A New Chapter in Empowering Girls
This story is a bit dated but still relevant. Back in November Louisville Catholic high school Mercy Academy launched a new advertising campaign aimed at injecting a bit of reality into the culture of young girls. Pictures of two of the ads are below:
The ad campaign was cheered by many and saw national attention in the media. It’s pretty hard to find fault with it as the message is uniformly positive. On first glance it seems the ads were targeted to the young girls about to choose their high school (this is the season when local private schools compete fiercely for next year’s freshman class) but I see the ads a bit differently. What the ads really challenge is the sense of entitlement among today’s youth and this is largely the fault of parents.
The gnashing of teeth over our entitled youth seems to assume this is a new phenomenon. In truth it has been observed for over a century. In the 1920s, for example, there was a great sense of worry over the youth of that decade. This happened again most noticeably during the 1960s but has also resurfaced in nearly every generation on a smaller scale. In the past the problem was accurately attributed to a bottom-up phenomenon which was that prosperity creates an atmosphere where kids rebel against societal norms. This was true however what we see today is more of a top-down problem in the sense that adults bear much more of the responsibility.
In the past much of the social upheaval among youths came from the middle class. Today it comes from all directions. We know the middle class is shrinking. We know today’s economy is more fragile and job security is less certain. It would seem that parents would dial back parenting excess and fall back a bit on a message of austerity and restraint in parenting. Unfortunately we see much the opposite. For perhaps the first time we see a generation where a parents’ wealth is not an accurate predictor of what kinds of luxuries a child will enjoy.
I am certainly not immune to this phenomenon. My kids have had the best we could offer even when that sometimes meant sacrificing more than we should have on our end. Expensive summer camps and fantastic vacations. Seemingly every electronic gadget ever invented. We are certainly in an age of excess and I have played right along. And we have seen firsthand how this affects our children. My daughters, unaccustomed to wanting for anything, have struggled with finding a path for themselves. It seems that a lack of hardship makes the future a bit harder to imagine.
Growing up in a family where we would be the first generation where everyone went to college and having parents who always wanted more for us, we could dream big. When your parents already seemingly enjoy a plush lifestyle, even if this comes from a willingness to embrace debt to buy whatever you want, well that makes kids a bit less willing to reach beyond their current circumstances. I touched on this in a post almost two years ago about the ways that different classes parent and how this can result in separate outcomes for their children. Perhaps the message for today is that entitlement culture is blurring class lines.
Circling back to the ads I mentioned at the start of the post, there is hope that recognition of this phenomenon will change things, however the very kids targeted by the ads are the children of parents that can afford an expensive private school education. One wonders how far this message can go in overcoming that reality.
Mike Dwyer is a freelance writer in Louisville, KY. He writes about culture, the outdoors and whatever else strikes his fancy. His personal site can be found at www.mikedwyerwrites.com. He is also active on Facebook and Twitter. Mike is one of several Kentucky authors featured in the book This I Believe: Kentucky.
Not very far. The ability of the rich and entitled to signal their wealth and entitlement will always evolve faster than any social norms that we might adopt to try and prevent it. In fact, that evolution is usually the very mechanism that allows the rich to signal in the first place.
It’s like that MTV show Exiled, where they took all the spoiled rich kids from My Super Sweet 16 and sent them to Africa to learn how not to be spoiled. Of course, the fact that you have a family who can afford to send you to Africa just to learn what it means not to be entitled is a pretty good sign that you are, in fact, entitled.Report
Yup or can get you on either show in the first place.Report
I sincerely hope folks realize that not every rich dude is “old rich”
and obsessed about letting everyone know how much money they have.Report
Kim, its actually the new rich that are obsessed with letting everybody know home much money they have. The old rich tend to think thats all terribly boorish.Report
Kim, its actually the new rich that are obsessed with letting everybody know home much money they have. The old rich tend to think thats all terribly boorish.
Or to put it another way, the new rich are signaling about how rich they are.
The old rich are signaling that everyone already knows how rich they are. They’re literally signaling they don’t need to signal.Report
David,
Maiming yourself to signal how rich you are is still signaling
how rich you are, no matter who’s doing it.
the rich send signals that the poor or middle class can’t afford to send.
They’re generally only meant to be seen by other rich folks, of course.Report
1. Garnishing your teeth over the younger generation is a tradition as old as humanity itself. I’ve seen 19 years old talk about how elementary school students don’t know how to respect their elders and weren’t disciplined enough. I wanted to smack said 19 year olds. I think this is one of the most tiresome aspects of humanity. We despair over progress and seem to think of hardship and suffering as goods. Yesterday, the Atlantic ran an op-ed about how we have grown soft for cancelling school during the Polar Vortex and as a counter-example Laura Ingells Wilder was brought in about how they went to school during a blizzard or after. The comment sections brought up the less attractive aspects of the Little House series and also stories about children freezing to death in blizzards at school. Going soft is something that very serious people (TM) think about. Most of these very serious people are also very soft.
2. This ad is aimed at parents more than it is at students. I would say it is especially aimed at progressively-minded upper-middle class professional parents who are being caught blind-sided by the Disney Pricess thing. Same as this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Cinderella-Ate-Daughter-Dispatches-Girlie-Girl/dp/0061711535Report
We might have actual less need to cancel school because of extreme cold and heat these days. As long as the heating system and AC are running fine than a constant temperature can be maintained at all times.Report
Yes. a constant temperature of 50 degrees, but still, a constant temperature!
Efficiency of furnaces is tuned for maximal efficiency at a particular temperature.
it is quite possible to have your furnace running all out, and still not be hitting 60 degrees.Report
Schools in my area had delayed openings, primarily because it was too cold for children to wait at bus stops before the sun came up.
Starting school two hours late so children can stand in 10-degree temperatures instead of 0-degree temperatures does not seem to be going “soft”.Report
Kazzy,
We have hills around here.
I’m certain the latest school bus crash will
encourage the local school district to
call off more snow days in the future.
(no one was hurt, luckily).Report
Garnishing your teeth over the younger generation is a tradition as old as humanity itself.
I know defoe asked us to eat our young but I did not think that he recommended our teeth for garnishingReport
Garnishing your teeth over the younger generation is a tradition as old as humanity itself.
That’s only parsley true.Report
I’ve seen a 30-something write about how 19 year olds criticize their youngers 🙂
(I hope it’s clear I’m joking. I agree with you and share your aversion to “kids these days” laments.)Report
I talk with parents a lot about the importance of demonstrating to their children the needs of others. Parents, naturally, want to be there for their children. They don’t want to see harm come to them. They don’t want to see them struggle. But harm and struggle can be beneficial. Without struggle, there is no growth. So I tell them to, sometimes, insist on putting their own needs before their child’s — even if only in small ways. “Yes, honey, I will come look at your drawing. But I’m going to finish this page in my book first.” “Yes, honey, I will get you more milk. But I’m going to finish my sandwich first.” This communicates to the children that sometimes they will have to put their needs on hold so that another’s can be met — especially if they are making requests or demands of another. Small things, but I think they’re important.
My head always shares the following quote with us: Our job is not to prepare the road for the child, but the child for the road. I think those are really good words to live by. Our children are going to encounter struggle one day; it is inevitable. The longer we put this off for them, the less prepared they are for it.Report
Kazzy,
Love that quote. We are struggling with this on a larger level right now as Oldest Daughter is living in her first apartment and being very independent and yet we see her make small mistakes and it is SO hard not to try to save her from them. We have established a few baselines for her that we hope she will honor and that gives us some peace. Things like coming to us if she gets into money trouble rather than getting a credit card or borrowing frm a bank. It’s not that we will necessarily bail her out but we can at least offer some advice before she makes bad situation worse.Report
I’ve let all my kids fail at things big and small. It’s not that I’m a bad dad, but I was allowed to try and fail repeatedly growing up. Every kid needs that. And we let our kids see us shop for clothes at thrift stores – not because we NEED to, but because they trash and outgrow the clothes so fast there’s no good reason to buy new. What we focus on most is giving our kids experiences – spending time with relatives, walking on beaches looking at sea life, reading together on the porch, attending formal concerts for the holidays. Not sure what the outcome will be, but we’re having fun doing it.Report
I tell my students (4- and 5-year-olds) the following when they complain about a task being too hard: “If you only do easy things, it means you only are doing things you already know how to do. That means you’re not learning.”
I don’t subscribe to the idea that if it isn’t hard, it isn’t worth doing: plenty of easy things are worth doing. And plenty of easy things were once hard things that have become mastered. But if people — children especially! — never do anything that’s hard, they aren’t being challenged. And they aren’t growing.Report
@kazzy
““If you only do easy things, it means you only are doing things you already know how to do. That means you’re not learning.””
i’m stealing that.Report
@dhex
Steal away! Teaching is 95% stealing as it is.Report
@mike-dwyer
Dr. Wendy Mogel has two books out you might be interested in: “The Blessings of a Skinned Knee” and “The Blessings of a B-“; the latter is geared more towards high school-aged kids, so if you can only grab one, that is probably it. I haven’t read them, but they are wildly popular right now. Dr. Mogel offers strategies to push back against entitlement (or, perhaps more accurately, the pressure to entitle). She grounds her approach in the teachings of the talmud and torah (I think the subtitle has a joke about “Jewish mothers” in it), but I understand it to be far less about religion and more generally about what we are discussing here. The titles alone I think demonstrate the connection.
It is possible the former book is the one where my head pulled that quote from; I know she often quotes it and it’d make sense. Regardless, they might be worth looking in to.Report
When I first read the OP and before I clicked on the link from which @mike-dwyer took his images, I was going to write that the campaign was trying to slam girls with the “princess” stereotype that they had to overcome while boys can sometimes be just as entitled and no one’s telling them not to be a “Prince.”
However, clicking on the link and reading more of those advertisements, as well as rereading Mike’s point that it’s aimed as much at the parents, I realize this really is a cool message.Report