Saturday!
Now, I’ve been playing a lot of Candy Crush and I’ve been noticing a number of things that, honestly, I find quite fascinating about it.
The first, of course, is that you can spend anywhere between $.99 and $74.99 on gold bars for the game. That’s a dime for each gold bar (but if you’re willing to spend $21 or up, you can get discounts as deep as 25%) but, of course, doing stuff doesn’t cost a gold bar. Doing stuff costs multiple gold bars. Buy boosters for 53 gold bars. Buy a handful of extra turns for 9 gold bars.
Occasionally (well, once) the game will give you (well, me) the opportunity to win a small amount of gold bars. Blow up 1000 red candies and win 10 gold bars, they told me. I won the gold bars. Still haven’t spent them.
When it comes to gameplay itself, I’ve noticed four distinct end game states (maybe five):
There’s the huge catastrophic loss. The “Holy cow, you didn’t even come *CLOSE*!” loss. These losses are vaguely irritating insofar as you find yourself asking “how can anybody beat this level with so few turns available?”.
There’s the ooooh, *THIS* close loss. With one more turn, you could have gotten there. One more jelly. One more chocolate. One more turn before the bomb blew up. Man, *THIS* close. (I imagine that this finish is the one that results in the lion’s share of gold bars being purchased.)
There’s the “just barely squeaked by” victory. This one has two variants. There’s the “just barely squeaked by” victory that happens on the first attempt at the level… and then there’s the “just barely squeaked by” victory that happens on the 213th attempt at the level. The latter is oh-so-much-more satisfying.
Then there’s the Victory Overwhelming. After you beat a level, the game tells you where you stack up next to your friends who also play. Did you come in 4th? Did you come in 21st? Did you come in 2nd by 20 points? Did you come in 1st by 200,000? There is just something so very rewarding about seeing that your ex-significant other got bumped into 2nd place by your magnificent luck that allowed you to merge two of the sprinkly chocolate drops on your last turn.
So you keep coming back and you keep getting tempted to just use those (first hit is) “free” gold bars.
Honestly, I can’t understand the price points on these things. I *MIGHT* be tempted to pick up a Facebook gift card and get some gold if it were, say, 90% cheaper. $7.50 for 1000 gold bars? Heck, I could see buying a pile for me and a pile for Maribou. But $75??? That’s crazy talk.
(And then I saw this video from The Escapist and that got me thinking even more. Maybe I’ll quit. After this last attempt to get past level 100…)
So… what are you playing?
(Photo is “The Game” taken by Mo Riza, used under a creative commons license.)
I don’t play video games (migraine trigger, plus I’m a person prone to bingeing.) Lately, I’ve been bingeing on Neil Stephenson; in the last two weeks, I’ve read Reamed, Cryptonomicom, and I’m about 1/3 of the way through Quicksilver. (This is why I haven’t been commenting much, I’m now having trouble keeping up with reading, posts, something that rarely happens in my life.)
Reading Reamed, I wondered if someone has used google earth as game world — and yes, I found Planet in Action. Fascinating.Report
@zic if you look through my archives, perhaps on my old sub-blog, you’ll find my fantasy casting of the theoretical HBO series based on the Baroque. I’d love your thoughts reacting to it, and any updates.Report
I’ll look when I need to come up for air and breath, Burt. I’m sort of overwhelmed. Totally reveling in being a nerd.
A few nights ago, I braved the cold, walked along the sidewalk under some mature pines at the corner of my yard, and noticed the moon up through the pine boughs, through a layer of thin cloud cover. I could see the expected circle of light in the clouds about the moon, it had an odd egg shape because the moon’s not full yet. Around the edges of the ring, I could a spectral rainbow, indigo on the inside through a narrow band of green, then a wider band of yellow fading through orange to red that was frizzed at it’s outer edge into the cloud, lit from underneath by light pollution from my village. I scurried to get out from the white pines for an unobstructed view, light changes incredibly quickly, equations involving the movements of earth, moon, sun, as well as the formation of cloud in the atmosphere. Unobstructed, the rainbow at the edges of the moon ring were gone, just silvery light in the thin cloud layer, I could see stars through. I stepped back under the pines, and the rainbow at the edges of the moonlight ring in the cloud reappeared. I did’t understand why, and I stepped back and fourth from under the pine for a few minutes, observing the phenomena, until it became too cold to stand so still.
Yesterday, I looked up out the window to focus my eyes distantly after a long bout of reading about Newton’s experiments with optics. From my chair next to the wood stove in my kitchen, I have a view across the village to the Androscoggin River valley, screened by the fringe of trees growing in the village, to the Mahoosuc Mountains at the horizon where the mountains meet the sky. Where the view was unobstructed by trees, the air above the river looked clear. But through the fringe of trees, I could see a faint mist hanging over the river, and where my view of the mist was interrupted by branches of giant maple and oak trees , I could see the thinnest band of rainbows it it. It was like the moon before; the obstruction revealed the refraction.
I’m still puzzling out light moving through moisture fringed by the branches of trees and the resulting rainbows. I think a similar phenomena happens when the afternoon sun shines through the wire mesh of my screen porch; but the hot bands of sunlight it scatters is far too bright directly observe rainbows at it’s edges, perhaps my camera will probably be able to observe it, so that’s an experiment in the works. I’ve been exploring light in atmosphere in lightroom, mostly using the luminosity settings to filter out the other colors of light that blend back toward white, You can see some of my early work in this G+ album..
Reading Quicksilver makes me feel glad to be a nerd. It’s often annoying to people, I love that my husband is that he’s rarely annoyed to be around as I figuring things out. He’s a Waterhouse through and through, and we’re both grateful that the need to each conduct our own research frees the time of the other for research, that’s one of the richest blessings in our marriage, and we spend a lot of time sharing our discoveries with each other.
I’ll dig into the archives when I take my next break, @burt-likko , and report back to the Ordinary Society (OS) with a brief comment or blog post, as the response warrants. Thank you for pointing it out, I’m grateful for the opportunity of conversation. Now there’s a wood fire and book in the other room I must return to.Report
Hmm. Dragon Age 2. And probably Minecraft, as soon as my nephew clears out. He’s currently playing Lego Star Wars and enjoying himself immensely.
OTOH, my wife is currently stranded in Dallas due to weather.Report
I haven’t played the recent version of that one. Do you still shoot J.R.?Report
Does anyone else remember the Apple 2e text-based rpg?Report
I played a couple of the Zork games and the very first wizardry, which was close to text-based.Report
If you feel like replaying Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, you can play it here (free! online!).
How I loved that game…
(If, instead, you want to play Zork, you can do that here.)Report
Way back in the day, my father-in-law’s workplaces put in the first desktop computers. Part of his training consisted, I kid you not, of being handed the Hitchhiker’s Guide game and told to play it.
Why? Because according to his manager (and my father-in-law agrees) it is a perfect example of “Computers will do EXACTLY what you tell them, not what you mean to tell them”. But in a format more fun that “Oh crud, I erased my hard drive”.Report
Hope everyone gets home soon. There’s nothing quite like the awful of being *THIS* close to finishing a trip indefinitely.Report
As far as internet games that take your money by bits and pieces, I find Fallen London to be much more entertaining, and a much better value in terms of what throwing a few bucks at the game will get you.Report
Reminds me, I should do a review of that.
Hope to hell you aren’t playing Sunless Sea.Report
“Those Facebook games are just a wasteful time sink,” he said as he prepared to play his 1,000th hour on Civilization V.Report
I know a guy who develops those FB games. Originally he was a computer game designer..and owner of his own company. At one time, he was partially owned by Microsoft, so he knew what he was doing. He said the profit profile of FB games was amazing and that’s why he sold his company and got hired on to make these games. I should have stayed with coding…Report
“At one time, he was partially owned by Microsoft, so he knew what he was doing”
… this doesn’t terribly seem indicative of knowing what he was doing, imnsho.
What did he publish?Report
I played Candy Crush for a while just to see what all the fuss was about, but I uninstalled it when I realized that there were certain levels that were very heavily luck-dependent, put there to goad people into paying to get through them.
Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised if it were on some kind of timer, where the game decides to give you the candies you need to win only after failing a certain number of times.Report
there were certain levels that were very heavily luck-dependent, put there to goad people into paying to get through them.
Filthy capitalist exploiters.Report
No politics.Report
I’ve just defeated the Queen of Scales in Hand of Fate.Report
Prunella?Report