Thursday Throughput 2/28
[ThTh1] So today is February 28. Since it’s 2019, there will be no leap year. So those of you still on the Julian Calendar will not be falling any further behind. Hope you had a good Valentine’s Day yesterday. Next year, I’ll go into some detail on leap years. And maybe leap seconds. In the meantime, I’ll note that the common conception that February has only 28 days because Augustus stole a couple of days is … a myth.
[ThTh2] I mentioned in this space before that the Opportunity rover has stopped talking. NASA officially pulled the plug. The oft-repeated meme that Opportunity’s last message was “it’s getting dark and my batteries are low” is not literally true but is an accurate figurative representation of the last data it sent back.
[ThTh3] One of the big questions in planetary astronomy is whether there a ninth planet or not. No, I’m not referring to Pluto’s status. I’m referring to the possibility of a much larger body out in the Kuiper Belt. There is an intense debate raging about whether the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects require a large planet or not. Until we detect one, that debate will continue. In the meantime, enjoy the Planetary Society’s montage of things that aren’t planets:
[ThTh4] The War on Cervical Cancer continues to progress. Not only do we have a vaccine, we may now have a cure.
[ThTh5] One of the tactics of interplanetary war that shows up in science fiction from to time is the idea of dropping objects on a planet from space. In particular, the idea of dropping a rod — which minimizes the cross-section for air resistance — has shown up in various stories. Turns out, the Air Force was paying attention.
[ThTh6] In 1974, scientists at the Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico broadcast a message to a distant globular cluster. They now want to broadcast a second and are enlisting kids to try to figure out what message to send. I link the article not just for that but for the ongoing debate about whether we should be broadcasting our presence at all lest we invite a hostile response.
[ThTh7] I’ve mentioned Oumuamua, the extrasolar comet, a few times. I had planned a post on alternative to the idea, advanced by Avi Loeb, that this was an alien solar sail. But now there are three theories, all of which are reasonable. The simple fact is that we’re in unexplored territory here. We’ve never seen an object like this. And unless we see another one, we won’t really be able to know for certain what it was.
[ThTh8] I love this video, showing an entire day at the South Pole and other low-latitude sites. A textbook case of how the Sun’s motion changes depending on where you are on Earth.
Looping 24hr 180 degree fisheye time-lapse footage, shot with the camera pointing straight up at the South Pole, Scott Base, and Christchurch NZ in summer. Noon is when the sun is at the bottom of the each picture.#Antarctica #astronomy #astrophotography #timelapse #education pic.twitter.com/q3fklWnIpl
— Anthony Powell (@Antzkiwi) February 22, 2019
[ThTh9] One of the more frustrating things for scientists to deal with is a lack of understanding of how probability works. Just because something has a one-in-four chance of happening does not mean it happens exactly one-in-four times. Nor does it mean it can’t happen at all. Here’s a lovely video demonstrating this:
This is an elegant video of how probability and sampling works – larger samples provide more accurate estimates of the underlying probabilities.
(via https://t.co/5LpIBI8Ygu)https://t.co/WLJTMxpt5O pic.twitter.com/20iAp2KUWI
— Jay Van Bavel (@jayvanbavel) February 25, 2019
[ThTh10] How big is Earth’s atmosphere? Depends kind of on how you to define it. But it probably extends past the moon.
[ThTh11] Radiation tends to scare people. We heard a couple of weeks ago that some radioactive uranium ore had been found in the Grand Canyon museum, potentially exposing tourists to dangerous levels of radiation. But … we can take a deep breath. No, the shouldn’t have been there, but the actual risk appears to have been minimal. I mean … minimal for uranium.
ThTh9 – The most remarkable part of sampling to me is that once you get ‘good enough’ – i.e. your sample size is large enough for your total population, getting a larger sample size doesn’t help you that much. Plus, the amount of ‘good enough’ sample size goes up relatively much more slowly than number in the populations you are studying.
I.e. for 30 thousand people, you need to get survey answers from about 2200 of them. But for 30 million people you only need to get 200 more, about 2400. (but the hard part is making sure the sample is indeed a random selection of the population, and not skewed to any one segment that tends to have a particular attribute.)Report
And unless you’ve had a class on stats, the why of that can seem wrong, and cause one to mistrust the stats for the wrong reason.Report
Yep. That’s why political polls so often have sample sizes of around 1000. Doesn’t much matter whether it’s a national, state, or local population.Report
ThTh9: The ever-popular Monty Hall problem, “Should you switch doors?” Or my favorite bar bet:
The odds in my favor are just about 70/30.Report
ThTh1 surprised me.
I thought it was that Augustus lifted a couple of days.
But I am left with more questions… WHY DID THEY ADD THEM TO THE FRONT?!?!?
Seriously, we could have had Seventhmonth be the seventh month. Eighthmonth be the eighth. Ninthmonth the ninth. Tenthmonth the tenth! It could have been BEAUTIFUL.Report
It’s quite remarkable that the month naming convention survived 600 years of Republic, 500 years of Empire, breaking apart of Latin into medieval romance languages, the merger between Anglo Saxon Old English and Norman Old French, then another thousand years of English language evolution.Report
What kills me are fundy X-tians that claim our calendar is somehow proof of the Biblical creation story because we observe a seven-day week. Ignoring that most (all?) the days are named after pagan gods.Report
This is exactly why it won’t bother me overly much that January isn’t either the last month or the first month of the year under my new plan.Report
If elected president, I will move January and February to the end of the year. The leap year day will be the last day of the year and it will be an official federal holiday.
If the government is forcing an extra day on you, why shouldn’t it be a day off?Report
Since it’s 2019, there will be no leap year. So those of you still on the Julian Calendar will not be falling any further behind.
This is technically correct, but seems to imply that if it were a leap year, those on the Julian calendar would be falling father behind, which is not correct. The Julian calendar only falls an extra day behind in years divisible by 100 but not by 400. The last time this happened was 119 years ago, and the next time will be in 81 years. Which is why in nearly 2000 years it’s only managed to fall behind by about two weeks.
Edit: Really missing those HTML format buttons on mobile.Report