“And don’t let the door hit you in the ass on your way out…”
Here’s some good news from the GOP just in time for the run up to 2016:
The Republican National Committee voted today to censure one of their own for making racist and homophobic comments and Facebook posts. Dave Agema, the Michigan National Committee member in question, has also been told in no uncertain terms that he must resign:
“Dave Agema’s history of harmful and offensive rhetoric has no place in our party, which is why the RNC executive committee acted in the swiftest way possible to avoid giving him a platform,” Chairman Reince Preibus said shortly after the vote. “We have voted to censure him, and we are urging the Michigan GOP and their voters to explore options to discipline Agema for his actions. Today, we used all available tools to remove him from the committee…. We cannot allow one man’s fringe views to undermine the work that is ahead of us.”
One might quibble with Preibus’s claim that the RNC is “[acting] in the swiftest way possible,” of course. After all, last year Agema went on record as believing that homosexuals were “filthy,” committed 50% of all murders in the country, and were largely pedophiles. He has also used social media to promote that age old question, “Have you ever seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the American way of life?”
In fact, for about as long as Agema has Tea-Partied himself onto the committee as an anti-GOP establishment crusader, that same GOP establishment has been pretty damn horrified by him. Preibus himself rebuked Agema’s comments on homosexuality as “deplorable.” The chief of staff to former Republican Gov. John Engler wrote an open letter to Agema after his anti-Muslim comments, mincing no words in the process: “When you spew stupid words about all Muslims,” he noted, “you attack my friends and members of our Party. Shame on you. Shame.” Still, prior to today the fear of alienating the voter-weilding Tea Parties has prevented any official actions or statements by the party.
What finally broke camel’s back, as it turns out, was more of a redwood than a straw. On New Years Day, Agema posted a link to an essay titled Confessions of a Public Defender, with this pulled quote:
However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason well. They cannot communicate well. They cannot control their impulses well.
“Very interesting article by a public defender,” added Agema.* “We are in a cultural battle. Very enlightening for anyone who is concerned about crime in America.” Two days ago, the Virginia GOP Chairman wrote to the RNC, saying that “it is time for us to take a stand against Dave Agema, the national committeeman from Michigan, who continues to disgrace our Republican Party.” Yesterday Scott Walker, preparing for a White House run, publicly seconded the sentiment. In less than 24 hours after Walker’s condemnation, the Committee had spoken. (RNC rules do not allow the committee to expel a current member, so their censure and and public demand for resignation really are the biggest hammer allowed to them.)
I actually clicked over and read the American Renaissance piece, and it is indeed quite shocking in its racism. And I’m not talking a Subtle, Dog Whistling level of racism here — I’m talking about an Out-Debyshiring-Derbyshire, David-Duke-And-Steve-Sailer’s-Intelectual-Love-Child level of racism. Go read it yourself if you wish,** but for brevity’s sake suffice it to say that if you are not white you really, really, really do not want to draw the guy who wrote this as your public defender. If you’re African-American, he’s not entirely sure why no one has had the good sense to throw you in prison already. (I should note that even though the piece focuses almost entirely on how terrible black people are, hispanics get the best line as he explains that the trouble with them is their propensity for “sexual assault against children and driving under the influence.”)
Confessions of a Public Defender is so bad, in fact, that if I hadn’t come to this story via the RNC’s actions I would have been convinced that Agema himself was the fictional creation of liberal trolls. It’s the kind of thing that I always read that all conservatives believe in the Balloon Juice comments section, despite the fact that I have never in my life met even one conservative that believe such nonsense. So seeing a standing RNC committee member’s favorable spotlighting of Confessions of a Public Defender is really quite shocking.
Far more shocking to me, however, is the RNC’s actions today. Since Obama entered the White House, after all, it has seemed to be SOP to refuse to take action against any party member, regardless of how unhinged they might be. And as depressing as it was hear bout Agema existing, the committee’s deciding to take harsh action against him are equally bouying. Shortly after the debacle that was the GOP’s run for the White House in 2012, Preibus himself declared that these kinds of stands against racism and homophobia had to begin if the Republicans were going to ever have a chance at securing 1600 Penn. Shortly thereafter, however, the demands of politics forced him to tone that s**t down — just as they made Michael Steele backpedal before him. That the RNC now feels like it can so publicly skewer Agema suggests that the GOP establishment is winning the internal battle for the soul of the Republican Party — and that’s a good thing.
And thus I am able to end this post with a heartfelt declaration that I feel like I have been desperately waiting six years to utter:
Way to go, RNC. Way to fishing go.
* It is unclear in the screen shots I have seen whether Agema himself penned these lines, or if he merely cut and paste them to stand for his own reactions.
** You can find it here. All of the obvious trigger warnings apply, or course.
[Picture: “Scientific racism,” via Wikipedia]
I kept waiting for the gut punch of “Just Kidding! This is like that officer who was fired for reporting his co-workers!”
Now I’m wondering how messy Agema is going to make it.Report
It seems odd that you see Agema or his post as so far outside what R’s might say that you could believe it is liberal trolling. Yeah Agema is a nasty piece of work but there have been plenty of other colorful statements and various pieces like the C of PD passed around.Report
GOP : “Hey, black voters! Why don’t you check us out? We really dig your church-centered communities and want to help you build strong families and ease your path to entrepreneurial ventures!”
Black voters: [Sees guys like Agema in party leadership] “Ewww. Um, thanks, but no thanks.”Report
Other black voters: “Hey, what about that Scalise dude?”
Some yahoo in the GOP: “But… Robert Byrd!”
Black voters: “Not impressed. Try again next decade.”Report
Question: Has Gov. Snyder or any other prominent Michigan GOP member called for this guy’s head? It seems like a two-fold good: (1) the people of Michigan need to know these views are not remotely representative of MI republicans, and (2) Maybe a word or two from those closer to him might persuade Mr. Agema to give up the fight.Report
Reporting live from Michigan, yes. Snyder has publicly criticized him, and a former GOP Gov, Engler, iirc, pointedly noted that Agema was criticizing his friends and their fellow party members. Others in the GOP here have been calling for his resignation for a couple of years.Report
According to Tod’s quote above, it was Gov. Engler’s COS, and Engler has been out of office since 2002. I was hoping some more recent pols had spoken up. I’m glad to hear that Snyder and others have come out publically against him.
Honestly, I have a hard time understanding why it’s so difficult to remove this guy. That’s a wierd structure that allows someone to do so much damage and gives you no levers to pull to get rid of the guy. Can the money flow be choked off? And maybe a shadow party structure put in place?Report
As far as I’ve been able to find, members are selected by the state party leadership and serve until they don’t want to any longer.Report
I don’t know their rules, but I did find the link to them, and they can be read here. I don’t have time right now to peruse them, but I’ll look at them later unless someone beats me to the punch.Report
Reading the document from James’s post, I’m wrong; the term of a committee member lasts from the end of one Presidential election to the end of the next. The committee members for a state are determined by the party leadership of each state, by the statewide election in the Presidential year, or by the state’s delegation to the national convention (different states use different methods.)
So Agema will be with us until the end of the 2016 election, unless he voluntarily steps aside. Based on the language on the Michigan Republican Party website, I’m assuming that he got the position through the state’s general election in 2012.Report
{removed}
Way to keep the blog classy Tod.Report
Probably right. I’ll take it down.Report
Thank you.
I just feel that if we want to actually have discussions across the political divide in this country, we really have to watch things like that.Report
No, thank you. That was very helpful.Report
As I recall, neither of the parties’ national offices have any power over states – it’s why they have to concoct schemes to have other states pressure early primaries, for example.Report
And yes, I did read that article, and thought it was the same kind of red-meat bullshit that you see at Taki’s Magazine all the time, the usual “I’m not racist, they really *are* all like that” thing.
I look at it the same way I look at a doctor complaining about patients who don’t believe in immunization or ask about Morgellon’s syndrome. You’re there to provide advice about the situation and possibly conduct certain actions on your client’s behalf; your feelings about your client and their beliefs and personality aren’t a part of that; and if you’re slacking off in your job because of those feelings then you’re committing a serious breach of professional ethics.Report
Funny, I initially read the title as: “And don’t let the poor hit you on the ass on the way out…”Report
A few questions…
What exactly is this guy’s job? Does he have any actual power?
Tod, in both the blurb and in the article you reference Obama’s election as a sort of line-of-demarcation with regards to GOP behavior. Do you really think there is a BBO/ABO line there? Or is that just a clean cutoff to keep the focus relatively recent?Report
@kazzy Like the DNC, the primary job of the RNC is to frame the party platform for upcoming elections. So where as, say, someone who is a city councilor for Klamath Falls might have a limited amount of PR damage they can do to their party by having outrageous and unpopular views, someone who is a member of the RNC or the DNC can cause huge problems from a signaling perspective.
Mind you, Agema had absolutely zero political clout to individually push through whatever (I can only imagine) his policy prescriptions stemming from his views might be. But having him simply existing as a member of the the small, inner-circle crafting the platform was like hanging a sign on the front door saying “MINORITIES PLEASE VOTE DEMOCRAT.” (See Burt’s great comment above.)
As to your other question, I actually said that that’s when *I* started waiting for them to turn the car around from the cliff they were diving over. Where and when they actually began driving toward that cliff is debatable.Report
Got it. Thank you. So what changed in 2008 for you?
(Note: None of these are meant as “gotcha” questions. I’m genuinely curious how your views on the GOP have shifted over time.)Report
I wonder if it’s not a coincidence that he’s a public defender. Most professional-class white people don’t have a lot of social interaction with black, Muslim, or Hispanic peers. As a public defender, his interaction with members of these groups is likely to be very heavily skewed towards people who provide anecdotal evidence for the stereotypes he holds.
That’s no excuse, of course, and he should understand that his experiences aren’t representative, but I wonder if that’s part of it.Report
Actually I think that’s a very good point, which i was planning to make, as well.
His comments are based upon his experiences. The comments about the media “Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. ” In a lot of cases that true. Hell, my local paper includes this statement in the crime news: “Descriptions are included only when the descriptions makes identification possible.” So even when there are eye witnesses, those no description is provided. Don’t tell me that’s not intentional.Report
Damon,
scrubbing the news is the most fun, though. Ya know, when some shooting occurs in a white neighborhood, they get the news off the front page as soon as possible… (I never said most of Pittsburgh wasn’t racist as all heck).Report
Keep right on braying, brandon.
MOST folks know people of color professionally, though they may not know them at church. (Yes, I know most Muslims are caucasian).Report
This happens quite a lot, actually.
There is such a gulf between the lived experiences of black people and white people, that both views of them by white people- as innocent victims or thuggish perpetrators- are equally possible, for the same reason.
The public defender or cop who tells us with the voice of experience “How Those People Really Are” thinks he is speaking with the voice of authority, when usually he is speaking as a tourist viewing them from behind a windshield.
The clients of the public defender aren’t his friends, he doesn’t live next to them, eat with them, socialize with them. The sampling of Those People are of course the very extreme examples of people whose lives are in chaos and disarray; I doubt the cop or public defender spends much time with the hard working, loving faithful churchgoing black father.
Of course, for the white liberal, the vision is equally skewed, just toward a different direction. The movies Mississippi Burning and Selma offer plenty of evidence for that.
What’s missing is similar to what’s missing from the dialogue about Muslims- the voices of Those People themselves describing their life with authority.Report
Of course, for the white liberal, the vision is equally skewed, just toward a different direction. The movies Mississippi Burning and Selma offer plenty of evidence for that.
I’m curious as to what you mean by this. Selma is by a black director, with black actors playing all the main protagonists; why would that make it indicative of specifically ‘white liberal’ opinion?Report
I actually clicked over and read the American Renaissance piece, and it is indeed quite shocking in its racism
That’s what AmRen does. It’s like being shocked there’s anti-semitism at Stormfront.Report
@mike-schilling
There’s a difference between understanding something intellectually, and seeing it with your own eyes.Report
@mike-schilling I think for me, when I read about a RNC or a DNC committee member being associated with something fringe — and not even just associating with it, but approvingly posting references to it on social media for all to see — I expect that they have have the brains to buffer the things that they choose to highlight in public. After all, you can get away with referencing “the good points” in The Bell Curve in a way you just can’t by referencing “the good points” of John Derbyshire’s Letter To My Son.
So when I saw where the essay Agema praised was from, I was expecting to see something racist at the end of the link. I just wasn’t expecting that particular essay to be that glaringly blatant.Report
I wouldn’t jump to conclusions too fast, Tod. If this guy hadn’t been exhibiting a level of racism that bordered on mentally unstable, would the RNC establishment have moved so “fast”? He was practically wearing a t-shirt with “Get Rid of Me Already!” on it in day-glo lettering. Let’s see how they treat the next example.
And the fact that it’s a presidential election year in 2016 means that all those black voters will be off the “Democrat plantation” and theoretically open for recruitment. (Which is kind of assuming that blacks are memory-challenged but hope springs eternal…)Report