Sometimes I fantasize while struggling through this *#$&! dissertation, but I ever actually did plagiarize, I think I’d have a nervous breakdown with worry. If I was a tenured academic authoring a Congressional study, I’d never have the nerve to use plagiarized passages for “35 of the report’s 91 pages“. Anyone think plagiarists might be like gamblers who get off on big risk?
Rufus F.
Rufus is a likeable curmudgeon. He has a PhD in History, sang for a decade in a punk band, and recently moved to NYC after nearly two decades in Canada. He wrote the book "The Paris Bureau" from Dio Press (2021).
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassIf you haven't seen this, you should. It's only a few seconds and it's really a treat. (Note: You sh… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThe underdog status ended after the Six Day War over there. It's wobbly over here but there are stil…
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassI also expect that the period where Jews were seen as an underdog was short and not entirely univers…
on The Shifting Politics of AbortionThe two big stories of political geography in the US over the last 30 years is the huge swing from b… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassAnd what really pisses me off isn't necessarily the anti-Zionism per se but just treating Jews as di… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassA mass slaughter of Jews but an organization that explicitly calls for expelling Jews from the Middl…
on The Shifting Politics of AbortionYes, I think this year should give us a very good idea if the trend is durable.
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harasshttps://www.timesofisrael.com/14-kids-under-10-25-people-over-80-up-to-date-breakdown-of-oct-7-victi… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass"What about Palestinian on Palestinian crime?" Seriously, you've seen this argument play out a thous…
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassAnd this is where the protests really do remind me of the Vietnam war, where naive people just assum…
April 24, 2024
April 23, 2024
Friend Husband At The Ballpark
April 22, 2024
Good Morning! Are You An Amateur?
April 21, 2024
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
on Open Mic for the week of 4/22/2024 on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
Yes, but you see, if climate scientists make one mistake, no matter how tiny, it invalidates all of climatology surrounding anthropogenic global warming. However, if the good and virtuous climate skeptics make huge, bungling, ridiculous mistakes or outright fabricate results, why, they’re just trying to prevent this vast evil conspiracy against everything good and wonderful about rainbows, puppy dogs, and America.Report
I should note that I really wasn’t posting this to make any points about global warming or climate skepticism, which are “above my pay grade” as it were. Really, my point is much more personal than that- the thought of plagiarizing on a paper and being caught doing it is, for me, about like imagining going to a gala ball and suddenly realizing that I was wearing no pants. But, when you hear about real-life plagiarists, it always seems like they went in for the big risk, even if the actual rewards were slight. It makes me wonder if that’s not part of the appeal for some people.Report
Yeah, I realize that, and I probably should have been more clear. I was suggesting that in this case it was probably plagiarized because of political pressure, not because of any “high risk” tolerance, although that could be the case.
It seems like plagiarism is pretty counterproductive in any academic field (plagiarism by undergraduate students is another matter) because eventually someone will find out and any original point you made will be lost. The high risk involved doesn’t even seem worth any potential reward.Report
Unless, of course, you’re on the Harvard faculty.Report
I see what you mean Aaron. I think I was sort of looking at it in terms of political pressure not to muck it up, because that’s one topic where you know whatever you write is going to be poured over by people looking for problems. There’s something almost masochistic about plagiarizing extensively on a political football report.Report
Especially off of Wikipedia, which is incredibly easy to check. (Undergrads do this all the time; it’s sad to see from an actual professional academic)
In the original comment, I was trying to be snarky, but I think it might have come off wrong. As a scientist who studies the atmosphere, but not necessarily anything directly related to climate change, it gets a little exasperating to see anyone still trying to play these games. It might have been worthwhile to double and triple check climate science 5-10 years ago, but at this point, it’s a done deal in terms of scientific validity barring any radical new discoveries to the downside (sadly most of them are to the upside…)Report
Oh, sure, you’re entitled to your exasperation or opinions. I was just saying that I can’t weigh in much on the issue myself. I study early modern Europe and the Ottoman Empire, so me pontificating about climate science would be about as helpful as a mailman explaining underwater oil rigs. But if you have some background, feel free to add context or your interpretation.Report
Well, OK, it might be a little too after the fact, but…
I think what really annoys me about this is that after the nontroversy of the “Climategate” emails, the head of the climate unit at the University of East Anglia almost had to resign, but no wrong doing was found in the investigation. These guys actually do something worthy of being forced to resign… and then they whine about the investigation. It looks like no one is going to do anything to them. (I could be wrong though)
As for the science, (skip this if you already know) the greenhouse effect has been known to exist for over 100 years. The basics are actually fairly simple. The sun heats the Earth to a certain temperature, which causes the Earth to radiate infrared radiation. (heat) Most of the atmosphere (N2, O2) is transparent to heat, but some minor parts of it (CO2, methane, H2O) can absorb this heat and re-radiate it back to the Earth’s surface, warming it further. This is normally a good thing because otherwise the Earth would not be hot enough to have liquid water without the greenhouse effect. But by releasing CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) into the air by burning fossil fuels, land use, deforestation, etc. faster than they can be cycled by biogeochemistry, we’re inadvertently increasing the greenhouse forcing, causing the Earth’s temperature to rise much faster than is typical. You can see this rise in the temperature record, and even in multiple different proxies of the Earth’s temperature over the past 1000-2000 years (the hockey stick). If we were to look simply at the cycles in the sun, which are what typically have caused climatic changes, the Earth’s temperature would be going down now.
None of this was all that controversial until it started to have political economy implications. Of course, even if the science is true, this doesn’t mean cap-and-trade or any other government solution is necessarily going to work. But then, at that point, I’m going to be as helpful as a mailman explaining underwater oil rigs myself.Report
“…the head of the climate unit at the University of East Anglia almost had to resign, but no wrong doing was found in the investigation.”
Ho, ho, ho. The Bush administration had lawyers’ statements that torture wasn’t wrong.
PS last year my niece was 3. This year she is 4. Since her age is therefore increasing at 33% every year, I can confidently–and with cold, hard math backing me up—declare that in the year 2025 she will be 225 years old.Report
Its that kind of analogy that does not lead a person to think global warming deniers know what the hell they are talking about. Its more likely to lead me to think you don’t have a clue nor do you desire to find one.Report
I worry that in my master’s thesis I’ve inadvertently plagiarized, or otherwise independently converged on similar enough wording that someone might think that I have plagiarized. I guess I’ll find out when the manuscript from the thesis is published.Report
I totally understand that fear. You read a ton of material and take a lot of notes and then there’s a chance that you’ve absorbed someone else’s words, forgot them, recalled them, and not realized that they weren’t coming from your brain. I wake up with cold sweats worrying about this happening.Report
exactlyReport