The Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan struck down the state’s voter-approved constitutional ban on same-sex marriage today. The ruling is here.
It’s hard to express my happiness.
James Hanley
James Hanley is a two-bit college professor who'd rather be canoeing.
Devcat is watching over, but if you notice any problems contact the editors and Devcat will be notified and deployed immediately.
on He Got Away With ItYou don't know many sexual assault survivors do you?
on He Got Away With ItHe accidently admitted they were correct during the campaign when talking into a mic he didn’t reali…
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Now, personally, I think that this should be read the exact same way as "The Emerging Democratic Maj…
on The Four Stages of Post-election CrueltyHere is a trans-woman who has run for office as a Democrat talking about how the Democrats have badl… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Jerusalem Demsas has a fun article in The Atlantic: The Democrats Are Committing Partycide A major p… on The Four Stages of Post-election CrueltyI don’t see why it should reflect on them. Fair enough. Do you see that it does? If so, we can move… on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024Ben Domenech the editor-at-large of The Spectator World? on The Four Stages of Post-election CrueltyWorse than that. They just quoted her and made it a commercial. on The Four Stages of Post-election CrueltyOh, and to be clear, the lie was literally just based in bigotry, hoping people would have horrified… on The Four Stages of Post-election CrueltySo what is your theory, there, Jaybird? That prisoners should not get medical care? This has been po…
November 15, 2024
November 14, 2024
November 13, 2024
November 12, 2024
on Open Mic for the week of 11/11/2024 on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question
on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question
on He Got Away With It on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question on An Election Map that Asks “What if Only Educated People Voted?” and a Follow-up Question
on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom) on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom) on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom)
on Weekend Plans Post: Garlic (Specifically Toom) on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty on The Four Stages of Post-election Cruelty
Congratulations. Is there a real likelihood of it being overturned, or does recent precedent pretty much make an overturning unlikely?Report
The 6th Circuit could overturn it, if the state appeals the ruling. It just doesn’t feel likely, though. And of course then the plaintiffs could appeal to SCOTUS. One of these many cases will get there in the next session or two.Report
Well, I’m glad and hopeful that things will work out. But I’m a bit nervous. At any rate, this is all very good news.Report
Booya.Report
Scalia was right.Report
Ain’t it delish?Report
It’d be even more delish if it’d been voter repealed, but I’m impatient enough and confident enough now to be chuffed over this development too.Report
I love the result, but I remember someone telling me not to judge court decisions that way.Report
I think that person would be sad that you didn’t hear the message correctly.Report
Eighteen! Awesome news and congratulations to all Michiganders!Report
Whats somewhat interesting about this particular case is that the judge used the rhetoric of protecting the children in order to legalize same-sex marriage, borrowing from Justice Kennedy.Report
I noticed that, too. It’s an interesting inversion of the SSM opponents’ arguments, and as much as I generally dislike “but the children!” arguments, in this case I think the facts clearly support it. Every child is more protected if they have two legal parents than just one, and the potential for a child to be taken away from a parent with whom it’s been for years and put into foster care, with no recourse by that parent, because of the death of the only legally recognized parent, should make everyone uneasy.Report
I’m relatively sure that the judge probably argued for the sake of the children to throw some additional mud in the face of the opponents of SSM.Report
Update: The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the District Court’s ruling until an appeal by the State can be heard. But before that could occur, some County Clerks took the unusual step of opening their offices on the weekend to issue marriage licenses, and dozens of couples (at least close to 100, it appears) got married.
The stay is not much cause to worry, as stays of orders are not uncommon and have almost nothing to do with the substantive issues, but is just a procedural move to prevent the winning side from placing too much reliance on a ruling until it can be reviewed. Given the Supreme Court’s language in the Windsor ruling, and the unanimity among Federal District Courts in a growing number of states, it’s hard to imagine the final conclusion won’t be in favor of marriage equality.
But the existence of SSM marriages in Michigan does complicate matters for the state. The linked article asks whether the marriages will count, but state-reversal of a marriage that was legal when it was performed is a vastly tricky question, I think, and the existence of legal same-sex marriages alongside a ban on other same-sex marriages raises real questions of fairness and equality. That’s the issue California had for a while, and while (if my memory serves) no legal ruling ever turned on that issue, it was legally contentious there, and could be in Michigan as well.Report
Think this’ll have any impact on the gubernatorial contest there?Report
I doubt it. The majority has shifted in favor of SSM and I don’t think Rick Snyder actually cares about the issue. He’s going to go through some pro forma legal process, but his spokesman was careful to say their actions were about their duty to defend a law passed by the voters and that if the courts determine its unconstitutional they’ll abide by the ruling. All very dry, and not a drop of anti-gay rhetoric.
Snyder’s heavily disdained by most of my liberal friends, but I honestly think they should be very happy that given the inevitability of a Republican winning the governor’s seat last election, they got one like him rather than either of the two SocCons he beat in the primary.Report