A Meathead Watches Gilmore Girls (“Paris Is Burning” and “Double Date”)
Notes
I have a supportive wife and supportive friends. They had all encouraged me to give Gilmore girls a serious shot, something I finally did when the show came to Netflix. So when I was finished watching the eleventh hour, I wrote this wife and friends of mine an email, demanding to know what in the hell I’d just witnessed. Let’s discuss that, shall we?
“Paris Is Burning”
Here are the things that happen in this episode: Lorelai and Max Medina have a date, Rory overhears her peers wondering about the woman who date Max Medina, Lorelai and Max Medina have another date, Lorelai goes to Chilton’s Parents’ Day, Lorelai and Max Medina kiss at Parents’ Day and are spotted doing so, rumors spread throughout the school about the relationship, Emily excoriates Lorelai for doing something as dumb as kissing Max Medina at school, Lorelai casually mentions that Max Medina might have been the one, and Max Medina ends up breaking things off.
If the episode had just been that, it would have been a fine throwaway, one in which we move immediately onto the next episode seeking something substantive. But there is a scene that deserves further scrutiny. It occurs after Lorelai and Max have gone ice-skating. Lorelai has managed to injure herself and when she gets home, her best friend Sookie is there to tend to her wounds. Sookie makes her tea and heats water for Lorelai’s feet and ankles. She also listens to Lorelai going on and on about Max and she notices when Lorelai appears to be withdrawing from the relationship before it even has a chance to blossom. Sookie calls this behavior out, noting that Lorelai always flees from relationships that show promise. Lorelai responds to this by noting that it has been years since Sookie’s last relationship. Let’s pause on that comment for a moment.
I might boggle about the Gilmore girls‘s characters conflict with one another – it’s me that’s the problem here, not the show – but I’m never confused as to why the conflict is occurring. When Lorelai and Emily throw grenades at one another, it is always, always, always motivated by their dissatisfaction with one another, almost as if both expect to be accepted in their entirety when that simply isn’t possible. Their skirmishes, in other words, make sense when understood within the broader context. The same is true of Rory’s fights with Paris, of Luke’s fights with the town grocer, of Lane’s fights with her mother, etc.
But Sookie is different within the broader context of the show. She is literally a joist propping Lorelai up. Even though we’re only on the eleventh episode, we’ve so far seen her repeatedly deliver professionally (the inn receives rave reviews for her cooking) and personally (she seemed to have made everything for the inexplicable Chilton Bake sale). Then, she comes to Lorelai’s house to literally take care of her with tea and a warm bath. And Lorelai’s response is to go straight for the jugular when Sookie strays even slightly off the path of the perfect friend who endures everything and says nothing?
My wife and friends excoriated me for getting mad about this scene. “It’s just what women do!” “It’s just one scene!” “She apologized right away!” etc. But that’s all bullshit. Depending upon how seriously you’re willing to take it, the scene puts Lorelai’s character into an entirely different light. No longer is she just the single mom who made it through against all odds…well, not all, but some, I guess, sort of…but now she’s also capable of being the bully, and not simply the bully, but the bully to the woman who is literally her best friend and who, it should be noted, doesn’t seem to have any particular reason to be endure this sort of behavior.
Sookie meekly protests her treatment instead, noting (as Lorelai should have known) that she has been working hard and that her hours (roughly twelve per day at the inn, plus another of couple tending to Lorelai’s every whim) prevent her from carrying on long-term relationships. Lorelai knows she was wrong to say she did and apologizes immediately. Sookie then doesn’t stab her with a kitchen knife or pour boiling water all over her head.
What we’ll see almost immediately is an attempt to remedy the situation as it played out here. Sookie asks Jackson The Produce Man out on a date. Lorelai’s relationship – such as it is – falls apart. But this moment was entirely boneheaded and ill-conceived.
“Double Date”
At the end of the previous episode, Sookie snagged a date with Jackson, but because television requires hijinks, her date is saddled with a cousin who comes along. He is Roon, destroyer of worlds, and Lorelai is pressed into service as his date. Roon is outrageously offensive, repeatedly criticizing everything about, well, everything. Jackson finally sends him packing and he and Sookie enjoy a meal and a conversation at Luke’s.
And again, because shenanigans, Lane presses Rory into double-dating too, only this involves lying to Lane’s taciturn mother and to Lorelai. Because they’re teenagers and because they have no game, they’re busted almost immediately, and only after Lane has realized that her fantasies about the boy far outpaced his reality. Lane’s mother insinuates that she doesn’t want her daughter ending up like Lorelai – presumably meant to be a dig at Lorelai at 16, not Lorelai now – and Lorelai is forced to side with her, excoriating Rory for lying. She cites what she describes as the Mom’s Code and Rory acknowledges her mistakes (the second time in recent history that Rory has made decisions that give her mother good reason to distrust her judgement).
The only other big of significant happening is Luke and Lorelai appearing, again, to have an easy chemistry with one another. This predictably results in absolutely nothing and Luke – inexplicably restrained despite Lorelai’s apparent availability – isn’t aggressive. They play cards together and the most Luke can muster is saying that he hopes they can play cards again.
the eternal charm
cartoon porn Get Latest and Exclusive Kolkata News through Namaskar Kolkata
how to lose weight fast2 fashion photographers release books
I thought the scene made perfect sense, because Lorelai is a self-involved, peevish person whose mouth often outraces her brain it’s exactly like when she accused Rory of stretching her sweaters because she was annoyed about something else.
We’re not supposed to like Lorelai, are we?Report
I sometimes can’t tell. And I feel like I ought to be able to tell. I think this was a case of writing that wasn’t thought out, and I would continue thinking that if Lorelai didn’t continue to take advantage of Sookie’s friendship while giving little in return. It’s all very strange.Report
I would continue thinking that if Lorelai didn’t continue to take advantage of Sookie’s friendship while giving little in return.
Keep in mind that I’ve only seen a couple episodes from the first season and the first episode of the second (I know I watched some episodes from random seasons back when they were on, but I have forgotten them entirely), but my impression was that what Lorelai contributes to the friendship was letting Sookie keep her job despite the fact that she nearly kills her coworkers and destroys the hotel at least once a day. That seems like a pretty big contribution.Report
“letting Sookie keep her job despite the fact that she nearly kills her coworkers and destroys the hotel at least once a day. That seems like a pretty big contribution.”
This is totally OT, but I have to vent.
My kids watch a lot of Thomas the Tank Engine, and I just cannot imagine how Sir Topham Hatt keeps his job. He’s a harsh taskmaster, who really only cares about whether his Engines are being Really Useful at all times.
And yet, Sodor Railways has a TERRIBLE safety record. There’s pretty much a daily derailment or crash.
Never take the train on Sodor, is what I’m saying.Report
That’s reflective of the safety issues with cartoon trains more generally. Vote NO on cartoon rail in your city!Report
You know what would be safer?Report
Sir Topham Hatt
You know who else made the trains run on time?Report
@jaybird – I’m always afraid for the day Hatt(ler) decides a train is no longer Really Useful. They’re not going to “scrub you down” in The Shed, Percy! Don’t go in there!Report
Aaaaaaand… that’s not a place I could have fathomed any discussion of Thomas the Tank engine would go, ever. Oh, internet…Report
As that article from The Guardian explained, Thomas the Tank Engine is right wing propaganda.Report
George Carlin, a fascist propagandist. Yeah, sure. (The rare case where a double positive makes a negative.)Report
Like? I dunno about that.
What is clear enough to me is that we’re supposed to love Lorelai. In spite of her flaws. Embracing her flaws as part of her. Understanding that she’s doing the best she can. We’re supposed to forgive her for them and keep on watching because we know she’s a good person who does good things even if she’s kind of lost a lot of the time, because she’ll find her way and be worth it in the end.
In other words, we’re supposed to be Sookie.Report
Ouch.
I love the show, but I think Lorelai is a privileged, self-absorbed brat who never really gets called out on it. The fact that she and Rory spend all however many seasons pretending to be underdogs is my biggest frustration with the show, but it was never annoying enough that the writing didn’t compensate for it.Report
“In other words, we’re supposed to be Sookie.”
There’s one born every minute.Report
Falling in love with Confederate Army veteran vampires is something that happens to all of us at some point.
Oh wait, there’s another Sookie?Report
I won’t be Sookied into this!Report
Your posts and the reaction of your wife and mom say something about how men and women view things differently or something. Nothing in your posts makes me want to watch Gilmore Girls and it makes me very perplexed that for some women it seems to be the best thing ever. The “that just the way women are!” line is kind eyeraising.
Maybe I will get more intrigued by Season 2.Report
I understand why it has its fans. Its conflict is often compelling, and the idea that people are still – forever maybe – stuck with decisions that cannot be undone is interesting. How that conflict manifests itself (passive aggression) is very different than how it manifests itself in other shows (physical aggression) but one isn’t better than the other. It’s just different.Report
I’m guessing a new favorite word, here?Report
Still enjoying your fresh take/perspective on one of my all-time favorite shows. I’m not denying for a second that Lorelai is a self-absorbed twink, but am having a hard time with your insults about her having this “big house.” They lived in the inn’s tool shed until she could save up enough to buy that house. How is that a bad thing? And this is all pre-story, stuff that happened before we joined them.
On Luke and Lorelai, have you never heard of the Moonlighting curse? Or the Who’s the Boss phenomenon? Once the chemistry between the two leads is acted on, the show is pretty much over. Really. Look it up. 😉Report