Hardwood Pines : Ten Things I’m Missing Due to the NBA Lockout
Every year, come the end of October, there is a special bounce in my step as I eagerly await the opening tip-off of the new NBA season. I love sports in general, but I love basketball more than any of them. And even though the spirit and grit of the college game is unquestionably awesome (the NCAA Tournament is hands down the greatest annual sporting event) there is something about the anticipation of seeing the greatest players in the world take the court for 82 games + playoffs that makes me giddy. (Like, literally giddy. I drive my wife crazy from about October 15 through November 1.)
Not this year, of course. This year, the inability of the players and owners to budge on whether the revenues will be split 50-50 or 52-48 is shutting down part or all of the season. (Seriously, we all know it’s going to eventually end at 51-49, so why can’t we just make the deal and start the show?)
And so, as a tribute to the season that isn’t yet and may never be, and to vent my heart’s frustrations and pains, I give you:
Ten Things I’m Cranky About Missing Due to the NBA Lockout
10. Mark Cuban Getting on Every Other Owner’s Nerves
Cuban is one of those guys that’s hard not to love, even if what you love about him is how much you relish hating him. Every year he gets on his associates’ nerves by whining about how he can’t get a break even though his club is so much better than everyone else’s. And now, for the first time, he can back up that claim. Can you imagine how insufferable he would be right now to everyone else in the league that doesn’t wear a Mavs uniform? Me neither, which is why it would have been nice to see it first hand.
9. The Celtics Giving it One More Chance
I’m a big fan of older champions with heart leaving everything on the court in the 11th hour of their career. I rooted hard against John McEnroe all of his superstar career, bastard that he was. But in ’92 when he was dragging his old-man butt around the court handing it to Boris Becker and Emelio Sanchez? I was his biggest fan. Garnett, Allen and Peirce don’t have enough in the tank to hoist another O’Brien, but they have enough pride to do some hellacious damage trying. If the lockout extends so long that Garnett and Company are too old to punk most of the Eastern Conference, I will never forgive the NBA.
8. Hearing Marv Alpert Say “Meta-World Peace” Over And Over in the Play-By-Play
As if there weren’t enough reason to watch the artist previously known as Ron Artest… each night wondering if tonight is the night he might finally snap.
7. The Inevitable New York Crash and Burn
Too much sports analysis these days is done by people who spend too much time with their fantasy leagues. Which is why the combination of Carmelo Anthony and Amare Stoudemire gets people talking “contender!” despite the fact that neither plays defense and each tends to disappear in big moments. Seeing a team that shouldn’t be great but everyone thinks is supposed to be great not be great is one of sport’s great guilty pleasures.
6. The Thunder’s Next Step
They were poised for greatness even before they got Kendrick Perkins. Now they look to be a top five team – maybe even a top two if they continue to develop.
5. The Crazy-Ass Quality of Point Guards
It feels like for a long time high-quality NBA point guards have been few and far between. Suddenly, the argument of “best PG in the league” is almost as fun as best player. Derrick Rose? Chris Paul? Rajon Rondo? Deron Williams? Russell Westbrook? John Wall? Brandon Jennings? And all of that’s assuming that Steve Nash finally slows down and acts his age, thereby finally getting taken out of the discussion. (I would not bet on this.)
4. Miami’s Next Move
And perhaps more to the point, will they have a “next move?” Will they really continue to try the “load up the superstars and see what happens” mindset, or will the try to use conventional team building to craft a potential dynasty? And regardless of how they go about trying to be a dynasty, will they succeed?
3. Blake Griffin Just Generally Being a Beast
‘Nuff said.
2. Seeing What LeBron Really Learned
Every year it seems like LeBron comes back to the league with a new dance move, a new bench routine that fans love, and a cool new Nike ad campaign packaged together with the greatest basketball talent God has ever seen fit to put on this Earth. But the drive to win, that bit of nasty and killer instinct, seems to take back seat. If he’s ever going to be the player we all hoped he would be, he needs to learn to focus more on the will and less on the marketing. If he ever does, MJ’s uncontested spot atop NBA greats might suddenly become a little shaky.
1. How Much of the Lakers’ Dominance Really Was Phil?
Yeah, yeah, this is only number one because I’m such an unabashed Laker fan. Sue me. But I have a feeling that, even though they have the right personnel and they will be rested and healed for the first time since 2009, Phil has been more important to his teams’ successes than he is given credit for. It will be fun (or torture) finding out if Kobe, Pau and Lamar can succeed without him. (Interesting side question: without Phil do we see dish-and-distribute-while-cutting-out-your-heart Kobe, or will we go back to shoot-first-and-get-81 Kobe?)
So hurry the fish up, players and owners. I need my fix.
(Later, once I have developed enough of a sour grapes attitude, I will post my 10 Reasons I’m Glad the NBA is in Lockout.)
Meh, who needs the NBA when you have college basketball?Report
I agree, though I was looking forward to seeing Wall at full speed (he was hurt most of last year), and watching Rondo do those crazy things he does. Also, I was excited to see the start of Brandon Knight’s NBA career.
Can you tell which college team I root for?Report
Go ‘Cats!Report
Agree with your #1. I’m not a Lakers fan, but am a Jackson fan, and was looking forward to the implosion of the Lakers this season.Report
I think implosion is overstating it a bit. They’ll still be a Western Conference title contender at the worst.Report
A small bet? First full season w/o Phil, they go out in the first round of the playoffs.Report
It’s killing me that there being no season I can’t take this bet. I SO want to take this bet.Report
(Seriously, we all know it’s going to eventually end at 51-49, so why can’t we just make the deal and start the show?)
Because it’s not about numbers, it’s about the owners crushing the union and imposing their will on the players. If the players agree to 51, the owners’ demand will go to 47. And a hard cap. And NFL-style non-guaranteed “contracts”.Report
I disagree. I don’t have a sense of animosity between players and owners in the NBA.
I thinks it’s about figuring out a different way to cut up a pie that just got smaller, coupled with the owners needing a bailout due to their inability to not go deer-in-the-headlights and award outrageously stupid long-term contracts to stiffs in the off season. (Which is why I think that the amnesty clause agreement is such an awesome idea – providing your name isn’t Gilbert Arenas, Reshard Lewis or Brandon Roy. In which case you probably feel like you’re about to be thrown under the bus.)Report
I get a different vibe from Stern, that he wants his legacy to be a fiscally sound league (i.e. one whose foot is on the players’ throats for good.) And I’ll believe the owners are really in trouble when the value of franchises stops going up.
Did I misunderstand the amnesty clause? I thought the contract still gets paid, but gets removed from the cap. That lets teams recover from truly bad long-term decisions , but at the price of spending yet more money, and doesn’t cost Agent Zero et al. a cent.Report
No, but they are allowed to waive the player and get them off of the team, while relinquishing their rights to re-sign them. Which means that a player like Lewis will have to effectively retire (at least temporarily), or take a pay cut and let their current team off the hook.Report
No, but they are allowed to waive the player and get them off of the team, while relinquishing their rights to re-sign them.
In baseball, that allows another team to sign the waived player for the minimum, paid to the team that waived him. (That’s why the Giants waived Tejada and Rowand at the end of August last year — as a courtesy, so that any team dumb enough to want them on the post-season roster could sign them by September 1st.) No idea whether that would apply to the NBA too.Report
Also, I think of Stern as the guy that built the league on the Players-as-Stars model; I think more than MLB or the NFL Stern and the NBA know that they are riding the players coattails, not vice versa.Report
They may know it, but that doesn’t mean they want to change it. They want the NFL model where the players are stars, but those stars can be released five seconds after they become unproductive.Report
I think that’s what fans want, not necessarily owners.
I think owners want to be able to cut costs if they are losing money, but I don’t buy that they really want an NFL model, because they could already have chosen to do that.
In the NFL, if Tavaris Jackson says he wants to be a top ten salaried quarterback when his contract is up, he will soon be unemployed. In the NBA if DeSagana Diop demands $34 million, there will be an owner stupid enough to sign him to a long term deal and give it to him.
In the NFL, your W-L record is about the only indicator of potential revenue and profitability. In the NBA, having a Blake Griffin can drive huge amounts of revenue and put you in the black, even if you are owned by the worst, suck-iest, most God-awful franchise owner in sports history.Report
No, they couldn’t have.
At least not in the past, as the NBA ownership mainly consisted of owners who were in more for the ‘fun’ of being an NBA owner than as an investment. Not so much anymore. This is a new generation of owners more focused on the bottom line.Report
I’d say Paul Allen and Mark Cuban as team owners counts more as “hobby” than vocation. The bottom line (Cuban at least) wants is the ring at the end of the season, and I’m glad he’s got one.Report
I love Mark Cuban because he is the only guy who rode the dot com boom into doing what real nerds would like to do if they hit that jackpot: cash out and do something awesome like run a basketball team.
I’m a big believer in cashing out and doing something awesome with your money. Anybody who gets to a net worth of $80 million or so and keeps going with money as the primary motivator is messed up in the head.Report
Charles Wang cashed out of Computer Associates and bought the Islanders. That did, at least, give me an NHL team to root against.Report
I feel like I should hat the guy cause he’s kind of an ass, but I totally love him. If I owned an NBA team I would be exactly like him.Report
“If he ever does, MJ’s uncontested spot atop NBA greats might suddenly become a little shaky.”
I’m no big fan of Kobe Bryant, but we’ve already seen the next Jordan. At this point, I don’t know that you can say there’s anything MJ ever did that Kobe hasn’t except that MJ did it first, except that Kobe has never been the Lakers’ de facto general manager and I’m not sure how you evaluate that.Report
The one thing that still separates MJ and Kobe (and this from a Kobe-lover) is Finals performances. MJ’s ability to will victory on the biggest stage makes him the #1 guy, IMO.
Kobe is so #2, but he’ll never get credit for it. People hate the guy.Report
I think Tod feels compelled not to rate Kobe that high, as a Laker fan.
Me, I take Jordan third. Give me Bill Russell and Jerry West as my first two picks.Report
MJ is third? You crazy.Report
You always take the big man first, that’s rule number one in basketball.
And Jerry was the only guy to ever bag MVP of the Finals when his team lost. He was a distance shooter who scored most of his points when there was no three point line.
M.J., granted, is a better defender. Hm; if you want to be entirely accurate… oh, wait. Now I have a Mindless Diversions post.Report
“You always take the big man first, that’s rule number one in basketball.”
…said Paul Allen. And the Sam Bowie, Greg Oden and the Portland Blazers lived happily ever after.Report
I would not have picked Sam Bowie.
To be fair, the number one pick in that draft wasn’t Bowie or Jordan, it was Hakeem. And Hakeem was a damn good pick.
Everyone always brings up Bowie, they forget that they probably would have picked Hakeem over Jordan, too… and that this was a decision that worked out okay for the Rockets, after all.
In any event, Bill Russell was the man. There are only two centers that come close, and that’s only because they each had a particular year in their career when they were better than Russell ever was; but neither of them were better of the course of their career than Russell was.Report
Yeah but the Bulls were clearly better than the Lakers, the Sonics and the Trailblazers. They were about even with the Suns. The Bulls should have lost to the Jazz twice but MJ completely intimidated Karl Malone so I gotta give you that one.
When you think about the greatest of all time, I think Russell and Wilt have to be in the mix as well. I don’t know what to think of the 80s era Lakers or Celtics. At one time I think you’d have to say Jordan was the clear-cut greatest of all time. I’m not so sure it’s as clear any more.Report
Off the top of my head, I’m going to say something that I have to research to see if I’m right or not.
The Bulls had a big advantage in that a goodly number of years, they were in the weaker (by far) conference. In their big run, in particular, it was “Chicago” and “Uh, maybe the Knicks if Ewing doesn’t get… oh, he’s injured again, never mind. Okay, just the Bulls”. There were a couple years with the Pistons in there, too, but I don’t recall any particular year in the Jordan reign when the top ten teams in the entire league were heavily in the Eastern Conference.
Kobe, on the other hand, played in the half of the league that was much more competitive basically his entire career. That means he had to play against much better defenders, more often… and guard better players, more often.Report
I still say that on paper the Cavs of the early 90s were the best team in the NBA. It’s that pesky playing the game not on paper thing.Report
Craig Ehlo, Mark Price, Brad Daugherty? I just don’t see it.Report
I thought <a href=”http://wagesofwins.net/2011/11/02/what-if-we-just-paid-players-what-they-were-worth/”>this link</a> topical.Report