Somewhere, Stephen Maturin is smiling…
‘What is Catalan?’
‘Why, the language of Catalonia – of the islands, of the whole of the Mediterranean coast down to Alicante and beyond. Of Barcelona. Of Lerida. All the richest part of the peninsula.’
‘You astonish me. I had no notion of it. Another language, sir? But I dare say it is much the same thing – a putain, as they say in French.’‘Oh no, nothing of the kind – not like at all. A far finer language. More learned, more literary. Much nearer the Latin. And by the by, I believe the word is patois, sir, if you will allow me.’
‘Patois – just so. Yet I swear the other is a word: I learnt it somewhere,’ said Jack.
—Master and Commander, Patrick O’Brian
Something is brewing in Catalonia.
With austerity forcing economic centralization to Madrid, the people of Catalonia have begun to question whether or not they wish to remain part of the Spanish state.
It’s no secret that distinct nationalisms in Spain have always been a problem. The Spanish Civil War and Franco’s nationalist repression of other Iberian languages was just one more in a long line of conflicts dating back to the centralization policy of the Habsburgs. The Constitution of 1978 had allowed some settlement to that conflict by recognizing cultural identities in autonomous communities.
Or so it had appeared.
Economic stresses that have hit Spain unequally throughout its regions have inflamed the cleavages between the nations. Catalonia gives substantially more money to Madrid in tax receipts than it receives in return. (Estimates put the figure at about 20% of government revenues and 14% of expenditures) Why should Catalonia suffer for the follies of the Castilians?
This question is exacerbated by the existence of the European Union. While the question of the monetary union’s survival remains unanswered, it’s the existence of the EU that makes Catalonian independence more feasible. A Catalonia that was an EU member state would retain the trade benefits of the EU and prevent Spain from enacting retaliatory trade barriers. Perhaps as importantly the existence of a centralized currency union would allow Catalonia to maintain its present currency in the Euro and prevent large-scale displacements either in foreign capital investments or the value of domestic savings.
The characteristics that make the EU a quasi-“Super State” allow smaller national actors to break away from multi-national states with fewer consequences. In the presence of this federal super-state the question is perhaps not whether Catalonia will be independent, but whether or not multi-national states within the Eurozone should disband and create a new organizing principle based around nationalist sentiment.
Afterall, what makes Slovenia, Portugal, Luxembourg and Liechtenstein so much more deserving of national self-determination than Catalonia, Flanders, or Scotland?
And in that question, the ghosts of European nationalists who fought for self-determination (and their fictional counterparts like Dr. Maturin y Domanova) appear to be smiling….
Unlikely to go anywhere. While reading this article as well as the article cited, I couldn’t help but think of what happened with Quebec in the 90s and where the sovereignty movement went.
This is not to say it can’t happen but, much like a live-action Akira, I’ll believe it when I see it.Report
Ah, but unlike Europe, Pyre, Quebec has no supra-national organization that Canada is already a part of that they could separate, remain part of and thus continue to remain connected to the rest of Canada. Quebec is different also in that they’re distinctly a receiver region in the Canadian economic scene. The French of Quebec have had significant Federal benefits and employment opportunities lavished on them by various Federal governments over the years. The reason the Separatists don’t disappear is that the people of Quebec would like this to continue. The reason the Separatists don’t do better is that not even the people of Quebec are delusional enough to think that they could separate from Canada but keep any of the perks they currently enjoy*.
*And there’s the discomforting and inconvenient fact that the First Nations of Quebec have very firmly indicated they have no intention of being carried out of Confederation by the French and that they would be staying in Canada AND keeping their Northern 2/3rds of the Province of Quebec with them.Report
Why should Catalonia suffer for the follies of the Castilians?
Best not think too much upon that question, lest you be led down a dark, dark path.Report
Stupid Flanders.Report
National self-de-diddly-termination!Report
Should’ve seen that one coming.Report
“After all, what makes Slovenia, Portugal, Luxembourg and Liechtenstein so much more deserving of national self-determination than Catalonia, Flanders, or Scotland?”
But really, the flip side of this, as was discussed in another thread, is ‘and why are Catalonia, Flanders, or Scotland so much more deserving than Kurdistan, Balochistan, Uyghuristan’ (or more pertinently, Euskadistan).
I’m also not entirely sure the desire to become part of a superstate upon achieving de jure sovereignty is even there – in either direction. (and fwiw, Sir Ulrich’s homeland is not part of the EU).Report
I think it’s not so much that Catalonia, Flanders or Scotland are more deserving than Kurdistan, Balochistan, Uyghuristan, Euskadistan, Tibet or hell South Ossetia, just that the structural implements in the form of the super-state that allows this sort of federalism isn’t there for them.
As for becoming part of the superstate, the Catalonians at least want to join the EU, they’re demanding they join as the latest member. As for Liechtenstein, mea culpa. But they are part of the EFTA and EEA and share a currency with Switzerland.Report
Would an independent Catalonia be better off or worse off than it is as a mostly-autonomous province of Spain? By how much? For that matter, is Portugal that much better off as an independent nation than it would be from a more cosmopolitan Iberia, and is it that much better or worse off than Spain?
By which I mean, I understand cultural and national identities, and that there are variances in regional economies as compared to the continental economy taken as a whole, but in modern Europe, what substantial differences in the day-to-day lives of individuals would be made here? Their own representatives in the European Parliament as opposed to only having a portion of the Spanish delegation?Report
The most substantial difference is in tax receipts.
As noted Catalonia supplies about 20% of government revenues but receives about 14% of expenditures. Self-determination would mean they’d get to keep all their own revenue within their own community.
It would be akin to say California no longer being required to send tax money to the federal government. (Its deficit and structural revenue problems would vanish overnight)Report
Okay, so it would be better in the short run, until government spending expanded again.Report
I suppose. It’s as much about autonomy as anything else. Fiscal autonomy is an important part of controlling your own destiny.
And putting it into context, Catalonia’s always been a more successful economic region within Spain. It’s likely it wouldn’t have the sort of structural fiscal issues that Federal Spain has at the moment.Report
If autonomy is important, they damn sure well ought not to be part of the euro zone. Leaving aside the whole currency issues, all those unelected ‘crats in Brussels mandating Eurozone policy re agriculture, etc.?
Na…Report
Spain has always hated itself.Report