perspective. The 7th Circuit has gone 3-for-3 this term, and that bucks a 3:1 reversal ratio that’s been a highlight of the Roberts Court. I’d look for a 5-4 vote for reversal, I’m guessing Alito writing for majority on free association grounds, and Breyer leading the dissent on ripeness grounds.Report

      • Avatar Gabriel Conroy in reply to Burt Likko
        Ignored
        says:

        Thanks for the thoughts. I imagine the fair share provision will be invalidated, but the decision won’t wipe out fair share generally, just in this case because of the weird medicaid issues. However, I don’t really know and am just spitballing. (I’ve listened to the oral arguments, but didn’t read the briefs, and ianal, etc.)Report

  4. Avatar Burt Likko
    Ignored
    says:

    I’m expecting decisions in Hobby Lobby, Noel Canning, and McCullen tomorrow. And my term recap is mostly written now. Thing is, I have about a dozen trials starting about an hour and a half after the decisions are to be announced. So, bear with me tomorrow while I keep my own bills paid and we’ll have a recap ready to go.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *