Growing up in the System:
My father wasn’t one for hectoring or lecturing. He was a quiet man, dealing with his own demons, and sparing his family any outward appearances of the battles he fought in his head long after Word War II ended. The war had dramatically changed what had been his hardscrabble existence of rural poverty and the damaging economic realities of the Great Depression. But I don’t want to review his wartime service. I have done that already. I want to discuss what came after: the life he and my mother built after he came home for good and married the girl of his dreams.
My father had always had a strong aptitude for building and repair. When he enlisted in the US Navy in 1937, the recruiters recognized this and sent him to learn aircraft maintenance. He excelled. Throughout the war, he was stationed both on carriers and ashore wrenching on a variety of aircraft and sending them out to be shot up, straggling back with damage and needing his attention.
Before the war, he had worked briefly in a tractor factory with his father who was forced off his family farm by poverty. After the war, he was able to get back on at the factory where his mechanical skills were prized by the John Deere managers at the Plow and Planter Works. He worked there until the day he died, aged 59 years, and just as he was reaching his retirement window.
My mom had worked at the International Harvester plant during the war building tanks — a true Rosie the Riveter. After the war, her rheumatoid arthritis progressed to a point she struggled with even simple daily chores. She became a stay-at-home mom with five children while my father supported this brood with his salary from the factory. When he left us all, his paycheck disappeared. Fortunately for my mother, his survivor pension benefits from the factory took care of most of her living and medical expenses.
The major economic growth period that blossomed on the heels of the Second World War ensured we would never know true want. Our family, friends, and neighbors were never rich nor ever would be. In the 50s and 60s, my company town was filled by these mostly large Catholic families with a single-income parent providing for basic, if not luxury, needs. We had a small house, a station wagon, a black-and-white Zenith television set, and my father built the beautiful wood furniture we used. But this world was changing quickly.
As a teenager, I had worked in landscaping, warehouse labor, and even managed a gas station at night. But I never had any insight into what I now call “the system”. What did I want to be in life? How could I find a career to support me? What process did I need to follow to be comfortable if not wealthy? Where to turn?
I grew up hearing that college was the new way to get ahead. Instead of removing your overalls and taking a shower when you got home – like my father did – you could take one in the morning and put on nice clothes. You could go to an office building or store front, perform your assigned duties, then stop off at the tavern on the corner for a pop before you went home to supper. It never occurred to me you could start or run a business. It wasn’t anything I saw growing up. I saw men and women who worked jobs in return for a paycheck. Only one of my younger uncles had attended college and he wore a suit to work. He had a very nice house and nine(!) children. That must be “the new system”.
No one in our little family had attended, let alone graduated, college until my sister, five years older than me, accomplished this amazing first-time feat. I was determined to take the same route because I had learned I didn’t have my father’s industrial-era aptitudes nor perseverance. When my time came, I used the money I had saved from planting trees and groundcover to take college course at the same institution from which my sister got her diploma. That’s when I planned to make it “the system” for me. It wasn’t to be. After one semester with a GPA akin to John Blutarsky’s in Animal House, I was politely asked to leave the campus and never return.
I went back to my landscaping job full-time, hung out after work drinking beer with my buddies at the Belgrade Tavern and fell into a pattern of restless indolence. I had not found “the system” that would work for me. After a couple brushes with the law and some time in a childhood basement to think, I decided I just needed to run off and join the circus. Why not? It couldn’t be any worse than a rootless life in my hometown surrounded by others who reminded me I had failed to make the jump from childhood to an adult “system”. My sisters had found spouses and meaningful, if not stimulating, jobs. I was a failure at life.
The circus for me came in the guise of the military. My father had made the same escape when grinding poverty and restlessness pushed him into a life that would transform him in heroic service in a world war. I walked over to the recruiting office in town to sign up — not because of any noble call to patriotic service, but because I knew something had to change for me to find “the system” for me.
I had never considered myself a cosseted child, but my first exposure to the military ripped away the blinders. Now I had to toe the mark without a supporting cast of friends and family. In basic training, I was expected to earn my way and gain the respect of my peers and superiors. For a while, I toyed with the idea of treating it with the same disdain I had applied to my semester of college. But an insightful drill instructor pulled me aside to give me a no-bullshit, tough-love lecture about the choices available to me.
I will never forget Sergeant Campbell’s life changing guidance. He explained the military system, and how I could use it to get what I wanted while being a dedicated and valuable member of the service. He outlined the many paths that fell under the purview of the US military – that it wasn’t a one-size-fits-all environment, and I had what it took to succeed. If only I wouldn’t be a selfish and spoiled little prick. After his talk, I was able to phone my mother home in Illinois. She backed up his words by telling me this was my last chance. if I failed at basic, I was not welcome back in the family home. I had to make my way in the world and now was the time.
I didn’t fully understand “the system” until I decided to pursue college courses with more than a little encouragement from my new wife. When I initially wavered, I was able to kick the can down the road a few months by promising my pregnant wife I would wait until after our first child was born. She adopted a serious, probing look and admonished me from her hospital bed the day after our first child arrived: I had promised her and now was the time. The next day, I went to Base Education Office, discussed the issues, and signed up at the university offering classes for military personnel.
In addition to the insane workload of active duty coupled with being a new father, I often felt overwhelmed with school work, but something significant happened soon after. My boss submitted me for an Airman of the Quarter recognition and I was selected. The write-up noted that not only was I doing a great job running that old core-memory Burroughs computer system, I was also actively pursuing an undergraduate degree. I suddenly got a glimpse of “the system” that would work for me. So that was it? I just have to go above and beyond the others to receive these dopamine bursts? This was “the system”.
I milked that system for many enjoyable and fruitful years. Airman of the Month was followed by NCO of the Quarter and Junior Officer of the Year plaques for my wall. The BS degree was followed by commissioning and a stint as a student pilot. Then came a full three-year MBA on top of running data centers as a company grade officer. The work experience coupled with academic pursuits then brought from the military into a rewarding civilian occupation that would last the rest of my working life. It found “the system”, and it worked for me. It was a system that accommodated an affordable pay-as-you-go education process where my wife and I each achieved a graduate and post-graduate education by putting each other through night schools. This reinforced and supported increasingly responsible jobs and allowed us to live comfortably and save for retirement.
So, is this a life lesson for everyone? Ahh, heck no. It’s not even really relevant anymore. I am the last person who should offer any one career advice. What became my “system” isn’t even extant for the most part. My father would be amazed had he lived to see his unskilled and lazy son fashion a life out of a completely new data-centric model divorced from his Industrial Era skills and work ethic. I am similarly amazed as I watch my two daughters pursue their own “system” to forge their working lives. One went the college route to find her career and the other pursued a trade school that resulted in a good work life for her.
When the government decided to support the goals of those seeking a college education or trade school, they did so in that familiar heavy-handed way that had secondary effects any high school student should have foreseen. They underwrote student loans in an egregious way that upset the entire cost/value balance of the educational system. To appease the bankers who would carry these loans, they made sure the loan couldn’t be discharged in bankruptcy. The colleges got their money up-front even before providing a service. The banks got to hang the debt around the necks of their customers for life. Not surprisingly, education costs have exploded while the value of the resulting diplomas has been substantially diluted. Once you leave with your sheepskin, you can’t go back and get a refund when your “system” doesn’t result in a lucrative career.
My own civilian career grew from the seeds of what would become known as cybersecurity. My recent experience with workforce development efforts has shown how ineffective it is trying to apply the old system to new realities. We have what my fellow professionals sometimes call a “jobs gap”, but it really is just a failure to adequately define a job description and the necessary foundational skills. There are still too many people of my experience (we don’t like to say ‘age’) trying to apply their “system” to today’s problems and today’s jobs.
The system I used has evolved and ultimately disappeared. It’s time we help our next generation build something better.
Nice essay.
Part of the problem is that it feels like it was possible to have a guess as to what the basic foundations would be for “two decades from now” for centuries… but, recently, those guesses have become more and more worthless.
In 1948, what would have been good advice for a teen? Well, sure. A, B, and C.
In 1968, what would have been good advice for a teen? Well, sure. B, C, and D.
In 1988, what would have been good advice for a teen? Well, sure. C, D, and E.
In 2008, what would have been good advice for a teen? Well… E and F… D used to be important but it might not be anymore…
Things are speeding up.Report
Another part is the way people say “oh,well you X? Well, I didn’t X, I guess that means it’s all about X.”
You had a college degree, I didn’t, guess that means it’s all about college degrees.
You had a STEM degree, I didn’t, guess that means it’s all about STEM degrees.
You went to an Ivy League school, I didn’t, guess that means it’s all about Ivy League schools.
You did an internship, I didn’t, guess that means it’s all about internships.
You’re white, I’m not, guess that means it’s all about being white.
You’re a man, I’m not, guess that means it’s all about being a man.
And, of course, then there follows a rule saying it can’t be all about What It Was All About, and there needs to be documented proof that it’s not about that.Report
“Learn to Code” was *GREAT* advice for a teen 10 years ago.
Now I look at GPT-3 and I don’t know whether it’s still going to be.Report
Learn to code is still good advice, but not in the same way it was 10 years ago.
Kinda like how learning spreadsheets was great advice 20 years ago, but 10 years ago it was expected knowledge for any white collar job.Report
Honestly? I think that management and communication are better skills than anything technical. Because machine-shops come and coding-houses go, but you’ll always need someone to figure out what problem ought to be solved and write up the plan for how to solve it.
Like I keep saying, “you kids better figure out how to like word problems and group projects, because the main thing you do as a grown-up is do group projects to solve word problems, and how good you are at that determines how much money you make.”Report
You aren’t wrong, but neither am I.
Being able to code up a script or macro is pretty basic these days.Report
Managers who do not have the respect or knowledge of the workers are a dime a dozen and usually fail.Report
“Management positions are a reward for technical skill” is how the Peter Principle was invented.Report
When I worked at Bell Labs decades ago, after they promoted you from Member of Technical Staff to Supervisor they sent you to five days of “charm school.” Also known as “care and feeding of MTS.” Few people backed out at that point. Enough people backed out at some point later that there was an official transfer category called “retreat.”
I put up with it for two years before retreating. I was highly rated as a supervisor, but it just wasn’t much fun. All managers got a monthly summary of recent transfers. The month my retreat was on the list I got phone calls from department heads I didn’t know congratulating me for making that choice, and lamenting that they couldn’t because their technical skills were out of date.Report
Not really. Managers who fail to respect the knowledge and experience of the workers will fail, but managers do not need to have that knowledge themselves.
I’ve worked for managers who only had a very basic understanding of what we do, but who did understand how to delegate tasks, secure resources, handle the politics, and run interference when appropriate.Report
Yes.
Lots of less experienced people have wholly bought into the myth that what worked for their parents and grandparents should still work for them, as if “The System” was static even though everything else is changing. Despite daily evidence to the contrary, they want the system of yore, and they somehow want social policy to enforce it.
PS, I know what you mean about making the military work for you. It was a bit of advice one of my uncles (former USAF) gave me before I left for basic, and he pointed at his own brother (not my dad) as what not to do.Report
But they aren’t wrong, though? I mean, if someone else did the things that they did, they’d have the same success in life.
The issue there is that they followed a path, and to get where they ended up they had to start in a particular place. And sure, you can stray from a path, but if I don’t start in the same place that you did then I won’t end up in the same place that you are now…Report
I’d say that the expected starting place is a foreign country.
My grandfather could graduate high school and get a middle class job doing physical labor, and learn additional skills on the job to gain advancement.
My father could do the same, but some school was expected for advancement.
I was expected to have a diverse skill set before starting the middle class job.
My son will be expected to have a different, possibly larger skill set.
High school hasn’t kept pace.Report
One should always remember that 1954 was the first year that more than 50% of 19 y/o had graduated from college. It took longer for 50% of blacks or Latinos to have graduated college.
I have always thought that the first internet boom is why people have so many career problems. The U.S went from an economy where employers invested in employees to an economy where employees invest in themselves and the emplyers are look for a “good fit.”
A job hopping economy is great in the boom times for workers but is lousy in a downturn/recession.Report
High school rather than college?Report
I always found it interesting that we want employers to invest in employees, but we don’t express that through the tax code.
If I get work to pay for school, I have to pay taxes on the cost of tuition as income. Or my employer does. Somebody has to pay taxes on that. If someone has to pay taxes on it, then I’m betting there isn’t any tax benefit to paying for employees to take external classes.Report
Employers can deduct up to $5,250 per employee per year for college tuition expenses. There are multiple deductions and credits that can be applied on individual returns. At least one of those no longer applies in 2021.Report
$5250? That’s it?
As for the individual, if I pay the tuition, I can deduct it, but if I get reimbursed, I have to pay taxes on that income. Last I checked, the deduction != the tax.Report
Yeah, clearly it’s in a student’s interest to have their employer pay the school directly rather than reimburse. As I recall — it’s been a number of years since I was in a position to notice — all of my employers who paid tuition sent it directly to the school.
$5,250 would cover six hours per calendar year at the state engineering school a few miles up the road from me. I suppose there are people who work full time and could do more hours. I don’t think I could have.Report
What I’ve seen is that, over the past 10+ years, a large number of large employers went from having generous education benefits to very restrictive ones. So either the tax code changed for the worse, or it failed to adapt to the changing landscape. Given the rise in tuition, my guess is it failed to adapt.Report
It is more than formal external schooling. There is in-house training, certifications, skills building. But these days, most companies do not seem capable of teaching anyone to run the point of sale system, how to answer the phone, or how to speak to a customer.Report
In house corporate training (not OJT) is hit or miss. Most companies do not have pedagogy and curriculum development as core skills, so they farm it out. The companies who get hired to develop the training are also kinda hit or miss, because (IMHO) they are responding to a customer that is not the consumer (i.e. the person contracting and paying for training is not the person who will be taking the training).
Add on to that the fact that in-house training is generally not a credential that has value outside the corporation. So if you take a training, and don’t have associated work experience, the training isn’t worth much.Report
Yup to all of the above. 40-some years ago when I started at Bell Labs, every new systems engineer took Engineering Economics for the Bell System. There was a published textbook. What you learned was 40 years worth of the Bell System: AT&T, Western Electric, the Labs, and a whole list of operating telephone companies. Lots of specifics, like which states allowed which end-of-study conditions, how to structure things so cash flowed around the places where taxes were levied, etc. An extensive curriculum in all sorts of disciplines was taught in-house. After a few years, one of the questions that got asked when management was doing performance review was, “What have they taught?” (In my case, nonlinear optimization and some guest lectures on exotic forward-looking switching technology.)Report
Geez, am I old. How did that happen?Report
Yes, thanks. Sorry for the mistake. 50% of Americans have not graduated with a four year degree.
What is important is have any type of credential that is hard to replicate. Think about an MD degree helps one be affluent but being a neurosurgeon helps even more.Report