Ludwig und Yeezy.
I’m at my desk listening to the new Kanye West album, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. I’m not going to argue with the pop critic consensus: it’s good. When the staff of the music review website Pitchfork named rap duo Outkast’s “B.O.B.” the best track of the last decade, they praised the song for its “obliteration of the boundaries separating hip-hop, metal, and electro,” thereby expressing a culturally democratic hope for a world where genres exist only as objects of play. It takes imagination to crack through the rigid marketing categories of pop music without losing focus; Kanye’s got an excess of that kind of imagination. Who else would imagine that you could successfully juxtapose a hook by Justin Vernon, the quiet pretty voice of indie band Bon Iver, with a rap verse from Nicki Minaj that reminds me of O.D.B.’s insane vocalizations on Enter the 36 Chambers? Kanye throws his tender heart in a blender, along with pretty much the entire landscape of pop music, and out comes a classic album.
Classic, that is, insofar as pop music can be classic.
This weekend, I spent some time working through Beethoven’s Eroica symphony. I know, I know, it’s one of the basic texts of the Western musical tradition, but I’d never sat down with the score before. As you might expect, there’s a lot going on, and I’m barely past the surface. And so I was interested to read through David P. Goldman’s First Things essay “Why We Can’t Hear Wagner’s Music.” I won’t try to sum up Goldman’s essay, but he makes good use of the approach to music theory first elaborated by Heinrich Schenker. Schenkerian analysis is a way of identifying deep harmonic structures in tonal music; its most devoted proponents — including, perhaps, Goldman — take Schenker’s analysis as describing the heart of Music Itself. Rhythm, timbre, and dynamics are surface phenomena, albeit important ones (and I expect a real Schenkerian analyst could make good use of these concepts).
Though I can’t do this kind of analysis, I’m starting to make sense of the foreground of the Eroica. The harmonic motion, even on the surface, is subtle, seductive, propulsive. You don’t need me to tell you this, though. It doesn’t take much time with Beethoven to make bad pop music sound unbearably repetitive, to the point where I want to say that pop music becomes indistinguishable from sound effects in the computer age.
Listening to Kanye, it’s hard to sustain the extreme opinion. Of course the harmonic sense is more or less lobotomized, but we’ve still got rhythm (lots), timbre (a little), dynamics, and — perhaps most of all — glorious allusion. To understand the achievement of the Eroica, I’ve had to read up on symphony and sonata forms in the time of Mozart and Haydn: out of context, the third theme in the Allegro, the use of a funeral march, or even the very heft of the symphony lose force. It’s fun in a similar — though less intellectual — way to catch Kanye riffing on Black Sabbath, or borrowing ideas from old Jay-Z lyrics, or bringing his predecessor-in-production the RZA in to take a verse. And, since there’s rappers everywhere, you get some delicious wordplay to boot. To me, these things aren’t merely ornamentation over a harmonic essence. (I could be badly mistaken here: David Goldman, for example, has a strong theological reason for connecting beauty and truth, and his emphasis on the harmonic structure of music in part falls out of that.)
Which isn’t to say the limitations in harmonic vocabulary don’t handicap the album; it’s just that this is true of so much pop music that you can’t really single Kanye out.
Also, I’d appreciate moral vision, but that might be too much to ask.
(Also relevant: Peter Suderman muses on why pop music critics converge on Kanye.)
So called “classical music” is an acquired taste. There is great stuff there; but most people have to, at first, listen patiently in order to be able to hear it.
Rock isn’t as limited, harmonically, or in any way, as its critics make it out to be. It’s mediocre pop stars who limit themselves. Keith Emerson, for crying out loud, incorporates all this stuff into his music. But even simpler rock — like Beatles, the Stones — if you listen carefully to the voicings of of their chord patterns and arrangements, there is some really cool nuanced stuff there, along with great melodies. A top 40 band with lead sheets can reproduce the great melodies, but they tend to miss the nuance.
Or I think of someone like Jeff Beck and what he gets out of the guitar. There’s as much profound nuance there as in a Wagnerian Opera.Report
“Rock isn’t as limited, harmonically, or in any way, as its critics make it out to be.”
This is one reason why I didn’t use the word ‘rock’ once in the post. I also managed to avoid saying ‘classical,’ for different reasons. My worry isn’t so much that there aren’t any sophisticated musicians working in the pop idiom (clearly, there are); it’s that the critics wouldn’t know the difference. For example, I looked through a bunch of reviews of Sufjan Stevens’s The Age of Adz to see if any pop critics had anything to say about his more compositionally adventurous moments in “Too Much” and “I Want to Be Well,” but I was out of luck.
I remember reading once that someone gave pianist Glenn Gould a Beatles record, and his only comment was that their voice leading was bad.Report
“and his only comment was that their voice leading was bad.”
Heh. Yeah if your ear is used to Bach level status on voice leading, that’s bound to be a first reaction. Likewise a Barry Manilow style abrupt change in key without “transitional” chords will sound “not correct.” And all those parallel fifths in heavy metal.
That’s what happens when you isolate yourself in an island (not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with it).
You can break the rules and still have it sound cool if you let yourself off the island.
I think the problem with orchestral music came after the late Romantics. The modernists seem to be melodically challenged. But some swear if you leave the island Schoenberg has some really great singable stuff. Personally I don’t hear it. I don’t go past Bartok. Ives is even too out there for me at times.Report
William, how did I ever miss post? Suffice it to say, I love Beethoven more than life itself. And the Eroica just happened be my musical burning bush—the second movement, marche funebre, one of the greatest pieces of music ever written, an aperture to a musical universe of eternal, heartbreaking beauty, this was Beethoven, close to complete deafness, defying his damnable fate, shaking the earth with his godly powers, his tumultuous irrepressible soul–the Eroica was Herr Beethoven’s arrival, his landing, his launching pad–this was music that so far and away different from anything that had been written before–the opening Eb chords followed by arpeggiated Eb melody so simple yet so incomprehensibly unique in symphonic literature. This was the piece of music that made me maniacally learn the Eroica Variations Op. 35—divine ecstasy! I just adore this man’s music—and the third movement of the Op. 109 piano sonata is proof that God HAS to exist! It’s revelatory, so far, far, heavenly reaching and longing for God–an utterly enraptured state of being is reached! As close to an empirical proof of God’s existence as anything that has ever existed. Alles liebe, lieber Beethoven!Report
Actually, the Glenn Gould quote was, “Hey Jude, is the ugliest pretty song ever written.”Report
Thanks for the quotation and the Beethoven recommendations.
I have listened to much more of Bach’s music than Beethoven’s, and so I get passionate about Johann Sebastian — not that I’m making a quality judgment, just that counterpoint appeals directly to my mathematical mind. So much to learn!Report
You’re very welcome, William. We are definitely musical kindred spirits. The Big Fella, JSBach, is nothing short of the nucleus of the musical universe. The Well-Tempered Clavier is my bible–not too long ago, picked up a recording of the WTC Bk. 2 performed by Edward Aldwell–AHHH, Ausgezeichnet! The best I’ve ever heard–GET IT! I don’t know of a single day in the last thirty years where I didn’t hear Bach at some point. And the Goldberg Variations…..Nirvanna. It’s almost impossible to believe a human mind could conceive something so exquisitely beautiful. A beauty that is tireless and boundless. It’s effect can never be diluted no matter how many times it’s heard. I’d be happy to burn you a copy of the WTC if you’d like. (Just picked up a copy of the Goldbergs played on the classical guitar–mind blowingly great!!)Report
For heavy duty classical music geeks only:
http://www.firstthings.com/article/2010/11/why-we-cant-hear-wagnerrsquos-musicReport
Unlike Mr. Rowe, I wouldn’t know the circle of fifths from a fifth of Old Circular Saw and our tastes in music differ significantly. Mark Twain famously quipped that Wagner’s music is better than it sounds, but I’m with Mr. Rowe on that one. The only good time to listen to Wagner is on your deathbed, as few things are more likely to make death look like a welcome alternative.
However, I’d say that much classical music is readily accessible even if a novice listener cannot appreciate it with the same depth of understanding as someone who has formally studied music. Certainly that is true of much Baroque music as well as much of the Romantic music frequently scoffed by music snobs (e.g., Rachmaninoff’s Second Piano Concerto). Sadly, however, the average person is no longer exposed to much of this music except in snippets as background movie music.
Too often forgotten in classical versus popular music debates is jazz, which truly is one of America’s greatest contributions to civilization. There are, to be sure, those who have pushed Rock well beyond its I-IV-V comfort zone, but I’d put John Coltrane or half a dozen other jazz giants up against Emerson, Beck, etc. Which is not to say they are not fantastic musicians. They are. But in terms of musical sophistication and, well, genius, late 40s to mid 60s jazz has little, if any serious competition from other genres of popular music.
All this said, de gustibus non est disputandum, and all that jazz.Report
There’s certainly great stuff in jazz. A jazz virtuoso tends to have mastered his instrument better than a rock virtuoso. For me, it’s more a matter of style. Steve Morse and Pat Metheny can both play really fast clean lines that the rest of us can’t. Harmonically, though, Metheny operates at a higher level. But I still prefer to listen to Morse. That’s my cup of tea.Report
This is from a guitar virtuoso (as virtuous-tic a rock guitarist you could imagine) friend of mine on Facebook.
“heard on the radio, today, that Kanye West is a ‘musical genius’. Has humankind really become that stupid that we refer to talentless hacks who’s only concern is making money as ‘musical geniuses’?
“In other news, i’m now officially considering myself a nuclear engineer because i played the video game Fallout 3.”Report
Kanye West is very good at doing what rap producers do, so “talentless hack” might be a little much… but to call him a musical genius is to misunderstand both music and genius.Report
I didn’t let my FB friend know this: I don’t like KW much at all — but he’s still better at writing melodies than my guitar virtuoso friend. And being able to write a good singable melody, even if it’s superficial like those of Def Leppard or Poison or Barry Manilow is a far far more valuable (and harder — perhaps impossible — to learn!) talent.Report