If You Must Know…

Kazzy

One man. Two boys. Twelve kids.

Related Post Roulette

73 Responses

  1. Will Truman says:

    I can’t believe I am rooting for Notre Dame.Report

  2. Plinko says:

    Nothing tops my desire to see Notre Dame humiliated on the field.
    Though it pains me to say it – ‘Roll Tide!’Report

  3. Kazzy says:

    Is it me or did Brent Musberger spend about 25 seconds too long gushing/lusting over AJ McCarron’s girlfriend?Report

    • Marchmaine in reply to Kazzy says:

      Heh, yes… I thought for a moment he was going to slide into some dangerous vernacular; in his mind he was thinking that quarterbacks get one thing, and rather clumsily translated that “thing” into “Pretty Girls.”Report

  4. greginak says:

    Well the only thing worse then bama in a rout would have been ND in a rout, so i guess that is the best lemonade to make out of it.Report

  5. Mike Dwyer says:

    As a lifetime Notre Dame fan this is painful. If they come out for the second half in green jersies I’m turning the TV off.Report

    • greginak in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

      Geez Mike we just went through this huge gun debate that was generally civil and all. Now you admit to something that REALLY speaks to a cultural divide and irreconcilable beliefs like being a ND fan.Report

  6. Chris says:

    SEC!

    Also, this should be Bama-Oregon, which I suspect would have been highly entertaining. Notre Dame has no business being in this game, as anyone who watched them this year already knew.Report

    • Kazzy in reply to Chris says:

      The computer polls loved ND, which tells me they didn’t get here simply on reputation. I do believe the computers are barred from using margin of victory, which might have helped the Irish and all the wins they squeaked by with. Plus they were the only undefeated team.

      Of course, a playoff would have solved this. Aren’t they starting the Plus-1 game next year? Which is really just a four team playoff?Report

      • Will Truman in reply to Kazzy says:

        Yeah, but playoffs ruin everything (fun fact, that was my first guest post on this blog).

        In any event, it’s not Plus-1 (taking the top two teams after the bowls). It’s a straight up playoff with four seeds. I think they should have gone with Plus-1.Report

      • Chris in reply to Kazzy says:

        The semifinals start in the 2014 season (actually played in January, 2015).

        I doubt they’ll resolve much. I suspect there will be 1 or 2 undefeated teams, and a handful (more than 2 or 3) one-loss major conference teams in most seasons, meaning those 4 spots will become as contentious as the 2 spots now.

        Also, Notre Dame required overtime to beat a team that lost to Youngstown State. Youngstown State.Report

        • Will Truman in reply to Chris says:

          Oh, right. Year after next.Report

        • James Hanley in reply to Chris says:

          I half agree with Chris. I think there’ll be enough controversy (and enough money potential) that the playoffs will necessarily expand. But I think he’s wrong to say they won’t resolve much. The 5th ranked and lower team rarely has a serious claim to being #1, so even if they have a serious claim to being #4, unless #4 ranked teams start regularly winning the championship, nobody’s going to worry too much about #5 being left out. “We shoulda been #4!” doesn’t mean much if #4s are regularly unsuccessful. (But of course who knows if they will be.)

          Of course “we shoulda been #8!” or “we shoulda been #16!” means even less.Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Kazzy says:

        I assert that the eventual end-state for all the conference realignments is four 16-team conferences, each with two 8-team divisions. Those 64 teams will tell the NCAA and the bowls that they’ll be playing their own 7-game tournament based on the division winners (no more conference championship games knocking teams out of contention). The four bowls now in the BCS can host the first-round games, all the weekend between Christmas and New Years, or fade away. Then two semi-final games a week later, and the championship a week after that. The NCAA rolls over for it when the 64 announce that the NCAA can go along, or the 64 will run their own basketball tournament in March (with invitations to a handful of well-rated teams outside the conference).

        Not saying whether it’s good bad or indifferent — just predicting that’s where they’ll end up.Report

        • The 4/16 has been talked about for a while. I don’t think that things will ever work out that cleanly. If the sort of consolidation you refer to occurs, it’ll likely be four conferences of varying sizes (12-18 teams). On the whole, though, I see two problems:

          First, it assumes a degree of cooperation between the conferences that I don’t think is possible.

          Second, the same reason that they gave the non-AQ conferences a clear pathway to BCS games and why they get an automatic berth now. The politics would make such a move very, very difficult.Report

        • Mike Schilling in reply to Michael Cain says:

          Is the NFL off-topic?

          I predict that within a few years they’ll go to a 16-team playoff (8 division winners + 8 wildcards):

          Week 1: 4 games, all wildcards
          Week 2: 4 games, the remaining wildcards @ the lower-ranking division winners
          Week 3: 4 games, the week 2 winners @ the higher-ranking division winners
          Then the conference championships and Super Bowl.Report

      • Mike Dwyer in reply to Kazzy says:

        If a team goes undefeated in Division I they have a pretty good claim on the championship game because you have to assume that any Division I team could beat any other team or the division system doesn’t work. Notre Dame’s schedule was solid. They weren’t playing fluff teams. The Irish won road games against No. 8 Oklahoma and No. 10 Michigan State. They also won at home against No. 17 Stanford and No. 18 Michigan.

        In contrast the Louisville Cardinals (my alma mater) had a very weak schedule and lost two games and then managed to embarrass a Florida team that almost made the title game.

        I think the biggest factor in last night’s game was the long layoff between their last games and the championship. Nick Saban is a master strategist and giving him a month to prepare is almost unfair. On top of that Notre Dame is practicing in South Bend while Alabama is practicing in Tuscaloosa. The high for today in Tuscaloosa is 62 degrees. South Bend is 38. That may seem trivial but it’s not when you’re prepping to play in Miami.

        I think Alabama earned their win and I am not knocking them at all. But I think the lopsided score doesn’t truly reflect the quality of the two teams. A tournament will fix that although I agree with everyone that it needs to be larger. I’d like to see them expand to 16 teams eventually.Report

        • Kazzy in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

          I generally agree with this, though think there was still a pretty significant gap between ND and ‘Bama. Not 30-something points big, but I think the 9.5 line was justified.Report

          • Mike Dwyer in reply to Kazzy says:

            ND was certainly a legit underdog coming in but again, if they had played in December I think you would have seen something much different.Report

            • Kazzy in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

              Probably. ND just looked unprepared, physically and mentally. I think a lot of that goes to coaching. And what was up with Teo? You barely heard his name mentioned unless they were talking about missed tackles.Report

              • Chris in reply to Kazzy says:

                Not just unprepared. They were small and slow. I honestly think that in the SEC, that’s a 3-5 loss team (depending on the schedule, and assuming they’re in the SEC East). I think Nick Saban is probably, at this point, as good as anyone has ever been at preparing teams for bowl games with all that time in between games, but I suspect that if this game had been held at any other point in the season, it would have been a blowout. ND just didn’t have the athletes to compete.

                Also, going undefeated in Division 1 is an accomplishment, to be sure, but with the exception of Stanford (and ND should have lost that game, and would have without some help from the officials), ND’s schedule turns out to have been really weak. I repeat, Pitt lost to Youngstown State.

                And parity is something that only exists at the top in football. Even in the top conferences, there are teams that simply can’t compete. Just ask Colorado.Report

              • Mike Dwyer in reply to Chris says:

                Here goes the SEC lovefest. If we’re talking strength of schedule, Alabama lost to Texas A &M, they lost to Florida and Florida lost to Louisville.

                So the Cards could have been national champs?Report

              • James Hanley in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

                The Cards lost (at home) to UConn, which lost to Western Michigan, which lost to Eastern Michigan, which lost to Central Michigan, so I hereby declare the Chippewas the FBS National Champions.Report

              • Chris in reply to James Hanley says:

                If football wins become transitive, eventually everyone’s the national champion.

                Also, who knew there were so many regions in Michigan? I thought it was just the hand and the UP.Report

              • Jaybird in reply to James Hanley says:

                If you’ve got a football trophy, you didn’t win that.Report

              • James Hanley in reply to James Hanley says:

                Chris,

                And I didn’t even mention Northern Michigan University.Report

              • Will Truman in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

                Florida came within a minute or two of losing to Louisiana-Lafayette. I would also add that a team that hadn’t been competitive in the Big 12 in years and years came in and did remarkably well. It does make one question the constant “they’d be mediocre if they had an SEC schedule” claims.Report

            • Marchmaine in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

              I don’t think so, Mike. I was at ND for the ’88 championship and have enjoyed watching them in good years and bad… Alabama is bigger, faster, stronger, and every other meliorative adjective in the book than Notre Dame – or, in a word, better.

              I agree with you that ND put together a perfectly justifiable #1 season under the old milieu. What honestly concerns me is that the SEC appears to be a completely different league and that means that the old milieu doesn’t mean much for college football anymore.

              Not sure if this is just a temporary phenomenon as the rest of the teams rush to upgrade their hookers and blow, or if there is some sort of long-term bias that will only get bigger with each win by an SEC team.

              I take nothing away from ND… they played like they did all year: well coached college team with a lot of solid players and a few stand-outs. In the old days of College Football, that was all you could really ask for – and usually enough to compete. They were obliterated by a team that played with the mechanical precision of a (semi-)pro team; they were awesome to watch, but it wasn’t college football.Report

        • Kazzy in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

          But, yea, undefeated is undefeated. You can’t do more than win all your games. And given the scheduling constraints, wherein some schools simply won’t agree to play other ones (this screwed Boise State for a while, who couldn’t get a game against a quality opponent for fear or being beat by a mid-major and then was criticized for a puff schedule). If you have multiple undefeated teams, SoS is a reasonable barometer, but barring a team really scheduling an absurd slate of games, you have to respect winning every game.

          Even if ND was lucky as shit in half of them.Report

        • James Hanley in reply to Mike Dwyer says:

          Notre Dame also barely beat Pitt and Purdue, and although I’m a Purdue fan, they were a weak pathetic team this year.

          And Notre Dame was practicing indoors

          Nick Saban is a master strategist and giving him a month to prepare is almost unfair.
          Brian Kelly’s overmatched? I’ll buy that.Report

          • Chris in reply to James Hanley says:

            You’re a fan of Purdue in West Lafayette, or of Eye-you-pooh-ee? (I just like saying IUPI.)Report

            • James Hanley in reply to Chris says:

              The real Purdue. IUPUI (pronounced ooey pooey) is actually administered by Indiana University, which makes it evil.

              There are several regional joint campuses, some administered by IU, some by Purdue. They exist in a sort of netherworld, much more than mere satellite campuses, but not fully independent, either. I’m not sure if any other state has anything similar, but it seems to work pretty well.

              For a truly obscure odd trivia fact, the University of Southern Indiana is now a stand-alone university, but was once a satellite campus of Indiana State University, which itself was once just a satellite campus of Indiana University.Report

              • Chris in reply to James Hanley says:

                That’s right, Ooey pooey! When I lived in Kentucky and dated a woman from Chicago, we used to drive through Indiana, from the Ohio River to Lake Michigan every 5 or 6 weeks to go hang out in the 2nd city. That drive… so much corn… so little of anything else. The horror. The horror.Report

              • James Hanley in reply to Chris says:

                Corn is beautiful. And unlike central Illinois, the corn-fields are broken up by innumerable small wood lots–very domestic and homey, very shire-like. And of course you went through Kentucky-like hills in southern Indiana. And unbeknownst to you, you passed within about 20 miles of one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever been, a series of sandstone gullies and gorges with vegetation unique to the region, remnant from the climate of about 5,000 years ago.Report

              • Kim in reply to James Hanley says:

                corn smells like cow shit.Report

              • James Hanley in reply to Kim says:

                This isn’t as funny as some of your other whacky comments. It’s just odd.Report

              • Glyph in reply to Kim says:

                Er, isn’t cow feed often at least partly comprised of corn (in the form of silage)? Could that be why, and your association runs the other way (cow shit smells like corn)?Report

              • Kim in reply to Kim says:

                James,
                yeah, I guess i just meant cornfields smell like cowshit. which they do, most of the year.
                Glyph,
                it’s just fertilizer.Report

              • James Hanley in reply to Kim says:

                They don’t unless fertilizer’s been recently applied. With the increase in confined animal feeding operations and the need to manage their waste streams, some fields do get more frequent applications than in the past, but nobody fertilizes continually, and fields generally don’t smell strongly for more than a few days (leave a dog turd on your lawn for a few days and you’ll see how quickly–thank god–it stops smelling).Report

              • Chris in reply to Kim says:

                James, silver bracelets taste like tangerine ice cream.Report

              • Glyph in reply to Kim says:

                My cat’s breath smells like cat food.Report

              • James Hanley in reply to Kim says:

                My dog’s breath smells like poop.Report

              • Glyph in reply to Kim says:

                Dogs are great, aren’t they? I mean, I use their *own* feces to prevent them from digging up the flowerbeds and the like – dogs avoid their own droppings like they were plutonium.

                But they encounter another animal’s feces, say a cat’s? A delectation, to be snarfed up posthaste.Report

              • Will H. in reply to Kim says:

                My cat’s breath smells like cat food.

                My dog’s breath smells like poop.

                I think I see a way that you could save a lot of money on dog food . . .Report

              • Chris in reply to Kim says:

                In some particularly barbaric societies of the past, the smell of dogs’ breath was used as a torture device. It was incredibly effective.Report

        • The high for today in Tuscaloosa is 62 degrees. South Bend is 38. That may seem trivial but it’s not when you’re prepping to play in Miami.

          Back in the early-to-mid 1990s, when Florida St and Nebraska seemed to be near the top of the polls every year, Bobby Bowden came out with a great quote. He was asked if he ever had nightmares about football match-ups. His answer was something along the lines of “Yep. Playing Nebraska, in Lincoln, at the end of November, with the temperature about 10, the wind howling, standing on the sidelines in the snow.” I’ve always thought teams from California, the Southwest and the South had a substantial advantage going into a bowl against teams from the Midwest.Report

          • James Hanley in reply to Michael Cain says:

            Most big football schools, and even middling ones, today have indoor practice facilities, and one of the tricks they can do is crank the heat. With 3-6 weeks of practice before a bowl game, there’s little excuse fir not being prepared for heat.

            They can also crank up the volume to prepare for paying before large crowds. I was canoeing past Oregon’s practice facility once when they were preparing for a game at Washington’s Husky Stadium, a very loud venue. We could hear it well before we came in sight of the facility, so it took us a while to figure out where the hell all the noise was coming from. It must have been deafening inside, but effective practice.Report

            • You can acclimate to the temperature and/or humidity in a few weeks; but you don’t rebuild your team into something else. In the Big 10 and Big 8 20 or more years ago, the problem was getting a team built around speed and precision passing through the November part of the schedule without two or three losses. “Five yards in a cloud of dust” was a good — perhaps the best — way to build a team for winning the Big 10 in the 70s and 80s. And a recipe for getting blown out in the Rose Bowl. Nebraska spent a decade getting outrun by the Florida schools, until Osborne and Charlie McBride figured out how to put enough speed into a running offense and overall defense to compete. Heaters on the sidelines didn’t hurt. And they still put the ball on the ground a lot in November.

              When I was an undergraduate at Nebraska, you generally froze your ass off at home games in November. According to my sister who still lives there, the most obvious sign of global climate change is that November games in Lincoln are a whole lot warmer.Report

  7. Nob Akimoto says:

    After Sam’s well written post on the subject, I’m finding quite a bit of satisfaction watching Notre Dame getting pasted.Report

  8. NewDealer says:

    I find this fascinating. Can I ask my own Tuesday question here? Why not?

    Why do people go crazy over college sports especially considering the conversation we had in Sam’s Post on the Ohio tragedy? What is the pull? Also why the seeming hate for Alabama? Is it like hating the Yankees? I get the hate for Notre Dame based on Sam’s post.

    I am not a big sports guy and sports are not really part of my life. I have a fondness for the Mets and slow growing liking of the Giants but it would never be my choice of entertainment in spending an afternoon or night at game: live or in front of the TV. I went to a Division III school and we just did not have a big sports culture. Nor do we even have a football team. The one sporting event I saw in college was a fencing match to support my friend.Report

    • Michael Cain in reply to NewDealer says:

      The one sporting event I saw in college was a fencing match to support my friend.

      Now that’s a friend. Fencing has got to be one of the most unwatchable of sports for non-fencers. And that’s speaking as a fencer.Report